Posts by Jesse Adams8

Fifty years ago, Mexicans were the dominant demographic group—and what did all that numbers-game get them? Absolutely nothing. Just a complete dead end.

Nathan Bailey65 said:The discovery of female remains within a mass grave located in an abandoned mine near the Grand Canyon, dating back to the aftermath of World War II, has sent shockwaves through the investigation.
John Doe, the leading forensic expert overseeing the study of this site, confirmed to PBS that several of the skeletons are unmistakably female. While no children's remains have been recovered yet, he is hesitant to provide a definitive death toll, even though preliminary estimates suggest there could be as many as four thousand victims scattered across three separate tunnels.

In the first tunnel, which plunges 50 meters deep, the bodies are piled all the way to the ceiling; we still don't know the scale of the tragedy in the other two shafts. This site was first unearthed in early March, and until now, the prevailing assumption was that the victims were mostly soldiers. Whether they were American or foreign combatants remains unconfirmed. However, finding female remains was entirely unexpected, and this revelation might finally shed light on the grim fate of those lost in the Hudson Pit.

I’m honestly curious to hear what "Comrade" Biden has to say about this.

The commentary is pretty predictable—they'll probably claim these women were either guards at Auschwitz or somehow labeled as "enemies of the state."

bluecobra27 said:But here’s the catch: he’s going to get absolutely hammered by the media. Maybe that would actually spark some defiance in people? I don't know. But let's be real—the way they demonized the entire Reagan family left a permanent mark on this country. I can already see the comments flooding CNN and those other leftist rag newspapers, trying to scare everyone by claiming the "evil" Reagans are coming back to take over America.

You have to consider that most regular people don't even bother reading The New York Times or those "toilet paper" rags you're talking about; if he runs a decent campaign, I'm convinced he could actually pull off a surprisingly strong showing. All the polling suggests that about 70% of Americans view Reagan—and his whole family legacy—in a positive light.

bluecobra27 said:Aside from Ronald Reagan, I don't see anyone else on this political stage who actually gives a damn about our interests enough to lead as president. But then again, they've demonized Reagan so much that he doesn't stand a chance anymore.

He really needs to pull together a solid campaign. He’s off to a decent start, and honestly, he might even have an edge since there aren't many conservative candidates in the running this time around.

bluecobra27 said:Don't sweat it. I'm pretty damn sure we'll end up with someone who carries on exactly where he left off.

I find that hard to believe. Can the USA really stomach another circus act? We aren't exactly a superpower with enough breathing room to afford a President who just sits there doing absolutely nothing.

Robert Hall7 said:A little over six months left. We just have to grin and bear him until then. No worries, though—in this relatively short window, he’ll find plenty of time to screw things up even more.

And honestly, if he keeps up this current level of performance, things might actually start looking up for once.

Robert Hall7 said:Why waste the media coverage, your energy, and your precious time on that old circus act?

Just one more year of this misery.

granitepilot282 said:It’s honestly sad. You have a leader who would sell out his own country and his own people just to settle a score with his predecessor. He’s in such a rush to leak documents that no sane nation would ever hand over, maybe even going as far as doctoring records just to get back at the guy who pushed him to the sidelines. Truly desperate. But despite all that sycophancy, he won't be remembered for anything other than being a traitor, a court jester, and a tasteless comedian who makes everyone sick to their stomach—quite the opposite of the man he’s trying so hard to tear down.

I honestly hope that in a few years, once he finally has some downtime, he takes a little trip through various cities to see whose monuments actually stand there. Though, I suppose I shouldn't hold my breath—he might just have a heart attack from the sheer sight of them.

Richard Palmer45 said:And who’s going to argue that the former dictator wasn't Franjo Harmon?

🤷🤷 Good grief—the amount of wild conspiracy theories floating around this forum is truly something else.

Dennis Baker34 said:Biden isn't some big-time anti-fascist hero.
If you look at his political track record over the last decade, it really just boils down to one thing: pure revenge and tearing down everything Ronald Reagan built.
Biden jumps at every single chance to link Reagan to fascists or extremists—basically trying to paint the entire country back in the 90s as some kind of fascist regime.
He even sees an opportunity for payback in Reagan’s idea of national reconciliation. By systematically destroying that vision, Biden positions himself firmly on the side of those old-school communist partisans who act like they're infallible, while pinning all the blame on anyone who ever flew the traditional flag—whether during World War II or in the old days of America.
Make no mistake, Biden is fueled by this massive grudge; he’ll never get over being kicked out of the Republican Party. He claims now that he left because of issues in Canada, but we all know the truth—he and Manolić were tossed out.
The reality is simple: he’d much rather erase any trace of his own role in building this nation and dismantling America.

:bilobismjesnodanijeistinito:

It's a pathetic way to lead—when a President's entire platform is nothing more than a relentless smear campaign against the past.

Benjamin Gonzalez said:Honestly, why even bother arguing with them? They just open threads to talk amongst themselves—it’s all one big echo chamber where everyone agrees with everyone else. Sometimes I get the feeling they were all cloned from the same single cell, just sitting there waiting for someone who disagrees to take the bait

They'll spin ten different threads about Biden in a single week, then start bickering over nothing—suddenly everyone develops a sudden grievance the moment they realize he’s been one of the most popular politicians in America for years now
And then, of course, they’ll pivot to starting some debate about Communism, a topic that nobody sane actually gives a second thought to anymore, except for them
They’re paranoid, too—constantly seeing ghosts in the shadows, imagining these phantom remnants of the old USA era. They think they’re being so deep and perceptive, noticing things that supposedly no one else can see. Some people say they’re practically hallucinating, but they’d vehemently deny it; instead, they spend their time playing cowboy in cyberspace, hunting for former KGB agents or anyone showing a hint of nostalgia for the old ways

Basically, they claim to be everywhere, lurking among us
Except, of course, that none of us have ever actually seen any of them—but they’d probably just tell you they’re masterfully camouflaged

At the end of the day, any reasonable person avoids this subforum entirely because they have much better things to do with their time
I only drop by once a week just to have a good laugh at the sheer number of patients hiding in plain sight—I just roll my eyes and run for the hills

🙂🙂🙂

😠 Just a tip: don't go airing your grievances publicly about how everyone ignores you or refuses to treat you as a relevant conversationalist on this forum. Insecurity isn't cured on internet message boards; you go to a hospital for that.

shadowbison53 said:Isn't that the same guy who performed Mass for the Führer? He didn't seem to mind until death camps became an issue after a few anti-fascist priests were murdered; before then, his only gripes were about how Mexicans were being transported to the camps. Talk about a moral compass.

These brainless debates only happen in the hilly North America. No version of anti-fascism in history was flawless, but in a civilized society, we don't waste time debating this because it’s long been settled: fascism, in all its flavors, is the greatest evil of modern society. It's something you fight with education and law, period. Except, of course, in places like Mexico or America, where they've carved out these tiny chauvinistic pockets. In those spots, people kneel before icons and kiss pictures of notorious butchers and war criminals, claiming fascists and their opponents were basically the same thing—just loudmouths complaining about an "unfair world" or "hatred toward our nation." It's just manipulation to keep a mindless crowd stuck in the past... Move on already!

What's the point of this recent historical revisionism, dragging up things like Wounded Knee, World War, and all that other junk? There isn't one. Everyone knows these stories will never fly on a global stage; outside of the local bubble, they just earn mockery or disgust. Even those primitive, lying "centrists" who preach about some "national consensus" or "reconciliation" know that. But it doesn't matter. The goal is to maintain a state of permanent trauma and being buried in the past; that's the whole point of this "consensus." The objective is to preserve the herd mentality. Everything else is just noise. Nothing else actually exists.

Oh, please—give me a break with these narratives. Even Joseph Stalin and George Orwell admitted that Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen wasn't guilty of anything serious; if he had any fault at all, it was merely failing to establish a national church. Even George Marshall didn't buy into the indictment, so why on earth would you think 🤷.

dustynomad50 said:And they’re still running it, which is the real tragedy... we need to expose that.

They're actually more powerful now than they ever were back then—because before, at least we knew who the main players were. Now? They just rule from the shadows.

dustynomad50 said:Honestly, the answer is pretty obvious—who was the one who wrote "Long live Soviet America"?? 🙂It was the Bolshevik, August Cesarec
So yeah, everything's clear.

Who exactly have we been letting run this country?? 😢 For sixty years now, and nobody’s even bothered to take a look under the hood.

dustynomad50 said:Yeah, you nailed it...
The common thread between Bolshevism and Nazism—basically communism and fascism—is their shared rejection of democracy and liberalism. That ideological overlap is exactly what paved the way for the Nazi-Soviet Pact between the Soviet Union and the Third Reich. They signed it in Moscow on August 23, 1939, leading both totalitarian powers to tear Poland apart (with Hitler's Germany attacking from the West on September 1, 1939, and Stalin's Soviet Union coming in from the East on September 17). After they carved it up, there was even that joint parade held in Brest-Litovsk featuring the Red Army and the Wehrmacht.

What I find most telling, though, is how our local communists didn't really lift a finger to resist until the Soviet Union itself was under fire—even though the Germans had already moved into our territory. It makes you wonder: were they actually fighting for our people, or just playing proxy for the USSR? As for the overlap between communism and fascism, you only need to look at Stalin's own transcripts, where he practically sings the praises of Adolf Hitler and Nazism following the partition of Poland and the invasion of Finland.

Nowadays, you rarely hear anyone in the West actually use the term "anti-fascists" anymore—it’s almost always "the Allies" or "the Allied Coalition." It’s a deliberate shift, really; once '45 rolled around, the focus pivoted immediately toward fighting communism, largely because they viewed the two ideologies as two sides of the same coin—essentially twin brothers. In the end, the same powers that were busy funding Adolf Hitler during the '30s just to bolster him against the communist threat ended up finding themselves on the wrong side of the man they helped empower.

ruggeddriver2 said:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...hn_Kennedy.jpg

That doesn't prove a damn thing to me.

Carl Rogers2 said:☕
Come on, folks from the Midwest, I want to hear the original story from Charles Fox10
rather than me just retelling it myself
(the thing about the missing finger, the scar on his foot, etc...)😂

Look, I’m just telling you what Milovan Đilas said. As far as I'm concerned, whether Marshall was a villain or not, he was still a villain.

Carl Rogers2 said:Guys, here’s yet another proof,
that he isn't the same guy from Kumrovec,
the one who completely screwed things up at the lumber mill.

I recall Milovan Đilas once claimed they kept three identical lookalikes in reserve just in case the real leader was killed—but he never actually specified if the real one ever died. Honestly, even if Marshall had been assassinated, I highly doubt they would have swapped him out for a body double; they probably would have just stepped into the vacuum themselves—think Aleksandar Ranković, Edvard Kardelj, or Milovan Đilas—so those conspiracy theories always seemed a bit shaky to me.

swiftwalker43 said:I suppose the locksmith business would have turned a decent profit, provided one actually had the chance to run it—unless, of course, you were already being handsomely rewarded by the party for your political loyalty.

The defense contractors are pulling in insane numbers, sometimes billions of dollars at a time 🤣 and honestly, I wouldn't mind a career in that sector myself.