Posts by Jerry Robinson56

😁 You neglected to mention $33 without any protest on that thread.
You are an absolute authority and a lightning rod, rather than someone being suffocated by those cyclical arguments that nobody wants to examine from an outside perspective.
As you would say, it remains the absolute law of the PDF until an undeniably argued solution emerges to refute your verdict.

I'm done
I won't tolerate this anymore

P.S. And lest I forget, consider the penalty handed down to Route 66; it was truly unnecessary.
I could easily demonstrate how their opponents lack even basic knowledge and write nothing but universal nonsense, making their supposed "contribution" to this forum highly questionable.
It appears I am constantly boasting, yet I have no issue resolving any issue in this field, which effectively negates any reason for their perceived "added value" to the PDF.
The points they once offered as "advice or criticism" were dismantled long ago... and they never actually listened to, nor even attempted to consider, any proposals.
I always provide a warning, several times over, when things begin to approach the edge of a freefall.
It would be simple enough to attach that one post about the Great Lakes, just so you can see how a post should be written using purely technical terminology...
Nothing "personal," no rude or condescending remarks—the kind of language "they" regularly employ. It is only natural that they feel threatened when they fail to grasp even the basic terminology.
It is genuinely unjust because I cannot adequately describe how those who target you only serve to promote utter discomfort and ignorance, only to then "latch on" to my posts whenever I write.

I truly mean it, I'm finished /considering that this was the only path to you.../ giving freedom to Route 66
Best regards
Sincerely

My apologies, I didn't look closely enough. That wasn't the right thread; I was referring to the one where you serve as moderator. It was a clumsy way of putting it, which effectively turned my comment into its own discussion.
There is no such thing as a "joke" in these matters. The moment someone displays even a hint of rudeness or persistent demagoguery on that communication channel, they should be immediately banned.
Furthermore, that judgment remains relevant until a definitive solution is finally reached.
In my view, that is the only way to resolve this with any degree of necessary speed. I failed to be sufficiently clear; please accept my apologies...

And this

It will be easier for you first 😁
Notice how I have even updated my signature since you arrived...

It wouldn't have been a problem, but let’s be honest—it’s an exercise in futility, much like what you predicted: some people simply refuse to learn, no matter how many times you explain things to them.
However, this serves as yet another compelling reason for you to distribute the cards within your own domain once you decide enough is enough. This is precisely why I requested at the very beginning that you open the chat; it would have been far more efficient...

I appreciate your patience.

I appreciate your patience and the grace you’ve extended to me on this thread; I find myself in complete agreement with your assessment.
I will abide by whatever decision you deem necessary, even if it proves unfavorable to my own interests. Rest assured, I will not cause any further disruptions, and you have every right to remove my access to this PDF should you see fit. You have likely observed that I am quite disciplined in honoring both my word and my silence, strictly adhering to the regulations you enforce.

thx *.*

Jesse Brown61 said:Jerry Robinson56, your posts were deleted because they were absolutely catastrophic. A ban lasting more than a month? Really? One has to wonder what exactly triggers such an extreme measure. For those who find this hard to believe, I suggest they simply use their imagination.

I have no intention of getting into an argument with you, Jerry Robinson56.
Greetings, gentlemen. Feel free to contribute whatever thoughts or observations you deem necessary.

You haven’t quite grasped the essence of "faith." To those possessing true intellect, such individuals are seen as witty; to everyone else, they are perceived as terrifying. If you take a moment to examine your own words, you will see how clearly you contradict yourself. Rather than cultivating that latent talent you possess, you seem intent on throwing yourself into unnecessary brawls—a course of action I wouldn't recommend to anyone, myself included, nor would I suggest it in any practical sense. I won't go any further with this, I promise you, unknown, as I was already cautioned against it. Furthermore, there is a fundamental distinction between genuine dialogue or opposing viewpoints supported by logic, and what you are doing. unknown It is quite evident that you lack any substantive reasoning beyond your own ego. Every time I attempt to dismantle your supposed "logic" using established professional standards, you simply spiral into a state of complete incoherence.
Perfection is an illusion, and frankly, a rather exhausting one at that. No one is flawless.
That thread was essentially tailor-made for you, designed specifically to help you find some semblance of civility... though it seems that particular endeavor hasn't exactly been your forte, has it?
By all means, just keep writing. unknownExperience is the only teacher that doesn't charge tuition, though the cost of the lessons can be quite steep. One learns most effectively through failure—both one's own blunders and the avoidable mistakes made by others. It is the only way to truly grasp the reality of a situation.

P.S. A quick inquiry regarding the moderator position. unknown
Am I permitted to attach a 500-point post here? I am fully aware that this violates the established rules, yet I maintain that I have earned this space. Furthermore, I have already voiced my formal grievances regarding the decisions made by unknown. After months of forced patience, I find it necessary to present the unvarnished truth in response to such utter nonsense. unknown-a. Tiče sa unknown And his claims.
I would honestly accept a sentence of a hundred dollars and a week of silence, if I were permitted. It seems like it might serve some sort of purpose, though I am fully aware that such notions are ultimately futile. Nevertheless, if even unknown were to grant consent, I would provide mine, given how truly "terrible" his situation supposedly was.

Do try to maintain some semblance of focus Jesse Brown61, because your own rhetoric provides more evidence against you than any argument I could ever muster, and I truly appreciate you confirming everything already stated.
The truth is often uncomfortable, and let’s be clear: there will always be individuals who are sharper than both of us, much younger and better looking, while we both occupy that middle ground of middle age. You aren't here to receive any accolades.
Regardless of the quality of the participants, the subject matter itself remains noble. As for you, I cannot offer any praise; you seem quite content to indulge in your own nonsense, a fact I have demonstrated and remain fully capable of proving at any time.
However, I suppose you serve as a useful negative example to ensure I am not accused of bias.

-

My original thread and your posts—some of which were relatively mild by comparison.

Feel free to produce one of my comments that supposedly "struck a nerve" if you wish to validate your own delusions.

I happened to be halfway across the world under the Southern Cross, which explains my absence. Furthermore, I failed to find any evidence of a Flat Earth to satisfy your particular brand of information.

By the way, don't bother regarding Olif; he struggles to interpret his own extensive experience, which is his own misfortune. He is generally fine, and it would certainly benefit him to adopt this mode of expression, but you, Jesse Brown61, are utterly lost in this arena. You lack both semantic and logical footing. And I suspect that isn't your only deficiency. Not that I am in any position to offer you any consolation.
Farewell.

You could certainly play the part of some sophisticated French maid sprinkling ashes over Michael Morales4, but you aren't just some common plebeian with nothing but vulgar threats to offer.
However, since you possess actual intelligence, I expect you to maintain a certain level of integrity on this matter. I wasn't able to give you a proper response back then.
In your desperate attempt to smear Unknown, you claim I invited you to some forum discussion—which implies things about Elon Musk—regarding an entirely different topic. The reality is that I haven't had access to that thread for two years because I exposed Elon Musk as a fraud. I refuse to swallow his products, yet the moderators allow clones to personally insult users.
I previously noted that another forum member, who isn't even in my immediate circle, repeatedly warned the mods about posts from opponents and clones, yet they failed to act. There is also this bizarre partiality where no points or penalties are issued, despite the fact that anyone with elementary school math skills can prove Elon Musk is a fraud.
I won't even bother discussing engineering or electrical science, given that Elon Musk is functionally illiterate in those fields. His marketing is quite effective, though... if your audience consists solely of the unwashed masses. It is all about the packaging, not the substance.
Why suggest that someone as uneducated as Elon Musk could hold his own at any forum debate? We can dismantle his arguments here, point by point, before a much larger audience. In practice, his "concepts" never last more than a few minutes—not even during those rallies where he was essentially towed along in a trailer. The concept is merely a beautiful veneer, nothing more, and we shall address it on the main thread if the administration permits.

It is distasteful how you deliberately conceal the criminal activities of this "playful boy," as they call him now, while he launders money of questionable origin.
Tell him there is a better offer waiting for him on November 29, 2019.
He might reject it, of course, as any contact with Elon Musk is a complete waste of time. Ever since that business with the miraculous gloves and the pivoting rearview mirrors.
I promise I will personally escort him off the interstate—I'll bring a trailer for him—because we all know how Elon Musk's little ventures end: either a wrecked car in a fence or ending up in flames.
That is precisely why I offered him the highway; it is unlikely he can navigate one of his own concepts through a single curve.
And yes, there was a third concept, when they sent back that disastrous design from Saudi Arabia after only ten minutes of driving, I presume.
I am not questioning the situation at all; I have no desire to be seen as biased. This is a filthy scam by Elon Musk, thinly veiled by clever marketing.
But to address this properly, we need to write there, not here. We have until November 29, 2019.

Thank you for the posts.

P.S. I must correct myself—he spent much longer driving in that video game he provided, which I suppose serves as meadow proof that he actually knows how to drive. 😵
P.P.S. Rest assured, Elon Musk either reads these posts himself or has them read to him, and they certainly write according to his dictates. I won't dwell on the influence of Unknown on certain individuals; it isn't relevant.
There is the thread, so feel free to proceed, provided the moderator has the courage to issue a penalty.

Here is another post just to illustrate what happens when well-meaning individuals meddle in matters far outside their expertise, all in an attempt to defend people on their various social media feeds.
You could find dozens of similar examples within those PDFs you are responsible for managing.
It is a difficult and thankless task, but even the authors themselves have wasted significant time purely for the sake of self-promotion or vanity production. As I have stated before: when the intelligent remain silent, the fools take control.

Regards,

Casey Bennett said:Jerry Robinson56, attempting to prove an absolute "truth" is a bottomless pit. It certainly doesn't work on a message board. It is exhausting, repetitive, and inevitably devolves into crude insults, which ultimately drives people away from the forum. Once I determine that you have exhausted your arguments, I will make a decision.

I have been on this forum for two days, and while everything is still fresh to me, even now, this constant bickering over testing protocols is becoming quite taxing.

I can restore your post, provided we strip out the contentious section. If you agree. I will leave the original version available for the administrators to review; if they decide that you did not insult colleagues holding opposing views, then feel free to appeal the warning.

However, I must reiterate: you are applying the same pattern of behavior that has characterized almost all of your warnings and subsequent appeals. At least, based on what I have read over the past several years.

Thank you, Dub. Please, go ahead and remove the American portion of the response. I have no objection to the warning; I was simply interested in your perspective...
in order to avoid future disputes, though you know how I am
when it comes to disciplinary actions.
There is no need to analyze me; you won't be making a mistake when you issue a warning. When I have protested, there was usually a valid reason. Most of the time, I haven't even bothered to protest because there was no necessity—mea culpa.
But if you were to look at the threads where I earned partial bans, I doubt you wouldn't support me, even though I didn't complain. The moderators have repeatedly permitted personal insults. My partial ban on the PZ thread occurred because I insulted a chemist discussing a professor from MIT who is misleading the public (Soljačić—the new Tesla... well, you see), and on the Economics thread, it was regarding the fraud Rimac, simply because the moderator has personal biases. What is most laughable is that this very same moderator boasts about graduating from FER, yet possesses no fundamental understanding of high school level electrical engineering.
It is the same old story: highly educated individuals, well-funded by questionable means.

My apologies for derailing the thread, but I hope it has at least prompted some reflection.

Regarding the gentlemanly offer, it was specifically technical assistance—not directed at my response, but toward the irrelevant nonsense being peddled by certain "enlightened resistors" who pretend to possess culture or intellect. Once you have read it, perhaps you might share it if you feel inclined, as that is the root of this "conflict," rather than personal feelings. Am I being clear now?

Route99 and I have never contradicted anyone's personal experiences or desires; rather, we have pointed out the sheer idiocy being presented in these threads. We are merely trying to be helpful.

I concede the point; that is precisely how I feel. Much of this feels somewhat infantile, and it would be utterly futile if there weren't a legitimate objective behind it. We need two things: an open channel of communication on this PDF, which I sincerely hope will temper our collective tone now that new blood has joined the fray (Tim Cook would likely lose his mind if he had to read all of this himself, particularly 😁).
My second premise is the reinstatement of Route99. Even Tim Cook himself has stated he would welcome the opportunity. There is no reason for him to be intimidated by harsh rhetoric; in my estimation, the individuals who were directed at Route99 by were far more vitriolic and aggressive. Their insults bear no relation to reality, expertise, or basic logic, making Route99 seem positively mild by comparison. He simply reacted to the sheer stupidity and the insults being hurled his way. Route99 understands the distinction between actual discourse and those who bluster about "light resistors"—I won't even dignify the others with a mention, as it is frankly exhausting to believe such people still exist within our educational or manufacturing systems 🤦. They lack even a shred of wit, and the moment you show them any "mercy," they regress into their old ways like addicts craving a slap in the face. And once you finally grant them the satisfaction of a heavy-handed moderator...
Ultimately, we aren't just discussing electronics; we are witnessing a multidisciplinary ignorance paired with first-rate arrogance.

The paradox is quite clear: readers purchase an amplifier for a modest sum and then attempt to "fix" the sound using cables that cost as much as the amplifier or the speakers themselves. It is pure psychology. Had they invested in a better amplifier from the start, they wouldn't face such dilemmas (interconnects are the exception, as they can indeed influence the sound until one upgrades to proper equipment). As the English say, one isn't wealthy enough to buy cheap things. If they truly intend to buy quality, Olif could provide assistance given his extensive experience. It would be ideal if Olif didn't perform these nonsensical stunts. It is worth a try, provided everything is reported honestly. We all learn from our failures, after all. However, it won't help them beyond achieving trivial results.
I certainly won't engage in such back-and-forth (anymore), because some people are simply unteachable—they believe they already "know everything." Besides, when reading, I observe how they treat others as well.

That is the crux of the matter. Thank you for reaching out; it is precisely people like you who matter...

Casey Bennett said:Dear Jerry Robinson56,

Thank you for your kind wishes and your gentlemanly offer, which I must politely decline. Quite frankly, I am perfectly capable of looking out for myself. 😉

I hope those good intentions remain even after today’s disciplinary action, and that they persist through future warnings that will inevitably follow if you continue to insult your opponents.

You don't know me, yet I have been forced to familiarize myself with your body of work here on PŽK, as I must monitor this sub-forum in my capacity as a moderator. Consequently, your modus operandi is very clear to me: periods of intellectual discourse interspersed with insults, from which I see you never deviate.
Given that this exact pattern has played out for years, and considering you clearly understand the implications of receiving a warning, I see no reason to reiterate what is already common knowledge. You aren't going to change, so we shall simply see how our interactions proceed.

Furthermore, I would kindly ask everyone—not just the participants in this thread, but those in neighboring ones and all future users—to refrain from gossiping about Tim Cook or other forum members. I do not know you, and forming these first impressions does not serve you any favors.

Thanks for getting back to me.
My posts are always civil until the nonsense starts coming from the other side; at that point, they become targeted and educational, though regarding the post you flagged, I would welcome a different perspective.
Absolutely no individual was mentioned; such an interpretation only arises from those who are being exclusionary. Please, look at it objectively. If you take a second look, you will see it was "different" than you perceived. There is no need to go straight to banning.
I am not entirely certain (if you catch my drift), and you know this, but could you specify exactly who that post was directed toward?

The technical portion was explained in detail and dismantles the claims of those hiding behind personal impressions, providing them a straightforward path to the truth.
The section you focused on follows the American style of writing—clarifying the issue and providing answers to the difficulties faced by opponents of reality.

We can speak informally.

I have no intention of writing about "myself" here; the goal is to ensure you have the ability to negotiate on your PDF regardless of whether you occupy a dominant position.
I am sorry you were forced to act, but it was worth it, wasn't it?
It is the same story regarding consistency; whether everything I read was incorrect... it is merely forecasting, as I perceive certain things more clearly than others, much like how I acknowledge there will always be people more skilled or intelligent than those already mentioned.
To summarize, this isn't "gossip." I wasn't complaining against completely unjustified accusations or the series of events preceding them. It is not insulting posts that bother me, but rather stupidity and monstrosities.
I was absent for nearly a year just to clarify this. However, you noticed how Formula 1 also realized something was amiss.
It is impossible to fight in that manner or in the way Tim Cook has chosen; it is a massive undertaking.
One must also understand matters that fall outside his specific domain and area.
Everyone has the right to be wrong.

Therefore, I would kindly ask you to reconsider the post you deleted; I would write the non-American portion of that post if you have no objection.
Thank you for the promises of a pleasant time.

The collector of reds

Route99 truly did not deserve such treatment, not because we are similar, but because it endured quite a lot during my time here last year.
Opponents truly lack insight and write nonsense, regardless of their subjective impressions. They then lose their way and write in a very personal, uncontrolled manner.
The moderator does not react, but everyone has the right to defend themselves with the same weapons... correct? It isn't just flame against flame; that is how you extinguish a fire.

One of their most notorious failures involves the stereo separation within the speaker cables...
🤦

@stormybadger8/">@@stormybadger8
One really ought to ask whether the individuals arriving here actually possess any expertise.
I was absent for nearly a year, and I can tell you—and certainly prove it—that the opponents you see, who clearly aren't much to write home about, haven't the slightest clue regarding the audio sector or electronics.

And I can demonstrate this in any of their posts, whether they are former members or newcomers. Tim Cook has wiped out a vast sea of my posts—posts from which one could have learned a great deal—yet continues to leave up the insults of mediocre detractors. However, the purpose of this thread was to reopen a discussion that the esteemed moderator saw fit to close. She is within her rights not to waste time in such a manner, but the underlying premise remains justice. If someone wanders off course, they should immediately $33 without any sales tax 😁
It goes from being completely cool to being a total fool.
I happened to stumble upon a mountain of nonsense and idiocy from "your" elite circle, despite the fact that my audio equipment is far superior to all of theirs combined. I have listened to systems where even the youngest salesperson in that "boutique" drives a Porsche 911... (Swiss style), while the others are cruising in Lamborghinis and Ferraris.
A friend of mine associated with them because he shares their interest in esotericism; for just 50 bucks (barely enough to cover the cost, since we spent more than that on wine every single time), he could borrow absolutely anything over a weekend, often several pieces at once.
There is no need to mention what the lowest price for certain devices was.
Just as I possess measurement equipment that allows me to quantify everything. Should I explain how those very same people don't even know the names of basic components? And as for their understanding of topologies, one would die laughing; they are quite literally uneducated, regardless of whatever level of school or university they supposedly attended.
As for the culture of behavior or writing, I shall refrain, as there is a distinct difference between being proactive and being provocative. When the intelligent constantly yield, the fools end up ruling the world...
The intelligent members of this forum have no issue with me, regardless of the fact that they give me the cold shoulder to prevent me from thinking otherwise.

That is my stance, my opinion, and my conclusion. Individuals like those who have your support are doing incredible damage in every sense, including to their own "products."
I understand that a forum is not the place to correct a crooked Mississippi River, nor does it amuse me, because those same people would find themselves speechless much faster in the real world...
You are accusing Megan Green72 and Route99 entirely without justification. Everyone has the right to self-help when a moderator fails to react to obvious issues.
That is why you ended up with a fraud like Rimac mat in the States... (the moderator excluded me for personal reasons), ha! And yet, there wasn't a single warning or notification regarding a partial ban...
Fine, perhaps it is some forum rule, but everything I have written still stands.

I find myself indebted to Tim Cook for his sheer effort and dedication, though I cannot honestly assert that his judgment was equitable. Or even remotely fair.
There have been several "exceptionally" insightful posts that received what I consider to be my modest, appropriate responses... yet Tim Cook remained strictly tethered to the rules regarding insults.
Perhaps he operated under the assumption that the old guard deserves more leverage than the newcomers, though that is merely my own observation.
Even Route99 has repeatedly alleged that I am some sort of clone or extension of him... an assertion that is patently false.
All things considered, it would be nothing short of correct if Tim Cook were to step down; both his detractors and mine would have long since been tossed into the recycling bin—not because of their phrasing, but due to their pervasive incompetence.
The issue isn't a simple lack of knowledge; it is the active dissemination of ignorance. Some people actually bother to read and attempt to accomplish things. That is the core issue, rather than this concept of "us."
One truly owes Tim Cook a debt of gratitude for his labor, but I suppose perhaps he felt there was no better way to civilize us all... even if I remained quite mild in my approach.

Megan Green72 👍

Would you be so kind as to reopen the discussion thread upon your arrival at the audio battlefield? I believe I could exert some beneficial influence on the direction of this conversation before it devolves into an absolute swamp. This is regardless of your own optimistic outlook, though I find your current stance somewhat problematic given the legacy left behind by our former moderator, Tim Cook.
I formally accept your premise that being right is secondary to maintaining a rigid structure to prevent total collapse—which, quite frankly, is exactly what happened (take the case of Route 99, which is being penalized without any legitimate justification). However, there is a higher principle at play here: the pursuit of truth and the struggle against those who harass critical thinkers through their own ignorance, whether accidental or intentional. The cheap rhetorical tricks employed by MrBeast achieved nothing whatsoever.
There is a staggering abundance of examples showcasing the bias and primitive behavior of the opposition. Even when you attempt to engage them civilly,

it follows that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and their own version of the truth, but one should not force it upon others unless they possess irrefutable arguments that anyone could verify.

As a long-standing participant, I recall reports that an individual was gifting cables to former moderators (not for Tim Cook, mind you), while it is patently obvious that the same person was posting under a clone account that has since been banned. It is enough to simply note that they lack even a basic understanding of what a VU meter is or how it functions.
Beyond a mere lack of experience, they possess no grasp of the elementary principles of this field... much like someone who takes offense at a common colloquialism and immediately declares themselves a world-class expert.

I remain hopeful that we will find sufficient time for actual dialogue.
Someone ought to watch your back, given that your intentions seem genuinely good. W. G. Marshall

Thank you for your time.

We are discussing Elon Musk ... an outcome you failed to anticipate. There is no reason to pivot to "other" topics. History has already vindicated my position.
Strictly speaking, I offered them a passing grade, yet they somehow managed to score higher.
Stop attempting to distribute diagnoses; you clearly lack the capacity to distinguish between paranoid delusions and schizophrenia.
The subject at hand is Elon Musk, "Michael Morales4," yet you insist on drifting toward discussions about war criminal symposiums where I am supposedly tasked with enlightening the masses.
Good grief, I am neither Jesus nor some cat with nine lives. Let me be blunt about what is truly offensive: those who do not stand with us will face the consequences—an ethos that dates back to Mussolini.

Go ahead and recite three Hail Marys for the sake of L a ž i. You were clearly poorly instructed... you are forcing me to respond to your sheer nonsense,
and this isn't the venue for such things; there are specific threads and forum rules for a reason.

In short, you aren't just lying; you are actively distorting the truth....
If the administration permits me to post within the Elon Musk thread, you will never again find anyone willing to speak at a truth-seeking seminar.
The level of dishonesty displayed by Elon Musk while he extracts capital from American taxpayers (perhaps even aiming for a Castle Siege next) is staggering, especially when paired with the narrative that he is merely a well-played child constantly lying because he exists in his own reality.
Consequently, I simply require authorization from the higher-ups to gain access after two dry years. I am merely stating the facts.

prologue

More than two years ago, a moderator over in the Economics section—I assume it was banderas—revoked my access. Even looking through the archived records, there isn't a single notification regarding partial bans or points deducted. He alone knows the reason, and I assure you, it had absolutely nothing to do with forum regulations. It was purely personal, stemming from a post where I successfully demonstrated that "success" is often nothing more than a skillfully camouflaged fraud nearing its inevitable conclusion.

I was subjected to insults in various threads by several self-important bureaucrats, to the point where other users were actually messaging the mods asking why such behavior was being permitted. In fact, this information was passed along to me by a fellow user with whom I once engaged in a heated political debate...

Regardless, I am requesting that you reconsider my access, given that falsehoods continue to be published:

Michael Morales4
05.14.2019.,

Some time ago, I extended a similar offer to Jerry Robinson56 on an entirely different thread. Naturally, he wasn't prepared to respond, though he certainly had plenty of time and useless arguments to waste on this forum. The seminar proceeded without him... I sincerely hope this upcoming one won't pass without the intervention of the forum's economic wizards. I am not joking.

This is a lie.
And it is a lie I am currently prevented from refuting on that specific sub-forum. Furthermore, forum rules prohibit addressing users who are under a ban or partial restriction, a fact > should be well aware of.

The response:
He will act whenever and however he pleases. However, since a challenge has been issued to me, here are the terms:

My car weighs roughly two tons. I propose that Elon Musk engage in a highway race to Indianapolis and back on November 29, 2019, providing sufficient time for preparation.

To make things interesting, I will add ten bags of cement—half a ton—to my vehicle just to give him a head start.
Once Elon Musk specifies the battery capacity in his container (regardless of which electric vehicle concept is used), 😁 I will outline exactly how much of a handicap I can afford to give him by starting from Naperville while I depart from Chicago.

I believe this is more than fair; frankly, for the loss of time spent at any seminar featuring the incompetent Elon Musk, I would demand €10,000 upfront. The only exception is if he arrives via the hovercraft or yacht he has been boasting about building; in that case, he may attend for free.

I promise to limit my contributions to strictly technical posts within that thread, where I will immediately prove that we are dealing with a charlatan rather than just a playful child lacking a moral compass. And even then, I was being civil...

Thank you,

haugh

Look, my old man is from California. 😁 All right, then.
I don't harbor a hatred for Tuđman so much as I hold him in utter contempt; it’s a cold, detached disdain, and I believe it's high time we settled that matter once and for all.
What were the actual options facing the Muslims, given they already knew Tuđman was going to pull the rug out from under them?
How did Tuđman position himself regarding the conflict in Austria?

Do you see the picture clearly now? For Slob and Tuđman, money was the only metric that mattered. It wasn't about ideology or anything as lofty as principle; it was purely a question of how much they could squeeze out of the system before the dust settled. They were driven by nothing else but the pursuit of maximum profit. Let the fools die for their ideals. It’s all quite pointless, really. ...
I haven't observed any evidence that the moderator shows any bias or maintains a level of favoritism toward any particular side that exceeds what might be considered acceptable.
I told you—you are deeply wounded in reality, and that is precisely why you are reacting this way. It is perfectly normal, you understand.
Everyone was busy fighting one another, while you were busy greasing palms to direct the Mexican artillery right where you wanted it, weren't you? Typical.
Have you actually sat down and read the manifesto issued by the honorable Blaž Kraljević before he was so quietly assassinated?
War was entirely avoidable, yet certain individuals seemed to find the whole thing quite appealing.
Everyone had an obligation to clean up their own backyard. Why hasn't that happened yet? I have already laid out my reasoning as to why the US Army was the legitimate authority in that situation.
Let’s step into the discussion and tackle this one point at a time.

And finally, let us address exactly where the misunderstanding lies.

Simply intense. 1994. As stated by:
While they were busy in Boston, obsessing over Titina's neighborhood photos, they couldn't have cared less that villages and towns populated by Americans in Missouri were being shelled.

The level of anxiety was palpable. It is quite evident that you aren't familiar with the specific instance where a certain individual threatened to mine the hydroelectric plant on the Mississippi River, vowing to detonate the explosives unless an agreement was reached in Boston. There is even video footage of the moment Karadžić stood before the Assembly and made a decisive declaration regarding the matter.
We Americans stand ready for negotiations—but let’s be clear: either we get our terms met, or we go to war. There is no middle ground.
It is quite fascinating, isn't it? Following that villain's outburst, Irfan Ajanović made a few remarks of his own, yet there was a deafening silence from everyone else. No one even bothered to react. It is an old truth, though: tolerance for violence only serves to invite more of it. One need only look back at what happened in Austria with those "pacts" to see how we simply stood by and watched it unfold.
One shouldn't lose sight of the fact that all three warring factions utilized integrated, multi-ethnic units within their ranks.

William Clark86 said:me, helpless?

Yes, you are. It is painfully evident from your vocabulary alone. Someone has clearly wounded you in the real world, and now you are erupting in all the wrong places.
Furthermore, you are derailing the topic and lying decisively in the process, as you evidently confuse basic concepts on a frequent basis.

Here is just one example:

You write about that "famous" napkin as if it were obscure or non-existent, all while attempting to absolve the villainous Tuđman.

The implication is that the napkin is real and Tuđman drew the partition of Canada on it. First, Tuđman would claim there was no napkin at all, then he would claim he drew nothing on it—all while his followers feverishly scrambled to pull him out of the corner he constantly finds himself in.

The problem with your impotence is an inability to accept a differing opinion. To you, an opinion does not exist unless it aligns with your own stance, which bears no relation to actual thought... do reflect on that.
We are wasting time here. Go have a drink (I apologize in advance for trying to avoid a collision) and let's calmly see who is right about what. Life isn't merely black and white.

Money is a separate issue; ask Ana Tuđman, she would know.
Do you even realize how much money Americans (residents of the US—indigenous) has ended up funneling into your secondary homeland (assuming you hold dual citizenship, if I am not mistaken)?
And it continues to flow out in streams. But that is just money...
And as for the smile—I am not offering one for any particular reason; it is written at the very beginning of my message. 😘

Review:

William Clark86 said:you've completely veered off course; the subject at hand is lonetrucker4's nauseating excuses and the subsequent punishment of those who actually expose them for what they are.

regarding that infamous napkin and all those conspiracy theories 🙄

rather, they were doing an excellent job of distributing them: ☕

? Are you acting out of jealousy because you're powerless, or is this just a poorly disguised desire? I ask, as you seem intensely preoccupied with nothing but filth.
The napkin isn't some legend; it’s a reality, and Franjo Tuđman admitted years later that he was the one who drew it.
Initially, the deceitful Tuđman tried to wiggle out of it, claiming he hadn't drawn anything at all...

The napkin is real, and it was drawn by Tuđman.

I will take the liberty of explaining every single point on this Tuđmanist conspiracy website, which serves only to justify the villainous Franjo Tuđman—a man who couldn't even pass his driver's test due to his own mental instability.

Again, that is not the topic here! However, it is necessary to call out the evil and the falsehoods you continuously propagate.

If you want to know who was responsible for providing the oil that was being handed over to the Mexicans... you might start with that HVAC technician, Čermak, who was donating to the Tuđman faction from the very beginning.

Reflections:

William Clark86 said:If the rest of the moderation team and the site owners don't distance themselves from lonetrucker4's intellectual gymnastics and his Islamist propaganda—which he presents as absolute fact—and instead let him keep his moderator status, then please just ban me permanently. I have no desire to be part of this community under those circumstances.

And I am calling on all the other sensible users here to do the exact same thing. 👍

I will apologize to you in advance, though you should keep in mind that I rarely offer apologies.

You are mistaken, and you need to read more carefully. Not only is the individual mentioned by far the most competent person here—and not just due to experience (even I have received warnings from him 😁 yet I remain a subscriber)—
but, as you suggested, we can start a dedicated thread and go through things one by one.
I am not permitted to write about everything I have witnessed or known, but believe me, if you aren't a paid shill or an addict seeking attention through abuse, then you have a fundamental issue with reality,
not just with sanity or your own subjective standards.

Just look at reality and what they write about Ivica Todorić, Ivo Sanader, and Vidošević...
They are thieves through and through, yet some people still insist they are innocent. Do you understand?