CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Adam Collins4 › Posts

Posts by Adam Collins4

1105 posts shown.

Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
Jesse Harris6 said:Fine, look, you and Milanović are both spot on regarding the energy situation. So, what’s your brilliant solution then? Should we just scrap the sanctions against Russia or something?

Milanović loves tossing out half-baked suggestions, but he never actually steps up to make a definitive call or commit to a final decision. It’s like watching a game show where the host keeps stalling—"Is that your final answer?" Because ZM never, ever provides a final answer.

Maybe take a closer look at what the President’s actual powers are...😉

Sent from my Samsung using Reddit
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
Linda Harris59 said:Sanctions against Russia serve to support Ukraine and condemn outright aggression. However, we have this one foolish president who fails to grasp that and instead offers his support to Russia. If he isn't simply incompetent, then he's clearly on Putin's payroll.

Actually, he isn't even alone in that regard. Look at Kim Jong Un and Joe Biden.

Yeah, sure...

One minute they're causing havoc, the next they're "providing support"...😬

Just wait a few months until energy prices actually hit the fan—then we'll see who the real genius is...

Basically, Milanović's statements from back then versus now actually hold up... and you just proved it yourself...

Anyway, you're nowhere to be found when the conversation turns to Plenković, even though there's plenty of dirt to dig up...

How so? How is that possible?
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
Linda Harris59 said:It is truly staggering how much sheer stupidity one man can display. Everyone with half a brain understood from the jump that sanctions would disrupt Western economies by cutting off access to cheap oil and shrinking market reach. But let's be clear: those sanctions absolutely hammer Russia too, specifically targeting the oligarchs who bankroll and prop up Vladimir Putin. Beyond the economics, these sanctions serve as a massive, undeniable signal that we do not condone aggression and slaughter, and that we stand firmly with the people of Ukraine. This logic is obvious to anyone except certain fools like Joe Biden, who seems intent on siding with Russia. Honestly, it wouldn't even be our headache if it weren't for the fact that one of those idiots happens to be the President of the United States.

🤣

And now you're going to chime in after that rant about idiots...

Given how much energy prices have skyrocketed—which is basically Russia's entire business model—you're really over here talking about "damage"...

Russia is still selling plenty; they're just charging a hell of a lot more for it...
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
🤣

I just drew a quick parallel here—one that pretty much highlights how hollow your whole argument actually is...

Think about it: you’ve got this crook, a total thief who surrounded himself with the exact same kind of bottom-feeders, someone who basically bled the taxpayers dry through his political party and failed to deliver on a single damn promise he made on credit... yet, somehow, he still managed to land a second term...

Then there's the guy backing him up—a criminal sympathizer who personally handpicked over twenty inner-circle associates, all of whom ended up in federal prison, and yet he still stands there defending them...

So, yeah, your little theory that people actually react when they get cheated? Completely debunked...

If you want proof of why people react to the Republican Party, look at that corrupt official in a city like Columbus—a guy who won't be fired despite blatant theft, even though he was skimming money right off a construction site in his own backyard...
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
Aha...

It’s just like how Richard Nixon got hauled in when he failed to deliver on every single promise from his platform...

Funny how you seem to have forgotten all about that... or maybe it just wasn't an issue back then...

I guess it isn't, since it seems the Republican Party voters just reward their own crooks and criminals... we all know exactly why that is...

So, your little argument about this Cabinet serving two terms is completely wide of the mark...

We're talking about more than 20 criminals that he personally hand-picked and shielded while engaging in corruption—easily the worst president we've ever seen, right up there with the likes of Richard Nixon...

Like I said, the reason is pretty obvious...

That whole scandal in Chicago involving the theft of construction steel perfectly illustrates how the mafia and the gutter crowd are running the show...
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
Of course you’re here—you’re basically the ringleader...

Ready to roll?

He goes after Biden because of Trump, but the second his own party votes to bail out Trump—sorry, I mean when they use Biden to shield their own people—suddenly everything is just fine...

He attacks Biden over Bernie Sanders, yet when that same guy was recently trashing Desert Storm and the Republican Party, he turns around and defends his own corrupt circle under the guise of "freedom of speech"...

Total bot behavior...
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
Linda Harris59 said:You claim to admire a man who calls politicians fascists without a shred of logic, plays supporter to Putin, and struts for the American public claiming he’ll block Sweden and Finland from joining NATO in the interest of the United States, only to tuck his tail and stay silent when it actually comes time to act. He’s arrogant, shallow, and ineffective. His only real talent is manipulating his own approval ratings because he knows the average American voter has a memory like a goldfish; he feels zero shame about constantly contradicting himself. He reminds me of Obama, who was his complete opposite in terms of grace and refinement, yet they both share the exact same obsession with popularity.

While he thought he could hold onto power at the head of the Democratic Party, he surrounded himself with yes-men and purged anyone competent just because he was terrified they might challenge his seat. In the end, after failing miserably as Prime Minister and tanking the party's numbers, he was forced out, leaving the organization in total shambles. Why? Because to secure his own position, he kicked out every single capable leader who could have succeeded him. The Democratic Party hasn't recovered since. Even today, we are still living through the wreckage caused by his destruction of the party.

Classic Republican Party bot talking nonsense about short memories or "special interests"...

🤣
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Gregory Hall66 said:I find that hard to believe.

The man is hardly the ideal candidate for the role he occupies; on the contrary, he is quite incompetent and will certainly fail to fix the sanitation issues, simply because they cannot be resolved through the whimsical methods favored by his little band of followers. Even Eric Adams wouldn't tolerate such blatant arrogance—this idea of someone merely gracing the office twice a week.

He is your quintessential political operative, the kind who will inevitably pilfer an hour here and there on Mondays and Fridays. When he moves, he moves for his own benefit.
But make no mistake, he is no manager.

Except for the fact that under his watch, the Sanitation Department actually negotiated and pulled through over $500,000 for waste management and energy efficiency...

And let's not forget that they were the first ones to actually meet the legal requirements regarding the number of recycling centers...

Not to mention the waste separation percentages and all that stuff...

Before him, Bloomberg couldn't even manage to buy a single new truck, and he left the city utilities in a state of absolute shambles with his little crew...
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Gregory Hall66 said:It’s all just nonsense.

The problem is that you seem to be the only person on earth claiming to possess these "facts" from 2012, yet you refuse to actually describe them or provide a single credible link to support your claims.
Quite unlike... well, someone like me.😁

Give us some actual substance, won't you? Provide an anticlimax regarding this 2012 era. What was truly happening then? Who was playing whom, and for what gain? How much was at stake?

You haven't provided a single useful link, other than your constant claims that someone else is to blame for Bloomberg's laziness and incompetence...

So, let's get to it: who is actually responsible for his lack of productivity in 2012, once everything had already been refinanced?☕
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Gregory Hall66 said:"Quote:"
Adam Collins4 As specified by:
It is simply impossible to proceed, given that the most recent "reallocation" of a 300 million dollar fund took place back in 2012 and 2013.

And now, we move forward...

Where exactly did that thieving scoundrel squander over $350 million intended for municipal infrastructure—funds that we are now expected to pay back in 2023?

You see, this is exactly what happens when one actually takes the time to confront the cold, hard facts...

So, we find ourselves facing the same wearying reality once again: this individual has twice collected our utility fees, yet what has actually been accomplished? Absolutely nothing. Is it too much to ask that when we pay our dues to the Sanitation Department, we might see some semblance of actual progress? It seems we are merely funding a void.

Did you actually specify at that time, or were you simply intoxicated?

To suggest that anyone other than himself is to blame is nothing more than a transparent attempt at trolling, isn't it? It remains a tiresome, predictable cycle of deflection.
First and foremost, you have seen fit to label me a liar, driven by nothing more than pure spite and a profound lack of understanding.
Furthermore, in that deleted post of yours, you went so far as to imply that my little helpers were stepping on my toes simply because they disrupted some business venture of mine. But really, how can we be certain of anything? Given the track record, isn't it safe to assume that any deal involving Bandić and his crew is inherently dirty and utterly repulsive?

If one were to adhere to even the most basic tenets of decent upbringing, wouldn't that necessitate a sincere apology for such behavior?

Even after behaving in such a manner, you haven't made the slightest effort to actually examine the complexities of the very issue you seem so intent on lecturing everyone about.

Could someone perhaps provide a direct link regarding the debt incurred during the 2012/2013 period? Where exactly was this financing secured, which specific institutions were involved, and under what particular terms was it granted? Furthermore, I find myself wondering about the underlying justification—what was the official pretext used to authorize such obligations, and what were the actual amounts?
Let us dispense with the flowery phrasing and the endless euphemisms. Send over the link, and then we can finally begin a proper discussion.
You really shouldn't take offense at my insistence on seeing the link, though I suppose one might wonder why I persist; however, given that you have just demonstrated such an enviable level of ignorance, isn't my skepticism entirely justified?

I maintain my position that the refinancing took place back in 2016. It was a maneuver that passed without much scrutiny, largely because those who possess the necessary insight already understand exactly how that initial $300 million was liquidated.

It seems as though the members on this forum are merely pretending to be indifferent, adopting a posture of feigned apathy that borders on the performative. 😉 😁

No, I called you a liar because I knew exactly what was going down back in 2012/2013.

And I’m sticking to it...

So, we have the end of the story in 2012, nothing from 2007...

So, who’s actually responsible for the refinancing that resulted in that jerk AGAIN doing absolutely nothing for our infrastructure?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Rachel Barrett8 said:
Adam Collins4 Asks:
We can't pull that off, because the last time they "reallocated" a $300 million budget, it was back in 2012/2013.

Alright, let's get back to business.

Where on earth did that crook blow through over $350 million meant for municipal infrastructure? We’re looking at bills coming due in 2023, and I want to know where the money went.

Look, this is what happens when you actually lay out all the facts...

So, let me get this straight. This guy has already taken our money for sanitation services not once, but TWO TIMES now, and what has he actually accomplished? Absolutely nothing.
..

So, you're telling me Lopovski hasn't actually accomplished anything? Seriously?
This is nothing but pure trolling and straight-up lies. It’s just typical of New York City residents who love to play the victim and act like they're above it all while pointing fingers at people who aren't even around to defend themselves.

The money is just being flushed away. It’s going toward building social housing in Beverly Hills for the underprivileged, setting up daycare centers for toddlers, buying textbooks for the incompetent, and paying for gas line connections for the bottom feeders. We're seeing handouts for the slow-witted, funding for those various churches over in Canada, celebrations for veterans, and grants for eco-activists and all those quasi-independent media outlets. Even our tax dollars are sinking into concrete museums dedicated to modern-day blunders. Is this really where it all goes?

Who exactly is this Lopovski jerk? Stop playing dumb.

So, we’re looking at 300 million euros here. Four million went straight into water infrastructure, and the rest was dumped into buying meters. Now, suddenly, everyone wants to point fingers and decide exactly who is to blame for that. But really, does anyone actually know where the math stopped adding up?

Was it Bandić himself, or was it those "angels" who handpicked him?

Look, Mustard isn't going to get anything done. Period. He was basically raised on the same chaotic energy you see all over New York City, and he was elected specifically because of that mindset. His whole philosophy is just: "As long as we're feeling good right now, who cares about everything else?"

Which part of the records stating exactly what the money was used for isn't clear?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Gregory Hall66 said:New York City took on 300 million euros in debt in London back in 2007.
.....with the explicit promise that this capital would be used to overhaul and expand the water, sewage, and gas networks.....

And you expect me to view you as a credible interlocutor?
I am even going so far as to point out, in good faith, that the trail for those funds leads directly to the corrupt political elite of that era, as they were all complicit in a coordinated effort to bail out their archetypal enemies.

As you can see, the answer is quite elementary if one isn't suffering from a cognitive lapse.

Shall we proceed?

Actually, we can't, because the last time they "reallocated" a 300 MILLION EURO tranche was back in 2012/2013.

Now we can proceed...

Where did that thieving crook blow over 2 BILLION KUNA meant for PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE—money that we're still paying off in 2023?

See, this is what happens when you actually have all the facts laid out...

So, twice now—not once, but TWICE—this fraudster has pocketed utility funds and accomplished absolutely nothing...

Did you actually name him back then, or were you just bluffing?

This pathetic trolling, trying to pin the blame on someone else, is just more of the same nonsense...
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Look, Gregory Hall66 is back at it again with his usual brand of fiction...

Michael Bloomberg didn't go into debt back in 2007—that happened much later than he claims. I'm just letting these posts sit here so everyone can see the lies for themselves...

So, Gregory Hall66, what's the deal? Why the dishonesty?

How many times have you dragged Michael Bloomberg for raiding the funds meant for city infrastructure?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Harold Phillips54 said:I think you're missing the mark here, just like before.
Even Tomašević's deputy mentioned on the news that the water infrastructure was damaged and due to the earthquake, if I recall correctly. He explained that ground shifts caused the pipe joints to move out of alignment. Having worked with irrigation fittings and valves myself, that makes perfect sense to me.

In those specific parts of New York City where the earthquake actually caused damage, repairs could have been funded through the recovery fund—obviously, we're talking about the affected areas, not the entire city's network.
But even that didn't happen.
It’s obvious to everyone that the water system is aging and failing, but since the earthquake, these kinds of breakdowns have become much more frequent and significantly harder to manage.

Unfortunately, this just proves how little you actually know... though, once again, it shows just how ready you are to lecture everyone else... which, honestly, we already saw during that whole flood incident when you couldn't wrap your head around the definition of nepotism and kept using it in the wrong context...

So, what happens when the joints in an irrigation system shift? Water leaks, right? Then you go in and "physically" move the joints back into place...

Now, try imagining all of that happening deep underground...

To put it in terms you might understand: if that had actually happened in NYC, the city would be a giant swimming pool after the quake, plus half the neighborhoods wouldn't have any water at all...

And that clearly didn't happen...

The only real fix for that kind of thing would be digging everything up, replacing the couplings/flanges, and maybe even swapping out the pipes entirely...

Look, you're writing total garbage here... maybe think twice before you hit that "post reply" button.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Gregory Hall66 said:Didn't Toto and his little band of wizards present themselves as the ultimate masters of European Union projects?

And yet, when they are handed a complete slam dunk—faced with crumbling municipal infrastructure following an earthquake—these great sorcerers don't even bother to draft proposals for funds that are already earmarked. Are they all suddenly sharing the same brilliant idea that the infrastructure isn't actually damaged?

Is anemic property ownership supposed to serve as their convenient excuse for sheer incompetence?

Where exactly did that money go—you know, the cash Eric Adams pulled specifically to fix that very same infrastructure just a few years back?

How much have you actually written about that?

I’m telling you again, just because the funds are "reserved" doesn't mean squat...
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Quincy:
I don't even know where to start with this one—just total chaos from the jump. It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck where everyone involved thinks they’re the hero of the story, but really, they’re just making a mess. Honestly, I'm sitting here trying to make sense of the logic, or lack thereof, and it's just... yeah. Nothing. Zero. Just pure, unadulterated nonsense being passed off as some kind of grand plan. Typical. says:
The latest news from the last three days:
Petek: Because the system in New York City is such a disaster, the whole thing is just falling apart. We’re looking at a budget of $110,000 a day just to keep the taps running—purely for drinking water. It's honestly staggering when you sit down and actually crunch the numbers. ...

https://www.google.com/url?esrc=s&q=...Google

If memory serves, Eric Adams managed to pull in about $300 million from the European Solidarity Fund after the earthquake—money that experts had specifically earmarked for damage recovery.
So, Eric Adams basically turned down over a billion out of that two-billion-dollar pot—yeah, you heard me—and sent it straight back to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. His reasoning? He claimed it was just surplus cash and he had absolutely no clue where to dump a billion dollars without making a mess of things. Instead, he only grabbed 800 million for building renovations, and the Department didn't miss a beat—they immediately diverted those funds toward other state-level reconstruction projects. Typical.
He didn't touch a single cent for fixing up the underground infrastructure—even though if you actually look at the IRS guidelines for that restoration fund, there’s a specific line item set aside for upgrading water, gas, and sewage networks. It's right there in black and white.
It’s been a long while since I first dropped the link to the IRS guidelines here—and honestly, after seeing all those pages of people mocking me and trying to convince me I’m talking nonsense, I’ve just been sitting back and watching.

Time is a bit of a blur lately—it’s been a month, maybe two, maybe three—so my sense of the timeline is slightly fuzzy. But basically, the Department of Housing and Urban Development basically cornered Eric Adams into a meeting. And when I say "cornered," I mean the Biden Administration initiated the whole thing just to dump two billion dollars onto him for fixing up New York City's underground infrastructure through the European Solidarity Fund—or something like that, I can't quite recall the specifics. This explains why Eric Adams has been rambling on for weeks about how they're prepping these massive projects, starting with an initial billion. The Administration is desperate to burn through that VF2 money. It’s all written into the Non-profit organization guidelines, and the EK only releases those cash tranches once the pre-set plans are met. Honestly, the government needs these projects moving just to keep the economy from stalling, so they essentially shoved Eric Adams into gear. It isn't exactly easy for him, though—he’ll have to cough up a chunk of that two billion from the City's own coffers. That’s why he’s acting like Sleeping Beauty, tucked away in a century-long slumber. Whether it's 20 or 30 percent—actually, even if it's just 15%—we're talking about 300 million bucks coming out of the NYC treasury. And Eric Adams doesn't actually *have* that money; everything he has, or everything he borrows, gets swallowed up by ideological pet projects and keeping the lights on. He’d much rather blow tens of millions on "civic education" in schools and daycare centers than deal with the actual headache of replacing cracked pipes.
It’s pretty standard practice—mayors and governors head up to see the Secretary to haggle over funding for their own cities and counties, trying to squeeze out every cent they can. But in this case, it looks like the Minister had to personally track down Eric Adams—our very own Sleeping Beauty—just to convince her that a little kiss might actually get things moving. 🙂
The thing is, you clearly have no clue what you're talking about... you actually think just handing someone a few billion bucks is some kind of "done deal" and that's the end of the story? Please.

The clearest sign that things are falling apart—and I mean really sliding off the rails—is the renovation work. Or rather, the complete lack thereof.

Here’s some light reading for you...

I was just reading this piece about how the Biden Administration is basically sitting on their hands while the housing situation in New York City continues to spiral—it’s honestly impressive how they manage to be so consistently useless. We’re looking at a massive gap between what people actually need and what the Department of Housing and Urban Development is willing to facilitate, and frankly, it feels like we're just watching a slow-motion train wreck at this point. The whole thing boils down to the fact that despite all the talk about "support" and "funding," the actual resources aren't hitting the ground where they matter. It’s the same old story: big promises from the White House, plenty of bureaucratic shuffling, and then absolutely nothing changes for the average person trying to find an affordable place to live in NYC. It's almost predictable if you've been paying attention for more than five minutes. You have these massive amounts of money being discussed at the highest levels, yet the local reality remains exactly as bleak as it was last year. Just another day of watching the gears grind without ever actually moving the car forward.

It’s looking more and more likely that we won't be seeing any help from the European Solidarity Fund to fix up the White House after everything that went down during the New York City earthquake—mostly because the Biden Administration has been such a mess lately.

Even though the Biden Administration hasn't officially pulled the plug on that structural rebuilding plan—which was supposed to be fueled by $10 million in non-repayable European Union grants—things are getting messy. Between the construction market going haywire because of the war in Ukraine and that ridiculously tight deadline to spend the European Solidarity Fund money, the whole project is being re-evaluated. It’s looking more and more likely that the EU cash won't actually go toward reconstruction at all; instead, they might just pivot and dump it into some other projects entirely.

Honestly, I had to laugh at your sheer audacity when you were bragging about how this administration secured reconstruction funds like nobody ever has before. I laughed when you were talking nonsense, acting like extending the deadline was some kind of massive win...

So, what's the plan for next year? Are you going to come crawling back asking for another extension?

Here’s the thing, sweetie—if you want that EU money, you need a "bulletproof" project. Believe me or don't, but my company pulled tens of millions out of those exact same funds to buy heavy machinery...

And we prepared for it, damn well did... because if even one little thing goes sideways, just let me know exactly how much cash you're expected to pay back...

That right there is a huge reason why your lot isn't doing a single thing regarding the reconstruction, and it's the same reason why TT "turned down" the money...

Because just because you have the *possibility* to apply for it doesn't mean the money is sitting there just waiting for you to grab it...

And frankly, this is just the tip of the iceberg...
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
hollowmason64 said:You can't really see anything in just one year. Not when you're dealing with the public sector.

Well, obviously it’s on the expenditure side of the NYC budget, and yeah, the citizens are the ones footing the bill. Is that really something worth highlighting? For what reason...?
It's not like from the very beginning nobody knew who was going to pay the money back. You made it sound like some big revelation, as if his old Bernie Sanders-style cronies had stepped up to cover the cost themselves.
Which actually would have been fair.
Just let us discuss where the money went and who was spending it—it was spent by the group of incompetent hangers-on he surrounded himself with just to look smart, wasting it on fake, inflated job postings, salaries for various clueless sycophants, and a whole bunch of other nonsense.
As for who set aside the funds and who's paying for it, well, that isn't exactly breaking news.
For over ten years now, the people of this city have been paying for the greed and the tribal, small-minded antics of the old guard.

Oh, sure I can see things—specifically, the glaring lack of actual talent and the endless parade of political cronies being dragged in through the back door...

I mean, let's be real, he hasn't actually delivered on a single one of those big promises regarding department heads or management positions...

And then there's the "top brass"—that big-headed guy who thinks rules and laws don't apply to him, using a company car like his own personal ride while sitting on the Board of Directors just to pocket money he shouldn't even be touching...
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Nah, we don't need to wait three years to talk about this... we can start right now...

I mean, look—after a year passes, you can just look at the competent people in your orbit and realize the guy hasn't actually accomplished a damn thing...
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
TT and We Can probably pull off for the left exactly what the Bridge did for the right...
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
A little light reading for those who were so confidently wrong about the LAPD solutions mentioning personal vehicles...

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/example-link

Furthermore—if you actually bother to look at Article 13, Section 2, Item 5 of the regulations—it explicitly states that payments from employers to employees aren't considered taxable income when they are reimbursements for using a private car for business purposes, up to a certain mileage rate.

Well, look at that—private vehicles exist. Who knew?

https://www.accountingtoday.com/example-article

Shall we move on? Maybe we can tackle those wild theories about how the administration hands over termination lists only for the union to report worker status back to them—just like some people were insisting?☕