It’s funny how people get all worked up about labeling someone a liberal just because I sent a quick message—total overkill, really—but when someone turns around and calls me a health hazard and a drunk, suddenly that’s perfectly fine...
fadedgull6 said:First of all, boo-hoo! Secondly, please act with some decency and remove the signature containing my post—a post that offends absolutely no one—which you seem to find sufficient grounds to drag me through the mud as if I were some fifth column for the Republican Party. Thirdly, boo-hooooooo! Fourthly, you really ought to look into your own health matters.
🤣
The group that was busy insulting me and dragging my family into a debate about medical conditions... hahaha, please...
And honestly, that signature tells everyone exactly who you are—nothing but FBI-style lies and cheap tricks wherever you go. It’s no surprise you’re jumping to defend someone just like yourself, someone who, much like you, has been absolutely demolished by actual arguments...
Just imagine—if I'm really all that, even with my health being a complete wreck, then what does that say about you two when someone like me just steamrolls your logic into the ground?
Regarding the thread about Eric Adams—it seems insults directed at Bill Clinton are being permitted. To address my actual points and arguments, he first responded with a totally "logical" claim that I’m just some drunk, then moved on to nitpicking my health, and finally called me a piece of trash... well, let's just say he was being incredibly disrespectful...
The moderator active during that stretch basically gave him a green light to keep going before eventually deleting everything without handing out any sanctions...
And to top it all off, they leave this trolling little post behind
"Go ahead, find where anyone on this thread actually claimed the numbers were dropping because of widespread theft. Find that specific quote and post it here, and if you can, I'll personally ban myself from this forum for six months.
There's my offer—take it or just stop babbling, assuming your medical condition even allows for that much coherent speech."
And that's where things get weird...
The kicker is that my response to that post keeps getting wiped out, simply because I am clearly and logically providing exactly what the user asked for—fulfilling his own demand to self-ban...
So, despite having the facts on my side, my posts get deleted while the insults stay up...
> Furthermore, it’s pretty interesting how my content gets scrubbed, yet the post where this guy attacks my physical health—which is a direct violation of the site rules—is left untouched...
Is the issue that the moderator is playing footsie with this guy who’s busy defending Eric Adams, or is it something else entirely?
And when exactly is that self-ban happening? Since the guy himself demanded proof regarding the discussion on declining housing numbers and corruption—just half an hour after he wrote that those topics were being discussed...
So, I’m just sitting here watching the former Republican mayor of Miami—who honestly acts like a total wrecking ball—setting up barricades all over town just to block the new administration's progress...
So, you guys really are just Plenković’s little puppets after all... I guess the Independent Democratic Mexican Party matters way more than the American, right?
Chloe Campbell95 said:Your one-sentence remark about an "agitprop comment" got wiped out simply because that specific comment was nuked too 😁. Did you even bother to look back, or are you just assuming that’s why your post vanished?
No, you didn't pull any cards on his thread—you got exactly ONE card: 10 points for trolling, which is pretty much fitting given how your "wisdom" mirrors the nonsense coming from Eric Adams and his crowd.
I never said he was built the same way... there was actually another word right before "same"...😉
I actually went to check what the deal was with your posts over on Politics and that specific thread, but then I noticed you've had a partial bias brewing there since 2018—so, yeah, I get the bitterness.
---- One last explanation from me:
Chloe Campbell95 said:T Calling forum members or voters Eric Adams' George Soros-funded mercenaries, those low-life sandwich eaters, losers, unemployed leftist crews, etc.—along with this whole "argument" system: lost causes, airheads, failed actors, sidewalk loafers, the NYU crowd, people who have never worked a day in their lives, saying Eric Adams is cut from the same cloth as Eric Adams, foreign agents, "Soros, the daughter-in-law, Soros" and all these "foreign spy" theories... no, that wasn't going to fly then and it won't fly now, just like posting stupid videos and sources in the thread (some of which are still hanging around if anyone wants a laugh). Same goes for the clones of permabanned or banned users that miraculously started multiplying in that specific thread.
The thing is, you only seem to give this kind of attention to the thread about TT...
For about 90% of the politicians discussed here, the commentary is ten times worse, and it's been allowed for ages under the excuse that they're public figures... some of them have even had their families insulted...
And now you're acting offended because someone suggested someone else is a foreign agent... it's hilarious...
fadedgull6 said:Look, things aren't great, but let's be real—the mods aren't solely to blame here, even if I’ve personally been hit with some pretty ridiculous penalties myself. The real issue is how people communicate; frankly, the quality is bottom-of-the-barrel. On the political side of things, it feels like there's this group of pathetic characters hanging around—you know the type—who are just waiting to tear you down. You can't even type a single sentence without someone labeling you a bot, a shill, a paid operative, or whatever other nonsense they throw at you. We can disagree—that's fine—but you don't need to act like you're trying to kick me out of the room the second I open my mouth. If we don't have people pushing back against the entrenched, retiree-heavy leftist crowd rooted here, then they won't get what's coming to them. We're all arguing about the same stuff—that's just politics—but the way we treat one another is where the real problem lies. There's no point in commenting on the OP of this thread because everyone knows exactly what they're about... you either put up with it or you leave. It’s a shame you feel forced to walk away. And honestly, it's already obvious there are no bots or shills left, because they've either been purged or they simply refuse to show up since they don't support policies aligned with Zoranizam. I'll say it again: sure, some moderators make mistakes, but they aren't the ones dictating the overall quality of the debate.
🤣
Spot on—everyone knows exactly what kind of mess that opening post was... it's hard to stomach a crew that relies on lies and planted talking points like you do, and you've been caught red-handed more times than I can count...
It's actually hilarious that *you're* the one calling for "quality discussion" when you spend half your time denying or twisting any fact that happens to go against the Republican Party...
And by letting those kinds of outbursts slide, the moderation quality is being dictated right then and there...
I’ll be honest—I went ahead and trashed his thread just to stir the pot a bit. I basically told everyone he lacks the actual leadership chops to run an organization this massive, because, let’s face it, he really doesn't...
As for the crowd on the other side? They were just parroting scripted talking points like broken records. Nothing of substance there...
And don't even get me started on the people he's surrounded himself with—absolute zero. Total dead weight...
Jonathan Barnes5 said:https://www.seebiz.eu/trzista/prived...umenata/68357/
I don't really want to dwell on that era since it isn't directly tied to our current topic or the core of this discussion, but it was a time when the USA saw some of its most intense crackdowns on citizens—all while far milder instances from the 90s get treated like unprecedented atrocities.
Besides, I have no desire to argue with you; I know you're a fair and decent person who isn't acting out of malice, so I don't mind at all if we disagree on certain points. It's the trolls that really get under my skin.
Man, you went from 200 down to 67, and all of them were detained specifically because they LACKED DOCUMENTATION...
So, basically, you lied three times—including the reason for the arrests...
And now you're lecturing me about being "malicious"? Sorry, but you aren't being "fair" or "decent" at all...
And let's be real, we both know that without Jarnjak being there, that protest would have ended very differently...
Jonathan Barnes5 said:It’s wild to think about how intense those protests were, even when nothing substantial happened. Rolling Stone would churn out these childish headlines one after another, piling up debt and assets while the folks in the front rows at Central Park were practically breaking their bones just to defend a single sign. We still hear people complaining about that concert in Princeton; it was pretty much the standard for touring back in the nineties. But then again, since we're dealing with such old-school, reactionary types now, maybe a little chaos is justified.
Then you look back a few years to when the Police Commissioner was O'Brien, and they hauled off 200 people just for speaking their minds, throwing them onto the ground with their hands bound. Just imagine going through that during Ronald Reagan's era. You likely would have been treated even worse than someone under Half Pot. It's funny how the yardstick we use to measure these things keeps shifting; I'm still trying to wrap my head around it.
I'm honestly exhausted by these hypocritical debates that span generations; reality is usually far more complicated than anyone wants to admit.
Wait, when exactly did Ostojić arrest 200 people just for speaking their minds? Can I get a link to that specific incident—especially the part about the hand-binding and throwing people to the floor?
Then we can move on to how Harmon wanted to deploy the military against protesters, but Jarnjak actually had the balls to stop him—not to mention the role the US Ambassador played in all that...
Here are three perfect examples of mindless insults thrown my way just because someone can't handle actual facts or logic...
The guy basically flies into the thread, ignores everything I've laid out, and resorts to cheap shots—like that ridiculous post I shared where he started ranting about "wild behavior" and "nerves"...
It’s honestly pathetic...
When is this actually going to end? How much longer do we have to deal with these brainless attempts at armchair psychoanalysis—clearly born out of pure desperation since they have zero real arguments to work with?
I’m not going to start a whole new thread just to deal with these mindless little jokes from people who clearly have nothing better to do than jump in here to provoke others and throw insults—it’s honestly pathetic.
When we were out near Columbus and Gary after that earthquake, man, the landscape looked absolutely devastating...
The locals actually told us that just a few weeks before everything hit, there were massive landslides happening in certain spots because of all the excessive logging in the area...
If you want to do your own homework, just Google "mineral resource exploration concessions"...
Seriously, look up what kind of prices and terms the government actually handed those out under...
Oh sure, the opposition is just lying through their teeth, while the ruling party absolutely crushes them with their "unassailable logic"—apparently, pointing out massive failures is just proof they don't love America...
So, instead of actually addressing the criticism, they just ignore it entirely—it’s much easier to just go after the people directly, I guess...
In a situation like this, who are you even supposed to believe? hmmm