Curfew restrictions: Is it legal to leave your house?
in Coronavirus ·
I’m honestly just wondering—does anyone actually have their e-Wallet set up and active?
1105 posts shown.
George Murphy12 said:Put the instructions right here.
https://www.coronavirus.gov/passes/364
It also says if you can't get into the eCitizen portal or don't have a token, you can still do it the old-school way via email and stuff...
Matthew Jackson2 said:Just read the interpretation from the Civil Protection Headquarters.Since land cultivation—that is, agricultural work—can fall under category f), which covers "traveling to and from work if the task is essential and cannot be performed from home," as well as category e), regarding "purchasing food and basic necessities" as outlined in the Decision, instructions are being issued to Civil Protection Headquarters to issue passes to individuals requesting them for the purpose of land cultivation or performing agricultural work outside their area of residence.
The Headquarters doesn't want to, nor can they, get bogged down in whether you're making wine or just snacking on grapes; it's like nobody ever asks if you're turning your potatoes into mashed potatoes, fries, or vodka (unless you have to report alcohol production to the Tax Administration). In a worst-case scenario, you could even turn wine into high-proof spirits to create disinfectant, which is actually essential.
And here you are, acting all high and mighty, being more sanctimonious than the Pope himself, basically telling a man to go plant some vines in his front yard and wait years for the first harvest while his vineyard in another county completely rots away and becomes a breeding ground for pests. Absolute genius!
Matthew Jackson2 said:Well, look at that, even the Civil Protection Headquarters has officially weighed in—apparently, tilling fields for private individuals is now considered a legitimate reason to get an e-Passport:
Adam Collins4 - you’re acting more devout than the Pope with all that insistence that tending to a vineyard isn't essential.
James Phillips92 said:Does anyone know if there are other places with these kinds of movement restrictions—besides North Korea? I was catching up with some friends living in Germany today, and they said things are totally different over there. No such restrictions at all.
dustymarlin10 said:Just ignore the troll.
They can't handle anyone having an opinion that isn't their own, so they just ramble on.
Plus, they get offended by anyone who doesn't bow down to His Majesty.
Anthony Jackson2 said:In a scenario where there’s neither herd immunity nor a vaccine—which doesn't change the fact that the virus is effectively just the flu.
Drawing charts on a forum is a pain, but if you're that lost, I'll try to make it easy for you.
Anthony Jackson2 said:I already gave you the arguments—maybe try reading for comprehension next time so we can actually move this along.
Anthony Jackson2 said:Actually, it is basically the flu—just a strain we have zero immunity or vaccine for.
If I recall correctly, even Berosh mentioned that a standard flu would be way more lethal if we didn't have any existing immunity.
But keep talking—it doesn't matter that you don't have a clue what you're saying. Not that anyone expected anything better from you.
Kenneth Jones70 said:It’s a real drag that when you quote someone, you still see replies from blocked users. They really need to fix that—once you block some guy who’s basically just spreading diarrhea online, you shouldn't have to deal with his nonsense ever again.
👍
It’s wild how a few panic-mongers can try to spread fear to the entire country.
I don't know who’s running moderation here or why they’re letting a handful of people talk trash, but whatever—politics is always going to be the weak link in this whole system.
And as for those folks claiming that "bla bla" everyone is suddenly going to wise up or that we won't value material things as much—yeah, you can forget about that.
If someone has assets right now, they’re enjoying them. And they’ll keep enjoying them later, too. Nobody is coming for their luxury house or their penthouse apartment.
But once you lose your job, and then the federal minimum wage drops—well, the dollar is going to take a massive hit. When people start trading dollars for anything else just to survive, that's when the real questions start.
Honestly? You're probably better off living in an old, beat-up shack where you don't have to sink money into it your whole life. Because look, whenever someone decides to wreck the economy, they're gonna wreck it. It's one of those stupid situations that makes you wonder every single day—is it really going to go down like that?
stormybadger8 said:What caused it was greed and theft baked right into the entire country, including the healthcare system itself...
That’s what happens when you have enough cash to buy insanely expensive equipment just to snag a 10-20% kickback, but then you can't cover payroll, so your medical staff starts jumping ship.
Then there's when you don't even have the basics like masks and sanitizer, or when you're dealing with hospitals that have a "new wing" built in 1962 and an old wing dating back to 1896...
And then, when something hits you suddenly—even just the flu—you’re in deep trouble. Imagine the mess when something like Covid shows up...
Honestly, we should probably call Covid "the disease of the healthcare system" or "the disease of society," because it perfectly strips everything down and exposes all the weak links...
But hey, it does a damn good job of highlighting the problems that usually stay hidden or get brushed under the rug...
It’s finally showing how incredibly senseless and idiotic these massive municipalities really are. I just hope we don't all collectively decide to forget about it and that something actually changes...
wiredotter89 said:It isn't even weeks anymore; we're talking a matter of days now. 🤦 😵
Anthony Jackson2 said:The argument is that any death where they find the virus in a throat swab gets labeled as Covid—mostly because they can't keep up with autopsies.
Death counts from cancer, heart disease, and chronic issues will probably drop to zero soon—which really just means their infection numbers aren't high enough (since they often don't catch it until someone dies), while the death toll looks inflated because everything is being blamed on Covid.
Right now, the mortality rate according to the data is around 10%, which is insane—China saw about 0.7-0.8% once things settled down. Sure, Italy will have higher rates due to a poor response and different age demographics, but they shouldn't be anywhere near 2%.
Even their own virologists are saying the recorded infection numbers are too low—they have no idea when the virus actually hit (some claim the first cases were mid-December)—and they won't know the true impact for quite some time.
fadedranger162 said:Well, duh, they tightened restrictions across the rest of the country because once you have one neighborhood hit with cases, it would be a total disaster for a country our size if it spread, but they weren't going for a full-blown lockdown.
It’s like I wrote before—you could see the mess happening in China, and you could already see the chaos in Italy, yet here in America, they let a few thousand people fly back into the country and wander around freely. Plus, they keep them crowded at the border for hours just to get a stamp so they can go into isolation.
They could have put them all in hotels, one per room, so nothing spreads if someone is infected. Thank God we at least have hotels; just station a few cops around the place so nobody escapes and you're done. They were closed anyway, and at least people (cooks, cleaners, etc., even on a reduced scale) would still have jobs.
Just so we're clear and you don't come swinging at me, I'm not saying this is *just* the flu, and yeah, take care of yourself and everyone else. But with all that "above average intelligence" you claim to have, it seems like you've forgotten where you actually live. It's easy for you to talk when you've got a secure job and, luckily, enough work lined up for the long haul, as you put it.
Now, try putting yourself in the shoes of someone with five kids who loses their job because of all this. No savings, living paycheck to paycheck on near minimum wage. For us—meaning the quarter or fifth of the population living right on the edge—we're definitely about to fall over it.
You're also ignoring the other side of the picture. You see it on the news all the time, but they diagnose maybe 100 people with cancer every day; lately, that's dropped to 10 or 20 because nobody wants to go in for checkups. Cancer mortality is around 50%, whereas this is around 2%—and even that might be an underestimate since we don't know how many people are infected if they aren't getting tested. We might save a few hundred lives now, only to lose thousands later because of missed diagnoses for cancer or other illnesses if this drags on much longer.
Jesse Hughes6 said:Viruses are generally incredibly hardy against external elements, mostly because they aren't even "alive" in the traditional sense. The real question isn't about surface survival, but rather when and under what specific conditions this thing becomes infectious. And since we have zero data on this particular strain, anything else is just pure speculation, so no, we can't draw any meaningful conclusions from such superficial data.
We don't actually know that; we're just making educated guesses for two main reasons:
1. This is our first encounter with this specific strain, so there's no baseline data to pull from.
2. We don't have an accurate count of how many people are actually infected, given that nobody is testing for it.
That response wasn't directed at you; I was quoting the post I was replying to.
For the record, I'm also staying put, though I'm a skeptic by nature, so I maintain a certain level of doubt regarding how information is packaged and presented. I also feel that during that first week when restaurants were ordered to close, I wasn't endangering a single child by walking alone or riding my bike, avoiding crowded playgrounds and stuff like that—all while practicing good hygiene and disinfecting, even if we weren't particularly filthy to begin with.
Now, more and more credible sources—including the WHO—are confirming it: the virus doesn't just float around randomly; it spreads through the saliva of an infected person. Wash your hands and stop touching your eyes and nose with dirty hands.
Jesse Hughes6 said:Viruses are generally incredibly hardy against external elements, mostly because they aren't even "alive" in the traditional sense. The real question isn't about surface survival, but rather when and under what specific conditions this thing becomes infectious. And since we have zero data on this particular strain, anything else is just pure speculation, so no, we can't draw any meaningful conclusions from such superficial data.
We don't actually know that; we're just making educated guesses for two main reasons:
1. This is our first encounter with this specific strain, so there's no baseline data to pull from.
2. We don't have an accurate count of how many people are actually infected, given that nobody is testing for it.
That response wasn't directed at you; I was quoting the post I was replying to.
For the record, I'm also staying put, though I'm a skeptic by nature, so I maintain a certain level of doubt regarding how information is packaged and presented. I also feel that during that first week when restaurants were ordered to close, I wasn't endangering a single child by walking alone or riding my bike, avoiding crowded playgrounds and stuff like that—all while practicing good hygiene and disinfecting, even if we weren't particularly filthy to begin with.
Now, more and more credible sources—including the WHO—are confirming it: the virus doesn't just float around randomly; it spreads through the saliva of an infected person. Wash your hands and stop touching your eyes and nose with dirty hands.
Jesse Hughes6 said:Viruses are generally incredibly hardy against external elements, mostly because they aren't even "alive" in the traditional sense. The real question isn't about surface survival, but rather when and under what specific conditions this thing becomes infectious. And since we have zero data on this particular strain, anything else is just pure speculation, so no, we can't draw any meaningful conclusions from such superficial data.
We don't actually know that; we're just making educated guesses for two main reasons:
1. This is our first encounter with this specific strain, so there's no baseline data to pull from.
2. We don't have an accurate count of how many people are actually infected, given that nobody is testing for it.
That response wasn't directed at you; I was quoting the post I was replying to.
For the record, I'm also staying put, though I'm a skeptic by nature, so I maintain a certain level of doubt regarding how information is packaged and presented. I also feel that during that first week when restaurants were ordered to close, I wasn't endangering a single child by walking alone or riding my bike, avoiding crowded playgrounds and stuff like that—all while practicing good hygiene and disinfecting, even if we weren't particularly filthy to begin with.
Now, more and more credible sources—including the WHO—are confirming it: the virus doesn't just float around randomly; it spreads through the saliva of an infected person. Wash your hands and stop touching your eyes and nose with dirty hands.
Sam Green73 said:Thanks for stepping up to help out. 🙂
I just realized—now that I’m not stuck playing moderator anymore—I can finally just toss him on my Block list.
Honestly, the forum discussions feel way more sane this way.
Give it a shot; it’s practically a spiritual awakening. 🕺
He’s not my headache anymore, and he doesn't have to be yours either. 🕺
coastaltiger72 said:That’s how you were talking to me yesterday—that's how you should talk to your own people back home, you know.
coastaltiger72 said:[
and this is what you said to another user. That user wasn't even addressing you, yet you just jumped on them like a wild animal. If someone is trolling, that's what moderators are for—it's not your place to act like that..
coastaltiger72 said:[
and the way you treat other users like that. There's more too and you called him out just because he was a moderator. You were constantly going off-topic there and picking on users...
coastaltiger72 said:[
your behavior toward other users here is totally out of line—honestly, I’d ban you for good if I could. I’ve seen how you act in a few posts, so I can only imagine how you carry yourself in other threads.
Joshua Gray75 said:Who was it that predicted you’d eventually end up in here arguing with yourself?🤔
Your last five posts back-to-back pretty much confirm it...
I just dropped in to break up the monotony... 😁
Feel free to carry on...