Posts by Morgan Brown5

Gregory Jackson said:Thanks Morgan Brown5, this is seriously awesome. I guess I was a little bit confused at first about what Akasha actually is, because, you know, when Daskalos would contact Akasha, he could learn so much stuff from the past and act as a sort of "witness," almost like watching a movie playing out within a window of time. But maybe that means the answer coming from Akasha doesn't have to be just some written "message," but could also show up as an actual "image." Daskalos wrote a whole book about the life of Jesus by pulling information from Akasha, though there are some differences compared to what Stojanovic received, so I suppose the truthfulness of the answers might depend on a person's spiritual level or how focused, relaxed, and willing they are at the exact moment they ask and receive the answer.

For instance, Daskalos doesn't really mention Jesus's life outside of Palestine, which is kind of interesting since he just skips over those early years, so you could probably conclude he was following the Bible and checking facts against its claims rather than looking outside those specific frameworks. So, he might not have been able to get info beyond that. Meanwhile, he was getting really detailed answers—like, "astral witnessing"—for situations mentioned in the Bible.
Even though it’s totally off-topic, do you happen to know if the dates for Jesus's birth and death (September 3rd and August 8th) are based on the old or the new calendar?

I don't think they'd bother bringing up dates tied to a calendar we don't even use... 🙂

An enlightened teacher from Mexico, while in a state of deep meditation, received this message regarding the Akash, which he uses for gaining insight and providing energetic healing:

On the Akash — the cosmic hub of the Encyclopedia Britannica, April 2012.

Just a quick look at what I've been listening to lately:

David Sylvian - Praise Pratah Smarami

Jon Gomm - Passionflower

Cocteau Twins - Seekers Who Are Lovers

Elizabeth Castillo87 said:Honestly, I love this stuff. But let’s get one thing straight: we don't actually *need* music to find some kind of zen. You don't need it to "achieve" spirituality or whatever. Music is for pure, unadulterated enjoyment—and you can find joy in it in a million different ways.
As for everything else? That's where the silence comes in.

If we’re being real, even Xanax won't help someone find peace if their nervous system is already worn down to a thread... 😲

Sure, spiritual music has a different dimension—it was always intended for a specific purpose for practitioners—but for most of us, it all tends to blur together.

To me, enjoyment is just letting your brain go idle. It's an escape from the daily grind. You focus on something you actually care about—like a hobby, maybe with a beer, or a joint, or just sitting in a pub with the radio playing in the background. I don't see how you "achieve" spirituality through it, but you certainly can't grow spiritually if your head is a total mess. That said, actively engaging with spiritual music definitely works... it's not much different from prayer or chanting.😢😲

electrictinker26 said:Yeah, it's fascinating... I couldn't find anything specific about how water reacts to blues or jazz. On a scale of one to ten (ten being the highest), how would you rate jazz and blues? Personally, I've always enjoyed them. Which musical genres would you put in a top 10 list, ranked from the most powerful down? I listen to a lot of music, but I'm looking to gradually transition toward heavier, more intense sounds. I can't jump in all at once, or I'll feel like I'm missing something intermediate.

It starts with the blues, then jazz, and then the modern stuff like R&B or Rock 'n' Roll. It all traces back to African American spirituals and Christian influences, which eventually lead back to the Nile Delta and the Sahara. That’s where you find what people call "world music" today—sounds that are closest to the original roots, just like American blues and jazz. There's this style called desert blues, and honestly, it's incredible.
I've listened to plenty of jazz and blues, and I used to play the blues myself. It's hard for me to draw a hard line between genres, though. To me, alternative music is all about that pure expression, which is what always drew me in. Lately, though, I haven't been listening to nearly as much music as I used to over the last couple of years...

electrictinker26 said:Morgan Brown5, could you tell me exactly which scientist conducted those experiments involving music and water?

There are actually tons of videos out there, here's one

Masaru Emoto from the USA became famous for this, though some researchers in Russia have been looking into it for decades...
Emoto mostly experimented with human thought—those positive and negative vibes that ripple out like spherical waves around us our whole lives. Though, honestly, our own thoughts are usually the most dangerous ones. You can find stuff on music too, covering everything from jazz and blues to R&B and metal. They’re all just different kinds of non-harmonic vibrations, and the water reacts by forming crystals that are broken, distorted, or irregular. I watched a lot of that a long time ago, including a Russian documentary about water that’s actually quite good...

Matthew Robinson3 said:If anyone has some actual advice, I’m all ears. How do you deal with living among people who just don't get you? It feels like they can't even begin to grasp any real depth. You have parents who seem like they never truly knew who you were to begin with, and friends who treat you like some sort of joke. How am I supposed to survive on the mere hope of meeting someone new—someone who might finally let me turn the page and actually start my life? I'm tired of constantly reshaping my own story just to be accepted by people who aren't even listening.

Tolerance is pretty much the only real glue holding people together. It’s the fundamental value required for any relationship—friendships, partnerships, marriage, even business dealings—to function. If you can offer tolerance toward others and their perspectives, provided they aren't hurting anyone, you won't find yourself constantly hitting walls or facing the friction everyone else warns you about.

Being tolerant is also a sign of inner peace. You can't really extend that grace to others if you haven't found harmony within yourself first. And once you have, there's the other side of the coin: someone else's tolerance toward you. There isn't much you can do about that, other than staying true to your own level of tolerance. If they refuse to be tolerant of you, they're the ones with the massive problem, not you. At that point, there are other ways to handle things...

ironharbor8 said:@ Morgan Brown5
Which of these Merriam-Webster definitions for "normal" are we actually discussing here?

1
: perpendicular; specifically: perpendicular to a tangent at a point of tangency
2
a : in accordance with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle
b : conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern
3
: occurring naturally
4
a : relating to, or characterized by average intelligence or development
b : free from mental disorder: sane
5
a regarding a solution: having a concentration of one gram equivalent of solute per liter
b : containing neither basic hydroxyl nor acid hydrogen
c : not associated
d : having a straight-chain structure
6
of a subgroup: possessing the property that every coset produced by operating on the left by a given element is equal to the coset produced by operating on the right by the same element
7
: relating to, involving, or being a normal curve or normal distribution

***

I find it difficult to align myself with your assertions.

Why does calmness carry a desirable connotation while excitement does not? Without excitement, in a broader sense, there is no procreation. I assume you would agree that procreation is a normal and positive phenomenon in the observable world.😁

Harmony and disharmony? Is there a mathematical formula that can indisputably determine disharmony?

Indian classical and spiritual music is full of irregular rhythms, so by your logic, is it also unnatural? Are Ravi Shankar and Zakir Hussain creating abnormal music?

And why is catharsis considered desirable and normal?

I don't think you quite caught my drift. I was just making a broad distinction between harmonics and disharmonics—natural versus unnatural. It isn't about personal opinion; it’s about the natural laws that even classical music is woven into... things backed up by studies from American scientists over the last 50 years, and even by the work of Masaru Emoto regarding water crystallization. That's the fundamental difference I was pointing out. It's not about whether it's inherently good or bad, just what it means to have that effect...

***

ironharbor8 said:@ Morgan Brown5
Which of these Merriam-Webster definitions for "normal" are we actually discussing here?

1
: perpendicular; specifically: perpendicular to a tangent at a point of tangency
2
a : in accordance with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle
b : conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern
3
: occurring naturally
4
a : relating to, or characterized by average intelligence or development
b : free from mental disorder: sane
5
a regarding a solution: having a concentration of one gram equivalent of solute per liter
b : containing neither basic hydroxyl nor acid hydrogen
c : not associated
d : having a straight-chain structure
6
of a subgroup: possessing the property that every coset produced by operating on the left by a given element is equal to the coset produced by operating on the right by the same element
7
: relating to, involving, or being a normal curve or normal distribution

***

I find it difficult to align myself with your assertions.

Why does calmness carry a desirable connotation while excitement does not? Without excitement, in a broader sense, there is no procreation. I assume you would agree that procreation is a normal and positive phenomenon in the observable world.😁

Harmony and disharmony? Is there a mathematical formula that can indisputably determine disharmony?

Indian classical and spiritual music is full of irregular rhythms, so by your logic, is it also unnatural? Are Ravi Shankar and Zakir Hussain creating abnormal music?

And why is catharsis considered desirable and normal?

I'm not expecting anyone to agree with me. A plurality of opinions is healthy, provided there's actual substance behind them. I'm not claiming what I've laid out is some urgent priority today—mostly because it's impossible to fix, much like the ozone layer above us...🙂

ironharbor8 said:@ Morgan Brown5
Which of these Merriam-Webster definitions for "normal" are we actually discussing here?

1
: perpendicular; specifically: perpendicular to a tangent at a point of tangency
2
a : in accordance with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle
b : conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern
3
: occurring naturally
4
a : relating to, or characterized by average intelligence or development
b : free from mental disorder: sane
5
a regarding a solution: having a concentration of one gram equivalent of solute per liter
b : containing neither basic hydroxyl nor acid hydrogen
c : not associated
d : having a straight-chain structure
6
of a subgroup: possessing the property that every coset produced by operating on the left by a given element is equal to the coset produced by operating on the right by the same element
7
: relating to, involving, or being a normal curve or normal distribution

***

I find it difficult to align myself with your assertions.

Why does calmness carry a desirable connotation while excitement does not? Without excitement, in a broader sense, there is no procreation. I assume you would agree that procreation is a normal and positive phenomenon in the observable world.😁

Harmony and disharmony? Is there a mathematical formula that can indisputably determine disharmony?

Indian classical and spiritual music is full of irregular rhythms, so by your logic, is it also unnatural? Are Ravi Shankar and Zakir Hussain creating abnormal music?

And why is catharsis considered desirable and normal?

I’m not making any grand claims here; I’m just talking about how these two extremes hit me personally. To be honest, music centered on decay, blood, and death doesn't do anything for me. At the same time, I don't feel like I need loud music just to get worked up. Don't get me wrong, there are incredible moments when blasting high-energy tracks with good friends gets the adrenaline pumping... but that's just a physical rush. It's like someone getting a sudden jolt from listening to black metal. It creates friction, sure, but there's no spiritual depth to it... 🙂

The kind of calm I’m talking about... I see it more as our natural state. Friction isn't natural; it's just external noise hitting the nervous system without any spiritual depth. And I don't mean being passive or checking out from reality—which is what most music tries to do—or becoming numb and indifferent. I mean a sense of fulfillment. That quiet happiness and genuine life energy that this kind of music brings out in you. It gives you this mental clarity that actually helps you solve problems. It lets you take a break from all that constant brain chatter and anxiety... that messy, unstable emotional rollercoaster most people ride through their entire day. Those thoughts usually bubble up from the subconscious and you just can't shake them. If those negative thoughts weren't there, we'd all be infinitely better at everything we do... even when we're feeling excited. That's the dimension of spiritual music. Other music just doesn't have it...

ironharbor8 said:@ Morgan Brown5
Which of these Merriam-Webster definitions for "normal" are we actually discussing here?

1
: perpendicular; specifically: perpendicular to a tangent at a point of tangency
2
a : in accordance with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle
b : conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern
3
: occurring naturally
4
a : relating to, or characterized by average intelligence or development
b : free from mental disorder: sane
5
a regarding a solution: having a concentration of one gram equivalent of solute per liter
b : containing neither basic hydroxyl nor acid hydrogen
c : not associated
d : having a straight-chain structure
6
of a subgroup: possessing the property that every coset produced by operating on the left by a given element is equal to the coset produced by operating on the right by the same element
7
: relating to, involving, or being a normal curve or normal distribution

***

I find it difficult to align myself with your assertions.

Why does calmness carry a desirable connotation while excitement does not? Without excitement, in a broader sense, there is no procreation. I assume you would agree that procreation is a normal and positive phenomenon in the observable world.😁

Harmony and disharmony? Is there a mathematical formula that can indisputably determine disharmony?

Indian classical and spiritual music is full of irregular rhythms, so by your logic, is it also unnatural? Are Ravi Shankar and Zakir Hussain creating abnormal music?

And why is catharsis considered desirable and normal?

For sure, but I don't really do math, so I can't help you much on that front... 🙂 Harmony is fundamentally rooted in mathematics. Even though water or plants don't follow mathematical formulas, they still respond to harmonics—to what is naturally resonant. The entire universe operates on this principle of synchronicity, a sort of universal harmony. You can see this clearly in the scores of Bach and others, but even someone without a musical background could pick up on it if they were just a bit more sensitive... It shows up in humans too, through all our physiological cycles. Think about how biological rhythms align, like how menstrual cycles have historically been linked to the phases of the moon. We’ve drifted away from those natural patterns lately, but you can still see the traces of it. Practically the whole ecosystem, everything known and unknown in the cosmos, is interconnected in complex ways. I can't think of specific examples right this second, but it's all there. People are connected to one another in ways we don't fully grasp, and our thoughts have a direct impact on health and the well-being of the planet itself...

ironharbor8 said:@ Morgan Brown5
Which of these Merriam-Webster definitions for "normal" are we actually discussing here?

1
: perpendicular; specifically: perpendicular to a tangent at a point of tangency
2
a : in accordance with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle
b : conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern
3
: occurring naturally
4
a : relating to, or characterized by average intelligence or development
b : free from mental disorder: sane
5
a regarding a solution: having a concentration of one gram equivalent of solute per liter
b : containing neither basic hydroxyl nor acid hydrogen
c : not associated
d : having a straight-chain structure
6
of a subgroup: possessing the property that every coset produced by operating on the left by a given element is equal to the coset produced by operating on the right by the same element
7
: relating to, involving, or being a normal curve or normal distribution

***

I find it difficult to align myself with your assertions.

Why does calmness carry a desirable connotation while excitement does not? Without excitement, in a broader sense, there is no procreation. I assume you would agree that procreation is a normal and positive phenomenon in the observable world.😁

Harmony and disharmony? Is there a mathematical formula that can indisputably determine disharmony?

Indian classical and spiritual music is full of irregular rhythms, so by your logic, is it also unnatural? Are Ravi Shankar and Zakir Hussain creating abnormal music?

And why is catharsis considered desirable and normal?

I agree, and I keep coming back to this idea... my best litmus test is how something reacts when it’s part of a whole without losing its essence. Take water, for instance—how it crystallizes and stuff like that. Even if we’re talking about Sufi or Vedantic singers, it doesn't necessarily mean the instrumentation itself carries the weight. The point is that the messages in spiritual music are healing; after all, spiritual music is often cited as the peak of expression during the Classical and Romantic eras. It really comes down to the vibrations of those musical accompaniments and whether they have a positive impact, especially since modern interpretations can vary wildly even with traditional pieces. But anyway, you're questioning me like I'm some kind of expert, rather than just offering my usual thoughts... 😁
I'm no expert, and I never will be. I'm just trying to wrap my head around what this actually means and why. But honestly, there are certain guidelines here. The whole thing with water tells me a lot, much like those ideas from Plato or even Aristotle regarding catharsis.

ironharbor8 said:@ Morgan Brown5
Which of these Merriam-Webster definitions for "normal" are we actually discussing here?

1
: perpendicular; specifically: perpendicular to a tangent at a point of tangency
2
a : in accordance with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle
b : conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern
3
: occurring naturally
4
a : relating to, or characterized by average intelligence or development
b : free from mental disorder: sane
5
a regarding a solution: having a concentration of one gram equivalent of solute per liter
b : containing neither basic hydroxyl nor acid hydrogen
c : not associated
d : having a straight-chain structure
6
of a subgroup: possessing the property that every coset produced by operating on the left by a given element is equal to the coset produced by operating on the right by the same element
7
: relating to, involving, or being a normal curve or normal distribution

***

I find it difficult to align myself with your assertions.

Why does calmness carry a desirable connotation while excitement does not? Without excitement, in a broader sense, there is no procreation. I assume you would agree that procreation is a normal and positive phenomenon in the observable world.😁

Harmony and disharmony? Is there a mathematical formula that can indisputably determine disharmony?

Indian classical and spiritual music is full of irregular rhythms, so by your logic, is it also unnatural? Are Ravi Shankar and Zakir Hussain creating abnormal music?

And why is catharsis considered desirable and normal?

No one is claiming it's inherently "desirable," but look at Aristotle. Despite how radical Plato was being with his arguments for restricting art and other forms of expression—basically wanting to ban anything that provokes too much emotion—Aristotle offered an explanation for the cathartic experience of, say, a drama. Plato would have simply banned such plays because he thought they triggered negative thoughts through internal psychological struggle and projection. But Aristotle points to that almost deeply experiential, educational moment that comes from experiencing catharsis. Back then, performances were experienced on a different level—something more mythic and psychologically profound. To give you a bit of a laugh... it's like that story about when a movie projector was first brought to a small town in the Midwest. Right at the start of the film, during a scene where a train is filmed heading straight toward the camera, the entire theater emptied out. Kids were running for their lives because they genuinely thought the train was coming right at them. 😁

ironharbor8 said:Eurythmics - There Must Be An Angel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCdneDxFRYQ

Turkantam - om namah Shivay blues

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBX1zEP6f1E

Janis Joplin - me and Bobby McGee

http://youtu.be/c7CtqwyxHM0

Sabri Brothers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4C2ufrnmN1w

Fleetwood Mac

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WriBVGuxQI

Ravi Shankar

Deuter

Hariprasad Chaurasia

Urmila Devi

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XSrpfVWdkk

By the way, what defines "normal" music versus what we'd call "abnormal" songs or compositions?

In the broadest sense—think pure harmony versus dissonance. Most music produced today falls into that dissonant category: irregular rhythms, clashing melodies, and so on. Sure, that’s one way to split it. But if you look at how water or living organisms react to specific frequencies, they would gravitate toward that tiny 0.001% of truly harmonic sound.

It isn't about following musical conventions, though. Maybe Plato wanted to achieve that kind of order in his ideal Republic to protect the human soul from this exact issue—though he likely factored in other arts too...

Still, I see a massive connection between two completely opposite extremes:

On one hand, you have truly spiritual music that radiates. It produces energy vibrations that actually benefit a person. Because it comes from someone with immense energetic capacity, a listener might feel physically refreshed, notice better circulation, find calm, or feel their thoughts aligning with the will of the Unknown. You get this internal warmth just by listening... nothing else required.

Then there’s something negative, almost mentally taxing, like certain popular horror-themed subgenres. Even if the musicians behind black or gothic metal are technically skilled, the themes are destructive. They tend to attract young people who are already predisposed to that mindset. I'm sure it gives people an adrenaline rush, but for actual spiritual or personal growth, I think it's pretty useless. Just my two cents, of course.

There is a long spectrum between those two points that we loosely call "Music." Personally, I’d say only that top 0.001% is true Music. Everything else is just some deviant sonic state that mirrors our own deviations in consciousness and the subconscious. As a musician myself, I end up creating something in that middle ground... trying to trigger a cathartic effect, though I'm not entirely sure how successful I am at hitting that target...

Jacob Sanchez7 said:Dredg, Karnivool, Cynic, mus, Nine Inch Nails, Tool, Porcupine Tree. That’s the list. Straight to the point.

Are these what > would call "Luciferian"... bands that supposedly tap into spirituality? 🙂

Take Tool, for example. I don't think this has anything to do with spirituality if you define spirituality as something purely positive. Sure, they touch on the occult, but true spirituality should be about elevating the soul... it shouldn't lead to pain, suffering, or brain tumors. It should do the opposite. You could argue the drummer—and likely the rest of the band—are influenced by things like Krovli, but that isn't spirituality. It’s just the human tendency to poke at the darkness within ourselves. You see it in Krovli's tragic end, which is actually pretty rare among highly evolved people, and you hear it in Tool's "sick" music. And I'm not talking about their talent. They're a legendary band with incredible musicality and performance standards. They have plenty of creativity... and then some.

Robert Diaz2 said:I guess the real question is how much of that positive vibe is actually just baked in with all sorts of subliminal messaging and stuff like that. I used to listen to Frank Ocean too, and honestly, he was amazing. But lately, I’ve just been leaning more towards total silence.

There’s this old saying about how Lucifer was basically in charge of the music in Heaven back when he was still there. The idea is that when he fell, the whole frequency of music fell with him. Now, you shouldn't generalize everything, obviously, but looking at the current music scene, I don't really feel like listening to much of it.

In my opinion, music hits your emotions and your ego in a way that ties you down to this physical existence. And neither of those things is really what we should be focusing on, I suppose. So, yeah, I don't know. 🤷

There isn't a Lucifer in this universe, though I haven't heard anything about any other universe existing either. Our subconscious minds are already so overloaded that some specific subliminal message isn't going to make much of a difference. Sure, it might affect your mood, but it's not the core issue. That doesn't even compare to the much more frequent occurrence of our own toxic emotions—life situations, dissatisfaction, sadness, grief, and various kinds of stress. They all pull in the same direction, impacting our entire being.

That said, there are certainly plenty of dissonant pieces out there, making up 99.9% of today's music. Those who stuck to Platonic principles of harmony gave us Classical and early Romantic music. And since we know from how water reacts to vibrations that original music is structurally the most natural, it's similar to certain Hindu or Buddhist mantras and things like that.

When it glitches, it just glitches... 😁

A real optimist 😁

Anthony Perez9 said:If he actually said that, it’s some pretty interesting pantheism, kind of like Einstein's vibe. 👍
It’s got nothing to do with God, Jesus being crucified, Allah, or any religious holy books out there.

Honestly, I have no clue where you got the idea that Tesla had anything to do with dogma in the first place. 😕

He did look at Christianity—specifically those underlying moral principles woven through it regardless of its formal structure—as a sort of religion of the future, blended with Buddhism.

You don't even need to use the word God; that term is already tied up in Christian tradition anyway. Beyond all the talk of pantheism, there is just a single mover, which is natural induction within a unified philosophical system... much like the concept of a singularity in theoretical physics.

“Aristotle taught that there is an unmoved Entelechy in the universe—the driving force behind everything—and thought is its primary attribute. I hold the same conviction: that the entire cosmos is interconnected, both materially and spiritually. There exists a core within the universe from which we draw all our strength and inspiration; it exerts a constant pull on us, and I can feel its power and the values it radiates to the rest of existence to maintain universal balance. I haven't unlocked the secret of this core, but I know it’s there. When I try to give it a physical form, I think of it as light... and when I attempt to grasp it spiritually, it manifests as beauty and compassion. Anyone who carries this faith feels a sense of strength. Their work becomes a source of joy because they feel themselves to be just one note in the grand, universal harmony.” Nikola Tesla

Anthony Perez9 said:(XX)

No matter how "inspiring" this sounds to the New Age crowd, attributing these words to Nikola Tesla is a total lie.

If this was signed by some anonymous person, it might actually mean something, but as it stands, it's just more sugary nonsense that has zero connection to our famous Ličanin.

And it definitely has nothing to do with God, who doesn't go around sending out "knowledge"—true insight comes from within the human being.

I never claimed God sends down knowledge, and I'm not claiming it now. If anything, I'd argue God has nothing to do with man in a direct sense. But seriously, just pick up his autobiography and read what the man was actually talking about...

"Life is a rhythm you have to learn to recognize. I feel that rhythm, and I navigate by it, letting it carry me... It’s incredibly grateful, and it’s given me everything I know. Everything that breathes is tied together by these profound, beautiful connections: humans and the stars, an amoeba and the sun, our own hearts and the orbits of infinite worlds. These bonds are unbreakable, yet we can learn to work with them, shaping new relationships in this world without destroying the old ones. Knowledge flows from the cosmos; our vision is its most perfect receiver. We possess two sets of eyes: the earthly kind and the spiritual kind. We should strive to make them function as one. The universe is alive in all its forms, much like a sentient creature. A stone is a thinking, feeling entity, just as plants, animals, and people are. A shining star is looking back at us, waiting to be seen—if we weren't so caught up in ourselves, we might actually understand its language and its messages. A person must align their breathing, their sight, and their hearing with the breathing, sight, and hearing of the universe."

(Nikola Tesla)

Anthony Perez9 said:Give it a rest already, for God's sake! 🙂 🙂

The text was written by American poet and playwright Stevan Pešić: "Tesla or the Angel's Adaptation".
So, it's just someone's fantasy.

Here’s what someone who studied his work for years has to say about Tesla—apparently, they're considered the leading expert on him globally. Our own opinion stays way out in the cold, no matter how much we disagree.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_3pb...eature=related

God, the sheer amount of nonsense and rambling coming from your "great" guy... it's enough to give you a headache.

THE DARK WIZARDS AT CERN!
😂

A textbook case of paranoia and conspiracy theories.
Your compatriot is unwell. Tell him to get some help.

Stevan Pešić actually drew inspiration for this drama from a real interview... back in 1899, Nikola Tesla sat down with "Immortality" magazine at his lab in Colorado Springs to talk shop...

A wiki-persona really ought to put in a bit more reading if they actually want to learn something. The way this guy is going about it is just unprofessional... see you at the next exam cycle. 😍

Anthony Perez9 said:Give it a rest already, for God's sake! 🙂 🙂

The text was written by American poet and playwright Stevan Pešić: "Tesla or the Angel's Adaptation".
So, it's just someone's fantasy.

Here’s what someone who studied his work for years has to say about Tesla—apparently, they're considered the leading expert on him globally. Our own opinion stays way out in the cold, no matter how much we disagree.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_3pb...eature=related

God, the sheer amount of nonsense and rambling coming from your "great" guy... it's enough to give you a headache.

THE DARK WIZARDS AT CERN!
😂

A textbook case of paranoia and conspiracy theories.
Your compatriot is unwell. Tell him to get some help.

Maybe if I could actually take you seriously 🙂 .. wiki-persona

Benjamin Taylor6 said:

Morgan Brown5 As I was saying—and I do mean this with the utmost sincerity—it’s like we’re all just stumbling through the dark without a flashlight. People seem to think that everything is straightforward, but if you actually sit down and look at the mechanics of how things function, you realize how much we've overlooked. It reminds me of that one time back in Chicago when I was trying to fix my old radiator—just a complete mess of pipes and outdated logic—and I realized that most people would rather ignore the leak than actually learn how the pressure works. We see the surface, sure, but we miss the underlying structure. It's frustrating, honestly. You try to point out the obvious connections, the way one thing inevitably leads to another, and you get met with blank stares. It's enough to make a person want to just walk away from the conversation entirely.
And you’re doing the exact same thing—just projecting your own "conspiracy theory" labels onto everyone else. It’s funny, really—how people always jump to that conclusion whenever someone presents an idea that doesn't fit their narrow little worldview. I remember back in college, sitting in a lecture hall in Chicago, watching some professor dismiss a perfectly valid scientific inquiry just because it sounded too radical for the status quo... it's a tired pattern. You see it everywhere. Instead of actually engaging with the substance of what's being said, it's much easier to just slap a label on it and call it a "theory" to shut down the conversation. It's lazy, frankly. 😕

Catch you later, my friend.

An interview with Nikola Tesla from 1899 (excerpt)

...

JOURNALIST: You told me that I, just like every other living creature, am Light. I have to say, that’s quite the compliment—though, if I’m being perfectly honest, I’m still trying to wrap my head around what exactly you mean by that.

TESLA: Why on earth should it even be obvious to you, Mr. Smith? Honestly, you just need to have faith in it. Everything—and I mean everything—is Light. Within a single beam of that radiance lies the entire destiny of a people; every nation carries its own unique ray within that massive, blinding source we perceive as the Sun. And please, for heaven's sake, remember this: no human being who has ever walked this earth has truly died. They haven't. They simply transitioned into Light, and in that state, they continue to exist. It’s all right there in the mechanics of it—the secret lies in those particles of light returning to their original, primal state.

JOURNALIST: Now that is what I call a resurrection!

Tesla: Personally, I prefer to call it something else—I see it as tapping back into one of our primordial energy sources. Christ and a few others certainly held that secret close to their chests. I’ve spent my life hunting for ways to preserve human energy; after all, it's just another form of Light, sometimes indistinguishable from the supreme celestial radiance above us. I haven't been chasing this for my own ego or any personal gain—goodness, no—it's for the collective good. I truly believe that once my findings come to light, they will make life significantly easier and more bearable for everyone, ultimately nudging humanity back toward spirituality and moral clarity. — "Per aspera ad astra"

...

Based on what Tesla said, you really have to conclude that he was a follower of Rudolf Steiner. It points to one thing—he was an anthroposophist.


Science hasn't just been stuck in the realm of the physical for a long time now—it’s been poking around non-physical phenomena for ages. I’ve heard people claim that massive amounts of taxpayer money have been poured into this—specifically for those weird military parapsychology programs they run behind closed doors. But honestly? Looking at the actual data, the results are nothing short of pathetic. If any of these "experts" were actually onto something, someone would have walked away with a million dollars by now... and let's be real, nobody has ever handed that kind of cash to Randy.

Anthony Perez9 As if I haven't heard this all before—it’s like listening to a broken record. Honestly, I’ve spent far too much time sitting in my study, nursing a lukewarm cup of coffee, reading through these endless threads only to find the same tired arguments resurfacing again and again. It’s exhausting. You think you’re finally making progress, digging deeper into the actual substance of a discussion, and then someone comes along with this half-baked perspective that lacks any real foundation. It’s frustrating, truly. I remember back when I was working in Chicago—just a simple job, nothing fancy—and I dealt with people just like this every single day. They’d walk into the room with such unearned confidence, insisting they were right despite having absolutely no data to back it up. It’s a pattern. A predictable, wearying pattern. And frankly, I'm getting a bit tired of playing the role of the one who has to point out the obvious flaws in these logic loops. We should be aiming higher than this, shouldn't we? Instead, we just circle the drain.
Tesla never actually said that—nor did he ever put it down in any of his writings. Honestly, people love to attach these wild, sweeping statements to him just to make their own arguments sound more profound, but if you actually dig through his papers, the claim simply isn't there. It’s one of those things that gets repeated so often you start to believe it's gospel, but let's stick to the actual record, shall we?

🙂 This is just some ridiculous hoax cooked up by some New Age liar—something naive theists love to spread all over the internet, along with countless other absurdities. 🙂

What we actually know is that the man himself, Nikola Draganić, known as Tesla, supposedly toyed with the idea of becoming a priest for Mr. Jesus (if you believe his autobiography)—though he’d have withered away like a dried-up plant before ever stepping foot in a church. And he spent a great deal of time associating with the great atheist Mark Twain; yet, there isn't a single record of him praising God, mentioning any Mr. Jesus, or bowing down to some Greek or Hindu deity.

Which brings us right back to the point about the blindness, ignorance, and sheer superstition of so many people who claim to deal with God while expecting Him to perform on command...

Why so much, Morgan Brown5?

You have to realize that "New Agers" aren't some monolith. They believe in parapsychology, sure, but that doesn't mean they all believe in God. You can absolutely be a New Ager and an atheist. In fact, some are pretty hardcore atheists. Just look at this guy in the picture: 😁

There is no God but Man. God doesn't exist, but humanity does.

It's not like American institutes or academies give a damn about Randy. 🙂

The guy isn't bothered by skepticism, just like thousands of others aren't...

He was focused on something else entirely through the messages he was sending...