Posts by Keith Miller30

Ashley Bailey6 said:What kind?

Absolutely terrible. He’s so underwhelming that even someone like Josipovic would look like a winner by comparison, and I only brought up Josipovic because he’s the last person on Earth I’d ever vote for, even under duress. ☕

Does anyone actually want to head over to YouTube to watch Kujundzic grill that guy William? It was honestly painful to witness, almost like watching a 330-pound man try to race Usain Bolt in a 100-meter dash. Roughly 80% of the questions posed to him were brushed off as "secondary," leaving him perpetually evasive; he’s just plain rude. He claims he’ll dismantle the banks, stop all foreclosures, somehow represent 500,000 ghosts, and insists the entire US system is corrupt—it’s all just pure nonsense. Kujundzic really gave him a hard time, though I can't help but wish Josipovic and Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović had been there to completely tear him apart.

Well, he actually seems quite likable to me. Why don't you bring him back?

I find myself strongly opposed to the idea of Grandpa returning to the Forum, as his presence simply doesn't sit right with me. May I ask that my perspective be given some serious consideration?

If everyone can just agree that CR is the greatest soccer player of all time, then perhaps you can consider bringing him back.

Ashley Bailey6 said:Make them unrecognizable.
Then, and only then, call the psychiatrist.

Noah Ross7 said:Maybe a psychiatrist will have to step in and beat some sense into them if they don't get their act together ☕

🤣

Kale, the true master of time.

Peter Thompson4 said:Look, I’m still absolutely floored by this movie. I don't even know how to put it into words, but everything just clicked for me—from the dialogue to the visual storytelling, including that intentionally grueling, slow burn at the start and an ending I totally didn't see coming but was genuinely happy with. Every single main character has their own deep-seated motivations, which makes even the "villains" feel more like protagonists in their own right.

Honestly, I went in expecting something completely different and got blindsided, but man, I loved being blindsided.
It’s so much easier to just be a hater and nitpick every little thing, but I was having such a blast.
Still a solid 10/10 for me.

Seriously, I am beyond satisfied with this film.
I'd recommend it to anyone. Even my friends who usually hate movies said it was great, giving it at least an 8/10.

Just don't go in there with a bunch of preconceived notions or massive expectations; and yeah, forget about hitting up the AMC, it doesn't make sense to go anywhere else (I was there yesterday alone) because you're going to have a blast regardless. Just clear your head and let the movie take you along for the ride.

As for the runtime and how long it lasts.
Trust me, if a movie is actually good, I don't care if it runs for five hours. Time absolutely flew by for me yesterday and I was actually bummed when it ended.
Now, don't get me wrong, I generally hate movies that drag on forever because most modern films don't even earn their 120 minutes, let alone anything over that, but here, something is happening practically every single second.

Oh, and one more thing. Yesterday was my first time heading to the AMC in a while, and damn it, I immediately ran into the biggest idiot in cinema history. This guy was just constantly whining from the trailers all the way through the first 20 minutes of the film (after that, he just did these weird hand gestures 😁). Is that the kind of moron that frequents theaters these days, or did I just happen to sit next to the biggest clown alive on my first outing? 🤣

I might have been exaggerating a little bit, but if it really is as good as you say, then I think we'll make a trip over to the AMC Theater this Tuesday. Even though I haven't actually looked up what the movie is even about, I'm not planning on checking. We'll have Interstellar on Tuesday, maybe Fury on Wednesday, and then we still need to find time for Gone Girl, Dracula, and whatever Jennifer Lawrence is in now. We'll try to squeeze them all into the week. ☕

Peter Thompson4 said:So I just got back from my trip to Tokyo and my head is absolutely spinning, but honestly, who cares because Interstellar is hands down the greatest movie ever made 🙏 🙏 🙏
My god, thank you Nolan, thank you Matthew, thank you for this masterpiece. Seriously, I’m giving this a 15/10. It was pure, unadulterated perfection. Those three hours felt like three minutes flat. The entire theater was a sobbing mess. It was freaking magic.

YOU ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO SEE THIS IN THEATERS. That sound design 🙏 🙏 🙏, man, you could practically lose yourself in the audio; it’s so vital to the experience that I highly doubt watching it at home could ever feel even remotely close to this. I'm officially taking a break from movies because I need a week just to process this, and honestly, what's the point of watching anything else after seeing this?

It’s a bold take, sure, but hey, nothing ventured, nothing gained

Interstellar > 2001: A Space Odyssey

I waited so damn long for this, I spent forever anticipating it, and man, it paid off big time. Absolute madness

Yeah, yeah, it’s always like that; after a big performance by someone like Bruno Mars, everyone is suddenly claiming he’s the greatest singer on the planet. Give me a call when you’ve cooled off a bit. ☕

Robin Fox2 said:Affleck is basically a god, and his take on Batman will undoubtedly be the finest we've seen yet. For starters, he’s actually the only one who looks the part...☕

Sign me up; Affleck is easily in my top three. 👍

Robin Fox2 said:That new Planet of the Apes movie was an absolute disaster... just utterly pointless 🙏

I’ll sign my name to this once more, because I honestly find this new installment to be incredibly dull; it really is quite a disappointment. Wouldn't it be better for everyone if you simply went back and downloaded the older films from the franchise instead? I’ve spent most of this year catching up on them all, and they truly are far superior.

Is there anything quite as hauntingly profound as the original 1968 vision of *Planet of the Apes*? When you sit down to watch it today, does it not feel as though the film is staring directly back at us, questioning the very foundations of our own civilization? It remains a masterclass in speculative storytelling, weaving a sense of dread and wonder through its desolate landscapes that few modern blockbusters could ever hope to replicate. One has to wonder, if we were to stumble upon such a world tomorrow, would we even recognize our own failings reflected in those primate eyes? It is a cinematic landmark that lingers in the mind long after the credits roll.
Is there anything quite as hauntingly atmospheric as the descent into madness found in *Beneath the Planet of the Apes*? Released back in 1970, this sequel manages to capture a sense of cosmic dread that most modern sci-fi epics fail to even touch, doesn't it? While the first film laid the groundwork for the fall of humanity, this installment pushes us much deeper into the psychological fallout, forcing us to confront the terrifying possibility that our own destructive impulses might be an inescapable part of our DNA. It’s a heavy, sweeping journey through a dying world, and one can't help but wonder if we aren't still walking that same precarious line today.
Is there anything quite as hauntingly beautiful as the desolate, sweeping landscapes found in the 1971 classic *Escape from the Planet of the Apes*? While many dismiss it as a mere sequel, I find myself returning to its quiet, philosophical depths more often than I care to admit. There is a certain melancholy in the way it explores the fragility of civilization and the heavy burden of being a messenger for a future that hasn't happened yet, isn't there? It avoids the frantic pacing of modern blockbusters, opting instead for a slow, deliberate build that allows the weight of the characters' isolation to truly sink in. Does anyone else feel that the film’s true strength lies in those moments of contemplative silence, where the vastness of the world seems to dwarf the struggles of the individual?
There is something profoundly unsettling about revisiting the 1972 classic *Conquest of the Planet of the Apes*, isn't there? While many prefer the more polished, modern iterations we see today, I find myself returning to this particular entry because it captures a very specific, gritty kind of tension that feels almost visceral. It moves away from the grander, sweeping allegories of its predecessors and instead settles into a much more claustrophobic, politically charged atmosphere. The film leans heavily into the concept of systemic oppression, portraying a world where the hierarchy is enforced through brute force and cold, calculated cruelty. It makes you wonder, doesn't it, how easily the thin veneer of our own societal structures might crack if the power dynamics were suddenly inverted? There is a certain heavy, somber quality to the pacing that allows the dread to settle in, rather than rushing toward the next action set piece. It’s a slow burn, focusing on the quiet desperation of those at the bottom of the ladder before the inevitable explosion of resentment occurs. Even decades later, the themes of rebellion and the cyclical nature of tyranny feel strikingly relevant to the American experience, reminding us that history often has a habit of repeating itself in ways we rarely anticipate.
Is there anything quite as hauntingly beautiful as the desolate, dust-choked landscapes found in the 1973 cinematic masterpiece, *Battle for the Planet of the Apes*? While some critics might argue that the franchise lost its footing after the initial triumphs, I find myself wondering if we haven't overlooked the sheer atmospheric weight this particular chapter carries. It possesses a certain melancholic grace, doesn't it? Even as the story navigates the inevitable friction between man and ape, there remains an underlying sense of quiet tragedy that lingers long after the credits roll. One can’t help but feel a strange sort of empathy for the characters caught in such a sweeping, existential struggle, as if we are all just drifting through the wreckage of a civilization that once stood tall. It is a slow burn, perhaps, but isn't the most profound storytelling often found in those quiet, contemplative moments of transition?
Does anyone else find themselves revisiting Tim Burton’s 2001 take on *Planet of the Apes* lately? While it certainly didn't capture the exact same lightning in a bottle as the original classics, there is something undeniably captivating about its visual scale and that sweeping, melancholic atmosphere it tries so hard to establish. I often wonder if we judge it too harshly simply because it wasn't a carbon copy of the 1968 masterpiece, or if the narrative deviations were truly as jarring as most critics claimed at the time. It’s a film that feels like a fever dream—grand, ambitious, and perhaps a little lost in its own spectacle—but isn't there a certain quiet beauty in how it attempts to reimagine such a foundational piece of science fiction?

It is worth noting that Linda Harrison—better known to many as Nova—possessed a certain unmistakable quality that set her apart.



For those who appreciate a good laugh, I find myself frequently revisiting the Pink Panther series; there is something truly timeless about that run of films spanning from 1963 through 1993, wouldn't you agree? 🙏 Peter Sellers 🙏

slyfalcon26 said:Interesting stuff here.😁

There really isn't much to debate here; the individual in question hasn't exactly been a saint, and I sincerely hope justice is served according to the law.

I’m not quite sure what your intention was in starting this thread, but if you were hoping to make a sweeping generalization, then I don't think that's quite right. Shouldn't we focus on individual guilt rather than painting everyone with the same brush? We can't possibly stigmatize an entire community because of one person's actions, just as we wouldn't judge every priest based on the actions of a few predators, or hold an entire political party responsible for the crimes of a handful of corrupt officials.

What color is the exterior siding?

Well, now...

Drone, how have you been lately?

Matthew Anderson4 said:Why’d you guys shut this down?

Doing some cleaning?

I love drones.

shadowheron49 said:Hey everyone.
I feel like the people here actually know how to give real answers, and while this might belong in a general vent thread, this is more about my mental state, so I’m looking for some "deeper" advice.

It all started ages ago, meeting someone online—honestly, the biggest illusion ever created.
I met this guy, and we spent so much time messaging back and forth; even though I have a totally grounded life offline, he had such a massive impact on me that after all those months of his advice, his photos, and our endless talks... he became a genuine part of my reality.

He became... someone incredibly important to me. So important that at first, it was just "falling in love," but eventually, that word didn't even begin to cover what I was feeling...

But... we never actually met...
There was never an opportunity for anything to happen...
And then our connection just snapped, suddenly and likely forever...

The thing that’s destroying me right now is this: He isn't here, and technically, he was never even "there"...
yet the fallout from him is everywhere, especially inside my head.
I had a few relationships before him... and I never thought of myself (at least, I didn't) as someone who suffers too much or stays stuck for too long...
But now... I am truly hurting.
That entire long stretch of time was just a mirage; everything I wanted was a fantasy, every dream I had about finally seeing him was just... a hallucination. It all feels as surreal as a dream.
I can't get over it, and I can't forget him...
More often than not, just when I think I've finally moved on... I dream about him...
I'm just... hurting. I'm suffering and I don't even know why—is that even possible?

Because of that illusion... him... I can't seem to fall for anyone else, because nobody compares to him.
Subconsciously, I find myself measuring every guy against him... and nobody even comes close to him... to the illusion.
I'm not some immature kid; I'm in my mid-twenties, and if I'm reacting this irrationally... I just don't know how to help myself.

He’s left me with an unanswered question...
a dream that never finished playing out...
like a single square of chocolate left from a whole bar...
an unfinished story...
Will I be stuck in this agony forever?
In this illusion?

I'm terrified of that... it would be the ultimate punishment...
How do I wake up from this fantasy?
How do I just keep living?

Is this even normal?

This might seem trivial to you, but please know it isn't; the answer to your question can be found in the song by Drazen - break the chain. 😉

Sarah Nguyen96 said:I just need to get this off my chest.
Honestly, I’m struggling with the feeling that I just have zero luck in life.
I always dream about hitting it big on a lottery ticket. I played for a couple of months, but I eventually quit because I actually save more money when I don't play. Then I tried poker for two days. No luck there either, so I stopped. I even gave roulette a shot a few times with some small change, but nothing happened. Even when it comes to romance, it's a total bust, despite a few brief flings here and there.
The only thing I have going for me is my job, but I really don't want to spend my entire life working for someone else. Why does the universe feel like it's against me? What am I supposed to do?

Well, now I am not entirely sure. Perhaps there is something I should be doing about it, or perhaps there isn't.

Here is how I handled it: Start → Computer → C: → Format...

And now everything is running perfectly smoothly.

Playing in that defensive midfield role instead.

swifttiger75 said:I really don't see why Saint Anthony himself would need to moderate the Religion subforum. After all, the community is built by the users, not by the moderators or even the super-moderators. I read the Religion section quite often, even if I don't post much, and the real issue there is that you have lost sight of the Human element. You seem to have forgotten that the letters you are typing on your screens belong to actual people.

Between the endless debates over God, political factions, radicals, various social issues, and everything else under the sun... you've completely forgotten basic decency: Please, Thank You, Here You Go, and I'm Sorry. You've lost touch with humanity itself.

Trust me, every moderator wants to spend as little time actually moderating as possible.

The bird has flown the coop!

It just isn't right; it simply isn't normal for the Religion subforum to lack a single moderator who actually holds a faith. Do you realize how absurd that situation truly is?

There were three moderators, and all three of them were Atheists. I reached out to Meadow via private message to ask for some clarification, and I finally understood why things were set up that way. While Meadow and Birdie are perfectly fine people, having an Atheist—someone who subtly insults believers, provokes others while offering hollow congratulations on the Christmas sun, and actively pushes against faith—moderate the Religion section is essentially like placing a white supremacist in charge of a forum dedicated to racial equality.

But honestly, it doesn't even matter anymore, because most people have migrated to a different forum, leaving this particular subforum to drift wherever it may.

Harold Kim5 said:You really need to settle this within the next year while the Democratic Party is still in power; they might be complete amateurs, but at least they launched a sports inspection that actually produced results capable of causing real headaches, and more importantly, they amended the non-profit laws—which some Republicans were calling Mamić's law because it was clearly targeted at him. As incompetent as these folks may be, the Republican Party would never have implemented those two specific measures against tata HDZUSRC... If this isn't resolved in the coming year, once the Republican Party returns to power, who knows when we'll ever see any movement on it again.

Exactly, you hit the nail on the head. 🙏 🙏 🙏

The Democratic Party absolutely tore him apart. 🙏 🙏 🙏 They passed the legislation. 🙏 🙏 🙏

So why on earth hasn't your precious Democratic Party removed him yet, now that they have all the legal tools at their disposal? 🙏

Don't you realize that the Democratic Party could get rid of Mamić whenever they felt like it if they truly wanted to? Do you understand that? Does it not stand to reason that if he isn't being removed, it's because someone is looking out for him? Can't you see that they are moving toward privatization precisely during the Democratic Party's term?

But privatization won't happen because there are legal barriers in place, so nothing will come of it. Even if, by some miracle, the first steps toward privatization were somehow pushed through, wouldn't they just be easily challenged in higher courts?

Kenneth Perez15 said:The mere fact that we’re basically the only country on the planet clinging to these specific (Vatican-style) agreements speaks volumes about the sheer brilliance of our politicians—specifically those who made such a "magnificent" decision in the first place, followed by the ones refusing to revise it, put it to a referendum, or just scrap it entirely. I mean, how does the KC in America manage to self-fund? How exactly are they being compensated or reimbursed for property lost during the communist era—through the gifting of entire buildings—while they simultaneously lean on local authorities and parishioners to pony up cash for crumbling churches and religious sites? It leads to the pretty logical conclusion that taxpayer money is just an added bonus for them. Given how they called for Americans to be handed over to Germany from the pulpit, I suspect they wouldn't find it particularly difficult to reorganize church funding according to their own particular model. It might actually be worth supporting the Labor Party's initiative regarding a church tax.
One more thing. During that recent referendum campaign—the one about marriage that the Church backed so enthusiastically—there was this constant refrain that the minority (homosexuals) were "terrorizing" the majority with their demands. Now, it's worth asking: why is it that this very same "majority"—the ones who don't want to directly fund the church—is so intent on terrorizing the minority that refuses to fund the church, whether directly or indirectly?

And who is actually saying they don't want to pay?