Posts by Daniel Davis40

urbangull90 said:Back on April 29, 2019, in a now-closed thread over at PŽK, I wrote the following.
I would just add that the "Raw food" thread is inherently problematic when people start preaching that eating raw plant-based diets can cure cancer. Tweaking recipes isn't an issue—in fact, it's encouraged—and it’s certainly not a real concern when someone includes cocoa powder under the umbrella of Raw food.

The actual issue arises when verifiable, scientifically backed evidence is presented to debunk a flawed idea, yet the person pushing that idea continues to promote it recklessly and without restraint. And then, you have the sycophants joining in—some of whom clearly have serious mental health issues.

But the single biggest failure here is the complete lack of moderators to actually step in and bring some order to this subforum.

SF

Look, on one hand, thanks for acknowledging that cocoa powder isn't something worth making a huge deal about. But on the other hand, please show a little sensitivity and recognize when it is or isn't appropriate to tell forum users they have mental health problems. We are all trying to see if we can find common ground and establish some semblance of normal communication here—so everyone gets what they want (some get a quiet corner to discuss their interests, while others get a space free from things that bother them). Resorting to insults isn't going to help anyone right now.

Alternative Treatment enthusiasts? 🙂

Mark Cruz15 said:^Those pseudo-alternative types should generally stay far away from quackery. They need to stop posting about anything that actually puts people's health at risk. Since they aren't going to stop on their own—obviously—this subforum desperately needs a moderator.

Alright, could you please be more specific about what exactly you're defining as quackery? Because someone else pointed out that, by your logic, suggesting a cup of chamomile tea instead of an aspirin for a headache could be considered quackery. How are we supposed to draw a line here?
I’m talking specifically about the context of the topics being discussed there—things like Raw food and such.

Jerry White29 said:Regarding the whole Raw food topic—look, publishing recipes is fine by me. If people want to try them, let them. To be blunt, I call Elizabeth Jackson’s recipes "blender recipes" because everything involves a blender; it basically boils down to sipping various colored liquids. But generally speaking, I don't have an issue with it. It could be interesting to write about how people feel after these meals—or better yet, provide the actual macros, like how many carbs, fats, and proteins are in a specific drink. In my view, everything is acceptable right up until someone starts preaching about miraculous cures. That is where I draw the line.
When it comes to Alternative Treatment, I absolutely cannot stomach those claims of "miraculous healings" from Veroljub in Jagodin and all that nonsense. On the flip side, discussing herbal teas, tinctures, medicinal herbs, or even toxic plants is perfectly fine—nature is incredible and possesses unique properties, and to me, that constitutes a legitimate alternative.
Here is an example... if someone has a headache, instead of reaching for Aspirin, you might suggest a certain tea. I think you get what I'm getting at.
An "alternative" isn't claiming carrot juice is identical to human blood, or that pigs carry cancer; an alternative isn't suggesting that when someone breaks an arm, they should just drink some blender recipe from some quack or guru (to use a caricature here)...
I believe you and I understand each other quite well, and I am almost certain that what I have written here aligns with your own views.
When you switched over to Raw food, I never once told you it was stupid—not publicly, not in private messages—in fact, I actually asked how your energy levels were since I eat plenty of Raw food myself. But I don't think it's some magic bullet. Nor do I promote the food I eat as being the best in the world, unlike Elizabeth Jackson, the quacks, and their pseudo-alternative brotherhood who do exactly that.

Everything written above is simply my opinion; those of us who aren't part of that pseudo-alternative brotherhood hold diverse views and different ways of thinking.

Thanks for the reply.

So there it is. I'd also welcome input from others who aren't part of that pseudo-alternative crowd if they have anything to add regarding what bothers them about this kind of writing.

And likewise, I'd love to hear from those in the "brotherhood"—would they find this level of scrutiny acceptable?

Jerry White29 said:The issue isn't about ten apple seeds—it's the fact that they’re citing "scientific studies" that don't actually exist and have never been published anywhere. And Elizabeth Jackson, that quack, and Guru, they're just throwing links out there—and here I am, still calling out this "scientific research" nonsense... They are lying to sick people, and that is dangerous.

Of course there’s a decent way to handle this, but only with people who react like actual adults. After my posts calling out Leeni's utter nonsense—things like apple seeds, carrot juice, and human blood—Elizabeth Jackson, that hack, and Guru started rambling and making these pathetic excuses, claiming they weren't the ones writing that garbage. Fine, maybe they can try their little word games with Gnuujninestrin or Rorion and the rest of that crowd, but they aren't pulling anything past me. Sorry, but I've got far too much education to let anyone try to sell me a load of crap.

What I find truly fascinating is how nobody from that whole pseudo-Alternative crowd wants to take a definitive stance on this. I’ll ask again: for those of you who follow Elizabeth Jackson, that quack, and Guru—do you honestly believe a person can synthesize Vitamin C from nothing but carbohydrates and water?
You see, even this question—which I've posed to basically every single pseudo-alternative follower—has gone unanswered. Except for Bone, but he was drunk and started rambling about concentration camps instead...

Alright, rather than going through my opinion on every single point individually (because once I start, it'll be way too long), what do you all think would be considered acceptable to post on that subforum? What should be allowed and what shouldn't, so we can finally stop the mockery, the insults, and the trolling? I want to know how a group of people can actually sit down and have a peaceful conversation about things they care about.
(If someone could practically list some examples of what's a "NO" and what's a "YES"—for instance: sharing personal experiences, stories from famous people, stories from strangers, anonymous accounts, signed testimonials, something read online, specific types of advice, or personal opinions provided there's an explicit disclaimer that it's just the view of a layman, etc., etc.)

I'm talking specifically about the Alternative Treatment PDF.

Or, if there’s another constructive suggestion for finding some common ground (assuming you don't find my idea of listing everything out unacceptable).

briskwalker10 said:😲

I really hope you went ahead and deleted all those dick pics of mine! I was actually sitting here wondering why you weren't responding... 😲

🤣

Ethan Brooks59 said:You don't have one, she doesn't have one, but you guys sure are eager to take shots at other people's wives and kids. Or their personal choices. But the moment someone calls you out on it, suddenly you're cranking out six replies in a row—just to play the victim. You aren't living in the 19th century; your behavior is practically sub-human, on par with Homo Erectus.

But since we're actually discussing clones here, let's clear something up: do you honestly think Monism and I are the same person?

Good grief, do you seriously believe children are just some tool used to "call people out"? 🤦
Now it's finally obvious why you were making them up in the first place.

You're the one disrespecting everyone else's life choices (and honestly, how many times are you going to project your own actions onto others?), while we're simply pointing out the blatant inconsistencies and contradictions in your arguments—not to mention the sheer absurdity of dragging this into a thread about nutrition.

If you want an example of actual disrespect toward someone's choices: I’m guessing your professional life is a total wash, considering how much you brag about a wife and kids you've clearly never even seen outside of a tent.

But I didn't say that to you, because I realize not everyone has the luxury—or the goal—of having a decent career.

Ethan Brooks59 said:As you can see, Daniel Davis already proved you wrong. So, Gnuujninestrin—you’re full of it and you're lying, just like you always do. Is there actually anything you say that's even remotely believable?

The fact that you directed that at Lorelei instead of me doesn't make the insult any less disgusting. And it certainly doesn't make Gnuujninestrin a liar, since anyone can easily verify exactly what you wrote. Honestly, I have no idea how you have the nerve to claim something like that.

stormyrider28 said:Or when the forum regulars... Leeni was being incredibly disrespectful—acting like they could just mock someone for being unable to have children. It’s absolutely uncalled for.

It wasn't me mocking you—it was Lorelei. And honestly, that whole attitude seems like a massive inferiority complex to me; the kind of thing people spout when they haven't actually accomplished anything in their own lives, so they feel the need to lecture others on how many kids someone "should" have to be considered a functional human being. It’s as if he thinks we’re still living in the 19th century—where women are expected to just churn out children simply to satisfy the outdated expectations of some old-fashioned folks back in a small Midwestern town, as if that should be their entire purpose for existing. He clearly hasn't checked a calendar lately. We live in the modern US; women actually have the agency and freedom to decide for themselves whether they want children, how many they want, and at what stage of their lives they want to have them. It isn't 1850.

Jerry White29 said:😬Oh, come on—don't even go there. If you ask me, I’ve been nothing but civil here... let's not start lecturing me about "conclusions" or "logic" now.

Look, whether people want to admit it or not, any post worth its salt—especially those that aren't just mindless filler—ultimately boils down to one thing: pure logic and sound reasoning.

Take a look at who actually started this thread... Brenda Gonzalez12 was probably referring to that moment when Elizabeth Jackson—acting like some kind of self-appointed medical guru—claimed that the two of us were clones. Even she admitted later that we couldn't possibly be clones, since our writing styles are completely different.

I have no idea what he was likely referring to—all I see is my own name sitting there in parentheses (and, mind you, right at the very front of them). 😍So, let me get this straight—you’re actually claiming that I’ve been going on for months about how everyone mentioned here (that includes you, Sus Ferox, and several people I don't even recognize) is just one single individual? Give me a break.

Go ahead and read what I wrote again. That was my actual proposal to Elizabeth Jackson—the self-proclaimed doctor and "guru"—but of course, he shot it down because he knows damn well I’m telling the truth. Arthur Smith15 and I aren't clones, for heaven's sake.

Look, that’s between you guys—I have no intention of getting involved in that mess.

As far as I know, there aren't any legal restrictions on having multiple connections—that’s just how the law stands—but don't go thinking that means ISPs have actually changed their rules. They haven't.
I think you're mistaken.

Look, I’m no tech expert—this isn't exactly my area of expertise—but here’s the bottom line: if someone is running two different phones on two separate networks just to maintain two distinct clones—one for each persona—are you actually suggesting that forum admins could reliably flag them as a single user?

Look, I never tolerated you being part of this pseudo-alternative brotherhood to begin with...

Honestly, I have no idea who decided to just drag my name into this mess without asking—I only realized what was happening when I saw I’d been tagged in this thread.

I have to disagree with you there. In my view, spreading pure nonsense is actually incredibly dangerous. Look, there’s certain grade of idiocy that Peter Peterson puts out—whether he's stone-cold sober or as drunk as he is today—but honestly, that’s beside the point. It doesn't change the fact that it still carries weight.
Look, when you start seeing these articles claiming people can magically cure cancer in just a few months simply by eating ten raw apple seeds a day—that isn't just misinformation; it’s straight-up dangerous.
Look, you know perfectly well that I couldn't care less what anyone else puts on their plate—honestly, it’s none of my business. I even asked you directly how your energy levels have been since you made the switch to raw food. I truly don't give a damn about someone else's diet. What actually gets under my skin—what really irritates me—is this blatant hypocrisy where people peddle fake "magical" cures while simultaneously demanding scientific proof for the benefits of raw eating, all while they spend their time spitting on actual science. It's infuriating.
And please, try to be civil.

You’ve mentioned twice now that it's "dangerous." Seriously? What exactly is dangerous about ten apple—or was it apricot? I can't quite remember—pits?

Personally, I don't believe that (ill) people are somehow cognitively impaired; everyone knows what works for them and what they won't tolerate. People have the right to choose. But fine, I get that this bothers some people—though I’ve never actually written like that. I just shared my own personal experiences while I was on raw food, both the good and the bad.

What really gets under my skin is this idea that the end justifies the means—it's being taken way too far here. There is a perfectly reasonable way to explain why you disagree with someone. You pointed out those non-existent scientific studies and other points you had, which, in my opinion, made for a much more effective statement than the rest of the group. Fine. But instead, people here have gone on a total witch hunt, inciting and justifying things that are frankly indefensible. In my view, they are doing more harm to the very cause they claim to support.

Jerry White29 said:It’s honestly fascinating how the pseudo-alternative crowd just stays silent. It’s a dead giveaway regarding the quality of the clones they're posting about—it’s blatantly obvious they’re lying. Plus, you could easily conclude they’re terrified of a clan audit, because if there actually were one, most of that pseudo-alternative lot would be sent straight to the Ban Corner.

And apparently, your ability to draw conclusions has been hitting a bit of a slump lately, too.

1. Brenda Gonzalez12 is lying (as usual)—because I never once claimed that all the users mentioned were a single person, and I certainly haven't been trolling with that angle for "months."

2. Why on earth would an accusation of cloning be grounds for a ban?

3. If someone isn't posting from the same device or the same IP address, how are the forum owners even supposed to know if they're clones or not? Therefore, any "proof" offered here is completely worthless.

Maybe that’s why the pseudo-alternative crowd hasn't spoken up—they'd rather jump on nonsense and play the victim against someone who is, frankly, an embarrassment to the moderators for not being permanently banned already, given what he's written. Some people actually have lives and don't intend to spend their entire existence babysitting a forum... and it's not because they're scared.

monty-zg said:The only orgasm you’re clearly getting out of this. 🤦
When your friends fall deathly ill, or when relatives pass away after wasting away from carcinoma.
You probably ended up in a grave alongside some "unloving father" who abused you, too. 🤦
A total psychopath at work...

And those sucking up to him—well, they make you wonder about their character.

monty-zg said:And you aren't quite sharp enough to realize (due to being completely unhinged, obviously) exactly where you've gone wrong in this story. Your lack of intelligence—mixed with the trauma of losing your innocence and the inability to have children—clearly points to a massive amount of frustration. But don't worry, once GNU bites, the pain will be over. Or maybe you'll get lucky. Why don't you go argue with GNU over on Hazel. You're just polluting this thread here. ☕

Do you people honestly think it serves your interests to let someone who has sunk to such depths of hell roam this forum unchecked?

Come on, let's be real—shouldn't this be a permanent ban?

(P.S. These posts are on Alternative, under the Prehan thread, just to make the whole thing even more bizarre)

Honestly, I don't care; the rest of us women were driven off this forum ages ago because we have zero interest in logging into a PDF just to read garbage like this—I'm just letting you know so nobody can claim they weren't warned. 🙂

I have no idea how the moderators are going to handle this—and frankly, I don't care to influence them one way or the other. This isn't my forum to run, so they can let it be whatever they want it to be, regardless of my opinion.

As far as I’m concerned, I could never forgive this. I don't care if they apologize a hundred times; there is absolutely no justification for a sane human being to write something like that—honestly, I don't even have a word in my vocabulary to describe it. I've dealt with insults, people jumping down my throat, and plenty of vulgarity before—and I've moved past all of that without needing an apology—but this? This is non-negotiable.

I truly cannot fathom what kind of person fails to see the difference here, or chooses to pretend they don't. That was my thought when I mentioned that I knew more about this than this individual ever will—even at eight years old—because no decent person would ever say something like this, whether they were eight or eighty-eight. And certainly not regarding my own chemotherapy treatments. It really shows just how little brainpower was behind those comments.

Regardless, my stance remains the same: a normal person would never say something like that, no matter the circumstances. And yet, they keep doubling down on the same accusations, just softening the language slightly—swapping out "dead mother" for "emotions" now.

—But for what? Just so they don't have to admit they know less about chemo than I did when I was eight? (Which, for the record, is something I never said and never intended to imply.) That's their motivation? Well, if that's considered "normal" behavior, then bravo.

At the end of the day, a person always reveals their true character.

Roger Cooper91 said:Look, please stop taking our conversation out of context by selectively cherry-picking posts and rearranging them out of order.

Let the moderators handle this—they need to actually read this entire thread carefully, starting from when you absolutely lost it just because I was skeptical about how a child could possibly be qualified to make medical diagnoses—which led to you pushing dangerous theories about medical treatments—and ever since then, you've been spewing insane nonsense about me and hurling insults.

I’ve said it before: my heart goes out to your mother, but I am not going to let you drag my name through the mud and insult me while hiding behind her memory.

This is exactly the kind of provocation I'm talking about—is there actually a rule on the books regarding this behavior?

Roger Cooper91 said:And there she goes—that lying queen of drama is back to clinging to me again, even though we are clearly over and done with. 🥱

Roger Cooper91 said:Do you even realize how monstrous you look right now? You’re essentially weaponizing your own mother’s death just because you ran out of actual arguments—all because offering a sincere apology for misinterpreting my words would be too much of an ego blow for you to handle. Honestly, I’d be too ashamed of myself to behave like this—dragging the memory of my loved ones through the mud just to cover up a lie.

Roger Cooper91 said:No, I don't find it right—it just doesn't feel right to me—to use my mother's death like this.

Roger Cooper91 said:Besides, you’re the one who kicked this off by banking on that whole "smug satisfaction" effect—hiding behind the excuse of your late mother just to avoid having to actually tell the truth for once.

Roger Cooper91 said:And yeah, you completely glossed over the chemotherapy part—not that I need you to explain it to me, since I know firsthand exactly how brutal that bile-inducing nausea can be—but fine, let's just lean into the misery and crank up the "sniffle effect" if that's what we're doing.

l

I wanted to ask whether this kind of provocation is actually permitted on this forum.

The provocations definitely landed—and frankly, I agree that I’m being sanctioned for insults too (though my opinion of that individual remains absolutely bottom-tier).

I realize I messed up by bringing personal matters onto a public forum—I genuinely thought I was dealing with a decent human being.

But what I really want to know is: because of my own lapse in judgment, am I just expected to sit here and take this kind of garbage? Is there any actual rule in place to protect users from such brutal provocations, or is this just how things work now?

As for Nica, I haven't lost my mind or anything, but I really don't feel like sitting here explaining myself right now—and honestly, what would be the point? There’s this bit of graffiti over in Dubrava that says "time will tell" (I can't quite remember the exact wording, by the way).

Brenda Gonzalez12 said:Quote : Exotericon

Thanks so much for the offer regarding your profile, but honestly, I’m good! I don't really need it. To be fair, I find myself using my own profile less and less lately too. I just have much more important things to do with my life than sit around here bickering with random no-name accounts. It feels like there are fewer and fewer people worth paying attention to—people you can actually have a real, meaningful conversation with about any topic under the sun. Unfortunately, it seems like the place is becoming increasingly crowded with people who just use the internet to dump all their life frustrations because they can't find anything useful to do in the real world. But hey, despite all that, I still hold onto the hope that there are still some decent folks out there!

Look, I think I see where you're getting tripped up. When I bring up certain topics, you just can't seem to handle it because—let's be honest—you struggle to put together a coherent response. It feels like your only goal is to play bodyguard for him! Even though he already knows (or maybe someone just whispered it in his ear) that he totally blew it by serving that pasta at the "raw food" event. And then, in the very next post, they immediately started backtracking! They began trying to correct themselves, arguing that eating cooked food is actually perfectly fine. Same here! Honestly, just read that part again—how he claims it all happened "on its own," totally unprovoked and out of nowhere. It’s wild!
Look, if we need to do this just to keep the quality of the discussion high, then fine by me! Honestly, the guy realized he messed up. He basically admitted he bit off more than he could chew, and once you own your mistakes like that, we can all just get back to the actual topic at hand. It’s not even about attacking him personally—it was just a bit of a tangent, but now we can finally move on! Hey there! Just wanted to say hi! That’s just not clear at all.

Honestly, he doesn't even need a lawyer for this. You’re just playing the part of his defense attorney from one post to the next! Do you actually know what he's thinking, what he's saying, or what he was even trying to get at? You're out here defending his views like it's your full-time job. Vauuu, you're quite the genius, aren't you? What exactly are you trying to "prove" here? If you want to make a point, try writing an actual on-topic post where you explain the "why" behind your stance. Instead of just echoing him with stuff like "that's right," "it's great," or "exactly what he said," give us some substance!
😒

Check out this thread! It looks like you might have hit "send" a little too early! I wasn't quite sure what you were getting at there. If you have a specific post or some text you want me to work my magic on, just toss it my way! I'm ready and waiting to give it that fresh, upbeat, and totally original American flair. Let's get to it! Look, regarding Exotericon—the thing is, he was actually the one who steered this whole conversation off-track into off-topic territory first. And now you’re out here defending him again (totally unnecessary, if you ask me) in just your second post on this thread! Honestly, do you even need a link to prove that? Because I definitely remember how it went down. And what about when things started getting heated over how the thread was being moderated? You didn't say a single word then! Neither did Gregory Ramirez2. But suddenly, when it comes to this, it doesn't bother you at all, does it? Huh? I'm dying to know... why is that?
Look, you just can't. That’s the sad truth of it. You're being incredibly selective about what you see and how you respond, which honestly makes you look more pathetic than funny. It's like you don't even have a real stance on anything!

Even Leena, the very person who started this whole thread, has completely backed down now. It’s honestly a little embarrassing to watch—she ended up acting almost exactly like that guy, Exotericon, whom she’s been constantly complaining about all over Reddit. She’s gone from criticizing him to throwing around insults and profanity himself! It’s such a shame, really.

Honestly, the only smart move was to just put that guy on mute. Everything was perfectly peaceful when nobody gave him any attention, because then his nonsense just falls flat. But apparently, some people actually enjoy running around slapping everyone left and right in these threads! 😵

Monty, where do you get the nerve? We’ve seen through you. It’s blindingly obvious that you’re posting under the name Biljka, Exotericon, and at least a dozen other aliases. Under two of those, you posted the most vile, vulgar outbursts imaginable—one of which was heavily quoted in the first post of this thread, and the other was deleted (though a screenshot exists), yet you lie and claim you never wrote it. It's clear even you realize how wrong that was.

I never directed a single vulgarity at any of your personas or anyone else. I am not some primitive hillbilly, and I don't have that in me. I don't understand how you can lump me in with you. You are a true manipulator, and you aren't exactly mentally sound, arguing with yourself across so many accounts and obsessing over a thread about raw food for years. One afternoon when you weren't around (after the "Biljka112" persona gave itself away with a clumsy mix of regional dialects), the atmosphere was actually wonderful. We were having great discussions and exchanging real thoughts and experiences. Clearly, that doesn't suit you; you're just envious and want to ruin everything because you can't stand seeing people happy.

Look, I’m not backing down—I have absolutely no reason to—but you are honestly so pathetic and spineless that I'm done. There's really no point in staring into an endless void of madness when there are much better things to focus on in this life.

It isn't just about them chasing higher engagement metrics—it's more calculated than that. Nica is intentionally targeting specific users to make them feel insulted, all while maintaining this fake sense of "decency" by refusing to be vulgar herself. Then, she goes a step further by inciting other users against them and essentially gagging the moderators so they can't step in when certain insults fly.

And clearly, I’m not the only one feeling this way; plenty of others have already jumped ship. Honestly, who in their right mind would want to hang out on a platform that actively encourages people who clearly belong in some kind of high-security psychiatric facility?

Someone actually spoke the truth here, only to have their post nuked immediately. It’s obvious—they are terrified of the truth.

Look, I only date people who eat raw food—they just have much better breath.😁

briskbison55 said:I mean, if you check out the alternative sites, you'll see there's this specific group of people who are constantly posting links to these weird news outlets where 'experts' claim that a simple juice made of beets and carrots can cure absolutely everything—from chronic issues to bad finances and even bad breath.

Everyone naturally gravitates toward whatever pinches them most🤣
it's just a giant game of free association—which Freud already figured out, by the way

(Sorry, I couldn't help myself—it felt like a good joke. And honestly, there might be some truth to it)