CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Daniel Davis40 › Posts

Posts by Daniel Davis40

113 posts shown.

Banned user in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I suspect the reason nobody's saying anything is because of what Monty wrote.
Banned user in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jessica Morris6 said:Give me a break. Just a few days ago, Elizabeth Jackson explicitly wrote that eating raw food cures cancer. Where were those charlatanism detectors then, the ones that are supposedly always able to spot them? 🤦
The reason why people have stopped talking about that hemp stuff is because everyone has found it acceptable. Instead, everyone has jumped on the bandwagon of promoting these fraudulent methods, like: "eat this and cure that because I read it on this site," or things like non-vaccination. How many times does it have to be repeated to you people that actual human beings—real Homo sapiens—are reading these posts? Grow up, for crying out loud. Someone is going to die because they followed some one of your tips.
Moderator, if one even shows up, the only real option is to bring in someone from the outside, someone who isn't active on this subforum. The reason is quite simple: right now, there isn't a single high-quality member here capable of handling it. For instance, a certain person comes to mind who moderates an alternative group and seems okay at first glance, but it would be tasteless of me to name names right now.
As far as the currently active members go, everyone is biased. That goes for the members active in the Alternative Medicine and On the Edge of Science subforums; as for the rest, I couldn't say.

Well, people die from chemotherapy too (certainly not from fruit), so the moderators on the Health PDF are also "biased" and won't allow anything related to alternative medicine there, forcing people to move to the Alternative section instead. Same thing happens in Natural Sciences. Personally, I think that's fine.

I think, purely for the sake of fairness, the Alternative PDF should receive equal treatment. If it were run the way you’re suggesting, what would anyone even be allowed to write in Alternative? Hemp oil? Since doctors prescribe that now, it isn't even "alternative" anymore—so that would be it?
Banned user in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Look, I get it—finding a moderator is a nightmare these days. It’s getting harder to find anyone willing to work for a standard American salary, let alone deal with this. And even if someone actually has the spare time to volunteer, they’re probably going to pick something that looks better on a resume—at least that's my take. Maybe others don't see it that way, but it’s obvious to me why more and more sub-forums are being left completely unmoderated.

But honestly? That's no excuse. You can't just let slimy, vulgar garbage be posted all over the Forum without any pushback from the people in charge. This stuff is showing up in PDFs and threads that are being read by seriously ill people—people who have absolutely nothing to do with LJES.
Banned user in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Any updates here?

Look, I’ve already made it clear that I don't expect you to actually *do* anything—it's obvious enough that the rules don't mean a thing to you people. Message received.

But honestly, hiding behind silence and dodging direct questions is just cowardly. If you want to be fair—and let's be real, transparency isn't exactly your strong suit—you should just come out and state your actual policy toward alternatives. Just say it plainly: "We hate you, we don't want you here, you're freaks, and we want everyone to insult you until you never show your face on this Forum again." At least then we'd know where we stand.

I truly don't see why being honest is such a massive struggle for you. Hell, you could even just slide into my DMs to clarify things—I'd at least appreciate knowing what the deal is.
Banned user in Feedback & Suggestions ·
To the management,

It’s been ten full days since a user explicitly admitted to being a clone of a permanently banned member—so why hasn't a single thing been done? You’re just letting this stench linger, allowing him to pollute the very threads we participate in, which is exactly why the regular visitors have lost all motivation to show up.

The issue isn't just that he's a clone; it's the blatant disrespect directed at you:
If you want to ban me, maybe try getting on your knees for one of the admins—we all know you wouldn't have any trouble with that.

On top of that, he’s committed several egregious violations, including the intentional manipulation of content when quoting others:

not to mention leaking private messages:

When I reached out to the supermod Saba, she gave a standard response and promised to look into it. But after "consulting" with you, she simply locked the thread under some transparently flimsy excuse, and since then, there hasn't been a shred of follow-up from her.

I don't actually expect you to lift a finger about this, but could you at least be honest for once? What exactly is your connection to this individual, and what is your actual policy toward alternative viewpoints?

If you think driving engagement through conflict is the way to go—assuming that more gnus means more money in your pockets (at least for those of you on the payroll)—you are dead wrong. Both the alternative crowd and their critics have lost any desire to contribute, and he has successfully chased everyone away. We’ll all just migrate to a different forum. 😛 Or perhaps that was your intention all along...

I am making this post simply so the community can see how vulgar, unjust, and unprofessional you are, and to demonstrate that your rules clearly don't apply to everyone. Though, frankly, people coming over from other sites already knew that.
Hey, my CRP came back at 15.7—the lab says the normal range is under 5.
Everything else looks totally fine according to the reference numbers.
My doctor sent me off to get more detailed testing done to check my folate, B12, and Vitamin D levels.
Now I’m stuck reading online about how an elevated CRP can point to all sorts of different things.
I originally went to see her because of a sore throat.
I honestly have no clue why she's focusing on those specific vitamins instead of addressing the other possibilities.
Is this level high enough to signal something serious, or am I overthinking a number that isn't actually that big of a deal?
Alternative vibes again :) in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I don't have a clue—to me, this Exotericon guy seems fine, and I really don't think he's Monty.
As for Monty, he’s alright too, provided he doesn't start getting vulgar.
To be honest, I think you all are fine. 🙂
The only one who's a bit of a bore is placidtinker39.
Alternative vibes again :) in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Come on, stop messing around 😲
What kind of conspiracy theories and soap opera drama is this?
There’s absolutely no way—why, Monty?
Do you think they're going to shut this thread down or what?

Ugh, this is honestly getting to be too much.

Look, it seems to me that Exotericon has spent a massive amount of time studying those bones, while Monty seems way more focused on rocks, geology, and stuff like that—so why would he be diving into deep studies about those bones?

And did placidtinker39 even realize it's all the same person? 🙂
I’d actually love to see him talk to placidtinker39 the way placidtinker39 usually talks to everyone else—just someone provoking him for once, even if it turned out to be a clone.

And why did Bonecrusher suddenly vanish from the entire PDF? 🤔 Could that be connected to something else?
Though, he has such a distinct writing style, I don't buy that he's anyone's clone (at least not from that PDF).

Edit: Also, from what I can gather, it looks like Exotericon lives in England. At one point, I got the feeling he was trying to imitate Ethan Barrett22. That could also be a sign of acting.
Judging by the writing style, it looks like he's from a place like Miami or something similar (just like Monty). 😲
Alternative vibes again :) in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Roger Cooper91 said:Hey Nicole Johnson20, what’s your take on how Exotericon is treating me—do you think I actually deserve this kind of attitude? Oh, right, he's "yours."

You didn't deserve it; honestly, you're easily the most decent person to talk to on this board. 👍

But placidtinker39—well, let's just say 🙂, he finally found someone willing to give him a taste of his own medicine.

And who knows, maybe you've got some luck 🙂—I seem to recall a time when you got hit with two penalties back-to-back through no fault of your own.
Alternative vibes again :) in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Hey 🙂
It’s been a minute since we’ve seen any activity here 🙂

I just wanted to flag that your relative (or so I gathered from a previous thread) Monty has gone back to his old ways—posting absolutely disgusting, vile nonsense in the threads regarding alternative cancer treatment:

Honestly, you need a stomach of steel to read this kind of garbage. If any of us regular users were forced to sit through this stuff daily, we’d all head straight over to the NSFW subforums just to find some peace.

So, I’m asking you to please delete the post—do it for the author's sake, too, so he can stop embarrassing himself and pretend to be a civilized human being for a little while longer—or just lock the thread if this is the direction things are headed.

Thanks!
Quick Question in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Peter Peterson said:Why can't I access the thread in the banned users section regarding "again Sharp"?

I was actually trying to mount a bit of a defense for him.

You should have said you were going to defend him.
Look, Monty, you really blew it this time. Someone gave you some decent advice to just step away, but instead of taking the hint and refocusing on the actual topics at hand, you doubled down—getting even more aggressive with every single reply, basically screaming at them to "get lost" and stuff like that. And what exactly do you think people are going to do in response to that? Well, they aren't exactly going to "get lost" just to spite you.

Just another case where you need two people to have an actual argument—or whatever you want to call this mess. 🧐
Robert Fox78 - Look, I’m being serious here because I can tell you're a reasonable guy who just shows up to mess around with these topics. I find your sense of humor just as funny—honestly, I die laughing at some of your posts sometimes—and I’ve definitely jumped into threads on Reddit about stuff I know nothing about, just because the joke is too good to pass up. But I’ve noticed that for the crowd there trying to actually contribute constructively, it isn't a joke (they were polite enough to try explaining the context to me, and I just kept pushing back—saying things like "you need to think outside the box, this is useless to you," etc., but thank God I didn't 🙂 too much) and it's simply not right if you keep bothering the regulars. I'm talking specifically regarding Edge of Science.

On the Alternative PDF, there are certain threads where it's obvious from the jump that they're just trolls (though some people clearly don't get that, which makes it even more ridiculous); here’s an example in case you missed it—I think you'll appreciate it:

So, come on, can we please limit that kind of humor to specific threads where it actually fits? You know as well as I do that one great joke hits harder than dragging out a stupid argument with other forum members—once you start nitpicking over nonsense, it stops being funny and just becomes exhausting... Even Atlantic said he was fed up, saying "I'm too old for this." 🙂
Ethan Barrett22 said:So, your brilliant advice was to just ignore him instead of spending their entire lives writing endless essays about his every move—much like those endless Markov treatises. It’s also just wonderful that you suggested they shouldn't bother themselves with him at all. Truly top-tier advice right there.

Look, I initially agreed with your post before adding my own observations. If I overstepped by doing that, my sincerest apologies.

It seems you aren't really paying attention to this subforum because none of this is actually based on the truth.
Can you actually provide a link to anything that backs up your claim?

If you actually bothered to look at the threads Robert Fox78 posts in, you'd see he sticks to the topic—he isn't insulting anyone, he isn't attacking anyone, and he isn't picking fights. In fact, it's everyone else who does that to him simply because they can't handle a differing opinion or they dislike how he presents his views. They dogpile him constantly, yet the man hasn't broken a single rule. And that is precisely why he hasn't received a warning.

That is correct.

If you truly believe that, it's honestly concerning.

I have no intention of wasting my energy on these kinds of outbursts...
Hopefully not. 😁 I still go on raw food diets every now and then, so I'm praying they don't kick me out of the cult 😬
I have no idea what you think was "brilliantly stated" in my post—especially since you’re treating my words as if you agree with them, only to follow up with something I never even remotely suggested 🤷
.
The guy is clearly trolling, stirring the pot, and just wrecking discussions in the Edge of Science section. Just because nobody reacts doesn't mean a rule hasn't been broken—I've seen plenty of times where people react and yet no rules were actually violated
.
I'm sure you're aware of that, too, but you're being intentionally provocative here, which honestly isn't a great look for you
.
I’m being completely serious here—why on earth are you still giving him the time of day? The guy is clearly just bored and hunting for attention; as long as he keeps getting a reaction out of you, he’s got all the fuel he needs to keep this toxic cycle going. Stop replying to his posts—no matter how much he tries to bait you or drag you into an argument—stop putting his quotes in your signatures, and for heaven's sake, stop starting new threads about him. Just send a quick private message to the others and tell them to stay clear. If you actually cut off his oxygen, he’ll lose interest and vanish before you know it. We've seen this play out before.
Moderation on PDF: Alternatives to the Science Edge V forum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Roger Cooper91 said:Let’s get back to the actual reason this thread even exists.

Moderator, I appreciate you being so quick to hand out another red card—really, top-tier service—but I am still waiting for an explanation regarding this specific page of the thread. The user who prompted me to open this whole mess in the first place is currently running wild.

He literally attributed my sarcastic post to someone else—he actually quoted it as if it were them—and he’s still stubbornly insisting we’re clones. Just look at the typical trajectory of this conversation on this page:

I'm with you! It’s absurd—you start a thread practically begging for the biggest troll on the site to stop ruining discussions (which is exactly what Robert has been doing lately), and then some other user reports *you* because you called him an idiot. Some people simply don't care about whether someone is being reasonable or what their intentions are; they only care about ideological purity and endless bickering.

Jerry White29 said:I’m genuinely curious—are you actually incapable of connecting the dots here, or are you just typing for the sake of hearing your own voice?
Fine, let's try this one more time.
I suggest we take this to the super-moderator to prove once and for all who is whose clone.
If Monty and I are indeed the same person, then we both get a permanent ban. However, if it turns out we aren't, then you get the permanent ban.
See, a proposal exactly like this was made to that main charlatan and snake-oil salesman, Abraham. What do you think happened? Did he accept? 😁Of course not; he folded, just like he always does when faced with actual arguments.
So, GNU, are you going to accept this proposal, or are you going to chicken out like the rest of those loyal followers of the con artists?

Your writing style and Monty's are as different as night and day.🤷
Moderation on PDF: Alternatives to the Science Edge V forum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
It’s honestly exhausting how much nonsense people refuse to actually digest. Apparently, the issue isn't that he was calling her weak—it's that she actually stood up for herself. I mean, given what she had to say in that moment, anyone would be left absolutely speechless and totally stunned.
(not that I condone those fringe conspiracy theorists intentionally trying to bait her—and then actually bragging about how they succeeded in getting under her skin)
Moderation for PDF: Edge of Science II Alternatives in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jason Grant, you might not realize it—you probably think you’re just giving people a taste of their own medicine when they provoke you—but objectively speaking, your posts come off way more repulsive than anyone else on this board. Whether they’re pro-alternative energy or strictly against it, nobody else hits this low. Since you jump from one topic to the next, it honestly feels like you're just polluting this entire thread with some kind of toxic energy. Look, I have nothing against you personally—don't go thinking this is a vendetta—but I’m telling you plainly how it looks from the outside. Everyone else is out here debating the actual issues, even if they call each other stupid, uneducated, or corporate shills—which isn't right, obviously—but you’ve taken it to a whole different level by bringing mothers into it. You've genuinely soured the whole atmosphere, and frankly, it’s embarrassing to even read what you write—especially coming from someone who claims to be into alternative lifestyles and living in harmony with nature and all that.