Posts by Tyler Scott8

Jesse Campbell said:Can we please get some perspective here? Mamara is practically at the twilight of his career...

You’ve been spinning this same narrative for five years now.
Don't you feel any sense of shame?
When the owner finally moves on in five or ten years, you’ll be sitting there grinning like an idiot, smugly claiming you saw it all coming, while the club itself will be nothing more than a hollowed-out shell of its former self—assuming you haven't lost everything by then.

The truth is, the guy doesn't care one bit; he’s just mocking us, mocking you, and mocking everyone because he knows someone much more powerful is pulling his strings, leaving him to act as the owner's little puppet. Once he’s no longer useful, that owner will cut him loose within twenty-four hours, whether it's for a major scandal or something as trivial as parking in the wrong spot.

Is it going to be the final derby showdown, a massive unified protest, or just the end of organized fan culture as we know it?

Benjamin Bishop79 said:We acted just like those demons who took the cards back—we rejected the tickets from US Soccer entirely. We don't hold any grudges against the other fan groups, but honestly, you can't call us "US Soccer puppets" while simultaneously accepting their tickets, can you? It just doesn't make sense...

Who exactly do you think you are?

There isn’t much room for debate here; the whole thing was driven by the rivalry with Mexico, plain and simple.
If that weren't the case, you wouldn't see about twenty different guys from the Black Knights actively following every single national team match.
Now, obviously, everything comes with a price tag. For the vast majority, the matchup against Mexico provides more than enough motivation to just buy their tickets through the federation, essentially ensuring they stay indebted to them because the officials went out of their way to accommodate them. Does Mexico really hold that much weight? In my opinion, it doesn't.
Don't go selling out your principles. 😂

Gary Green32 said:This is exactly how that mindset works—that sense of ownership—and it is precisely why this divide between the North and the South exists. They view New York City as the ultimate metropolis, treating it as if it were the only part of America that actually matters. If the fans of a club from New York are the ones fighting against the mafia, then suddenly they are the only ones fighting, and they are always the first in line. It seems nothing else matters except what happens in New York City, as if history could simply be rewritten to suit them. But you aren't fooling anyone, you rogue. 😁

What exactly is this "Code," and what does our Hajduk represent? When did all of this truly begin? Who were the figures within Hajduk over all these years whose influence can still be felt to this very day? What is Joe, what is Sinovcic, who is the one pushing Bonacica, and who is Stimac?

What is the actual purpose of the Code? Before this existed, what was there—our Hajduk or the ZSD? Just how long has Mamic been running Real Madrid? How many titles have you actually celebrated alongside him? In the end, who is really pocketing the money? And who was it that used to boycott the big matchups?

I am not asking for an answer; I am merely suggesting that everyone take a moment to reflect on these questions.

If you had just stayed out of it, things might have been different. Sure, we’ve dealt with our share of nonsense, and it has taken us a long time to finally see clearly, to change, and to filter out the wrong crowd. But now, suddenly, we are standing against the mafia... we have reached our breaking point, and honestly, it is better to face this truth now than ever before.

But no. You show up with this kind of demagoguery, acting so arrogant, much like Zdravko Mamic during his peak. You know, the two of you are remarkably similar.

Signed, plus adding our Hajduk's fight against Mamic, his mafia, Males, and the corrupt refs.
There is just so much of it, whether Jesse Campbell keeps rambling on about it or not, and here I am, the fool, getting mixed up in it all.

And besides, were you really right when you claimed Mamic was finished? You have been talking about "tika-taka" and saying he was done for at least two years now. His time expired a long time ago, so technically, you are right. He will scrape through at least one more autumn in Europe and two more transfer windows, and once he has sucked everything dry, he will leave—whether by choice or by force—and then Jesse Campbell will finally be proven right. You are becoming a laughingstock.

coastalangler16 said:You see, you’re drawing lines again regarding who belongs and who doesn't, constantly emphasizing that divide. That kind of approach can really rub people the wrong way, can't it? It risks alienating everyone else. If we keep this up, we'll end up with just 500 "true believers" present while the rest of the stands sit empty. While I mostly agree with your sentiment, I don't think there's any need to fuel those arguments or keep pointing out divisions; as I've said before, what we really need is unity. We shouldn't be standing on the north end of the stadium, drawing a line in the sand and telling people, "you guys over here are the Raiders, but you over there aren't"... why is it necessary to tell people they aren't part of the core group or label them as "just some other kind of fan"? You should just live your life, yet you share the stands with people who, as you put it, are the "die-hard Dodgers fans" who show up every single time they are needed, providing the numbers and the mass presence, cheering and building the atmosphere for their club... because if 3,000 people show up to the stadium, and you decide that only 500 of them are actually the Raiders, do you really think it feels good for the others to hear someone constantly lecturing them that they are merely "casual fans" rather than being part of the Raiders? I mean, sure, you could maintain that distinction, but perhaps some things should be left unsaid for the greater good, just to ensure we don't ruin the positive atmosphere and the culture that took so much time to build...

You mentioned that "...but at least for me, the definition of the Raiders isn't just hardcore ultras"

And my response was simply my own perspective—that the only true Raiders are the hardcore ultras, while everyone else is just a Dodgers fan.
On that point, we more or less reached an understanding. There is no need to create division or draw arbitrary lines, but it is essential to know who is actually leading the stands.

The issue isn't quite what you're suggesting when you say: "... because if 3,000 people show up to the stadium, and you decide that only 500 of them are actually the Raiders, do you really think it feels good for the others to hear someone constantly lecturing them that they are merely 'casual fans' rather than being part of the Raiders..."; rather, the reality is almost the exact opposite. Those 3,000 fans often try to push their influence where it doesn't belong; they refuse to cheer unless everything is perfectly catered to them, and they question why changes are made when things seem fine, ultimately resulting in the actual leaders of the group being sidelined. In essence, they haven't contributed anything to the collective effort beyond just showing up, yet they are the first ones ready to comment, gossip, and stir up unnecessary divisions. That is where the real problem lies. Let's call these people the "500 true believers"—if that helps clarify things, though I dislike using such a term and certainly don't advocate for it—and despite having different views on certain matters, they will eventually find common ground.

coastalangler16 said:@mark my words

But if I may offer a different perspective, isn't there a tendency to conflate the very concept of being a fan with the specific ultra mentality? Even within our own stands, there are people who are deeply immersed in that lifestyle, though they certainly aren't the majority. You mentioned that a supporter shouldn't necessarily need to be able to name a single player on the Los Angeles Dodgers roster, but if someone has absolutely no connection to what happens with the club, can they truly call themselves a fan? Without that bond, isn't it just like cheering for any random team like some kind of programmed robot? Beyond that, I am quite convinced that when the students originally founded the NFL Ultras, their motivation wasn't to say, "Let's get rowdy just to cause chaos in the streets and show everyone how much we don't care about authority," was it? Rather, it was born out of a profound love for the Los Angeles Dodgers—to support the team wherever they play and to elevate the entire experience of being a supporter by bringing together the most loyal souls. The core purpose wasn't street skirmishes or an "ultra hooligan" blueprint. I won't point fingers at those who live that lifestyle twenty-four hours a day, as opposed to those who are less intense or simply follow a different path, because the stands actually require everyone. We need the group that handles the street presence, the pyrotechnics, the choreographies, and the atmosphere to keep the energy alive... you suggest that one feels early on whether they possess the ultra spirit, but for me, the definition of the NFL Ultras isn't strictly "hardcore ultra", but rather a fusion of everything I just described. A fan isn't inherently an ultra. If those who identify as ultras immediately distance themselves from those who don't, we create a rift, and what we truly need right now is unity... I just wish people would stop tearing each other down and instead give their all so we don't stagnate during times of such significant change. Whether anyone is for or against these shifts matters less than the fact that they are happening; we have to move forward rather than sitting in silence in the stands, mocking the efforts of those trying to engage the rest of us... I know I might sound like I'm rambling through a mess of thoughts, but I hope I've managed to explain at least a third of my reasoning clearly enough...

The first point you made hits the nail on the head regarding the issue. Every fan sitting in the North Stand thinks they are part of the NFL Ultras, but they aren't; they are simply Los Angeles Dodgers fans. Unfortunately, the events of the '90s are largely responsible for this shift, as that's where this narrative began, and it hasn't changed much today—where anyone who shows up to a game considers themselves part of the core group.

To truly be part of the NFL Ultras, you have to live that life 24/7, every single second, and beyond just supporting the Los Angeles Dodgers, you live for the group itself. It is exactly the "hardcore ultra" lifestyle you mentioned.
Once we finally draw a line in the sand and realize that we have maybe 500 true NFL Ultras, we can recognize that the other 3,000 passionate Los Angeles Dodgers fans can continue their support separately.

That second point is accurate, but then you aren't an ultra, period. You are just a fan.

p.s. It has felt a little slippery lately, seeing how everyone feels entitled to comment on these changes and push their own opinions. A little humility wouldn't go amiss.

Mark Carter10 said:So, I am currently deep in the books, trying to cram everything in before my exam tomorrow... it’s one of those long nights, isn't it? Just me, the coffee, and a mountain of notes. Wish me luck.
Is there anything quite as simple, yet as profoundly satisfying, as a thermos full of hot coffee? It’s one of those small, quiet rituals that seems to ground us, doesn't it? Just the thought of that warmth waiting for you whenever you need a moment to breathe. ☕ 🙂

steeltrucker said:I find myself wondering if we can truly grasp the depth of what it means to be a supporter, to exist within that shared space where passion meets identity? Is it simply about the game, or is it something far more profound, an unspoken bond that ties us all together regardless of our individual paths? I am genuinely curious to hear how others perceive this connection, as I feel there is much more beneath the surface than most are willing to admit.👍

😂😁

John Brown30 said:Let’s be honest, aren't we all neglecting our personal lives to some degree just to keep up with our fandom? It really isn't necessary to take things to such an extreme level. 😉

Honestly, we’re all just wasting our time here, aren't we? It feels like we're spinning our wheels and accomplishing absolutely nothing.
Is it really fair to say we're being neglected? When you look at the numbers, we’re talking about maybe twenty or thirty people who aren't fully stepping up, and even then, they aren't doing it one hundred percent of the time. Honestly, if I were to suggest that they are only neglecting their responsibilities fifty percent of the time, I think I would actually be overstating the situation.

It seems we simply hold differing perspectives on this matter, as I personally don't view attending a game as an act of neglect. One might choose to frame it as dedicated time set aside for the group and the club outside of match day, but since the vast majority of us enjoy a fair amount of flexibility in our schedules, it rarely ever becomes an actual issue; ultimately, it all comes down to one's own mindset.

steeltrucker said:Look, guys, stop with those mindless clichés. Yes, the Hell Angels come first for me, and the Los Angeles Dodgers follow right after. Don't try to tell me that people travel from places like Indianapolis or small towns in the Midwest just to support the Dodgers. Support which team? For heaven's sake, what are we even talking about here?...

But really, why else would anyone go?
Of course, everything else is a nice bonus, but the core reason—the Dodgers—has never been up for debate, and I sincerely hope it stays that way; otherwise, there’s honestly no point in showing up at all.
And while we're on the subject, it isn't exactly surprising that you hear so much buzzing and grumbling coming from the stands when half the crowd there clearly couldn't care less about the game.

To start things off, the atmosphere wasn't actually all bad, but there’s still this bitter aftertaste left behind when you realize we could have easily outshouted the Boys at our home stadium if everyone had just stepped up and given it their all.
I wouldn't go pointing fingers at the "donkeys" either; at the end of the day, they are part of the same fan base, and a little bit of respect goes a long way. These people braved sub-zero temperatures in the city just to show up and support the team, so I wouldn't blame them. It's not about blaming one specific group, but rather addressing those certain types of people who have spent years acting like they're somehow above it all, thinking they don't need to bother cheering. We saw quite a few of them in the South section yesterday, and it isn't just a one-time issue. That's a problem that needs to be directed elsewhere, not at the "donkeys." Honestly, in this whole situation, it's hard to tell who the real culprits are. 😉

As for the Boys... despite how much noise they tried to make, their turnout was honestly pretty underwhelming. The chanting was lackluster, though I will give them credit where it's due: the pyrotechnics were excellent. But looking at the big picture, they were a disappointment. I'm expecting the Armada to be on a much higher level than them this Wednesday.
Their message is absolute bottom-of-the-barrel nonsense; while they were busy taking payouts from the owners, we were out there fighting against the likes of Grgić, Schtimac, and the rest of them, effectively kicking off the fight against the football mafia here in America. It's almost laughable.

We keep moving forward, for the same old reasons.

It’s pretty clear he just misspoke and meant per week, so I don't really see why everyone is getting so worked up over such a minor detail. 🙂

If you’re looking at what to consume immediately following a workout, perhaps some chocolate milk might be a good 🤷

Joshua Davis98 said:Hey there...
I'm about 5'0" and weighing in at 165 lbs. I play soccer and do my strength training at home.
I'm thinking it might be a good idea to start taking some protein supplements.
I have soccer practice four times a week, and I hit all my muscle groups with strength training two to three times a week.
As far as my diet goes, I've got it pretty much dialed in.
I picked up a catalog for some Multipower products, and I'm torn between choosing a whey protein or a gainer—looking at the ingredients, it seems like the gainer might be the better route.
Could someone please help clarify what would be most beneficial for me to take? I'm open to any other supplement suggestions you might have.
Thanks.🙂

What makes you feel like you need to start on supplements in the first place?
And what kind of specific results are you actually hoping to see from them?

Thomas Cook54 said:You make a valid point; consuming extra servings really is just throwing money down the drain, considering the body can only effectively process about 35 grams of protein in a single sitting.
p.s. Look at you growing, man—you’re turning into a total beast now.😁

That guy from my old neighborhood reached out to me. 😁

From what I understand, serving more than 30g of whey protein per portion is essentially just wasting money, since that seems to be the upper limit our bodies can actually break down and utilize within a single window. I would love to hear from someone a bit more knowledgeable on the subject if they could confirm whether this is accurate.
+ As for my own routine, I typically go with a double scoop of glucose, which works out to roughly 30g of whey paired with about 60g of glucose... though sometimes I'll add even more glucose depending on how I'm feeling.