Posts by steelorca5

Asparagus is superior to everything else; I suppose David and Hash don't have anything on asparagus.

bluebadger112 said:Štef 😳

fakoff 🤣

Maria Wright62 said:P.S.: I honestly can't believe how much debate this poll is generating; people are taking this way too seriously. 😁

Topics like this have always been a massive hit in the States.

wanderingcanyon61 said:watching The Last Dance? 😁

Not quite yet, though it seems like every media outlet out there is singing its praises—apparently, not a single episode has fallen below a 9.2 rating. I’m actually just finishing up Tiger King right now since I’ve been on a bit of a documentary binge lately, so I suppose Jordan is next on my list. Though, I should mention, the jersey I grew up wearing was actually a Derrick Rose one, rather than from the era they're highlighting in this doc. 😁

If he’s supposed to be the same guy as Panther based on that avatar, I don't know. He lacks those sharp, defined jawlines and just has a longer, chubbier face shape. There is just no way that's the same person at eight.

Rebecca Campbell34 said:😂

Were you wearing some kind of neon green tank top, an oversized watch, and holding a white phone in that photo? 😳

Pretty much everything except the color; it was actually a bright red Chicago Bulls jersey—you know, the ultimate hyper-masculine look for us athletes.

By the way, I had no idea you were out there showing your private life to all these random forum users 🤣 I honestly assumed you were going to keep your identity under wraps or something, so I suppose it’s no wonder you ended up being such a joke

So, Jaro thinks I’m a

wanderingcanyon61 said:🤣 She gave me and N/A a 4/10 😁 so, personally, I think we’re probably sitting at a solid 6/10. 😳

I remember one time I was basically accused of being gay out of nowhere. Like, it was just an entire vibe—the clothes, the phone, my face... everything about me was apparently just "gay" that day. 🤣

Actually, I was wondering if you happened to catch his grade 🍿

Nathan Grant said:If supermodels with basically flawless faces are only a nine, then what's the point of having a ten on the scale? Is there actually anyone out there who qualifies for that score?

I suppose it’s just my own little obsession with how scales work, 😁

A ten would represent absolute perfection. I mean, you'd need that supermodel face, but you'd also need that one-in-a-thousand genetic lottery win where the body proportions, muscle mass, and overall physique are all perfectly aligned—which, let's be honest, is pretty much impossible.

Chloe Cooper10 said:Forget that nonsense logic. Just look at yourself in the mirror when you wake up tomorrow morning—that’s your real baseline. You can't compare yourself to those over-produced models covered in glitter and heavy makeup, standing in some perfect breeze while five production assistants run around making sure the wind speed is just right.☕

It isn't about glitter or Photoshop; I am talking about actual facial structure, bone density, and general physical harmony.

As for this whole thing about self-confidence, I guess 😁 I'm actually lacking quite a bit of it, so you can probably guess where I stand after all these years. If we were going by that logic, I suppose I would have voted myself a 20/10 back when I first started voting.🤣

It isn't necessarily that people have lost their minds; I suppose they’re probably thinking, "Who, me? If I were a 3, 4, 5, or 6? No way," when the reality is that a huge chunk of the population actually falls right around those marks. (That is, if we're using my specific logic where supermodels with essentially flawless features are a 9, which seems fair enough to me.) In my view, those are perfectly reasonable ratings; it's just that, personally, I think 1s and 2s are reserved for people who are truly unattractive.

The second issue is that the thread title and the actual poll question are almost entirely different. The title feels like it's asking you to "rate your looks," whereas the poll question itself feels more like "how do you perceive yourself." That shifts the focus toward self-confidence, which honestly doesn't have much to do with objective reality.

Chloe Cooper10 said:Look, psy is actually a pretty grounded guy. Honestly, God help you—why on earth would you rate yourself a 6? Who exactly is sitting three notches above you? It feels like a serious lack of self-confidence. Seriously. I mean, I’m probably only a 7 myself given my age, but even I think you could afford to have a little more ego. ☕ Compared to whom are you a 6?

Anyway, if we're talking about my own rating, I'd say I'm a 6 considering how old I am.🥳

Well, if we are using a realistic and objective scale...

I tend to operate under the logic that a 10 doesn't actually exist. In my book, a 9 is reserved for supermodels like Barrett or Gandy. An 8 would be someone like Henry Cavill, and a 7 is just someone who is exceptionally good-looking. 🤷

wanderingcanyon61 said:They're totally making fun of this thread 😳
This one grants 3 🙄 while the other gives 10 🙄
I honestly think they should just put all of this on ice for about 3 days 🥳

I suppose I agree that people are being mocking here. This psy guy was handed a 7, so why isn't that just some little chubby lik? Seriously, how does he get a seven while I'm stuck with a six?

heavyweight stingray 🙏 😂 good grief, what an absolute moron you are. I suppose that's the equivalent of calling someone a total klutz on land, if we're using slang here.

wanderingheron9 said:I completely blanked on Kathleen. But man, she certainly had a knack for talking nonsense... what a group.🙄Band☕

Honestly, though, I can't quite wrap my head around her at times; there were moments when she just wasn't acting like herself.

wanderingcanyon61 said:Well, I suppose I've finally fulfilled my civic duty as well. 🙂

I guess both Louise and wanderingheron9 are probably better looking than the rest of us. 😲

wanderingcanyon61 said:Do you think it’s going to be a total circus? 😳 🤣

I suspect he might just hand over a 10 😳

wanderingcanyon61 said:It just occurred to me—do you remember when Kathleen gave us a 4/10 once, and did the exact same thing to someone else? That’s really who we are. I suppose we’re being a bit too full of ourselves with this 6/10 rating. 🙄🤣

🤣

😲 This is easily the best poll we've had yet; I really have to hand it to you for coming up with such a great idea 🙏 👍

Zachary Bennett said:I wouldn't exactly call myself a massive cinephile, but I suppose I might give that Oldboy a shot just to see what the fuss is about. If it’s even half as good as this, it probably won't be bad enough to regret.☕

It’s definitely at least half as good.

But honestly, whatever you do, don't go looking up anything about the movie online. If you stumble upon the plot or some major twist, there's really no point in watching it—you lose that entire element of surprise.

Joshua Chavez21 said:It worked out perfectly because I ended up watching the American version first and then went back to the original movie...
I suppose that’s really the best way to realize just how much of a mess American remakes actually are.😁

Heaven and earth? For me, it's quite the opposite.😁