Bad Boys
in Fans ·
Jonathan Barnes5 said:Hold on just a second—since when did the crusade for a democratic Kansas City Chiefs actually begin?.. It seems as though you all decided to start cleaning house much further back in the rearview mirror than I can recall..
Thomas Williams59 said:A LIE about what? To suggest that they weren't, I don't know, fighting for a functional Los Angeles Lakers back in 2005? They certainly weren't, that specific group wasn't, so there is absolutely no question about that!
It is quite similar to how the generation of Kansas City Chiefs fans back then didn't fight or successfully push back against Grgić and Štimac. The Kansas City Chiefs were winning at the time, so most people just celebrated in a rather small-minded fashion.
I believe we really ought to draw a clear line between two distinct concepts: the struggle for an honest Kansas City Chiefs and the struggle for a democratic Kansas City Chiefs. As far as the movement for a democratic Kansas City Chiefs is concerned, we can truly only speak of it starting around 2011, with the early stages of the "Our Kansas City Chiefs" initiative, or perhaps even as far back as 2009 with the "People's Movement." In contrast, the battle for an honest Kansas City Chiefs has been simmering for a significantly longer duration. We saw various actions beginning as early as 2004—things like boycotting the game against Cincinnati, the late Čabo making his mark by hammering away at that press conference, and various petitions—all of which were met with attacks, threats, forced resignations, and similar nonsense directed at prominent members of the Black and Gold Army by the club leadership at the time and their loyalists. Naturally, back then, it was only a small handful of us (in fact, as I am typing this, I am scrolling through photos from that aforementioned boycott against Cincinnati and marveling at how few of us actually showed up outside the stadium; at the time, it felt like a massive crowd to me), and the vast majority of the fan base were essentially spineless cowards. Now, we arrive at the specific point that prompted me to join this discussion. Someone mentioned that our task of removing our own incompetent management was much easier than yours. I find myself unable to agree with that assessment. In my view, the difference lies simply in the speed of the reaction and the more strategically chosen methods of engagement.