I caught this on FOX last night—talk about a rough watch. Honestly, the movie feels like a direct insult to anyone's intelligence, and Keanu Reeves was such a massive miscast here. ☕ As far as the plot goes, it’s not just aimless; it’s borderline absurd and completely nonsensical because the script is so incredibly shallow. Man, the guy had a hundred obvious chances to just get out of that house and run. 🤣
darkhawk30 said:In my desperate attempt to remain just another small-time user on this Forum, I managed to churn out nearly 2,700 comments by the time I was thirteen. 🙂
Honestly, it doesn’t even matter; you’ve got people on here with thirty, forty, or even fifty thousand posts under their belts, yet if you actually take the time to read through them, it’s mostly just an endless stream of absolute nonsense. 🤣
It really comes down to quality over quantity, doesn't it?
Paul Kern12 said:Folks, behind this whole concept of political parties stands the Reddit version of George Soros. Don't let yourselves be misled; all that money is just heading straight into Soros's pocket.😒
I mean, honestly, who else is supposed to be lining their pockets if not me? 😒 Is that actually going to happen to the Speaker? ☕
If a thread like that ever actually gets started, you can bet it’ll be a massive hit, especially if some of the heavy hitters on this forum decide to go head-to-head.
Can we move this duel to its designated thread? Give the people what they want—bread and circuses, Boss. ☕
Let people vent their frustrations in a proper duel, but honestly, this whole voting thing for the "best" duelist is just mindless filler (as someone already pointed out). It’s completely pointless; obviously, everyone is just going to vote for whoever they happen to be rooting for, no matter how poorly they actually handled the argument.
Personally, I’m really looking forward to all the non-transparent power struggles, the political games, the cheap shots, and the endless barrage of ad hominem attacks where everyone talks about anything except actual policy.
I suppose that’s just what people on Reddit—or what our younger voters would call "vibes"—actually crave.
It is truly an honor to introduce to this wonderful little community a political party specifically designed to deepen your misery, all for the sake of my own personal gain. We intend to fight for plenty of battlegrounds, most of which involve selling nothing but smoke and mirrors, and even the tiny sliver of actual substance we might find, we won't bother fulfilling. Casting your vote for us will benefit exclusively you, because if you actually place your trust in the FDZ, then you clearly possess the maturity required for placement in a closed institution (to put it in layman's terms, a mental asylum), and there really is no better metric than self-assessment.
Our Party Platform:
1. Splitting the forum into multiple districts to create more moderator job openings. Each district should be further fragmented into sub-districts to be managed by sub-moderators. Moderator positions would be awarded based on a strict system of qualifications, which will include (rules regarding such a system will be subject to change to allow for cheating and rigged bidding, should such a thing even exist)
a) The mandatory maintenance of a forum dossier: essentially, your applications will be reviewed based on a points system tied to your disciplinary record (for example, if you have 10 strikes, you get 10 positive points; however, if you’ve had zero strikes in your entire career, we’ll have to disqualify you). Furthermore, you receive extra bonus points if you have been banned (specifically, an amount of points equal to the number of strikes used to ban you).
b) Mandatory proof of having voted for our party during the elections, provided in the form of a screenshot.
c) Educational requirements: a minimum of the first four grades of elementary school (not strictly necessary)
d) You must be widely hated, ensuring that as many threads about you as possible are opened on the PŽK—because that drives our engagement numbers up.
Additional qualifications will not be rewarded. We couldn't care less if you are fluent in Arabic or if you happen to hold a Nobel Prize; frankly, go do that somewhere else.
2. People frequently ask us whether we are left-wing or right-wing. Our answer is: whatever makes us feel like messing with you.
3. Implementing the full force of Forum lustration: this means everyone who moderated under the current regime (which will soon be the former regime) must be purged from every sphere of forum life, placed on a pillar of shame, publicly humiliated, and banned for life (and even beyond that, just in case they decide to reincarnate).
4. Opening a new sub-forum titled Forum eavesdropping, where private messages sent by users from 2005 all the way to the present day will be published on a daily basis.
5. Supporting freedom of speech, which we will carefully regulate through special ordinances, because only a good government knows exactly what its citizens need and are allowed to think.
6. Renaming the Messages, Complaints, and Comments sub-forum to "Praises and Messages"; after all, you don't have much to complain about if the government has already sent you to the history department's detention room.
7. Granting amnesty to everyone banned over the last 20 years who was punished for "serious" offenses like insulting others, instigating arguments, or trolling. We need more of those constructive and interesting users back in the mix.
8. The possibility of forming coalitions with anyone whose vision doesn't extend beyond our own interests.
9. Replacing the PŽK with Forumite, a space where formerly banned users can enjoy all the blessings of Reddit as if they were never banned in the first place.
This list is subject to expansion. Please be patient; even for top-tier thieves, swindlers, and shameless opportunists, compiling a complete list of interests all at once is a daunting task.
How to join? Completely free of charge, though perhaps a little grease under the table wouldn't hurt. I believe that fighting for one's personal interests is a fundamental right, as the great Enlightenment thinker Voltaire once suggested.
Slogan: Best when trolling. Who knows. United by petty interests. New era. New loot.
It’s honestly pretty creepy how much you obsess over his sex life and the specifics of his wife's anatomy. Throwing insults at his family and kids into the mix doesn't make it better, either...
Nicole Johnson20 said:Honestly, I’m struggling to wrap my head around how any sane, rational person could actually back those kinds of posts or go through the trouble of making excuses for them. 🤷
Still haven't bothered to answer my questions, have you? ☕
Linda Harris44 said:I’d appreciate it if everyone could pay attention to how Monty Python continues to resort to cheap insults and dragging my old posts from UNESCO back into this open thread, which honestly seems to have absolutely nothing to do with the Libertarian Party, let alone the current debate.
And tell me, Lorelei, does his wife have anything to do with the Libertarian Party?
What about his kids?
Or his wife's anatomy?
How often is he getting laid?
When is he doing it?
Where and with whom is he spending his summer vacation?
Does he sleep in a tent and wear hiking boots?
Does any of that actually impact the Libertarian Party, Lorelei?☕
So, Leena, you’re being pretty hypocritical here, aren't you? Why didn't you say a single word about the sexism and those insults when I brought up Toolman's comments during the town hall meeting? He was hurling some seriously nasty slurs at me, all because he mistakenly thought I was a woman 🤣
But of course you stayed silent. In fact, you spent the next few days copying and pasting that post everywhere you could find an audience, only to suddenly play the victim and delete it all once things got uncomfortable
Nicole Johnson20 said:I have absolutely no idea what kind of "agreement" you think we made, but I don't play those kinds of games where I have to stay quiet just to protect someone or pretend things aren't happening when they clearly are. I’m not the type to join some little clique and hide the truth. ☕
So, no apology planned?
And I suppose there won't be an apology for how you spent days cherry-picking and dragging Toolman's posts into threads where he called me a total slut? Sure, you deleted them, but don't think for a second the moderators can't see exactly what you did. 🍿
We’ve been extending an olive branch for days now, only for you guys to snap at it and then immediately spin up two different threads on Amtrak within forty-eight hours.
Yesterday I was the one under fire, today it’s Monty, and tomorrow it’ll probably be Zacopas or whoever else. It feels like we're just working our way through the legendary ignore list until we circle back to the beginning. Honestly, it’s becoming almost predictable at this point. 🍿
Sophia Fowler44 said:Honestly, it strikes me as pretty bizarre how much someone would jump to defend him after those absolutely vile insults. It’s weird to see such intense concern for a guy who is being so relentlessly, aggressively obnoxious. That kind of behavior just isn't healthy.
And frankly, who I choose to stand up for or whose side I take is none of your business. I’ll back whoever I feel like backing, so I really don't see why you're making it your problem.☕
Can we please, just for once, drop the hypocrisy and admit that there is nothing normal about this situation? For two months straight, this user has been acting like a total loose cannon—constantly circling back to his family, his wife, his kids, even obsessively tracking when other members are hooking up or writing entire manifestos about his wife's anatomy. It’s painfully obvious who actually lit the fuse on this argument.
Look, I’m not an advocate for insults, but if Monty gets penalized, then the person who started this whole mess deserves to be held accountable too.
At the end of the day, let the man speak for himself... let there be another side to the story.🧐