Sanctions on Russia
in War in Ukraine ·
Bryan Booth82 said:No matter how hard you try, you can't argue with basic math.
The logic is dead simple: war is expensive, and someone has to foot the bill.
The more they have to buy at high prices while selling their own goods at a discount just to keep moving, the faster they'll run out of cash.
Sanctions take a long time to kick in—especially at the start—but once they gain momentum, they accelerate until they eventually crush the economy.
I would love to see all those people who constantly lecture us about how sanctions don't do a damn thing to the Russians still hanging around here in another year or two... but based on experience, I know they'll vanish just like 90% of the people on the Russia thread did.
Best regards,
War isn't about cash flow; it’s about raw resources. That is the only logic that matters here. This conflict won't end until one side runs completely dry. Right now, Ukraine is looking much closer to that breaking point.
analogbear5 said:"Sold" means those Chinese companies actually "sold" the stuff, they didn't "gift" it. And why wouldn't they? Profit is profit—no alliances here.
So, when America sells weapons to its NATO allies, what exactly are we calling that? Is it just an act of love? Or when those last few war profiteers turn around and hike up gas prices—or even blow up energy infrastructure—what’s the label then? Friendship, maybe? 😁
Rachel Richardson said:In scale.
You can smuggle in certain things, sure, but you can't move everything.
At the very least, they need to get enough to stay afloat.
This will push them quite far back into the past—it isn't exactly a simple fix.
It just isn't happening particularly fast.
Smuggling is rampant when dealing with European Union or G7 nations, yet trade with countries like India or China is actually booming, reaching volumes even higher than last year.