Posts by hiddenhound3

lonegardener, there you are again, surrounded by a group of women with whom you clearly struggle to find common ground; though, if I am being honest, it seems to me that this particular dynamic suits you perfectly.😉

slywolf45 said:🤣
Good grief, you actually sat down and tried to give a serious answer to that..😁

Let's not get sidetracked; we aren't here to discuss your personal neuroses.😳

🤣

It is actually your fault, as you are always the one pulling me into side conversations and steering us off-topic. 😠 😬

slywolf45 said:As long as the fingers are still functioning, we're fine. 😈 😬

No, you aren't.

It happens every time, and I am quite certain this is merely a temporary phase... 😁 as I sit here admiring my lovely plants, my cyclamens, and my cacti, I find myself wondering, "Is this actually possible?" It appears that 😳

Alex Patel96 said:That’s a pretty accurate description of me!🤣 But wait, does that make me a Gen Zer if men don't even interest me sexually?!😕

Have they truly never been?

slywolf45 said:It isn't actually about what people are naturally drawn to.
At its core, this is entirely a matter of ego.

Not even remotely.☕

🤣

I find myself quite at a loss for words; I am truly stunned by this.
🤣

Alex Patel96 said:I'm with them on this one!🙏
If only they didn't have that damn equipment...😢

Well, I suppose that is simply how we were designed by nature... 🤷 There isn't much one can do about it. On a side note, I happened to be watching an episode of Dr. House the other day, and there was a segment discussing how Gen Z individuals tend to be generally lost and disoriented, lacking decisiveness and clearly defined boundaries...

slywolf45 said:Exactly. That’s precisely the point I’ve been making this entire time.

Absolute disaster. They’re throwing it on the bonfire.🙂
I suppose I should come clean: I’m a bit of a florophobe. There’s just something about the way plants exist—all that silent, aggressive growth and unyielding photosynthesis—that feels deeply unsettling to me. It’s hard to explain to anyone who hasn't felt it, but I prefer my greenery to be strictly digital or perhaps printed on high-quality cardstock. Real, breathing foliage? No thank you.😳) 😁

Yeah, I see you're reading this under the radar. 😬

Of course not. ☕

😛

Are you teasing me? 😲

lonegardener said:😍 This version is a bit softer, but I still don't agree. Earlier, you basically boiled "sex" down to just "a dick." LOL. If that's really all you need from a man... then I'm surprised it could "hurt your feelings" when someone doesn't find that particularly impressive.🤣

Look, like I said, this take is a little milder, but I'm still not a fan. Regardless, there's no rule saying I have to agree. And you don't have to like my perspective either. 🤷

You seem to be missing my point—I make no distinction between men and women in terms of value or importance; I hold both equally in high regard. To me, the only meaningful distinction lies in biological equipment. There is nothing inherently offensive about that observation, and since we aren't exactly looking to snub one another here, my particular viewpoint shouldn't carry much weight for you anyway.

slywolf45 said:Of course there aren't any rules.
There’s a school of thought that suggests you don't fall for a gender, but rather for the individual itself. I suspect you might lean toward that philosophy.
Personally, I also find myself falling for the person, though in my case, that person always happens to be a woman.🤣

I must admit, I also find myself falling in love with flowers.🤣

slywolf45 said:And yet, somehow, I'm the one finding it abnormal?
I’m simply pointing out that people tend to open up to me far more readily once they realize I'm part of the community.

On the flip side, the real gut punch for my sister was when her ex admitted he’d cheated on her with another man. So, while her best friend is gay and there’s zero judgment regarding her orientation—they talk about it like it’s nothing—she would never, ever date a bisexual man again. 😉
It’s not like I’m exactly out of the loop.

So what?
For most Americans, having a partner confess to cheating with someone of the same sex would be a massive blow regardless of anything else.
It isn't some strange phenomenon. It doesn't matter whether you're trending or not.

I suspect this occurs because much of the American public remains somewhat skeptical of such matters, and consequently, individuals hesitate to shock others by sharing their personal experiences too abruptly. On the other hand, it is quite possible that sharing this part of your identity actually fosters a sense of trust.

Alex Patel96 said:Yeah, I feel the exact same way. Except for me, men don't do anything for me sexually. It's strictly women for me!🤣

It seems we are facing two sides of the exact same coin, just mirrored in opposite directions.🤣 It is a bit of a whirlwind, really—a complete reversal of circumstances.

slywolf45 said:Ha, see? There goes that old cliché again... I honestly don't know how to respond to that.
The whole "there are a hundred people, a hundred different personalities" thing?🤷
For me, I just can't feel that same spark for both men and women. In fact, I can't really love men at all. You know what I mean—romantically.😁
I could probably go out and have a fling with a guy, but there wouldn't be anything deeper than that.

As for your gay friend... he claims to prefer a "feminine temperament," yet he stays in relationships with men. It’s funny how often we reach for the very things we criticize at first glance. If he actually found someone with a purely "feminine character"—not that I even know what that truly entails, since women can be just as fierce and somewhat ruthless—he’d likely be bored within a week.

In my estimation, there truly are no set rules when it comes to matters of the heart.😍

slywolf45 said:

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the whole florine situation. It’s one of those topics that seems straightforward on the surface, but once you start peeling back the layers—much like an onion, or perhaps more accurately, like a particularly stubborn layer of old paint on a mid-century modern sideboard—you realize there’s a lot more complexity than the casual observer might think. It’s easy to get swept up in the immediate implications, but if we step back and look at the broader landscape, the nuances become much harder to ignore. It isn't just about the singular event; it's about the systemic ripples it sends through the entire structure. One might compare it to how a minor change in interest rates by the Federal Reserve can send shockwaves through the housing market in a city like Chicago—suddenly, everything feels a bit more precarious. kaže:
So, what you're essentially asking is whether someone who identifies as a lesbian could actually find sexual compatibility with a man. It’s an interesting question, though I suspect the answer depends entirely on how one defines "functioning" in that context. If we're talking about the mechanics of it, biology is a funny thing, but if we're talking about genuine, holistic connection, the labels usually exist for a reason. It's like asking if a high-end electric sedan can suddenly decide it wants to run on diesel just because the pump is available—it might physically move, but it wasn't built for that fuel, and the whole system isn't designed to handle it. 😕

Hmm... no, I don't think I could manage that.
Not anymore.
It isn’t just about his toolkit, though. Honestly, I could see myself being part of some three-person FMF crew, for instance. But just me and that guy? That sounds like a hard sell. I think I’d need a little extra motivation to make that happen.😁

I’m asking because I can’t quite wrap my head around this... I’ve experienced both sides of the coin, and if I’m being honest, I much prefer sex with men. It would actually be devastating to be rejected by a man simply because he couldn't handle the fact that I chose him specifically because I enjoy intimacy with him more than I do with women. 😢

I suppose you aren't exactly thrilled about it, then? Just sex. That’s really all there is to it. Are there more men out there? It’s one of those questions that seems simple on the surface, but once you start peeling back the layers, you realize how much depends on whether you're looking at raw data or just walking through a crowded Starbucks on a Tuesday morning. If we’re talking strictly about the numbers—looking at the census data or general population statistics here in the States—it’s actually quite close to a wash, though historically, men have held a slight edge. However, as life expectancy trends shift, that balance starts to wobble. You see it in almost every major US city; the demographics fluctuate depending on whether you're in a college town or a retirement community in Florida. But I suspect the question isn't really asking for a math lesson. Usually, when people ask this, they’re sensing an imbalance in their own social circles or dating apps. It’s that feeling that everywhere you turn—whether it's a packed gym in Chicago or a local pub—the ratio feels skewed. It’s like being at a concert where the crowd is overwhelmingly one way; the perception of "more" is often driven by our immediate environment rather than the national average. So, is it true? Numerically, it's a toss-up. Socially? That depends entirely on where you're standing.
I suspect there’s a bit more to the story than just the surface level... it feels like an entire emotional and mental package wrapped up in one. Wouldn't you agree?🤷

I just can't.
It seems like nobody here actually bothers to focus on the psychological aspect of anything.
Good grief, it feels like I’m reading *The Secret*. 😬

Not at all. I am capable of loving someone for who they are with equal passion, regardless of their gender. That is precisely why I find myself feeling so conflicted. My closest friend is gay, though he hasn't always been; his early experiences were entirely with women, yet for the last fifteen years or so, he has only been with men. He once mentioned to me that, psychologically speaking, he finds men to be much harsher, which leads him to actually prefer the temperament typically found in women.

slywolf45 said:Exactly.
It’s not like I’m into women just because of what's between their legs, and a woman isn't straight simply because of a man's equipment.
There are plenty of variables at play here, but the decisive factor is really the psychological makeup of both parties.🙂

I certainly grasp the concept of loving someone for their inner beauty (or even their outward appearance 😁), yet we cannot ignore the reality that one group of people gravitates exclusively toward the same sex, while another seeks partners of the opposite sex. It would be naive to pretend that gender doesn't play a fundamental role in this entire dynamic. This leads me to wonder: if you identify as a lesbian, could you realistically function sexually with a man? 😕
The reason I ask is that I find the distinction somewhat confusing. Having experienced both, I find that I much prefer sex with men, and it would genuinely hurt my pride if a man were to reject me simply because I chose him based on sexual preference rather than anything else. 😢

lonegardener said:Look, I don't even know where to start with this response because you completely missed the point. How am I "irreplaceable" just because I have a dick? Seriously, there are another 3 billion guys out there with them. So, any one of those 3 billion could take my place if we're talking strictly about the anatomy. Right? 🤣

In this specific instance, please spare me the clumsy jokes about ego being some barrier to pleasure. I’m never going to "get rid of" my ego here. Nor do I think it's "necessary." Maybe you should ditch that pointless philosophy of yours—LOL. What good was yesterday's pleasure anyway? Why not go out and enjoy yourself right now instead of wasting time arguing on a forum? 😬

It would probably be best if you didn't respond at all. 🤷

lonegardener said:There's no way I can explain that in just three sentences; I assume you realize that? It’s way too complex for such a quick answer. I suppose women just suit her better. 😍

As far as that goes, it's her life. Though, I have to admit, I get a little annoyed by that tiny, subtle (😍) sense she has that she's part of some "elite" group because of it. Like, "Oh, I'm just special in a positive way." Yeah, sure, whatever floats your boat. 😬 🤣

No hard feelings, slywolf45. 🙂

Personally, I don't get that impression at all.

lonegardener said:You’ve got a skewed perspective simply because you’re right in the thick of it.

Most people aren't actually at the center of everything. In other words, your conclusions are being drawn from a statistically insignificant sample size.

Sure, there are plenty of them. But let's be honest—that term "plenty" is pretty vague. It could mean anything.

You missed the mark again, honestly. 🤷 It’s not like it's completely worthless. I'm not saying it lacks any significance at all. 🤣Of course, that's a pretty interesting tool. 🙂 Look, that’s definitely not the only reason a woman would be straight. For crying out loud, I feel like I have to spell everything out for you.

When it comes to homosexuality or heterosexuality, there aren't specific "reasons" one can point to, because these aren't decisions made by a rational actor. Someone who has explored both sides can simply conclude which way they lean and live their life accordingly; I am truly at a loss as to why this remains unclear. The women I know have simply realized they prefer men over women, and that is the extent of the matter—there is no profound mystery to uncover.

lonegardener said:Hold on, you missed my point... of course it's not a rare phenomenon. I never claimed it was. In fact, I know it's quite common. (Though I am curious what "rare" means to you).

But you definitely missed the mark with that idea that "a dick is irreplaceable." That is simply not true. Just ask slywolf45, for instance. 😬 It is incredibly easy to replace one thing with something else.

Honestly, I'd rather not say what I think about a girl who would choose me over another woman just because she thinks "a dick is irreplaceable." I’d probably just hand her the most expensive vibrator on the market and say, "Here, this will serve you just fine." 😬 😈 🤣

I already covered that in middle school biology, but no matter how you look at it, the fact remains that you echoed her while completely ignoring his post. There isn't really any other reason for that besides what I already mentioned. Look, you know it and I know it—there’s no reason to be stubborn. Having an opinion isn't a "sin." I'm just stating a fact.

Why does any of this matter? 😕 Since you possess that particular "irreplaceable" asset, you are just as essential, if not more so, than anyone else. Do not allow your ego to rob you of pleasure over such trivialities. It is quite evident that the woman in question has simply realized she is heterosexual and has no desire to date women. This has absolutely nothing to do with your character or who you are as a person.

slywolf45 said:What exactly am I seeing differently?🤷

No, but it doesn't mean they weren't either. 😉
You pick up on a lot more things when you're right in the thick of it—if that's even how you'd put it. You hear way more than you do when you're straight.😉

Honestly, I really don't have the energy to summarize everything right now... lonegardener and I were discussing this quite extensively, so you should probably just check out the thread starting from post 34.

lonegardener said:Hold on, you missed my point... of course it's not a rare phenomenon. I never claimed it was. In fact, I know it's quite common. (Though I am curious what "rare" means to you).

But you definitely missed the mark with that idea that "a dick is irreplaceable." That is simply not true. Just ask slywolf45, for instance. 😬 It is incredibly easy to replace one thing with something else.

Honestly, I'd rather not say what I think about a girl who would choose me over another woman just because she thinks "a dick is irreplaceable." I’d probably just hand her the most expensive vibrator on the market and say, "Here, this will serve you just fine." 😬 😈 🤣

I already covered that in middle school biology, but no matter how you look at it, the fact remains that you echoed her while completely ignoring his post. There isn't really any other reason for that besides what I already mentioned. Look, you know it and I know it—there’s no reason to be stubborn. Having an opinion isn't a "sin." I'm just stating a fact.

Those women—and I include myself in that group 😁—have reached that conclusion based on their own personal experiences. Obviously, slywolf45 holds a different perspective, but that is a matter of individual intimacy; what carries weight for one person does not necessarily apply to another. Wouldn't you agree? 😉

lonegardener said:Nothing is so sacred that it can't be replaced. Even drug Marshall. 😬

I'd argue the same applies to the cock... I mean, what is it really? Just some cylindrical object. Why should it be considered "irreplaceable"? There are plenty of vibrators out there that simulate both the shape and the sensation perfectly.

Basically, it's total bullshit. 🙂

I am not being untruthful; rather, I am simply attempting to convey that such instances are far from rare. My intention was to address the underlying motivations behind these experiments—whether they stem from pure curiosity, a search for sexual identity, or a desire to push the boundaries of how one perceives sexuality. From what I have observed through personal experience, rather than just reading textbooks, the vast majority of cases eventually settle back into a conventional pattern.