CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Jessica Kelly4 › Posts

Posts by Jessica Kelly4

193 posts shown.

Requesting a Banhammer in Feedback & Suggestions ·
placidhound5 said:Good morning. I'm speaking on behalf of the FEC. I'm here to help clarify how we handle things around here. 🙂

What kind of censorship are you talking about? There’s no censorship on this Reddit, aside from what's strictly laid out in our rules.

We only issue a Banhammer at a user's request in extreme cases where there's a truly compelling reason. Otherwise, it's pointless—you just stop visiting the site. Honestly, it happens more than you'd think; someone says they need to focus on studying but can't quit the site... Then people start asking us if they're just being dramatic or why we're being so harsh.

Anderlon again? Seriously, don't you have anything better to do with your life?

Pretty sure under GDPR I have the right to get my data wiped from your database.
As a dev, I always had to build retroactive data deletion into my apps to decouple users from their activity. So, I'm invoking GDPR.

Besides, have some self-respect. If someone doesn't want to be part of the community or show up in your user stats, just delete them.

I'm not looking for an argument. I'll check the fine print with the FTC, but otherwise, whatever.
Give me the Banhammer. Every few years I get sucked into a thread, realize I can't post there, and stop. I have too much pride to just make burner accounts like you do. Peace.
Requesting a Banhammer in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I can't deal with the censorship on this Reddit anymore. Just banhammer my account and, per GDPR, wipe all my private data from your database. Thanks and goodbye.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
bluelynx52 said:So, you're saying an unvaccinated doctor wouldn't be allowed to cause that same kind of chaos?

The difference is that unlike those who are vaccinated, the unvaccinated have to keep testing regularly just to prove they aren't infected.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
bluelynx52 said:Why would anyone think I need defending? 🤔

As an unbiased observer, I’m just looking at who actually contributed here. There are more of you than there is Casey Bennett. And that’s not even counting the guy who asked me the same question four times—asking why his own ego got deleted. 🙂 Like Casey Bennett would say: "Start your own thread, what are you doing crashing our party?" 🙂

You guys are being way too serious and repetitive. This whole thing was settled on page one. If someone's playing dumb (hopefully they aren't actually dumb), then they're just looking for a laugh. Which is clearly what this thread is for.

Here's a little secret: COVID is over.

(For those who took the shot. Bu-h!)

I'll tell you a secret, too. The people who got vaccinated are the real danger now. They have a license to kill. One infected doctor with a shot in their arm can wreak havoc on an entire hospital ward, all because they have their credentials in their pocket.

Besides, COVID stopped being a boogeyman for regular people a long time ago. You just live with it, like any other illness.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Morgan Peterson said:Pardoncek, you’ve gone off the deep end into conspiracy theories once again. Somied hasn't been hit with a permanent ban, but rather a temporary suspension for being incredibly rude—which was sent his way to cool things down. I truly hope there won't be a need for a permanent ban once he regains his senses.

By the way, if I recall correctly, we have never actually issued a permanent ban over that whole COVID PDF situation. A few factions split off among the regulars, but that was the extent of it.

But really, this constant atmosphere of terror...

There's really no point when you've shoved all your critical thinking into conspiracy theories anyway.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
driftingtinker said:You’ve got that picture on "that" forum, showing that "respectable" little outburst that everyone greets with total awe and just assumes is pure perfection.
But you didn't realize that, did you?

So you got rid of him too? Honestly, is there anyone left from the old COVID forums worth reading? Bocecco is still trying... Perma? His idea isn't half bad.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Somied got banned?!? A perfect example of a decent, logical poster. But you guys really lost the plot here.

Invoking vaccine mandates in PMTs is a whole different level of pathology. Especially now, when all the skeletons are starting to crawl out of the closet. You're psychopaths and accomplices to a crime against humanity.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
It’s actually a shame. This used to be a top-tier platform with brilliant users and great discussions. Even with all the crap, I still felt some connection to this community. Now we’re just getting burned by Nero in Rome for no reason—just because he's feeling moody and wants to read his own poetry while watching the city burn. It sucks. I consider myself a decent enough writer, and I really missed being able to post, but not like this. It’s good there’s an alternative now; hopefully, it puts a dent in this rot.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Casey Bennett said:they'll clear themselves up before you know it. 🙂

Do some of you honestly believe I'm sitting here breaking my head over your absolute nonsense? I've already told you that I'm cutting down on my time spent here—quite successfully and quite enjoyably, I might add. 😁

Is it really that boring for you today, needing to defend the boss and clean up his messes? Total Republican training, straight up Bacic style. 🤣
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
driftingtinker said:Like this?

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...bbf53ca565.jpg

You can see the threads are being moderated. When someone crosses the line into aggression, they get a warning. That’s how it should work here. But no, instead we get instant red cards and bans. God forbid you write something that doesn't fit perfectly inside Ego or Anderlon's heads—then the persecution starts. They could actually learn a thing or two from how Giod handles moderation.

So much of what was banned has turned out to be true that the entire moderation team involved in the COVID era should be blushing with shame. Some might even feel a bit of guilt, especially for blocking the spread of information regarding Ivermectin.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Why should I bother wasting my energy on you people? You already wore me out with those "official" stances on abortion, where you didn't just shut down the debate, but actively banned basic pro-life terminology. I walked away back then, but then the pandemic pulled me back in, and clearly, nothing has changed.

At the end of the day, competition is a good thing, right?
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Casey Bennett said:Go over to Giod and tell the mods they're targeting people for no reason. Honestly, I'm dying to see how this plays out 🙏

Don't worry, ZgSash will get exactly what's coming to him. He'll get a taste of his own medicine, but he isn't deleting posts just because they don't align with Giod's politics. Because, get this—Giod only asks for decent debate. There are no set rules on opinions, and he isn't sliding into anyone's DMs.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Casey Bennett said:It doesn't affect anyone except the forum owner. While the moderation team is solid, nobody actually cares if a moderator goes by Anderlon, Mr. Pink, or Guesswho—it doesn't matter who they are or where they post.

Reddit is meant to be a space for users to communicate and debate, and in that regard, it functions perfectly well.
I suppose it's true that congregants don't get a say in electing their local clergy, nor does anyone bother asking them, so your parallel is actually spot on—mea culpa.🙂

Pointless argument. Anderlon should just use his own name instead of hiding behind fake profiles. Instead of playing these games, he’d be better off actually fixing this Reddit. Giod is a great alternative, but it would be nice if people on this site could actually write without censorship and these stupid setups. You aren't just limiting free speech; you're insulting our intelligence.
Absolutely insane. If the government tries to push this through with a sledgehammer, I’m ready to hit the streets myself. This is a line they simply cannot cross. Once they start mandating vaccinations for kids against their parents' wishes, it's game over. The end.
PDF partial download policy in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Daniel Ward87 said:Oh, so now we’re both primitives and gunslingers? It’s funny how the right-wing intellectual elite complains about being called primitive, yet here they are using that exact same vocabulary.

I see we're using the same old tactic of denying what I actually wrote. Of course, I must be lying—all these things about the Roman Catholic Church are just being written by leftists who want to bring back the USA and hate everything American or Catholic.

Why are you even arguing with me about the church on this sub? Are we just trolling now?
Here are some interesting facts. Try discussing child abuse like an adult instead of using it as ammunition for your culture war.

Anyone can control a debate by banning posts and stifling free speech whenever they feel threatened. Meanwhile, there's always someone available to bully.

Just grant my request and you'll get rid of another conservative poster. Soon enough, you'll have a perfectly unified chorus that sounds as monolithic as the Red Army.
PDF partial download policy in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Give me a break. I’ve been on this forum since day one, so don't try to sell me your nonsense.

I’ve spent years going toe-to-toe with the mod clique, and it hasn't just been complaints—I've actually offered constructive feedback. All I've seen is top-tier users walk away. Now, all that's left is a handful of conservatives and maybe a few others from the right.

Enough is enough. I put too much effort into my posts to waste them arguing with people like you.
There are actually interesting people here with different viewpoints, but I can't even reach them through the wall of trolls, idiots, and trigger-happy moderators. I actually quit two years ago because of the censorship, then I crawled back after getting sucked into certain topics again. A partial ban will make sure I don't make that mistake twice.
PDF partial download policy in Feedback & Suggestions ·
"The thing is, American Catholics, led by Main Street, don't hold marches across the US because even their priests are caught up in sexual scandals involving minors."
Daniel Ward87

After I called out this generalization, the insults toward clergy, and the trolling, the mods wiped my post and left the one above.

Enough is enough. For years, plenty of conservative users have endured harassment on this subforum while just trying to bring some actual debate to the table. No matter how much I try to stay polite and stick to the facts, it doesn't matter. This current lineup of moderators has driven away almost every conservative user, and honestly, the owner should be ashamed of all of you.

I've finally hit my limit. I'm done with the bullying and the lowlifes who substitute moderation violence and vulgarity for actual arguments.

Please just give me a partial ban from the political discussion section so I don't have to deal with being targeted there anymore. I understand a requested partial ban carries the same weight and consequences as one issued for activity.
unknown in Feedback & Suggestions ·
lonebadger6 said:Catholic organizations—depends on how they operate.

Are insults against Catholic groups allowed based solely on a moderator's whim?
Come on, man. Re-read that claim. Be fair and admit it’s fine. 🤷
Worst of all, this isn't just your opinion; it's the actual reality in threads involving the church and Catholics. I know this site is a private company, but it's not the owner moderating—it's people with names and faces.

Look at what someone using the handle lonebadger6 wrote right here two years ago:

I don't really get these arguments against calling abortion murder. That's literally the core of the disagreement!

I'm pro-choice, but I truly don't see the point in this constant bickering.

Then just ban any discussion about abortion entirely (in Politics). If abortion is an open topic, then obviously one side is going to call it murder. That's the whole foundation. They aren't against abortion because they hate white churches.

But today, we're supposed to accept that moderators use their discretion to decide who gets insulted and when? 🤷

Look, some of us have been on this forum forever, like elephants, and we know exactly how things go down.
And no, I'm not attacking you personally, but I'm genuinely trying to figure out what's happening with the political section moderation. How do aggressive haters like Sarah Doyle54 end up as moderators, while others get banned for no reason?
unknown in Feedback & Suggestions ·
lonebadger6 said:Do you have a link to a post where someone calls Catholics "unknowns" that was reported and yet went unpunished?

Two political moderators are actively policing this thread. I’ve managed to rack up two warnings on this exact topic alone—was I actually reported, or is the system just glitching? I expect some transparency here, especially since this isn't just a one-off thing.

And honestly, I don't get this sudden decline in standards. Two years ago, you were the one defending free speech when I argued against censoring pro-life discourse. Now you're a moderator, and what changed? 🤷
I'll still get flagged if I call an abortion a murder, yet your fellow mods perfectly tolerate people insulting Catholics and Catholic organizations.
unknown in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Daniel Ward87 said:What kind of supermoderators are we talking about here? The ones at the New York Times?

Now you've really gone and... 🤣
I have no clue how this forum's management is structured, but it’s definitely unacceptable to have a moderator assigned to me when I'm literally filing a complaint against their work.