Posts by Jessica Kelly4

Charles Murphy6 said:Now I’m starting to wonder if you happen to be an English teacher, because that is precisely what he told those kids—and they’re only in second grade here in the States.
It was pure luck that it happened at the very tail end of the school year, otherwise I would have certainly stepped in... because if this happens again, there’s going to be trouble.

If you aren't a professional educator, then frankly, that comment of yours is completely out of line. If you can't handle the reality of the American education system, then just move on... let's keep things serious.

Right?
I wasn't anywhere near enlightenment even in my glory days, so don't worry about me. 😁

Jason Ortiz5 said:I really hope you aren't being serious here. ☕

I'm not exaggerating. I'm surrounded by educators, so I see firsthand just how much disrespect they deal with.

Well, look at that—me too. And honestly, aside from maybe two or three extreme cases who are just jerks in every single part of their lives, everyone else agrees that this stuff is basically just a normal side effect of growing up. It's happened since forever. Most people in the field agree that a good teacher just needs to know how to handle it. (And I'm not talking about that tiny group of truly problematic kids where the issues usually start at home; teachers actually have the tools and the authority to manage those situations, they just seem to lack the drive to use them.) Of course, I also know those self-important teachers who act like dictators, where anything less than total obedience and worship is seen as disrespect. Luckily, there aren't many of them, and nobody takes them seriously anyway. 😁

You honestly think people working with adults don't run into way worse attitudes?

Unfortunately, I am.
Clearly, I wasn't built for the role of an educator. 🤷

Jason Ortiz5 said:I really hope you aren't being serious here. ☕

I'm not exaggerating. I'm surrounded by educators, so I see firsthand just how much disrespect they deal with.

Well, look at that—me too. And honestly, aside from maybe two or three extreme cases who are just jerks in every single part of their lives, everyone else agrees that this stuff is basically just a normal side effect of growing up. It's happened since forever. Most people in the field agree that a good teacher just needs to know how to handle it. (And I'm not talking about that tiny group of truly problematic kids where the issues usually start at home; teachers actually have the tools and the authority to manage those situations, they just seem to lack the drive to use them.) Of course, I also know those self-important teachers who act like dictators, where anything less than total obedience and worship is seen as disrespect. Luckily, there aren't many of them, and nobody takes them seriously anyway. 😁

You honestly think people working with adults don't run into way worse attitudes?

That’s the ideal, sure. But reality is different. And it isn't just about the parents. Suddenly, teaching is ranked among the top five most stressful jobs in America, and regular health screenings now include stress-related checks like blood sugar monitoring. It turns out dealing with entitled parents and their kids is actually a massive burden for many teachers.

Jason Ortiz5 said:I really hope you aren't being serious here. ☕

I'm not exaggerating. I'm surrounded by educators, so I see firsthand just how much disrespect they deal with.

Well, look at that—me too. And honestly, aside from maybe two or three extreme cases who are just jerks in every single part of their lives, everyone else agrees that this stuff is basically just a normal side effect of growing up. It's happened since forever. Most people in the field agree that a good teacher just needs to know how to handle it. (And I'm not talking about that tiny group of truly problematic kids where the issues usually start at home; teachers actually have the tools and the authority to manage those situations, they just seem to lack the drive to use them.) Of course, I also know those self-important teachers who act like dictators, where anything less than total obedience and worship is seen as disrespect. Luckily, there aren't many of them, and nobody takes them seriously anyway. 😁

You honestly think people working with adults don't run into way worse attitudes?

Teachers deal with adults too. Usually when they go full mama bear mode. They remain completely oblivious to their own bias and refuse to admit their kid might not be the genius they bragged about to the whole neighborhood. 😁

Arguing over stress levels feels pointless.
There are actual professionals for that. 🤷

Jason Ortiz5 said:Look, whatever the case may be, there is absolutely zero excuse for an educator to call a student stupid. Period. 🤷

Teachers who fall for these kinds of kid provocations basically get eaten alive. And then they have the nerve to ask for dessert too.

Honestly, if a teacher can't handle a little bit of classroom sass, they probably picked the wrong career. It would be better for everyone—the teachers and the kids—if they just went into something else.

Plus, it’s just sad when people label every tricky question or ambiguous topic as a "provocation" just because a teacher doesn't have the answer ready. Then we act surprised when the general knowledge level in our schools hits rock bottom.☕

Kids are lucky most teachers are pretty softies.
I’d be tossing them out the window! 😁
Not exaggerating either—I work around educators all the time, so I know exactly what kind of losers they deal with.

Peter Doyle2 said:There’s no such thing as a stupid question, just stupid answers.
The teacher reacted really poorly.
It was almost as if he had said something incredibly foolish—she shouldn't have even implied he was being dense 🙂

And regarding that "stupid" question, you'd be surprised how many grown adults actually approach pregnant women with questions like that ☕
This is just more proof of how much we need comprehensive sex education in our schools. If the question had been directed at a teacher actually qualified for that curriculum, I doubt anyone would have been called names.

The Department of Education picked a specialized curriculum, but then a few activist groups blocked it. 🤷

Jason Ortiz5 said:Look, even if the kid was actually trying to be a rebel, a truly smart and capable teacher would have known how to turn a moment like that into a real teaching opportunity. Instead, she just showed how some people in our school system are more interested in power trips than actual education.

We need to hear the other side of this.
It’s entirely possible that what looked "stupid" was actually something else entirely.

And teachers who fall for these little provocations get eaten alive. They're basically asking for it.

He tried to act tough, but he ran straight into a veteran teacher who shut him down instantly. I don't see why you're making such a big deal out of it.

Move this thread over to Natural Sciences. It’ll be way more interesting there, though we have already covered nuclear energy extensively. There is plenty of political fodder here, sure—like how ready we are as a society to cut back on energy usage to lower our reliance on nuclear power, or if we are actually willing to invest in new sources. But honestly, debating nuclear safety feels a bit hollow when you consider the hundreds of millions lost to warfare; almost every major conflict can be framed as a fight over energy resources, one way or another.

So, I think the discussion here should focus on the political paradigm regarding energy sources. As it stands, this topic is leaning too heavily into technology. If we are talking strictly about engineering, a meltdown was definitely a primary concern during the design phase.

wiredcanyon19 said:Look, he’s clearly dealing with PTSD and probably some other deep-seated mental health issues—but honestly, the bigger issue here is that he’s just an irresponsible, irrational person who refuses to get help. It’s easier for him to stay this way, I guess. And since we don't really have any kind of mandatory treatment programs here in the States unless someone is actively threatening suicide—which isn't happening here—he just gets a free pass. It feels like all the "experts" have basically washed their hands of him because he's such a chaotic mess, and now he's just out there wrecking everyone else's lives simply because it suits him.

It’s like he goes out of his way to ruin every single positive moment. He carries this mindset of, "if my life is a dumpster fire, I want yours to be too." He fixates on every negative thing, blows it way out of proportion, and then completely dismisses anything good or bright. It genuinely feels like he's putting all his energy into sucking the joy out of every room, acting like nobody deserves even a second of happiness while he chooses to remain miserable, broken, and totally lost in his own world.

Some of you guys might actually hate him for all this, but I’m just not built that way—I don't really know how to hold onto hate. Honestly, having that kind of bitterness would probably eat me alive more than it would affect him, and I think hating people is just a massive waste of time. I try to be empathetic and understand where people are coming from, but—and you can probably tell by now—that doesn't always work for me. Meanwhile, life keeps moving and the crap just keeps piling up...

There’s real hatred, and then there's just "dislike." It's only natural to react to stuff like this.

Maybe this helps. I'm talking about addiction here. Parents can be patient, too—they'll literally pull their kid back from the brink more than once (paying off debts to some pretty shady people)... eventually, you realize you can't keep doing that. Either everyone goes down with the ship or you cut ties. And, btw, since this wasn't a drug addiction, forced rehab wasn't even an option.
In the end, though, the parents gave an ultimatum: get out of the house or go to treatment. That person is a different person now.

Look, I'm just some random guy on a forum, so don't take everything I say as gospel. Karen Rodriguez3 made a good point—you should talk to professionals.

wiredcanyon19 said:Karen Rodriguez3, look—this person’s whole "uniqueness" (which is really just an excuse for being a teenager who refuses to grow up) makes them totally incapable of living on their own. And honestly, nobody else in the house can afford to move out either because of the money situation, which makes the whole thing pretty much a dead end. Even if this "special" individual stayed behind alone, that house would turn into a magnet for every local drunk and low-life scumbag in town within weeks. They’d just be hanging out and drinking with people they "empathize" with—you know, those bottom-feeders—whenever that government check hits their account based on their "condition."

Would you seriously let your family home go down the drain just to accommodate someone’s "uniqueness"? It’s hard when they refuse to adapt to the people around them who genuinely want what’s best for them—people who, unfortunately, can't help someone who doesn't even *want* to be helped. We're all just sitting here clinging to this delusional hope that there's a cure for everything and that the perfect solution is just right around the corner.

Seriously though, is there some kind of vaccine for stupidity? Because I’d love to inject it straight into their lazy backside just to get them to act like a normal human being before they drive the entire family completely insane with this behavior.

No. You have to set boundaries. For their sake and yours.
If things get extreme—like an addiction situation—there are solid institutions out there built for this. One of the best (I’ve seen it work with extended family before) is something like Hazelden Betty Ford.

Why does the headline call it "communist" when the rest of the article just describes Vatican City as a monarchy? 😕

Andrew Wright23 said:I mean, seriously, how are you even supposed to invent trade barriers in a true free market?
At the end of the day, cheap goods did exactly what they were supposed to do, and that's how China won this "war."
It looks like we might be heading toward a trade war over high-end luxury goods next.
It isn't even a struggle for China to just buy up a bunch of European brands and move all the manufacturing over to China, right?
They're basically turning the European Union and the USA into nothing more than a customer base.

It’s honestly wild that this whole process, which has been grinding along since the 80s, didn't show its face sooner, don't you think?
Where were all those famous economic theorists and Nobel laureates when it actually mattered?

The idea of a global free market was just a massive blunder by a greedy Western elite. We basically dug our own graves. A true free market requires at least some level of economic and especially social parity. Anything else doesn't lead to market integration—it leads to war.

copperhound122 said:Exactly. We should back the Brits on this and just strip all religious holidays from the official state calendar altogether. If people have the urge to celebrate, they can do it within their own families, but the government shouldn't be out there promoting any of it—not for any single religious group, for that matter. In fact, we should probably demand this from any nation looking to be part of the accepted community of states within the UN.

As an institution, the state really shouldn't care whether it's Christmas, Hanukkah, Eid, or Chinese New Year being celebrated by its citizens.

That’s a fair point, but if you go down that road, you don't even need a government. A state is inherently about division. The goal seems to be erasing every shared value that actually built our history and ethics, turning everyone into identical little "Coca-Cola bottles." As long as people are working and spending, who cares?😉

Richard Wilson4 said:Whoa, you didn't hold back there... 😁

I'm not exactly a fan of the new Pope, but I know everyone's gonna be losing their minds once he shows up. 🙂

I was pretty skeptical at first too, mostly just because they looked a little off.
Once you actually dive into his work as a philosopher and theologian, you realize just how much depth there is. Honestly, if he makes it through this, I’m starting to think he could bring some much-needed change to the table. For instance, here is one of his ideas that hasn't quite made its way to the ears of our local KC yet:

Church leaders shouldn't be playing politics directly. They weren't assigned that role by their followers, and they certainly didn't get it from the Lord. That responsibility falls on the laity. The Church's job is more indirect—to help clear the mental fog and reignite the moral strength required to sustain any just institution.
I can build threads that prove useful over time. But honestly, if you want to establish a fair society, that’s on the lay believers to actually do. As citizens, they have a responsibility to step up and engage in public life.

There’s plenty more here that’s actually grounded and practical.
It feels like EU bureaucracy is just getting more bloated, while the KC is having a total renaissance. 👍

The European Commission printed 3 million planners for high school students that mark every religious holiday for Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and so on, but somehow missed Christmas!

Link:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...ool-diary.html

They’re claiming it was just a mistake. Honestly, I'm skeptical. Between the Catholic hysteria on one side and the slow awakening from liberal multiculturalism and globalism on the other, I wouldn't be surprised if this was a deliberate provocation. Is the goal to trigger an outcry just so they can paint everyone as crazed fanatics?

The end of the article is pretty interesting, though. A spokesperson for the Commission suggested that future editions might just leave out religious holidays entirely to avoid controversy. Does that actually make any sense?

Adobe Acrobat Reader - lightweight version:

http://www.rapidshareindex.com/Adobe...26_260579.html

Worked fine for me.

I dropped out of college right when I was supposed to be hitting the books, then went back years later to finish what I started. Now I’m finally at the end. After an 18-year gap, it’s the exact same scene and the same headaches. Unbelievable. My biggest gripe is the sheer volume of coursework—I'm stuck with 10 to 13 classes a year. And of course, every single professor acts like their specific course is the center of the universe. There's zero room for actual deep learning. It’s just cramming everything into your head using condensed study guides so you can pass and move on. Who actually has the bandwidth to detaljno master the material for 13 different classes prostudirati in a single year? You barely have time to memorize the basics, let alone read supplemental literature and actually learn something.

goldenmason172 said:That is precisely the most critical point, and it counts for a great deal. If it hadn't been for their foresight, we might not even have these products in our daily lives today. 👍 👍 There is still so much else we enjoy modernly simply because NASA recognized its value early on!

I think you’re getting a bit too hyped up about NASA. To me, the real strength of American technology lies in the countless small, innovative companies and research institutes—places like IBM—rather than in a massive behemoth like NASA.

Same goes for the science; no sane person would question Russian science or their space program. As for practical everyday benefits, I think you're right—the US economic system is great at quickly turning "military toys" into civilian tech.

Pretty informative piece on Korolev, the Russian giant of space tech:

http://www.zvjezdarnica.com/full.php...&%5C%20target=

It’s wild how much Hitler and Stalin set their countries back. Without them, space technology and the global balance of power would look completely different. But hey, wishful thinking, I guess...

goldenmason172 said:Oh, really? 🤔 In that case, the least you could do is be a bit more specific! ☕

Who could possibly remember all those names? Luckily, Google is there to help you out. 🙂

Doug Engelbart developed the Mouse back in the early '60s at the Stanford Research Institute. NASA eventually took an interest, and then you get that whole story involving Xerox and Apple.

Joystick - Germany in the 40s, you've got an interesting story on Wikipedia.

The history of LCD is actually pretty fascinating. If you check Wikipedia, it goes all the way back to 1888.

Science and technology are just too massive and complex to be wasting time arguing over two major, high-stakes institutions.

At the end of the day, both American and Russian space tech—specifically rocket propulsion—is built on the backs of German scientists and engineers recruited after WWII.

I think this whole debate is pretty pointless. Every single invention or breakthrough mentioned here is built on centuries of grueling work by countless scientists. It’s not like Newton was kidding when he said his greatest achievements came from standing on the shoulders of giants.

goldenmason172:
Mouse, joysticks, and LCDs weren't invented at NASA, nor were they developed because of NASA (though it's true they were quickly recognized, funded, and put to use there).