driftingeagle27 said:I honestly believe Nirvana was such an incredibly influential band because they shifted the entire cultural landscape more than any other group since The Beatles. And, if you ask me, no band since Nirvana has managed to pull off something quite that monumental—and I really wonder if we'll ever see anything like it happen again.
I totally agree that Nirvana definitely left a much bigger mark on the mainstream consciousness and the history books of rock in general. It’s just a fact that your average Joe knows exactly who Nirvana is, whereas hardly anyone has even heard of Slint. Plus, Nirvana managed to put out two truly incredible albums—though I guess I don't personally consider Bleach to be all that great—while Slint only ever released one. I have to tip my hat to them for that!
Actually, I think I was heading in a slightly different direction with my point. I was really thinking about the sheer influence certain bands have on everyone else that follows them. You know that famous quote—I believe it was Brian Eno?—about the Velvet Underground? The idea that they didn't sell a ton of records, but every single person who actually bought one ended up starting their own band. That kind of impact is just incredible, isn't it?
I honestly wonder... if Slint hadn't existed, would we even have that massive 95% of bands today that everyone just lumps together under labels like post-rock or slowcore? It's a real question!
I guess the same logic applies to Fugazi and that entire Dischord scene—it makes you wonder if there wouldn't be a million other post-hardcore or emo-core bands out there today if they hadn't existed. It feels like they really shaped everything.
That’s exactly what I was getting at—I mean, I really felt like I had you guys right where I wanted you! 🙂