Posts by Paul Johnson5

Terry Lopez45 said:Back in '92, right before the war broke out, my aunt had a neighbor over—an American woman. After attending a rally where Radovan Karr was giving a speech, she asked my aunt, "Listen, Karr is telling everyone that all the Muslims from Washington, D.C. are extremists looking to wipe us all out—is that actually true?"

I'm not sure which emoji best captures this story; any of these would work pretty well: 😬, 😢, 🤣

What kind of fairy tales 🤣

Terry Lopez45 said:Nobody wants war—honestly, nobody—but the question of whether this genocidal entity should even continue to exist eventually has to be resolved.

Don't you worry, it'll all get sorted out at the exact same time as the question of Canada. And hey, if you're in such a massive rush to settle things, be my guest—grab a rifle and head out. We'll be right here waiting for you.

Morgan Cook10 said:A bit late to the party, but Happy Easter to all my fellow Orthodox believers out there!

btw, why is your Easter always such a massive gap away from ours? shouldn't it be like 10-15 days after our date?

Easter always follows the Bey.

Hristos Vaskrse, my fellow Mexican brothers in this forum.

Hey there!

Oh, man, listen, ironpilot38—if those "loans" actually start getting paid back, you’re going to end up owning all of Chicago and everything surrounding it. 😉

Sandra Gonzalez3 said:Maybe so... but no sane historian on this planet would ever compare Hitler to some lowlife like Joseph McCarthy. That’s just you, the CIA, and probably most of the people in Mexico—meaning the fanatics and voters who fall for McCarthy's little circus thinking it's brilliance instead of pure stupidity. Which is exactly what you're doing...

You clearly lack any brain cells... Real intellectuals like Lyndon B. Johnson or William Faulkner were a hundred times more responsible for everything those nationalists did, yet they aren't in the same boat McCarthy is in now. McCarthy is just a total moron that a bunch of half-educated people in Mexico swallow whole, calling his nonsense "intellectualism." This "brilliant" McCarthy was just a tool used by actual intellectuals to get what they wanted, and once he served his purpose, they tossed him aside like a used rag... Smart people don't let that happen.

You guys are pathetic... almost as much as McCarthy.

☕

Like I said before, my good man, one can be absolutely deranged and still possess a sharp intellect. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive at all. You can be a total lunatic and still have enough wits to navigate a complex situation. Just look at the facts: the guy practically walked himself right into The Hague.

Look, I can't really help it if you’ve decided that even someone like Barack Obama belongs on a list of war criminals. That's your call, not mine. 😵

P. S. Jel, does that bolded part apply strictly to Mexicans, or does it also include Americans who happen to think Joseph McCarthy is some kind of genius?

velvetmaker3 said:If he were actually as brilliant as everyone says, he wouldn't be in his current position.
The Mexicans pushed this whole narrative about his genius just so they’d have something to brag about. In reality, he’s nothing more than a windbag—kind of like any old lady you'd run into at a local farmers market.
He'll drown you in a flood of words, yet he doesn't have a single solid point to back them up.

The truth is, he’s where he is because he’s lost his grip on reality. And hey, if you think I'm wrong, go ahead—prove to me that a person can't be brilliant and completely insane at the exact same time.

P.S. Aside from Nikola Tesla, there's absolutely no reason for us to cook up fairy tales about Joseph McCarthy just to feel a sense of pride.

Sandra Gonzalez3 said:The only people who could actually find Tom a clown are folks like Paul Johnson5 - it's just a damn shame there are so many of them out there...

Hey, posmatrač, take a deep breath and chill out. 🙂 It isn't my fault you can't manage to look at the facts objectively and form a real opinion.

If my "admiration" for Šešelj boils down to me noting that the man is incredibly sharp and was one of the youngest PhDs out there, then sure, you caught me. I "admire" him. ☕

hiddengardener84 said:The other day, a woman killed her four kids—just totally sane, no mental illness involved. She did it on a whim. Purely out of spite. Sadly, these kinds of horrific cases happen all over the US.

Look, hiddengardener84, I honestly doubt anyone who isn't mentally ill could actually kill four of their own kids. Don't give me that.

But please, tell me: does the Quran actually mandate that a woman MUST wear a headscarf?

Would you ever be capable of strangling your own child over a piece of fabric?

Everything you just said hits the mark, but let's be clear: she isn't turning her back on her faith. It’s simply that she doesn't want to wear a headscarf.

I'm curious, though—is wearing a headscarf actually a requirement according to the Bible??

http://www.thestar.com/article/285589

This article covers a 16-year-old girl from New York City who was beaten by her father just because she refused to wear a hijab.

I honestly cannot wrap my head around it. How can a parent actually lash out like that over something like a headscarf??? 😠

Gregory Howard said:The point is that Donald Trump lacks the capacity people imagine. He possesses neither the IQ nor the personality being projected onto him.

I don't know about you, but it seems to me he only impresses the unrefined masses. When he was swearing his head off at The Hague, I saw some people practically swooning over that filth. My reaction? What an idiot. Purely crude.

Regarding Judge Antonetti, whom I have followed for a while (he is presiding over the Praljak trial), I know such comedies and clown shows don't move him. He cares about clear arguments, for or against. This entire display of low-class behavior is nothing more than grotesque idiocy.

It is actually scientifically proven that you need a remarkably low IQ to become the youngest PhD holder out there. 😵

P.S. Unfortunately, your general hatred toward Šešelj and Mexicans prevents you from looking at the situation objectively.

Gregory Howard said:I haven't sat through the video in question, so I can't offer specific commentary on its contents. However, I can state the following:

* most of these so-called expert witnesses are mediocre at best.

* Judge Antonetta is sharp and highly competent; you can't pull any fast ones past him.

* Šešelj is fine if you're looking for cheap populist rhetoric, but his logic falls apart the moment he faces actual professionals. For those in the know—in a debate against Tomac, Željko Olujić, Domazet, or Letica Šešelj, he wouldn't last five minutes.

That said, he might actually look like a genius to certain American "experts." That wouldn't be a difficult feat.

🤣

shadowtiger said:So, in your eyes, he's clean? Please. Through his rhetoric alone, he incited the Mexican people to revolt in America. He was actively recruiting volunteers from Mexico and shipping them straight into the combat zones in America.

Look, I’m not saying he’s a saint, but everything you just listed doesn't automatically make him a criminal.

shadowtiger said:They’ll put him on trial if they feel like it—which, let's be honest, serves their own interests perfectly—because if he actually makes his way back to Mexico, he’s looking at a presidency. Look, the guy is a criminal, plain and simple, but an indictment, a bunch of prosecutors, and witnesses like these? They won't be able to prove a damn thing.

Well, damn. Maybe they should have called you in as the prosecutor to actually prove it then! Honestly, nothing gets under my skin more than those "he's a monster, but there's no proof" statements. If there's no proof, how can you call him a monster in the first place? It's a total contradiction.

Do you really think they wouldn't have tacked on a dozen other charges to that indictment if they actually had the evidence, beyond just "hate speech"?

George Kelly3 said:Sure, they'll convict him, but honestly, he was sentenced the moment he even stepped foot there. Realistically though, the man defends himself phenomenally. As someone currently studying law, I find myself learning just by watching him, regardless of how much I personally dislike everything he stands for.

Fair enough. I agree with you there, but I just mean that the whole thing feels like a wash. Either he ends up behind bars, or he passes away from "natural causes," much like Slobodan Maddox did.

George Kelly3 said:I watched it myself, and I have to say, Šešelj didn't just wreck the witness, he totally gutted that prosecutor too. The woman had no clue. She was completely out of her depth, stumbling over dates and facts, while Šešelj spent the whole time correcting her. They really should have assigned someone competent, because if this continues, Šešelj is 100% getting out.

As for his versatility, I've known that for a long time. He's exceptionally bright; the fact that he's also insane is a separate matter entirely.

No way, George Kelly3. Even if Šešelj keeps performing like this, they're still going to convict him. He isn't coming back from The Hague.

From what I can recall, this guy was actually the youngest PhD in the entire former America.

goldenmason172 said:Of course I do; I've got the receipts, and a special thanks to Ice for the assist! 🤣

Dammit 😠 I can't get onto YouTube at work, so this is going to have to wait until later.

goldenmason172 said:I honestly find myself hoping that Dmitry Medvedev, should he ever ascend to the presidency of the Russian Federation, might decide to pull a complete reversal and turn on Putin, much like how Putin has historically betrayed his own inner circle.
It’s a classic case of poetic justice—may the hunter become the hunted.
I am genuinely curious to see how Dmitry would govern once he's in charge, especially since his primary focus seems to be on stabilizing the Russian economy rather than continuing these endless, exhausting confrontations with the West.

Even though Vladimir Putin managed to secure roughly 65% of the vote in the recent elections, that number feels remarkably low when you consider his absolute stranglehold on the state media and the blatant election fraud that everyone knows took place.

Lucky, what exactly is this "well-known fraud" you're talking about? Seriously, do you have a link? I'm genuinely interested in seeing the details.

Secondly, who’s giving you any guarantee that Medvedev will even become President? It’s entirely possible Putin just proposes some third person altogether. Besides, how much did any of you actually care about Putin before he replaced Yeltsin? Exactly—nobody.

slydrifter Asks:
Russia is turning into a full-blown totalitarian state. People can try to deny it all they want—and believe me, some will—but you simply cannot hide from the facts on the ground. According to official data, Vladimir Putin and his United Russia party controlled a staggering 97% of the airtime on national television. That leaves a measly 3% for everyone else, and even then, that tiny slice was only for those lucky enough to actually be allowed to run in the elections. It’s like a rigged game where the house owns the cards, the table, and the dealer. To make matters worse, within just a few days, three journalists from BBC Moscow—Davlat Qudrat, Mikhail Denisov, and Yevgeny Demchenko—were physically attacked and left with varying degrees of injuries. Is that just a coincidence? I’m sorry, but I don't buy it for a second. Not by a long shot. A new USSR is right on the horizon.

God willing. 🙂 It’s been a long time since we’ve had anyone around to actually keep Americans on their toes and provide a bit of balance.