CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Amanda Nguyen5 › Posts

Posts by Amanda Nguyen5

302 posts shown.

The Bee Movie in Movies ·
Just got back from the screening, so I figured I'd kick this thread off right now.

"What did you watch?" my buddy asked me over the phone. How am I supposed to answer that? "An animated feature"? Nah, sounds too formal... "A cartoon," I said... and then I paused for a second. Man, "cartoon" sounds so innocent, doesn't it?
That's really the core issue with animation these days. It’s not being made to be a "cartoon" intended primarily for kids. No, nowadays, "kids' movies" are stuff like Bridge to Terabithia, Golden Compass, or eventually Harry Potter. Kids want to see talking trees and flying broomsticks, not a dog chasing a cat because the cat is chasing a mouse—which was basically the essence of the cartoons from my childhood (and yours, too). Modern animated films are something else entirely. They're targeting an educated, attentive audience; people who want to actually think while they watch, rather than just sitting there, munching popcorn and laughing at random gags. Honestly, I had to work harder watching this thing than I did watching 80% of this year's live-action cinema releases. The pacing, the dialogue, the colors, the dense jokes—it all felt like something you need to come prepared for. You could follow those older genres three times easier today.
There were tons of clever bits flying through this film (animated film, cartoon, whatever...), and I think I caught about 70% of them. Actually, I bet I caught more than 80% of the audience, because the rest just flew right over my head for some reason. There were moments where you could tell a joke was clearly "in the air"—but the theater just sat there in silence. Not even grumbling or loud popcorn crunching, just pure silence, because if most people didn't feel it, they definitely felt what I felt.
The movie is incredibly fast-paced, even if it doesn't feel like it at first, and that's my biggest gripe along with it being a bit unfocused. So, this bee is trying to make a life for herself, so she flies out, pollinates flowers, gathers honey, talks to humans, ends up in a courtroom (I mean, a courtroom! in a cartoon!), saves Mother Nature's entire flora, goes back to gathering honey, and so on and so on, endlessly.
Roger Ebert also drew some (conditional) parallels between the bee's worldview and Marxism, which is actually pretty easy to spot once you look for it, and it's pretty interesting.
Something Ebert didn't mention, which I find even more fascinating, is that the two biggest animated hits this year both focus on communication between an animal protagonist and their human friend—basically their anchor in the world. Why is this happening now, and why is Hollywood pumping out so many political films this year? It's certainly not a trivial question you can just brush off, but it's a hell of an interesting phenomenon.
Even when I compare it to Ratatouille, I have to admit Ratatouille left a much bigger impression on me. Rotten Tomatoes gave The Bee Movie a measly 53%, while Juhu-h got something like 96%. Personally, I'd be a bit gentler and give our flying hero a solid 7 or 8/10. The animation is gorgeous and there are great jokes (Chris Rock absolutely shines, and as one American critic noted, it's about time he got his own animated movie), but I still can't get past how overstuffed and unfocused it feels.

Sorry, I started rambling at the end because I remembered nobody actually reads these long posts anyway, and I don't want to spend days typing this out, so I'll stop here.
Golden year Queen Elizabeth in Movies ·
ambermoose22 said:I was totally blown away by Cate's performance. Honestly, I felt the exact same way about Helen Mirren.

Really? I didn't even notice Mirren was in it.
I guess Cate just had my full attention.
Golden year Queen Elizabeth in Movies ·
Dammit, I was hunting for this thread thinking it didn't exist, but here it is after all.

Alright, let me just grab my entry from my "recently watched" list...

"Golden year Queen Elizabeth" - Shekhar Kapur

If we’re going by Polimchev’s rating system, I’d give this a yellow—and honestly, it's leaning pretty hard toward red.

It’s boring, lacks focus, and feels pretentious at times.

The only redeeming quality is that one 5-6 minute sequence near the end where they cut between Elizabeth on the hill and Philip in the palace—the acting and the score actually make that part work quite well.
Everything else? Total waste of time.

Then again, maybe it’s just because I’ve been bingeing six or seven Scorsese masterpieces lately, so my standards are through the roof right now.

I will say, Cate shines in certain moments, and the overall vibe isn't a total disaster.
I haven't seen the first movie or the prequel, though.
Saw IV in Movies ·
I checked again
She’s actually got a great figure for her age, honestly.

In the meantime, I stumbled upon this:
Lionsgate has teamed with the American Red Cross for the annual Saw IV Blood Drive.[16] Since the first Saw blood drive in 2004, Saw film-goers have donated nearly 38,000 pints of blood to help save as many as 112,500 lives. Collection totals have doubled year after year resulting in tens of thousands of lifesaving blood transfusions.

And I can't forget to mention that right before the movie started, I was out having this massive dinner with some friends. We went all out—steak, pancakes, you name it... we ate a ton and drank a ton. It was one of the weirdest feelings ever, being totally stuffed and happy, then sitting there watching someone get sliced up during a full Jigsaw autopsy.

I’m pretty sure 80% of people would have been puking right then and there.
Luckily, I’ve never had an issue with it, so I was fine.

By the way, there were only two of us in the theater. Me, with my full stomach, and the other guy with a mountain of popcorn. The faster Jigsaw got sliced up and the bloodier it got, the louder and more aggressively that guy shoved popcorn into his face.

But hey, it was all good—crazy movie, crazy people.
Saw IV in Movies ·
Since there isn't much of a discussion going on, I’ll just keep this brief since I just got back from the theater screening.

Visually, the movie is an absolute assault on the eyes, and the sound design? Not great either. There’s way too much plot happening, which is totally unnecessary for a genre like this. The acting is just bad—super over-the-top—with everyone being terrible except for Jigsaw. Honestly, the only thing worth watching is when Jigsaw shows up and that whole aura he carries, though even that starts to feel a bit thin every time he reappears.
That opening puzzle was brilliant. There are a few other decent ones scattered in there, but most of them are just plain awful.

It’s a real shame, really. Saw I left such a massive impression on me, but everything following it just keeps dragging the franchise down. I remember Saw II being worse than the first, then Saw III felt a little better than the second but still didn't touch the original, and now Saw IV has completely ruined the whole vibe.
I’m telling you again, it’s such a bummer because Saw I really hit home for me.

On a different note, Jigsaw's wife looked great. I have no idea how old she is or who she even is, but man, the camera angles definitely did her assets justice.
Barbarella in Movies ·
Vadim was actually going to do the remake, but they scrapped that idea

Now everyone’s buzzing about the Rodriguez version, and word on the street is that Rosa Parks is basically locked in for the lead role
Barbarella in Movies ·
Caught this one on the big screen today

Man, I don't even know where to start

It was pure nonsense. Honestly, it got stupider by the minute. I kept wanting to just get up and walk out, but something kept me glued to the seat—which probably means it was at least some high-quality garbage. Or, if I’m being fair, semi-quality garbage.

Still, I'm glad I sat through it because I can point to three things that actually worked:
1. One of the most gorgeous opening sequences I've ever laid eyes on.
2. That crazy Dillinger guy became an instant favorite of mine. He is absolutely unhinged.
3. Some of the best dialogue in cinema history:
(The Queen of the Night—or whatever that villainess is called—wants to hook up with this handsome angel)
Queen of the Night: I want to make love to you.
Blind Angel: But an angel doesn't make love. An angel *is* love.
Queen of the Night: So, you're sterile then.

I mean, I'm stumped. Is this Sci-Fi? Adult Entertainment? A comedy? A parody? Just some weird Space Odyssey filled with nothing but travel and hookups? Who knows.

I have to say, the color palette and the whole vibe kept reminding me of "Satire," which also left me totally speechless.

First one I saw from Fellini was "Satire," first one from Vader was "Barbarella"
And apparently, I'm a bit of a film critic myself...

Alright, let's hear what you guys think.
Directors who totally missed the mark in Movies ·
Spiderman is easily one of the best things to ever happen to Hollywood since the legendary masterpiece "There Will Be Blood."

Look, if you just don't get it, well, damn, I guess we aren't all cut out for movies, right?

I’m honestly glad velvetcrane57 is sticking by that theory.

In my book, Raimi is miles ahead of his namesake Sam, who just churns out mindless garbage like that "Life Storm" flick where everyone's just messing around, or that "Road to Destruction" mess where some Forrest Gump wannabe tries to take down the entire mob. And don't even get me started on how certain directors just shoot from the hip—you can tell immediately when the Parker stunts are missing. Even DeFoe's performance in "The Tarantula Man" was something we haven't seen since "Crucifixion," where he starred alongside Gene Hackman—that guy with the French connections, the sax player from those Copland tapes, helping out Will and the "I Am Legend" Smith from Bel Air in "Public Enemy Number One," which isn't even Cagney anymore because Volle stopped acting after losing an eye like Nelson, and then there's Mandela fighting apartheid and winning a Peace Prize that didn't even sit well with big peacekeepers like Bakarić, aka "The Dead Man," but whatever, that's irrelevant. Spiderman is basically the Caligari of the 21st century, but the 21st century is passing by way too fast, so really...
Edward Norton in Movies ·
Well, I think someone already pointed this out, Ethan Price68, you left out some key stuff in your list here
like his killer performances in "Rounders" and "The Score" (I can't quite recall how they titled that one; basically De Niro and R. Oz)

Honestly, when it comes to him, I've mostly stuck to "Rounders," "The Score," "Fight Club," and "American History X." So, I actually haven't seen his debut—which I hear was his most acclaimed role in "Primal Fear"—but his work in "Rounders," "Fight Club," and "American History X" pretty much cemented him as an all-time great in my book.
He's definitely a phenomenal actor.

By the way, he shares a birthday with Slater, and I think his dad did some work for Carter once or something like that.
Lost Valley in Movies ·
redowl90 said:I'm waiting for Indiana Jones as well, obviously, but I just wanted to point out that we’re actually in the minority when it comes to the "other" films. Then again, there's a completely different crowd out there: the folks who live for film festivals and gritty indie stuff. But we've already covered that. 🙂

Based on how you put that, it sounds like the movie shouldn't have even been made, which isn't quite right. It definitely needed to be filmed, especially since we're about to see a wave of anti-war movies. I'm not sure if you've seen Lions for Lambs, but I'd honestly recommend it.

Did I catch that correctly? You've actually never seen an alien movie? I thought that would be impossible these days, but here we are... To be fair, I still haven't seen Blade Runner either. That's why this five-disc DVD set is so welcome. I can't wait for the weekend. 😍
AVP will probably be garbage to you, but to me, it's a masterpiece. I love that kind of movie: totally casual, no deep message, just pure action from start to finish, mindless fun, and hot women with guns... It's awesome! 👍

Wait for Anderson and his There Will Be Blood. Now that is a straight-up 10/10.

I have to do the same thing and it drives me crazy. But hey, life sometimes writes tragic novels.

I saw the film on November 27th at 7:20 PM. There were people there—maybe thirty or so. At the Branimir Center. Why do you ask?

Exactly what I said.

That’s not what I meant. But look, if a movie can exist without its final scene, then the world can exist without the movie, and space can exist without the world. You get what I'm saying? We could go on like this forever. So, even though you don't see eye to eye with me, I'm sticking to my guns regarding the flag. It's possible. Honestly, I might have just let my emotions get the better of me there. But seriously, anti-war films are bound to happen. It's a cycle. People started writing anti-war stuff right after WWI and again after WWII. It's no surprise that Iraq—even if it's just treated as a "place where wars happen" rather than a specific location—has to have consequences reflected in cinema. I'm definitely going to see Lions for Lambs. Like most of the new stuff hitting theaters, I'll catch it as soon as I have a free moment. I'm hoping to make it out by next Thursday to see Lions and Control. If I have time, maybe I'll even squeeze in Knocked Up or Saw 4. We'll see.

Look, I haven't seen any of the Alien movies, I haven't seen Blade Runner, and I haven't even touched anything by Welles, Hawks, Renoir, Eisenstein, Lubitsch, or Walsh. My "to-watch" list is massive and my free time is tiny, but hey, I’ve got plenty of drive and a whole lot of years ahead of me, so I’m just taking it slow. And honestly? I don't see why I wouldn't like AVP. I love all kinds of stuff. I'd give Transformers 9 a solid 9 or 9.5 out of 10, and Stardust is a 9.5 for me. Taste is a wide-open thing. Sure, you try to be objective whenever you can, but let's be real—sometimes that's just incredibly hard to do.

I was actually getting a little worried that we were stuck with another Wes movie, especially since I haven't seen much of his stuff despite all the hype. But then I saw they’re doing an Anderson film! I’ve actually met him, by the way. I've seen Magnolia—which was absolutely brilliant—and Hard Eight, which was really good too. Everyone seems to have Punch-Drunk Love and Boogie Nights on their must-watch list. Honestly, if I haven't missed anything, I think that's pretty much his whole masterpiece collection right there. Either way, I am definitely going to see this. It'll be my first time seeing an Anderson film on the big screen. I remember watching Magnolia back in Montauk when the rain completely ruined everything—what a total disaster!

5. 😁

Just doing a little field test to see if our theory actually holds up in the real world. On my end, I counted about six people. It was at the AMC Theatres near Top Time around 9:45 PM last night.
So, it’s worth it.

Dammit, just look at point one.😉
Lost Valley in Movies ·
redowl90 said:Let's face it, nobody here is actually going to watch this. 90% of the people visiting this site are just waiting for the next Spider-Man, Indiana Jones, or pirate flick. ☕

Personally, I felt that whole thing was pretty unnecessary, since we had already figured everything out before that scene even played out.

From your keyboard straight into the Academy's ears, but honestly, I feel like AVP 2 might get a Movie of the Year nod before Fincher ever gets anything for directing.

1. Look, I’m waiting for Indiana Jones and all that too, but I’ll still go see this. Also, grammar check: it's "are just waiting," not "just waiting." 😁
2. Did you really need to sit through the whole movie to realize what you realized after it? We could do that forever.
3. AVP? Good grief, I didn't even know there was a movie, thought it was just a game. Sure, I'll go do my homework, watch all the Alien movies for the first time, then rewatch Predator, then finally get to AVP... see how that works? You end up learning about AVP on a thread about Haggis. As for Fincher—I think he’s the only director whose film made my top 10 list after the awards, so I’m definitely rooting for him.

Two quick off-topic points:
1. Why can't you quote a quote on this forum? Why doesn't it auto-quote instead of making me manually copy and paste the "/quote" stuff?
2. What day and time did you catch the screening? Was there actually a crowd there?
Lost Valley in Movies ·
redowl90 said:Personally, I have to admit that the final scene—that last shot of the upside-down American flag—actually made me feel nauseous, and it dropped my rating from a five down to a four. I felt Haggis had already successfully delivered his message in a very simple, direct way earlier on. I don't see the point in that final scene or the heavy-handedness of basically shouting, "What the hell are Americans doing at the end of the world and dying for?!" right in our faces.

That closing moment, while completely foreseeable from the start, feels like total nonsense. But I suppose it was designed to cater to the Academy voters. I’m anticipating a guaranteed screenplay nomination and likely a lead actor nod as well. They should also consider Charlize, who is excellent. Her kid is great too, especially in those two scenes, particularly the one with Tommy where he tells him the story of David and Goliath. Susan Sarandon is predictably pathetic, just like she always is (ugh!).

To wrap things up: Paul Haggis should stick to writing screenplays rather than directing them. When he just writes for someone else to direct, the results are extraordinary (like Letters from Iwo Jima), but when he takes the director's chair himself, it unfortunately settles for being merely "very good" (like Crash or the lost valley).

Rating: 4/5

- Susan Sarandon doesn't exactly shine, but she did her job decently. Plenty of actresses in her position would have completely botched it, so she played it relatively well (as much as possible).
- You didn't really need to mention the last scene, because even if it isn't huge, it's nice not to spoil the ending. Personally, I didn't find it pathetic at all. To me, it showed the only remaining way Jones could express his frustration and grief. He did it quietly, without all the heavy-handedness, drama, or sentimentality. It was beautiful, and I loved it (even though I also said it was totally predictable). Maybe it's just a Jones thing.

And maybe, since it reminded me a bit of Redford's move in The Last Castle, I'll just take a great role in an equally great movie.

Look, I forgot about the Academy for a second, but actors are definitely in, and the screenplay could easily snag a nomination too. The movie might as well, but I'm rooting for a Zodiac sweep.

At the end of the day, redowl90, it's still a very good film.
Lost Valley in Movies ·
A new flick just hit our theaters from two-time Oscar winner Paul Haggis.

The three leads are all Oscar winners too, which is a pretty solid hint that this movie is going to be good.
Plus, it’s a drama. Given how often AMC Theatres puts dramas on the schedule, we can actually hold out hope for a decent one. I mean, when you have a crew this talented, you really ought to expect something special.
Though, honestly, it didn't have to be this way.

Tommy Lee Jones plays Hank, a Vietnam veteran whose two sons followed in his footsteps. One is already dead, and the other deserted his military base without permission. Hank doesn't act scared, but you can feel that "certain" vibe coming off him, and he sets out to find his son. Once he realizes his boy is dead, the search for the son ends and the hunt for the killer begins.
In a lot of ways, this reminded me of the brilliant "Zodiac," even though they don't share much besides the theme of "hunting a killer"—except here, it isn't really about that at all. It's more of a "search for oneself," or as Jones so beautifully put it: "Only after we conquer ourselves can we face others."

This could have easily been just another entry in the endless string of anti-Iraq projects. It could have been another cookie-cutter "find a killer" flick or a typical American story worn thin by repetition.
Haggis skillfully avoided all those traps.
The acting ensemble delivers a massive, heavy-hitting performance. It was great seeing Jones and Sarandon on screen together; I haven't seen them paired up since "The Client." Charlize Theron plays a cop helping Jones out, but she's also helping the whole group—and helping him find himself.
Jones gives one of the best performances I've seen on screen lately, and it actually gets better the less he talks and moves. I remember Theron as this gorgeous blonde girl (I still haven't seen "Monster"), and at first glance, I didn't even recognize her. She's "aged" a bit, "lost" some of that youthful charm, and became truly excellent—nothing like your typical, stereotypical investigator. I have to admit, the most thankless role goes to Sarandon. She’s in very little of the film and mostly just has to mourn or cry, or at least show up looking totally depressed (aside from a few minutes of normal conversation with Jones at the start). But I'd say she handles it perfectly, and thanks to her, the movie avoids getting too sappy.
The film doesn't suffer from filler, rushed pacing, bad acting, awkward music, or lousy dialogue. Everything is exactly where it needs to be. Unlike "Zodiac," which I mentioned earlier, it doesn't struggle with details (even though those served a different purpose there), but it was still interesting to spot—if you were paying attention—a picture of a smiling Bush hanging on the wall during that intense dramatic conversation between Theron and Jones in her office.

I absolutely have to mention that about ten minutes before the end, there's this scene at the confession table. It’s just a series of close-ups without any dialogue, but it’s executed so simply and skillfully that it leaves you speechless—even more than shots that are technically much more difficult in other movies.

This is probably the best drama I've seen at AMC Theatres so far (unless you count "Zodiac," which isn't strictly a drama), and it's definitely one of the best films of the year, right up there with "Zodiac."

I have to say, the ending really got to me. I actually shed a few tears—tears that felt way more earned than the ones I expected from "Damnation," which didn't move me at all. Even though the final scene is predictable, the way the story unfolds combined with the score, including the Puerto Rican influence through Jones, makes it one of the most impactful endings I've seen in recent memory.

Objectively: 9.5/10
Subjectively: 10/10

A must-watch!

And I should add, Ebert is usually high quality, even if he occasionally misses the mark. He rarely opens my eyes because he tends to write about generalities and draws parallels that I could probably draw myself (most of them, anyway). But I always love reading him because you can tell he takes his job seriously. However, this is the only review where he pointed out everything I would have said, and where I agree with him 100%. It's a strange feeling.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...4/-1/REVIEWS01
Fracture (2007) in Movies ·
I read all those scathing reviews out there, so I decided to skip seeing this one in theaters.

Honestly, I have no clue why everyone here is raving about it when they usually aren't.

I'll just wait and catch it on my TV at home instead.
PhD Programs in Film Studies in Movies ·
Maria Clark said:writing reviews? 🤔


Are you sure about that?
Kids (1995) in Movies ·
I watched it maybe two or three times, but the last time was probably five or six years ago, so I honestly can't say how it holds up objectively

All I know is that, personally, I thought it was absolutely incredible. I’ve spent ages hunting for something else by Clark that hits that same way, and so far? Nothing. Still nothing.

Yeah, a film was playing at the Everglades recently, but after some pretty bad experiences—both for me and my friends—I decided to just stay far away from that place. So, yeah...
Jurassic Park in Movies ·
It’s been ages since I sat down to watch these, and honestly, this is how they stuck with me. Though, I really should probably give them another spin through a more mature lens to see if my take changes:

Part 1 is a straight-up masterpiece.
Part 2? Total garbage.
Part 3 is actually decent.

I mean, back then I was just a kid, obsessed with stuff like >, >, and whatever else was playing at the theater...
Even though those classics still hold up, I definitely need to revisit the main topic again.
Jack Sparrow (3 Steel) in Movies ·
And there’s that bit too, claiming high school poetry is just a total drag
Where can I buy The Godfather trilogy? in Movies ·
Hey, ask for me too because I'm super curious about this, so just shoot me a DM

thanks
What's playing at AMC Theatres? in Movies ·
I stumbled upon that Ida Tarbell documentary on "www.inzg.net"—you know, that site that pops up right at the top when you Google "AMC Theatres"? It updates constantly, so it’s always got the best, most detailed info out there.
The Europa Theater still doesn't have a regular schedule set up, but things should change pretty soon. Now that the city has finally bought the theater, there's no way they're going to let it just sit there empty forever...

Anyway, hope that helps!