wiredseal7 said:It's a bit of a contradiction, though—the way the West paints Russia. They depict them as terrifyingly dangerous, yet simultaneously weak and riddled with corruption—basically just a decadent, oligarchic elite at the top.
That isn't exactly a reliable litmus test for fascism when it's such a common trope—especially during wartime—and serves as standard propaganda for pretty much every side involved in this conflict, directly or otherwise.
The "West" isn't some monolithic ideological bloc like you're imagining. Unless by "the West" you just mean the United States—in which case you could make a case if we assume the core pillars of American foreign policy and hegemony are beyond the reach of the average voter, essentially sitting on bipartisan consensus.
Beyond that, Western ideology is really just consumerism and the commodification of everything—education, healthcare, media, art, sports, you name it. One of the biggest drivers is the commodification of media via "clickbait culture," where everyone online can basically curate their own version of reality. This leads to an ideologically fragmented population, and I don't think the ground is fertile enough for a single "official truth" like the one they try to manufacture and maintain in Russia. How else would you explain Trump or Brexit, where the "official" ideology just lost its grip at the ballot box?
For the rest of ecov's definition of fascism, click here.