Posts by Alex Edwards4

It’s ridiculous, isn't it? Look at the North America. On Reddit, which was founded by none other than Satoshi Nakamoto himself—the very hub for the most dedicated supporters of his vision—people are allowed to criticize and challenge the concept. You'll find threads titled "Bitcoin is a myth, not reality" sitting there without any issue, sparking open debate.

But on this particular forum, that kind of discourse is strictly forbidden. It all comes down to the fact that the moderators and their inner circle can't handle the truth. When I posted the exact same arguments here that were being discussed on Reddit, the group attacked me personally, acting as if I had insulted their families. The moderator didn't hand out a single warning to anyone else. Instead, I received a permanent ban from the subforum simply because I spoke the truth about the system. It isn't even that I care about debating here; there are far better places for actual discussion than a subforum hijacked by a few crypto enthusiasts and a moderator who shuts down every critical topic. I am only pointing this out on principle.

What the moderator actually did was clear the way for misinformation to spread unchecked, effectively misleading the entire community here. On top of that, they’ve allowed the promotion of fake transactions, which is essentially criminal behavior in any other context. While fabricating Bitcoin transactions might not be codified as a crime just yet—it seems our politicians are a bit slow on the uptake regarding these matters—what is happening within Satoshi's scheme is fundamentally fraudulent because people are being sold something that simply doesn't exist. It’s identical to the way someone might falsify an invoice. You record a quantity and an item name, even though no actual transaction ever took place. Similarly, Satoshi's system records that you own a certain amount of Bitcoin, when in reality, no such assets exist within the system. You aren't actually gaining possession of anything. We are looking at a global online scheme built on fictitious transactions, where cryptographic keys and protocols are used to manage imaginary quantities assigned to virtual addresses.

I was penalized by the moderator simply for describing this global scam. I was punished for pointing out how people are being deceived by presenting these fictional transactions as if they were real. I am calling on the administration to correct the moderator's arbitrary decision.

Mark Richardson86 said:I mean, broadly speaking, that’s all true... but there's a catch. Given how this forum operates, and seeing how much energy goes into defending a specific viewpoint, aren't you just philosophizing about a subject you clearly haven't grasped? You're talking extensively about absolutely nothing, yet somehow convinced that you'll manage to persuade someone that you actually know what you're talking about. If that's the case, then the alternative is frankly a bit unsettling...

I am here to expose misinformation and hollow arguments. Just as I have already done in your case.

Mark Richardson86 said:You can tell someone else they're spreading information all you want... acting like whoever shouts first wins the argument... lol... what a joke... just because you're in the dark doesn't mean everyone else is too...
Yeah, you are spreading misinformation... and you're doing it quite deliberately, if you ask me... I only need to say it once, and any person with a shred of common sense will see right through it... 👍

It seems you have lost all sense of reality now that I’ve exposed your position. You are denying basic facts by clinging to the fantasy that the healthiest segment of our population—children—serves as a primary reservoir for spreading disease. Once caught in a lie, you simply retreat into rhetorical performances to save face. I am asking you again: Why target children? Why propagate lies and misinformation regarding kids? Who is funding you? What you are doing borders on criminal behavior.

Mark Richardson86 said:Because you're talking nonsense... apparently viruses just manifest and spread through some kind of spiritual energy, I get it... they don't actually pass from one person to another... it's funny because on other threads here you guys provide these exhaustive 3D analyses of every tiny detail, yet somehow this obvious, transparent garbage completely escapes your notice... I honestly don't know... how you can even bring yourself to write such absurdities... I really don't.

No amount of 3D modeling or similar nonsense can change the fact that people without symptoms can still serve as reservoirs for spreading infection. In reality, those with more severe symptoms act as the primary reservoirs. Stronger symptoms indicate a higher number of attacked cells. More attacked cells mean a higher viral load. The elderly and the immunocompromised experience more intense symptoms, making them the main hubs for accumulating and spreading the virus. Children are essentially the opposite. Why do you persist in spreading misinformation? Why would anyone try to pressure kids with needles?

rustywalker82 said:Don't get all philosophical on me. This is just a preprint. Even if it weren't, you can't just throw around claims like that. Raw data has to be processed using actual scientific methods first, and then medically interpreted to figure out if there's even a cause-and-effect relationship happening here.

The data has already been processed and stands as it is. The issue is that these findings contradict your narrative, so you are fighting them tooth and nail. You are simply using Freudian rationalization to remain loyal to your preconceived notions. However, nobody cares about your narratives or your justifications. Formalized facts will always supersede intellectual constructs.

rustywalker82 said:Just keep in mind, this is a preprint study, so plenty of people are pushing back on it. Here’s one critique from another scientist who isn't buying it.
https://yourlocalepidemiologist.subs...nts-and-the-uk

That isn't a study; those are raw data points. Data represents facts presented in a formal structure. Facts do not simply vanish because of how people choose to interpret them.

Mark Richardson86 said:I wonder if any of those self-appointed internet warriors have actually bothered to wrap their heads around why schools act as such perfect breeding grounds for viruses to just sit and simmer before spreading everywhere.

Children are actually the key to stopping the spread caused by immunocompromised individuals. A child's immune system is robust enough to brush off a virus like a minor nuisance, picking it up from the environment after those with weakened systems have introduced it. Most kids don't even show symptoms; they neutralize the virus at the very first line of defense. In reality, the true reservoirs for accumulating and spreading viruses are people like Xavier Becerra, who disregard health protocols, or those gripped by vaccine anxiety, where constant stress can compromise their own immunity.
And even then, nobody cares if Xavier Becerra or some other person chooses to get vaccinated, because everyone is free to protect themselves however they see fit.

So, why bother spreading misinformation, and why would you ever want to target children with needles?

New research indicates vaccine side effects vs COVID risks may be higher for boys.

American scientists have found that teenagers face a greater likelihood of developing vaccine-related myocarditis than being hospitalized due to COVID-19.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...suggests-study

According to American researchers, healthy boys are more likely to be hospitalized for rare myocarditis caused by the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine than for complications from COVID-19 itself.

Their analysis of medical data suggests that boys aged 12 to 15 with no underlying health conditions are four to six times more likely to be diagnosed with vaccine-related myocarditis than to require hospitalization for COVID-19 over a four-month period.

Apemant said:Right, I just realized I actually agreed with the idea that the vaccine contains the spike protein. 😁

In reality, it provides the instructions for the body to produce a massive amount of that spike protein, which then triggers the development of antibodies against them. My previous point still stands, though: because it is so narrowly targeted, the vaccine is ineffective. 😬

Exactly. With a natural infection, the body develops immunity against various proteins—different antigens—of the virus. This means that if a single protein or its coding RNA mutates, you don't lose your entire immunity to the virus. That is the fundamental difference from an artificial vaccine, which focuses solely on the spike protein. Furthermore, we are born with a massive repertoire of B and T cells specific to antigens we have never even encountered. It is entirely possible that the defense against a new strain already exists within us. Finally, our genome contains numerous genes for antibody production that constantly recombine to create a vast array of random antigen-specific lymphocytes—roughly 3x10^11 of them. Some are pruned during the process due to auto-specificity to ensure they don't mistake our own proteins for threats. Essentially, the human body is prepared at multiple levels to handle most new threats, including new viral strains; it only truly needs to "learn" in exceptional cases. If this weren't the case, and given how viruses constantly mutate, we would face endless pandemics. Even the seasonal flu would become increasingly lethal every single year. Therefore, this constant fear regarding new strains and the desperate search for salvation in vaccines is anything but scientific.

Brian Wells3 said:I love my kids and I want to protect them as much as possible. They’ve stayed up to date on all their routine shots—and they’re getting the COVID ones, too.

If they possess a healthy immune system capable of brushing off COVID without symptoms, then their chance of dying from the virus is essentially zero. In that scenario, you are simply exposing them to the risk of side effects, which can include death. That isn't an act of love; it is pure irresponsibility. Why would anyone choose to do that?

Can someone explain how arguing that current mandates target innocent people constitutes a crime under the "forum rules violation" policy? Does the moderator honestly believe that government officials are somehow immune to committing crimes? Or is wrapping a criminal act in the cellophane of an "epidemiological measure" supposed to give them a free pass? It seems like once something is wrapped in that label, you aren't even allowed to question it. I don't get the logic here.

During the Nazi era, state coercion against innocent people was masked by the phrase "purity and preservation of the Aryan race." Under communism, it was rebranded as "preserving brotherhood and unity." Today, the camps in Xinjiang are euphemistically called "re-education centers." Whenever a regime targets innocent individuals, it wraps its actions in layers of soft, melodic terminology to distract from the reality that these actions meet the textbook definition of a crime.

This is exactly what we are witnessing right now on a global scale through these mandatory lockdowns. The government exerts its power over completely innocent people under the guise of "epidemiological measures," "containment protocols," or "protecting public health." Behind these soothing, euphemistic labels, those running the machinery of state coercion are directing their force against blameless citizens. Whether they are attacking bodily autonomy, using vaccine passports as a form of extortion, enforcing isolations, or barring people from their jobs—it is all the same pattern.

Those being subjected to forced isolation are entirely innocent. They haven't done anything wrong to anyone. They bear no guilt whatsoever. Their only "offense" is breathing. Walking down the street isn't a crime or a misdemeanor. Having nucleotides in one's nasal passages isn't either. Going to work or attending a concert shouldn't be treated as such. Consequently, an individual outside of mandatory quarantine can do nothing but breathe. An unmasked person heading to their job or a concert can do nothing but breathe. That is their sole "fault"—breathing. Breathing is a spontaneous physiological process that, by its very nature, cannot be classified as a criminal offense or a violation. One cannot be held legally responsible for the act of breathing. Breathing is as innate to a person as their gender or skin color; to suggest otherwise would be akin to prosecuting someone based on their gender or the color of their skin.

Since guilt cannot exist ipso facto, those in power simply manufacture it through coercion. They are following the exact playbook used by every criminal regime in history: inventing a crime just to provide an alibi for their forced actions against an individual. In this specific instance, the fabricated offense is "spreading a contagious disease." If a person fails to comply with some arbitrary "epidemiological measure," they are falsely accused of the crime of spreading a virus. This accusation is fraudulent because, as previously established, no actual spreading is taking place. Spreading a disease implies a willful act, which is entirely absent here. There is only the physiological function of breathing.

Even from a biological standpoint, respiratory illness is ultimately the result of a compromised immune system. It is an individual's own immunity that allows the virus to enter the cells, effectively granting it "permission" to replicate, which leads to cellular destruction and subsequent sickness. A person falls ill because of their body's internal state and their failure to protect themselves by inhaling a virus from an environment they chose to enter. Therefore, when dealing with a respiratory virus, the responsibility lies solely with the individual and their own physiology. It is not the fault of anyone else simply breathing.

All forced epidemiological mandates are essentially criminal acts committed by government officials acting as an organized system of state coercion, alongside those tasked with enforcing them. They function as part of a criminal enterprise that victimizes innocent citizens, committing serious felonies and causing massive financial and personal devastation.

Let’s take a quick look at two examples of these crimes.

COVID passports constitute criminal acts of extortion, unfounded coercion, and abuse of power and authority. These measures were implemented to secure financial gains for the pharmaceutical industry and to mask the misappropriation of public funds through the creation of excessive vaccine stockpiles. Those in power have abused their positions to coerce the citizenry. People are being threatened with the seizure of what is rightfully theirs—their fundamental human rights and their civil liberties as American citizens. This happens unless they accept the vaccine or pay for testing. In reality, they are being blackmailed. They are forced to choose between risking injury or death from vaccine side effects or facing the loss of their livelihoods just to reclaim their basic rights. Under the U.S. Penal Code, specifically regarding extortion, anyone who compels another to act or refrain from acting to the detriment of their property can face prison sentences ranging from six months to five years. Furthermore, if such an act of coercion results in someone's death, the perpetrator faces a minimum sentence of five years in prison.

2) Masks. Forcing someone to wear a mask is a direct assault on an individual's bodily integrity. It restricts their natural breathing capacity and interferes with basic physiological functions. Even convicted criminals shouldn't be subjected to such treatment. Once guilt is proven, we might restrict their movement, but we don't violate their physical autonomy or biological processes. Here, innocent people are being mistreated in this manner. And it is happening on a massive scale.

We should not fall for soothing euphemisms; we need to call these actions what they truly are. These aren't "epidemiological measures"—they are criminal acts.