Boosting G-Force
in Women's Health ·
Sophia Wells72 said:I’d honestly love to know if there is 🙂 let me know 😁.
Right? 🙂 😁
1429 posts shown.
Sophia Wells72 said:I’d honestly love to know if there is 🙂 let me know 😁.
Melissa James70 said:But seriously, look at that opening line— this isn't a substitute for a doctor.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/
Maria Gomez4 said:Look, I don't mean to upset you, but I find this whole narrative a bit strange.
In other words, my only real conclusion here is this: we are clearly facing a massive shortage of practicing physicians.
Because, honestly, it seems to be in the interest of every single family doctor (and several other specialists, I suppose) to take on as many patients as possible, given they are paid via capitation models; so, I can't really fathom any reason why someone would turn you away, unless they are simply overwhelmed by their caseload.
Maria Gomez4 said:Which one? You shouldn't just go around cutting someone's therapy without consulting a doctor, right?
How exactly are you interpreting this, and how did it even get to this point?
I already laid out my interpretation in my first post on this thread.
Listen, that sounds like hearsay to me. They are incredibly strict! They just sweep you aside... ugh...
Well... that brings us to the actual question of what is happening here. I suppose, without going further, Americans prescribe and consume far too many antibiotics, but in my view, we really need to investigate the root of the problem scientifically first.
As far as I know, where are they prescribed most often? To young children for throat infections.
And I guess the factors at play here include: physician fear, parental anxiety, ignorance (?), or perhaps pressure?
Teenagers and older adults aren't much of an issue; that demographic is relatively healthy.
Look, melloworca6, if you want to have a serious discussion, I guess you should avoid making such sweeping generalizations. The issue with antibiotic consumption isn't really about the financial aspect as much as it is about the development of resistance. And frankly, I highly doubt you actually know how much different antibiotics cost, or how frequently certain ones are (incorrectly) being prescribed. Please.
Maria Gomez4 said:Which one? You shouldn't just go around cutting someone's therapy without consulting a doctor, right?
How exactly are you interpreting this, and how did it even get to this point?
I already laid out my interpretation in my first post on this thread.
Listen, that sounds like hearsay to me. They are incredibly strict! They just sweep you aside... ugh...
Well... that brings us to the actual question of what is happening here. I suppose, without going further, Americans prescribe and consume far too many antibiotics, but in my view, we really need to investigate the root of the problem scientifically first.
As far as I know, where are they prescribed most often? To young children for throat infections.
And I guess the factors at play here include: physician fear, parental anxiety, ignorance (?), or perhaps pressure?
Teenagers and older adults aren't much of an issue; that demographic is relatively healthy.
Look, melloworca6, if you want to have a serious discussion, I guess you should avoid making such sweeping generalizations. The issue with antibiotic consumption isn't really about the financial aspect as much as it is about the development of resistance. And frankly, I highly doubt you actually know how much different antibiotics cost, or how frequently certain ones are (incorrectly) being prescribed. Please.
redridge13 said:Look, if you want to slide into my DMs with a list of names and phone numbers and expect me to actually pick up the phone and start dialing, you're dreaming. I'm not running a telemarketing agency here, man. Go ahead and send whatever you want privately if you need to vent, but don't expect me to act like some kind of automated calling service. I've got better things to do with my time.
Honestly, I’m just as baffled as you are. Something about this whole thing feels off to me, too.
The only logical conclusion I’m drawing from all this is that these people are living pretty damn well off those massive kickbacks they pull, and honestly? They have zero incentive to actually deal with more patients. Why bother busting their backs when the money is already rolling in?
Look, I’m telling you, they don't have more patients. I had an auntie from Medicare confirm it to me twice—and honestly, if you just head over to the Medicare website and check the tables for contracted teams, you can see exactly how many patients everyone actually has. It's all right there in black and white.
And just for the record, I’m not some elderly shut-in, I'm not immobile, I don't have some chronic illness, and I'm definitely not a junkie.
I do all my research through my private insurance provider, but I still need to swing by my GP's office to get a formal sick note processed. My pediatrician recommended it, and honestly, I need the paperwork—I’ve got a little preschooler at home who seems to catch every single bug going around. It feels like we're constantly fighting off something new.
Maria Gomez4 said:That sort of oversight happens constantly through various commissions, boards, and audits. They monitor how many referrals you issue, how many sick leaves are signed, how many antibiotics are prescribed... basically, it’s all handled quite rigorously.
That is a very common—almost legendary—side effect of ACE inhibitors, so I honestly can't fathom why the physician didn't consider that possibility. They really should have.
No, I'm not; I just changed my status.
That's how we're trained now, and it's mandatory (knowing how to use a computer). Digitalization has advanced so much that you even have semi-professional apps right on your smartphone.
Maria Gomez4 said:Well, I suppose that’s a pretty controversial topic you've brought up. I guess the real question is whether it’s actually more cost-effective to hire a dedicated clerk or just let the doctor handle the typing themselves.
From what I gather—though I might be wrong—there used to be plenty of medical transcriptionists back in the day, but then they were all mass-fired (well, not everyone, since some departments still have their own dedicated ladies handling the machines), so now the doctors have taken over the typing duties. It varies wildly in terms of skill level, too; I mean, some doctors are incredibly fast—I once saw a specialist from Florida typing with one hand while flipping through charts with the other!—whereas others are practically illiterate when it comes to computers, which makes sense considering the average American specialist is probably somewhere in their 50s or 55.
The amount of time wasted on data entry is just massive. In some departments, during my internship, that was basically my entire job, and I consider myself a relatively quick typist.
I can't help but wonder why everything has to be re-typed manually instead of just being copied and pasted; I guess it's just baffling why these records aren't readily available in a digital format.
redridge13 said:This thread was basically made for me 😠 😠
So, let’s dive into my little saga regarding the supposed "right" a patient has to choose their own primary care physician.
I need to switch my GP, so I decided to take the logical route—you know, the one that actually makes sense? I called Medicare, asked the lady to check near my neighborhood for any doctors who haven't hit their cap yet (they're supposed to be under 1,900 patients), and that's when the absolute circus began...
I called them one after another, and every single person just brushed me off with some variation of "we're totally full."
I don't even want to mention how much time I wasted on the phone trying to get through to everyone.
When I finally got home, I sent an email to obvezno-osiguranje@hzzo-net.hr asking if they had a list of doctors actually accepting new patients, since calling every single clinic in Washington, D.C. isn't exactly a great use of my life.
Still no response today....
I called Medicare again this morning to ask for advice, and the woman tells me, "Look, there's nothing we can do for you, it's just plain rude of them, you can file a complaint." Then she casually mentions there are three doctors in a clinic just three blocks away.
Out of those three, I manage to reach one, and of course, he turns me down too.
Then I call the clinic I'm technically assigned to (the afternoon shift)—both of them blow me off. A nurse at another clinic even tells me that their colleague from the opposite shift *should* have taken me, even though that same woman snubbed me yesterday!
Then, at a clinic in the next neighborhood, I get rejected yet again.
I was so incredibly pissed that I called the Department of Health and Human Services hotline: 0800 200 063.
The website says—and the automated operator confirms—that live people are available from 8 to 4, but somehow, at 3:30 PM, I'm still stuck talking to a robot.
I left my info and gave a brief rundown of the mess.
About 15 minutes later, my phone rings. It's a woman from the Department of Health and Human Services. She didn't really know what to tell me; she seemed like she wanted to suggest everything I'd already tried with Medicare, but since I had, she just said she'd pass my complaint along...
And honestly, what can I say? On paper, I have the right to primary healthcare and to choose my doctor. In reality? It's a complete joke.
Tomorrow, I'm heading down to the local clinic in person. If they reject me, I'm demanding a written refusal. Then I'm sending the whole story, along with that paperwork, straight to Milinović and let him try finding me a GP himself.
Just as a little side note from the Medicare regulations (specifically the rules on exercising the right to freely choose a primary care physician or dentist):
Article 9.
A chosen doctor has the right to refuse a patient only in the following cases:
1. If the number of enrolled patients under their care exceeds the maximum limit set
by general agency policy.
2. If there is a breakdown in the relationship between the chosen doctor and the insured person.
The reason for refusing a patient must be recorded by the doctor in the designated section of the official statement form.
A chosen doctor is NOT allowed to refuse a patient simply because the person is older,
sick, immobile, an addict, or suffers from mental illness, or for any other reasons that are NOT
listed in paragraph 1 of this article.
P.S. Every month, several thousand dollars are stripped from my paycheck for health insurance.
This is going in the news. ☕
dustynomad8 said:If my thyroid results come back positive... is that actually bad? I mean, how much am I going to have to deal with this? My mom is already 20 years into this and she’s on those pills constantly. I honestly don't know anything about it. I've been scrolling through the forums, but I haven't found a straight answer on what's actually coming my way 🙄
Sorry for bugging you all with these stupid questions, but I'm starting to panic 😢
Andrew Wood5 said:They are terrible. With this new system, everything from referrals to intake is typed into a computer. They just stare blankly at the monitor. You’d think they were doctors making some profound clinical assessment, but they aren't. 😂It feels like you're walking through a courtroom where they're just waiting for you to slip up so they can let you go. And they are so incredibly slow. There is zero effort to speed things up. Maybe they actually want Milinović's failures to take hold. Patients are treated like mere numbers now. It’s all pure bureaucracy, even though the whole point of this change was supposed to be the exact opposite.
Maria Gomez4 said:Look, you have to realize that money isn't infinite; our budget is already massive and, frankly, unrealistic, so those funds and resources have to be taken from somewhere!
From whom?
From pregnant women? From people with the flu? From ICU patients? Or palliative care? It doesn't matter, but all those resources—the operating room, the prep work, flying an organ in from another state via Air Force One—it all costs an enormous amount. I might be exaggerating, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's close to a million dollars. This woman underwent an experimental procedure where they transplanted a liver from a different blood type! Hello?! That is straight out of a space-age sci-fi movie.
And all of that implies that someone else who actually needed that liver didn't get it, or someone who should have been operated on immediately had to wait because the OR was occupied. It means surgeries were postponed and people were left waiting because the surgeons and staff were tied up. Maintaining that organ requires incredibly expensive medications and oversight from a top-tier clinic like the Mayo Clinic... which is great, really, but I honestly don't know who is going to foot the bill. I'm just not sure our economy can sustain that level of medical intervention.
And yeah, I have this intense urge to go visit the lady, but I probably shouldn't for ethical reasons (besides the fact that she was "my patient" back in my med school days 🙂, so I definitely remember her, even her name)
Maria Gomez4 said:I suppose they aren't necessarily unintelligent just because they’re taking advantage of a service they don't actually have to pay for; if anything, they might actually be quite clever, wouldn't you say? 🙂
I honestly feel that the cost of treating illnesses caused or worsened by clearly defined factors should be shifted directly onto those specific culprits—tobacco products, most notably. While alcohol is certainly a major driver, the number of people actually ending up needing liver transplants because of it seems relatively low compared to other issues; I suppose there is definitely a question regarding how we approach addiction treatment, but I have this nagging impression that it just isn't the massive problem that smoking is.
And why on earth would they just hand them out like candy? I mean, let’s be honest—so many people outright lie about it. It’s a total classic when you look at disability benefits or those extended medical leaves... sometimes a person just doesn't feel like showing up to work, so they turn to a doctor and say, "Hey, write me something."
I suppose a doctor might be weak, or perhaps he simply lacks the necessary expertise, or maybe he’s just plain terrified—it could honestly be all of those things at once—but you have to believe that, deep down, he truly wants to help the man.
I guess you might recall that recent news story about the patient who was treated incredibly harshly by a doctor on the second shift; apparently, they just brushed her off because she hadn't scheduled an appointment, even though she showed up specifically because she was in pain.
Look, I really have no desire to see my name being dragged through the papers!
Sigh. I usually just hop online to look up whatever is going on with a patient; most of the time, I really only need a quick refresher. I have to admit, there are plenty of things I used to think were groundbreaking, yet it turns out they’re just standard practice that my colleagues handle perfectly well. Then again, maybe it just comes down to the individual or the specific nature of the illness.
I suppose the real issue here boils down to trust—trust in the system and trust in our doctors. While I'll admit the system could certainly be performing better, it does function, and maybe there really isn't any need to descend into such widespread panic.