northernpilot2 said:I spent most of the evening scrolling through this thread—jumping around pages randomly—and stumbled upon some images that just don't belong on this forum. To be clear, nobody is fully naked (doesn't matter if they're guys or girls), but that's the point—this kind of content isn't appropriate here.
So, if they're "inappropriate," does that mean I shouldn't even post them as links? Apparently, we've reached the point where I can't even link a shirtless guy without breaking rules. If that’s what counts as inappropriate now. We all know full nudity is a no-go, but you're saying even photos of people who aren't naked are somehow problematic too. Fine. I guess we'll just wait until winter—then I assume it'll be perfectly trendy to post pictures of dudes bundled up in heavy parkas.
I wasn't calling anyone out specifically. This thread is massive—around 8,000 posts—so it's just easier to start a new one instead of letting this one head to the archives.
Is the thread slowing down the server? Is it causing technical issues? Or is someone going to have a literal heart attack when they try to read our thread and we force them to open a new one?
If you want, I can start a new thread containing just the last hundred posts. It's no big deal.
No thanks—at least not for me. And if you do start a new one, leave my posts out of it. Thanks.
Emily Fowler52 said:The forum is public. What many of us don't find an issue with might bother the general public. That's the situation with this thread—even though it's "yours," it's still accessible to everyone else.😉
It's only problematic if someone posts a photo of a user actually typing in a thread, because that compromises their privacy and opens them up to risks. Everything else seems fine to me. Though, maybe I'm just being selfish... maybe you guys are doing us a favor by making sure society gets a "cleaner" image of us, since so many outsiders read this stuff.🙂
Advice for the future: it's better to just use links for images rather than posting the image directly😉 especially if you think a photo might be "problematic" for someone.😉
So, by posting an image as a link, what exactly are we saving ourselves from? If someone’s curious, they’re going to click—whether it’s embedded via IMG code or just a plain link. Honestly, I don't see the issue here, other than maybe someone getting a little startled by some male nipples. I still don't think there's any reason to lock the thread or force everyone to use links. If you wanted things done this way, you should've cleaned up the options on the Offtopic subforum and the hazelnut section first. Then we wouldn't be in this mess.
guys, seriously, this isn't some moderator invention or us flexing our power—it's not like we have anything against your thread or you 😉—but moving forward, we really, really need to be careful with images.
Why? What’s the worst-case scenario? How could we possibly be causing harm? 😁
rustydrifter10 said:Generally, nudity is banned on the forum. That means anything showing nipples, bare butts, or genitals. Also, anything that could be considered disturbing or illegal is off-limits. Controversial photos can potentially be posted as a link, but not using IMG code.
This doesn't just apply to one specific subforum; it applies to the entire site.
We know which images are banned or "disturbing." But unless I'm mistaken, how is someone seeing a nipple going to ruin my life? 🤷 We aren't posting genitals or butts, nor do we intend to. If people were actually posting stuff like that, I'd be the first one to stop typing in the thread. Besides, I don't get why a photo is supposedly less "disturbing" if it's a link versus being embedded via IMG code—it's all just one click away. I don't see the point in hiding them behind a link. You're seeing it either way. Is a photo going to offend me more because it's a link or because it's embedded? It's the same thing.
And why didn't anyone say anything about the chat earlier when people were posting images too? Was that rule not in effect back then?