Rachel Davis said:It honestly bugs me how Angela Edwards66 gets singled out. No matter what she posts, if the rest of the group doesn't like it, the mockery and provocation start immediately. It’s like people are actually rooting for more strikes, penalties, or bans just so they can say they achieved their goal.
Does this even make sense to me?
Is asking for an actual argument or a concrete example to back up a claim really considered an "attack"?
If she writes a hundred times about how Ibrica does great things, I’m going to ask her for one single example of those deeds a hundred times.
And of course, I’ll never get an answer. Also, I have no idea why you feel personally obligated to jump in and answer questions directed at her.
Rachel Davis said:@wiredwolf442/">@@wiredwolf442 look, even if one or two of his posts were offensive, I still support him because he was one of the rare ones trying to be objective. But since the whole thread isn't like that—because everyone is just trying to stir up drama and rack up points—it's no surprise he got banned.
I am actually dying laughing here.
Agreeing with something doesn't make it "objective."
I mean, clearly, I’m the most objective person on this entire board.
Speaking of
@wiredwolf442/">@
@wiredwolf442, I'm curious—did he actually face any sanctions for harassing and insulting people through private messages?
Rachel Davis said:I’m asking the moderators to please bring some order to this thread. Like wiredwolf442 mentioned earlier, there used to be way more comments and active posters, but now everything has just fizzled out. I assume it's because people don't feel comfortable here, and honestly, neither do I.
I totally agree that you guys have completely trashed this thread.
I feel like I'm being targeted in this discussion, so I think it would be nice if someone actually invited me to defend myself. xD
My personal nod to you all. Bye, guys.