CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Gregory Peterson2 › Posts

Posts by Gregory Peterson2

41 posts shown.

Can money actually buy happiness? in Psychology ·
Jamie Bishop29 said:True happiness is likely found within the struggle itself—in the pursuit, the growth, and the eventual triumph of reaching a goal.

Once a reward hits a certain threshold where it becomes impossible to measure—say, when having five houses feels no different than having ten—that sense of value simply evaporates.

It’s why so many of the ultra-wealthy struggle with deep depression or anxiety; they lose their driving force. When there isn't a bigger prize waiting at the finish line, what's left to trigger that adrenaline rush or push them forward?

That’s precisely why I agree with what Anderson is saying. For these individuals, philanthropy becomes a new reason to get out of bed. Finding joy in helping others provides that renewed sense of purpose and reward that they thought they had lost forever.

And I totally agree with you there. The way you stack your cash matters immensely. If you earn it through pure grit and hard work, that success keeps feeding your soul even after you've hit the "enough" mark. It's not that you *need* the money, but knowing you crushed your goals and grew your earnings by 20% over last year? That feels amazing! It's about that personal win.

But if the money just falls into your lap—say, from collecting rent on ten luxury condos in Manhattan without lifting a finger—you lose that sense of pride. You have nothing to truly be proud of.
Can money actually buy happiness? in Psychology ·
Maria Barnes said:Let’s break down the points from the first post. Once you hit that $75,000 mark, the happiness boost from extra cash basically flatlines. We don't know the exact correlation between money and happiness below that threshold, but we can make an educated guess—and honestly, we've all felt it—that it's roughly proportional. So, the graph of money versus happiness would look something like this:

image

A few things to take away here. First, for those of us living on an average American salary of $2.00, if two people in a household are working, their combined income is about $4.00 a month, or roughly $24,000 a year. That means they are still in that zone where more money directly buys more happiness. Because that proportional climb lasts a while and many people find that threshold unreachable, we live under the illusion that the relationship is linear all the way up. It isn't. Makes sense, doesn't it? A good meal makes you happy if you're starving, but eating ten meals won't make you any happier. At $24,000, you've barely finished the appetizers. 🙂

So, folks, if you're banking on getting rich as the foundation for your happiness, think twice. Once you cross that tipping point ($75,000), you're better off being a philanthropist and giving money away than hoarding it; you won't feel the difference, but giving actually brings joy. It's even worse if you sacrifice the things that *actually* guarantee happiness—family, friends, travel, free time, culture—just to chase a paycheck. Look at wealthy people; they often don't seem happy at all.

To answer the question in the title: money doesn't guarantee happiness (there are too many other factors), but it can buy it up to that threshold. After that, there's zero impact. (By "happiness," I mean "well-being.")

It would be interesting to hear from someone who has actually crossed that line. $75,000 is a solid benchmark for an average American family, though it can be adjusted up or down depending on the cost of living in a specific area and what an individual needs to lead a fulfilling life.

Reading your post really got me thinking...
You know there's a lot of truth in all of this.

Throughout my life, and even now, I am in close contact with extremely wealthy people—by our standards—who blow past all those limits mentioned in the post.

And honestly, once they pass the point of having enough wealth to live comfortably, they don't really care how much more they have. Now, "living comfortably" is subjective; everyone defines it differently. But essentially, it's about being able to afford a life without financial stress—eating at a nice restaurant without needing to check the prices on the menu, traveling the world for vacation without taking out a loan or saving up for six months, and so on. That’s the threshold where every extra dollar definitely boosts your happiness because it provides new experiences and reduces survival anxiety.

But once you can afford all of that, any additional earnings aren't a source of happiness anymore—at least not lasting happiness. In the end, it doesn't matter to them if they're driving an $80,000 car, a $200,000 car, or a $500,000 car. At least, that's how they see it. Maybe a new luxury item makes them happy for a few days, like a new toy, but they get bored of it quickly, and I have truly never seen it cause lasting joy. It's the same with boats, houses, clothes, and stuff like that. A designer suit doesn't make any of them...$10, just like how a designer shirt from $100 isn't going to make my life complete. I honestly couldn't care less. I buy things because I need them or because I have the cash, but owning stuff doesn't magically spark joy for me.

And seriously, since I’m constantly chatting with people in that circle, money beyond a certain point just isn't their source of happiness; it's basically nothing to them. To those of us looking in from the outside, it looks like they've hit the jackpot, and we envy them for being able to afford everything, but to them? It's just Tuesday. It's like how it's totally normal for us to grab three meals a day without feeling an extra burst of euphoria every single time, even though someone starving in a developing nation might see a full plate as the greatest blessing on earth. Okay, maybe the food analogy is a bit heavy-handed, but you get my drift. What I'm trying to say is that once you cross a certain threshold, wealth and luxury become baseline expectations—it's just what's "normal," and it doesn't bring a single ounce of extra happiness.
Off-topic in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Just a little demonstration of how you guys moderate. Right after Sarah got banned, this kind of chatter starts popping up in the same thread:

The moderator Tisa isn't allowed to chime in on that. But we all know exactly what’s being implied, especially since we saw this exact pattern earlier today:

We all know who and what they're targeting here. Meanwhile, the whole crew in the off-topic section is just laughing and mocking everything... and apparently, that's perfectly fine and doesn't break any rules.

On the flip side, this specific post is an immediate strike and a ban:

🙄 And honestly, it's been playing out like this for months. It’s always the same story: people trying to have a decent conversation and defend their views get slapped with warnings, while the folks who haven't contributed a single meaningful thought in ten years of being on this forum stay untouched. I've put up 2,000 posts in the politics section and I've never been banned—maybe one or two warnings at most—yet over in the off-topic area, I'm getting flagged constantly.

Because of all this, and because there isn't a single person on this site you can actually exchange ideas with unless it's about the weather or what someone had for lunch, I'm done. You just keep banning the same small group of people whenever a real discussion breaks out. I want out of this bias. I don't want the option to clash with people who are clearly operating far below any standard of basic human decency.
Off-topic in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Honestly, with the way moderation has been handled on this site lately—turning what used to be a chill chat subforum into a playground for a few specific people to pick on others—I’m basically looking for a sanctuary elsewhere. I need a spot where I won't end up being the target of some random vendetta just for posting a comment.
I know the drill, though. No sockpuppet accounts, no rule-breaking, blah blah blah...
New Member Registration in Feedback & Suggestions ·
dustypilot11 said:That’s just not how it works! If you’ve been away from the lounge for more than two days, you’d actually know. Most people here are convinced that’s the truth, so by your logic—which honestly feels a bit pointless to me—you’d be looking at a penalty right now.

I ended up getting flagged just for saying "probably someone's clone 🤔," and I didn't even realize you guys had dropped a new rule at the top of the thread. It’s like driving down a street in Chicago and suddenly realizing the speed limit changed overnight without any signs!

Plus, leaning on the argument "everyone on the forum knows" isn't exactly a winning point. If something is against the rules, it's against the rules. Period.

Signed, sealed, and delivered.
Can someone please put a stop to Eugene in the off-topic section? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jason Brown5 said:Just so we’re all on the same page here—this is all volunteer work. We aren't glued to our computers 24/7, so things tend to spiral in the wrong direction sometimes, which seems to be a recurring theme over at PZK. This specific call was made by Eugene simply because he happened to see the reports first and acted on them. It wasn't some grand decree from him personally; the rest of us weren't even part of that decision.

Does everyone really think exactly the same way, like you're all part of some hive mind? 😳

Scott Miller5 said:Unfortunately, you aren't the first person I've clashed with on this forum. Between Hannah's bans, LSD, and the rest, everyone has felt how you have this subtle, feminine way of provoking people—insulting others through sarcasm wrapped in velvet gloves. It's all very pretty and packaged, but I see right through it. I know exactly who the real problem is here, and I hope the admin team does too.

Honestly, this post says way more about you than anyone else. You seem to have a perfect memory for who starts the drama and who eventually stands their ground. But then again, what can you expect from someone with such "high morals" who goes around sharing people's private photos in DMs? I know exactly who I'm dealing with the moment I hear something like that. And trust me, others know too. 👍
Can someone please put a stop to Eugene in the off-topic section? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Richard Nelson84 said:There’s nothing weird about those warnings. You earned them, fair and square. By my count, you got 60 points from me, not 70.

Well, isn't that funny? It seems you conveniently forgot that Maria Johnson also received exactly 60 points from me.

Look, calling someone Osica isn't an insult, and you definitely didn't get a warning for being offensive. I've looked through these posts, and honestly, I don't see any insults here at all.

Plus, I really only had two ways to play this: either hand out warnings to everyone—which would include you, Daria, and Scott Miller5—or just drop a note asking everyone to stop bickering in the thread. I went with the second option because, in my view, nobody actually crossed the line. But hey, if you want a final ruling, just wait for the site admins or the head mods to weigh in. They'll have the last word.

I’m not interested in getting into a back-and-forth about why this thread was locked. My mind is made up. You'll just have to wait for the admin or the lead mod to make the official call.

And honestly, you just proved exactly why you shouldn't be a moderator.
Since apparently "Osica" is grounds for a warning, but "bezmudi" isn't.

But what can I say? Mr. Always Right is still standing, regardless of what the mods or admins decide. 🙂
Can someone please put a stop to Eugene in the off-topic section? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Richard Nelson84 said:If you ask me, you’re the only one who actually crossed the line here. Everyone else played it straight. Now, if you really feel like I handled things poorly, hey, you’re entitled to your opinion. Go ahead and vent if you need to!

Yeah, I’m complaining. I really am. But honestly? You handled this poorly, just like you always do. It’s the same old pattern: instead of actually tackling the root cause, you just go after the symptoms. It’s like trying to fix a leaky faucet by mopping up the floor—you're dealing with the mess, but the water is still spraying everywhere! Same mistake, different day.

Yeah, let's talk about that thread where we can all reach out to the other members and the mods to let them know what's up! You’re gonna get exactly what's coming to you! It's like when you ignore the "Check Engine" light in your Ford for three months and then suddenly find yourself stranded on the shoulder of I-95. You can't run from the consequences forever! Karma's got a way of catching up, just like a slow-moving storm rolling in over the Midwest. You reap what you sow, plain and simple.Oh, absolutely. No doubt about it! 🙄 Take it on the bright side—you actually dodged a bullet and didn't get flagged for that thread!

How on earth can you be so sure I’m actually directing that at someone? Honestly, I haven't even addressed anyone specifically, and frankly, it isn't your place to sit in judgment of my intentions. It’s like someone trying to referee a game when they aren't even on the field! The topic itself is completely legitimate and doesn't break a single rule on the books.

🙂 Man, you are being absolutely ruthless!

Save the melodrama for someone else in Chicago, because you aren't fooling me. 🙂
Can someone please put a stop to Eugene in the off-topic section? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I honestly don't know what that guy's personal vendetta against me is about, especially since he already slapped me with a random ban over at LJS once before.
Then yesterday, he swings by and hands me a red card over some totally trivial topic, while everyone else involved in the whole thing gets a free pass.

So today I open up this thread
which is basically just a standard way people play games on tons of international forums. I can provide more links if necessary. But instead, he shuts it down without even giving an explanation.

I’m asking that he stays away from us in the off-topic section, because the guy doesn't get the vibe of this subforum, isn't objective, and frankly, isn't even interesting. If the goal is to have someone here who just uses random moderator tools once a day, I could probably just write a script for you guys to automate it.

The clone mods are actually better. At least they go after everyone equally, so you always know where you stand. When the heavy fire starts, everyone catches it.
Any English-language forums similar to this one? in Miscellaneous ·
www.pornhub.com
Racist remarks and hate speech in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Look, I don't personally have any beef with LSD, but unknown uses it pretty frequently on her own. She actually called me trash earlier today, but honestly? I didn't even blink. If I had decided to fire back, we’d be stuck in a massive thread about me right now instead of this 🙂

In this specific scenario, LSD is totally innocent 🧐
Ryan Carter3 said:Just head over to the site and count the number of prevented layoffs for yourself if you're so skeptical.

Do you honestly think that just because they block one eviction, the problem vanishes? Like the bank just shrugs its shoulders and says, "Oh well, I guess we won't collect our money"? 🤣
No way. Next time, they’ll just show up with twice the amount of police, haul Pernar and Sinčić off in handcuffs, and finish the job regardless.

Some people here act like they’re living in a Saturday morning cartoon. 🙄
DIY Smart Clock Box in Miscellaneous ·
wood 😁 I actually have a piece of this stuff sitting right here at my place, a little heirloom from my grandmother. It’s shaped just like one of those tiny wooden toothpicks you'd find in a diner.
Classic: I don't get the rules on this Reddit thread in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Peter Doyle2 said:The lie is that we were all online—I mean, I'm certainly not the supermod for that PDF. How exactly are you, or anyone else, going to issue a Punishment to me??

And (since we already established it isn't pedophilia), what is CONCRETELY the issue here? What specific rule is being broken? Is it because certain cults are mentioned and such?
Do you think we should just delete the entire forest then? 🤷
Or is the issue simply that it's in verse?

No, seriously. I'm reading this and I honestly can't figure out where the actual problem lies... other than the fact that someone doesn't like it...
I don't like it either, but I still don't see a problem or any violation of the rules. 🤷
Because if this is a "no-go," then fine—we might as well just delete every single thread that describes any kind of sex in any way. Ever.

But have you actually sat down and read his posts?
He’s talking about locking her in a pantry, shooting her in the head, or slashing her throat with a knife.

Now, go ahead and tell me that’s perfectly acceptable for a forum.

This isn't "art." Do you honestly think Al Capone counts as an artist?

Seriously, if you guys keep ignoring reports and the FBI eventually determines that actual crimes were committed... well, as the ones in charge covering this up, you're the ones who will face the music. I really don't see why you'd want that in your life.
Isn't it just easier to just ban the guy?
Classic: I don't get the rules on this Reddit thread in Feedback & Suggestions ·
https://www.fbi.gov/ I'm not entirely sure if you can file a report through this site, or if it’s strictly reserved for kids under 15. 🤷

By the way, ignoring the authorities here on Reddit is actually a punishable offense too! It's not like anyone was offline—everyone has been lurking right here.
Why is family being pushed so hard? in Close to Politics ·
Anthony Garcia19 said:With that kind of mindset, you're putting way too much pressure on thought alone! 😉

Quincy:
I'm just playing devil's advocate here, but imagine a world 100 years from now where robots raise children. Kids created in a lab, raised by one or two robots. Honestly, technology is already shaping how we grow up. We use tech to train reflexes, learn languages (think gaming or AI), and navigate the web...
And let's assume for a second that their mental development turns out perfectly fine—that they end up healthy and smart.

What would be missing?
Love! 🙂

Quincy:
Humans are living beings just like cabbage, mushrooms, cats, dogs, or monkeys... We breed and raise all of them. But because we view ourselves as these "superior" beings, we insist that family is the only way, and that a child can only be conceived through traditional intimacy because anything else is "unnatural."
I'm with you on the animals, but why drag humans down to their level instead of raising the bar for us? Why project one bad relationship onto the whole human experience?

Take it easy, you'll get there 😁

Love! 🙂

And even that is up for debate. See, the folks pushing the "traditional family" angle act like biological parents are the only ones capable of truly loving a child they're raising.
Every single day, adoption stories and kids in the foster care system prove them wrong, but hey, who cares? It's all about the biology 🙂

I'm with you on animals, but why drag humans down to their level instead of the other way around? Why project one bad relationship onto the whole species?

You totally misread me there. I'm no anarchist, and I'm certainly not suggesting we live like beasts in the wild. My point—for the millionth time—is simply that the nuclear family isn't set in stone. It hasn't always been the universal building block of society, it isn't inherently sacred, and it definitely isn't the only environment where a healthy human being can thrive.

So, I really have to wonder: why is there such massive fear surrounding the evolution of the family unit? Why the resistance to upgrading our communities and letting things change as people evolve and times move forward? It should be natural, just like everything else.
Why is family being pushed so hard? in Close to Politics ·
hollowtrucker77 said:If this is really the end result of your thought process, what is there even to say?
It’s honestly such a massive waste of time and money spent on people like you.
Goddamned religious types, they don't know anything and can't even handle things without their holy handbooks.

When you run out of actual arguments, you just resort to trolling.👍
Why is family being pushed so hard? in Close to Politics ·
Zachary Collins2 said:Even newborn animals seem to have more common sense than you do...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/article/local-news-story-example-link

Go ahead and ask Klepetan what he’s actually up to down in the Deep South during the winter. Honestly, I bet he isn't even thinking about hopping on a FaceTime call with his wife or any other ladies. He's clearly got much bigger fish to fry!
Why is family being pushed so hard? in Close to Politics ·
briskdrifter3 said:The family has served as the fundamental building block of society since the very moment the first flicker of intelligence appeared in primates. Even among today's great apes—gorillas, for instance—you see a remarkably distinct social hierarchy... one where the mother acts as the anchor for the offspring while the father handles the hunting and defense against external threats.
To criticize the family unit as the bedrock of our civilization is simply irrational; it leads directly to the dehumanization of society and its eventual devolution.
It is a scientifically established fact that the absence of either a mother or a father within the home increases the frequency of psychological deviations and abnormal behavior in children. If you look at any notorious criminal, any degenerate, any madman, any dictator, or even those widely despised media personalities and vapid celebrities, you will find that 95% of them lacked a stable, traditional family structure. A broken or incomplete family produces a broken and incomplete individual—and I don't think anyone with a shred of common sense would dispute that.
By "broken family," I am also including households where parents simply lack the time to actually raise their children. The result? We end up with adults who grow up to tear down the entire institution of the family, which explains much of what we are seeing today... this flood of people promoting some distorted, hyper-liberal lifestyle where every random person feels entitled to everything and anything.
I won't even bother getting worked up about it, though... nature handles these things quite efficiently. It leaves all those deviants without descendants, or perhaps with an insufficient number of them, effectively cleansing society over a few generations. It is pure mathematics, really. A traditional, right-leaning Catholic family with five children holds a massive statistical advantage over an ultra-modern gay couple with only one or two. It will all balance itself out eventually..... it just takes time....🙂

You can count the animal species that are actually monogamous and maintain some semblance of a family unit on one hand. Please, stop trying to lecture me about animals and family being some evolutionary milestone for apes, because frankly, it’s just not true.
Why is family being pushed so hard? in Close to Politics ·
Anthony Garcia19 said:Maybe not, but it’s the only way right now. Real change takes a higher level of awareness—less selfishness and more actual connection and empathy. If we could love our neighbor's kid like our own, or treat a neighbor like a brother, things would be different. If we didn't constantly feel the need to outdo everyone else and actually became selfless, the traditional family unit might lose its current importance. Love would just be everywhere. No one would be attacking anyone, and no one would feel the need to protect their own from the rest.

So (assuming we're all thinking good thoughts here! 🙂), we shouldn't be talking about getting rid of families. Instead, we should focus on tightening the bonds within our own communities—like our neighborhoods or the US as a whole—to pave the way for a better society. Otherwise, we're just leaving the door open for abuse.

I’m with you on that, but let’s be real: shifting to a higher state of consciousness doesn't just happen by magic. It’s built through how we think. If we convince ourselves that the status quo is the only "right" way and label anything else as crazy or unnatural, then progress moves at a snail's pace.
It’s the same old story. We saw it with civil rights movements, we saw it with racial equality, even back when slavery was the norm.
People always cry foul whenever something changes—calling it "unnatural," saying it goes against God, or saying it's against human nature.
But based on what? Look, we *are* part of nature. Everything we create is an extension of nature. Our technology? Natural. Our breakthroughs? Totally natural.

Okay, I’m exaggerating a bit here, but just imagine a world a century from now where robots raise children. Imagine kids being grown in labs and nurtured by two robots or even just one. Even today, technology plays a huge role in how we're shaped. We use tech to sharpen reflexes, learn languages through gaming or AI, and connect via the internet...
And let's just assume for a second that this works perfectly for their mental development—that they grow up healthy and brilliant.

What would even be missing?

Humans are living organisms, just like cabbage, mushrooms, cats, dogs, or monkeys. We breed them, we cultivate them, we manage them. Yet, because we fancy ourselves "superior beings," we insist that the only valid way to exist is within a traditional family, and that a child can only be conceived through biological means because anything else is "unnatural."