CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Jerry Rogers6 › Posts

Posts by Jerry Rogers6

494 posts shown.

Clones in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I have a question for the admin team regarding this unfortunate thread

We’ve bumped into this whole issue regarding multi-cloned accounts several times now—and, just to recap, Bio Fosna already gave me an answer once, basically stating that there isn't some grand system to systematically wipe out this nuisance; you just scrap them without hesitation once they're identified.
So, I get that part fine.

What I don't get is the forum's actual policy regarding their presence—specifically, why certain users' favorite sports are being rubber-stamped when those very individuals have quite literally torn this forum and its basic logic to shreds.
Could someone please explain why we aren't calling out the people whose entire purpose in life seems to be obsessively destroying any semblance of cohesion or constructive dialogue here, harassing other members and mods (the mods especially), and pathologically forcing their own "experiences" down everyone's throats?
I honestly don't see the point in tolerating people like that.
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
I don't have enough context to provide a meaningful rewrite of that specific input. Please provide the full text you would like me to re-craft. The user says:
We already broke down these kinds of patterns—and several others just like them—a few pages back.
The machine behind GNK and New York City—it’s pretty clear they have several agencies on the payroll specifically to run these perfidious smear campaigns across various news portals, forums, and social media. It’s a coordinated effort to tear the group down through sheer, calculated misinformation.

Matthew Martinez64 said:Let’s be honest—these comments you see popping up on the forums and in the evening news cycles? They aren't organic. It’s pretty obvious that they're being pushed by paid agencies.
Just ignore them—it’s nothing more than old-school FBI propaganda. It’s the classic "divide and conquer" playbook, plain and simple.

If you ask me, we’re looking at a massive problem here—one that requires some serious, heavy-duty intervention to actually fix. I mean, look, I’ve tried doing my part by manually flagging them and trying to downplay the influence of these bots, but let’s be real for a second: we have been getting absolutely wrecked by the exact same group of bad actors for years now. It's a systemic issue, and just waving a hand at it isn't cutting it anymore.
People like that have completely gutted any semblance of normal communication—not just in the political arena, but right here in this community too. They spend their time driving everyone insane, stubbornly insisting on "truths" that seem to originate from some alternate dimension. It’s the same pattern you see on every other social platform: they curate this deceptive narrative that we live in some irredeemable, broken society. It creates this false impression that we’re just a bunch of naive, gullible people who—much like a herd of confused calves—constantly hand our trust over to the most dishonest, thieving crews in the business.

Look, listen—these are exactly the kinds of industries where someone with actual guts finally needs to step up and take control, if only for the sake of the greater good.
Discussion about Ukraine in Feedback & Suggestions ·
granitefalcon26 said:You and Konev are just constantly trolling at this point.

That's a lie.
Discussion about Ukraine in Feedback & Suggestions ·
This is honestly just another transparent, whining thread started by people who haven't been able to hold a decent conversation on Reddit for years—and then, following their usual pattern, they come running to the mods to cry about how they're being "bullied."

I’m putting forward one specific post that does a pretty damn good job of outlining what’s actually been going on with this miserable topic for months now.

rooibos said:
fadedmason3 said:Check out this post
It looks like this thread has become nothing more than a playground for pro-Russian fanboys who love to pat themselves on the back while insulting anyone else—whenever they actually face a real argument, they just resort to heavy-handed trolling.

It’s funny—anyone who stands against Russia and Putin gets slapped with labels like "nationalist" or "old-guard sympathizer," whether it's direct or implied. Then, you see these coordinated raids where people jump onto Reddit in the middle of the night to spam dozens of filthy posts targeting perfectly reasonable, peaceful Democrats—leaving the mods to spend their entire morning cleaning up the mess. The playbook is always the same: they call for a bullet to the head of prisoners, offer these calm, sanctimonious laments about shelling civilian targets in cities or instances of torture, yet they somehow find the energy to condemn peaceful marches where nobody even gets hurt. When they run out of actual arguments or intelligence—which happens fast—they resort to twisting statements, hurling insults at anyone talking back, and making threats. It’s just pure jealousy and frustration; since they can't win on facts, they try to find every possible loophole to tear this sub-forum apart. 🙂

By the way, fadedmason3 is clearly just a troll at this point—nothing more than a clone designed to clutter the thread with total garbage. Most of his posts are just nauseating nonsense that has absolutely nothing to do with Ukraine; he’s clearly only here to derail the conversation and pollute the discussion.

Just as a side note—personally speaking, there are only two users on Reddit representing the "democratic" side that I haven't hit with the block button yet. That’s about all I can say about the "democratic" camp.
Discussion about Ukraine in Feedback & Suggestions ·
If I may, I’d like to take this opportunity to ask whether there are any plans in the near future to beef up the moderation presence regarding policy—honestly, it feels like we’re seriously lacking senior oversight at the top right now.

As for candidates, I’d put my money on Division and Žalac.
graniteharbor502 said:I don't think any actual Formula 1 enthusiast here is going to agree with you. Sure, he might be making a mess of things off the track—those blunders you pointed out are real—but when it comes to actually driving? He’s easily one of the most talented, spectacular drivers on the grid.

Look, since you clearly think I’m some kind of expert scout for racing drama, let me set the record straight: Lewis Hamilton is an absolute class act.🙂

ps. The truth is, Lewis backed off because he's got an ego the size of Texas. I distinctly remember him ranting over the radio about how the whole thing made zero sense—claiming they had to save the engine, blah blah blah.
In reality, he just wanted to get out of the way because he wasn't leading the pack; he simply can't handle navigating through the field with that turbo engine while everyone else is playing the game like normal people.(And let's be honest, he was just livid because Nico Rosberg absolutely smoked him yet again.🤣)
John Phillips82 said:So now suddenly Lotterer is some massive fraud?

This entire forum needs serious psychiatric help.

Good grief, there’s so much of this lately—and honestly, you’ve got a point here.
If I had to guess, about 50 percent of the people hanging out on this wrecked forum are probably on the exact same long-term therapy regimen.
image

image🤣🤣😂
Just imagine the scenario where these idiots actually fail to consolidate their lead and tame Nick and Luj—and then we watch Ricciardo snatch the 😍😍🤣
title right from under their noses.
Roger Wright94 said:+1

Nico Rosberg is definitely in the stronger position here.
Lewis Hamilton needs to realize that playing it a bit more tactical would actually serve him better (take yesterday’s situation for example). He has the raw pace—what he really needs is clean air to work with.
Furthermore, I might be able to wrap my head around being that uncompromising if we were talking about the final 5-10 laps. Doing it this way, right at the start? That's just bordering on stupidity.

Plus one more thing.

And to take it even further (😁) — Lewis would have done the exact same damn thing if the roles were reversed, and then we'd all sit back and watch how Lewis's little minions cry about how some "rude savage" intentionally ruined his race.

What a circus. 🤣

P. S.
"He said he could have avoided it, but he didn't want to," said Hamilton after meeting with Rosberg and Mercedes bosses Toto Wolff and Paddy Low. "He basically said, 'I did it to prove a point.'"

🙂 🙂
this could honestly be Red Bull's version of a one-two punch 😍

wayyyyyyyyyy 🙂🙂
Richard has officially started handing out those little treats to the maestro 👋👋
ruggedfox28 said:Magnussen is just some rookie playing house in a Ferrari cockpit😂

🤣🤣
Give me a break with this Nico Rosberg nonsense—as if Ricciardo is actually going to pull off a win at Indianapolis 🤣😁

🙂🙂
shadowhawk24 said:Richard is back in hunter mode again—let's go, smiley 👋

aha 🙂🙂🙂
ode lujo 😁
haha, look at the master at work 🙂

almost 😢
Mr. Warren Buffett in Close to Politics ·
rowdyranger44 said:What kind of "mindset" are we even talking about here?! You guys are missing the forest for the trees. Maybe you'll get your wish sooner than you think. The New York Times is already speculating that Walmart's credit arrangements with JPMorgan Chase might be thrown into jeopardy due to the latest sanctions against Russia. If that happens, our very own Blake Carrington might just be forced off the stage entirely... and frankly, I'd love to see if that actually stops the bleeding...

Look at this—The New York Times has managed to trip over its own feet and contradict itself in record time, even though they’ve spent years perfecting that delicate balancing act to maintain plausible deniability.
It's funny watching people scramble like they've lost their footing—thanks for the insight.
Unacceptable moderation on the Palestine thread - Bubimir in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Edward Thompson5 said:Look, people—we aren't living in some idealized world of fair play. It only takes one sensitive soul to cry foul and label this entire forum antisemitic based on what they see elsewhere. Once that happens, the thread gets "purged," if it isn't nuked entirely. Even giants like Finkelstein or powerful figures like Obama couldn't escape that particular label, so don't go expecting freedom of speech or true equality in this specific discussion. And don't blame the site for it. We either end up with pro-Israel moderators or we get nothing at all—that’s just the reality we have to accept.

Don't give me that crap. Their military plays itself a little too bloody again—once upon a time, and again now—and suddenly, if anyone dares to point out that we're dealing with absolute lunatics devoid of any morality, honor, or restraint, they're branded an antisemite. Right?
(Their propaganda machine is still unbeatable; give it up for the bots. 👍)
People aren't stupid. There is more than enough material available across the internet these days for anyone to reach their own conclusions about which side deserves condemnation.
By the way, the international community also deserves condemnation for blessing this slaughter of civilians. If they actually cared about doing good, they would have facilitated a humanitarian evacuation before they started on, how should I put it... "clearing out Hamas infrastructure."
It is absolutely shameful what the current collective conscience is willing to protect. Truly shameful.
Unacceptable moderation on the Palestine thread - Bubimir in Feedback & Suggestions ·
When we talk about the crisis in Ukraine, Putin gets slapped with even harsher labels and qualifications, yet nobody seems to dare say a word, for God's sake.
I don't recall Putin ever being "gracious" enough to address us with those colorful descriptions where he calls certain groups subhuman 🤷

(And honestly, looking at our domestic political scene, it’s always been full of absolute nonsense—if we're talking about the sheer "creativity" of my fellow forum members)

On the Israel-Palestine thread, the second you voice any criticism regarding Israeli policy or their leadership, some self-appointed watchdog jumps down your throat. And once you use a term that's considered even slightly controversial, they start lecturing you by quoting this charter or that one, throwing links everywhere and waving papers that supposedly prove you wrong—which, let's be real, is mostly just pure propaganda. And if you don't back down, damn, people actually start threatening you with lawsuits.

I mean, seriously, what's the point? Just put up a disclaimer stating that Israelis and their leadership are a protected species and call it a day. Stop pretending to be all insightful and polite when you aren't.

Sorry, but you're just not doing your jobs properly, if you'll excuse my observation.🤷