CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Chloe Roberts2 › Posts

Posts by Chloe Roberts2

131 posts shown.

Condescending, disrespectful, and passive-aggressive behavior in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Hannah Thomas18 said:So now you're going to sit there and tell me how many parents of kids named Susan, Barbara, Mary, or Jane you actually consider clueless just because they picked names that sound a bit dated🤷

Look, if we're allowed to call modern names ridiculous, then I think I'm well within my rights to say what I said. If you want to punish me for it, fine, but then you'll have to go around punishing everyone else who thinks these new trends are just as absurd.
Condescending, disrespectful, and passive-aggressive behavior in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I’m reporting this one too.
Condescending, disrespectful, and passive-aggressive behavior in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Just imagine if they talked to you like that.
Trolling in Politics in Feedback & Suggestions ·
The way Elizabeth Davis claims the American Red Cross is some kind of sanctuary for people with mental health issues is just wrong, and calling psychiatry anything less than a legitimate science is honestly pretty gross. To me, this whole thing feels completely off; it seems like a blatant attempt to take shots at the American Red Cross and mothers simultaneously—essentially implying moms are mentally unstable without providing a shred of actual evidence. By attacking the field of psychiatry, she’s indirectly insulting mothers by suggesting they're unwell and then claiming doctors can't even help them, which leads to the ridiculous conclusion that kids should be handed over exclusively to their fathers.

I'd love to hear what the other moderator thinks about this.
Trolling in Politics in Feedback & Suggestions ·
That’s not even the half of it, so please, do yourselves a favor and actually read the other posts in this thread. I’m genuinely struggling to figure out if we’re dealing with some dedicated trolling or just a full-blown psychotic break here. There’s this constant stream of conspiracy theories claiming that certain groups are being discriminated against, and honestly, it’s exhausting.

I’m asking you—please, just appoint two more moderators and start handing out much stricter penalties for these... well, I don't want to get flagged myself, but there needs to be some actual order in the Politics section, and frankly, reading these posts is starting to get under my skin.
Have any mods ever actually admitted and fixed a mistake? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
melloworca6 said:You don't have a single record from the Health Department on your account, not even a single day logged or a reversed entry (which would still show up on your profile as canceled).

That was under my other username. 😉
Have any mods ever actually admitted and fixed a mistake? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
So, I managed to get myself flagged over on the Health board, and now my post has been pulled. Honestly, though, an administrator is still an administrator.
Elon Musk and his avatar!?! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I'm actually looking to change my avatar too. Just imagine if, instead of that flag, it was the United States flag, but somehow twisted into some ridiculous pattern of Mexican colors. And what if it was accompanied by a caption saying "The United States must be wiped off the face of the earth"?
Would you guys even consider accepting an avatar like that?
There’s a massive debate currently swirling around a pretty fundamental question: just how much do those first three years actually dictate a kid's future behavior, IQ, and emotional stability? You’ve got some developmental experts arguing that if you miss those "critical periods" of brain development, the window slams shut and those opportunities are gone for good. Then you have the others who argue that since the brain keeps growing well past age three, the door isn't exactly locked. To get a handle on what we actually know about neurology, early development, and the whole parenting struggle, we sat down with David Steinberg, M. d. Quote.

AboutOurKids: We can all see how fast babies grow physically, but is their brain activity keeping pace? What’s actually happening under the hood that we can't see?

Dr. Steinberg: A baby is born with roughly 100 billion brain cells, but they haven't built the complex circuitry they'll need as they mature. >, and eventually, a single cell can link up with as many as 15,000 others.


From ages four to nine, a child's brain is actually running at double the intensity of an adult brain. >.


So, if we give babies a ton of stimulation during specific windows, does it help solidify those neural connections? And what's the fallout for a kid who doesn't get enough engagement?

If a child misses out on the experiences needed to trigger the brain during those vital stages, it can leave a permanent mark. >. >. We already know that if a child’s eye isn't properly focused during that key visual development window—which wraps up around age six—they might never achieve normal vision in that eye. It’s essentially because the brain wasn't given the right input when it was most receptive. On the flip side, if an adult's vision is impaired later in life—say, by wearing an eye patch—it won't result in that same kind of permanent neurological deficit.
Are there specific windows for developing other skills?

While not every skill follows such a rigid timeline, things like language definitely move in waves of intense growth and plateaus. >. For instance, an eight-month-old might grasp a couple of isolated words and look toward an object when you point it out, while a three-year-old is already processing full three-word sentences. When it comes to the words they actually use, a three-year-old typically has a vocabulary of about 900 words, which is a massive jump from what they knew at age two.

Here’s the link, though my connection is being temperamental and acting up. I barely managed to copy and paste this without losing my mind.
http://www.aboutourkids.org/articles..._baby039s_life

The snippet I grabbed basically says babies are born with about 100 million cells in the brain, and then over those first three years, all those connections start forming. It also emphasizes that without proper stimulation, a kid just doesn't develop properly. So, if you actually want your kid to talk, you should probably talk to them. There's also this part:
Children are best able to learn a new language when they're young. There's no sound data to support the belief that speaking two languages at home will impair a child's language skills.

I’m stopping there before I end up in a wrestling match with my mouse.
To recap: it claims it’s never too late for a child, but during the first three years, we can really "enhance" their development. Those first three years are everything—not necessarily to turn them into some world-class violinist, but because research shows that abuse or neglect hits hardest during this window. One study even concluded there are strong indications that children who receive the best care from their mothers go on to be more successful later in life. Still, there are plenty of unanswered questions.
The interviewer wraps things up with some commentary and provides links to the actual studies.

This is the other page: Zero to Three.
http://main.zerotothree.org/site/Pag...name=key_brain
Sorry for the off-topic post. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
My bad on this one, I guess I should probably apologize for that last post.
HPV vaccine discussion in Women's Health ·
Where can I go in Seattle to get the WHO vaccine? And is it okay to get it if I'm already 18?