Posts by Charles Martin2

Adam Collins4 said:Look, I don't harbor any resentment toward the people who rear-ended me twice just to justify someone else... hatred isn't really a feeling I've ever carried for anyone...

And the cops said you were the one at fault, without even bothering to look at how bad the road actually was... but whatever...

It's not like I'm defending Cacic—I've said plenty of times that he's guilty and I can't wait for the trial to happen...

You're acting like me waiting for actual facts is some kind of defense...

bluerider63 said:Because he's being tried like any other regular citizen who caused a car wreck, not because of whatever mess he made while acting as a party leader.

bluerider63 said:Look, you should be adjusting your driving regardless of what the weather is doing, but honestly, there aren't many people out there who actually bother to follow that rule.
I'm not trying to stick up for R. Čačić—he messed up, plain and simple, and everyone knows it. I just don't see why he shouldn't stay on the job until things actually play out in court, assuming he even ends up facing prison time.

Adam Collins4 said:Look, you were speeding again, and I was following too close... and because of both of us, there's a crash...

Because clearly, if you had to slam the brakes like that, you weren't leaving enough space...

Adam Collins4 said:See, you're lying when you claim you never speed...

You caused the accident because you were driving too fast...

And if I recall correctly, one of those total wrecks was someone swerving in from the side, while in the other case, someone else slammed into him...

Adam Collins4 said:Others mentioned Žužić and are trying to draw parallels there... which is a massive stretch...

Besides, how would you even know who's at fault for those minor collisions?

I'm sure you never speed, always maintain a safe following distance, and all that... just like every other average American...

Adam Collins4 said:First off, you actually have to prove someone is a "road rage criminal"...

Second, it’s pretty clear you aren't reading between the lines here. I’m not defending Čačić; I’m just saying we should probably wait for actual facts to come out before jumping to conclusions...

The only time I actually "defended" him was regarding that comparison to Žužić, which—let's be honest—is completely ridiculous and doesn't hold water at all... except, apparently, in your eyes...

Adam Collins4 said:Comparing domestic violence or social aggression to "violence" on the road is a stretch...

Because most people who act out in society will always use the dumbest excuse possible: "I was provoked"...

And no, I'm not speculating about the crash itself—I'm just pointing out that we need to wait for the court's verdict...

Adam Collins4 said:The court, unlike us mere mortals, actually has access to the facts...

Especially since the accident happened overseas...

Adam Collins4 said:Honestly, it’s exactly because of posts like this that we even have a court system...

It is incredibly difficult to remain objective when emotions are running high, which is precisely why the courts exist—to follow the law while maintaining enough distance to reach a fair verdict...

And yeah, sure, anyone could have been in an accident... it falls under the category of "unforeseen circumstances" rather than intentional harm...

But that doesn't mean we're defending Čačić, nor does it mean the judge will view "accidents happen" as a valid legal defense when handing down a sentence...

Adam Collins4 said:Look, if you can't actually read or comprehend the thread title, maybe find someone else to do that heavy lifting for you...

Adam Collins4 said:Honestly, it’s exactly because of posts like this that we even have a court system...

It is incredibly difficult to remain objective when emotions are running high, which is precisely why the courts exist—to follow the law while maintaining enough distance to reach a fair verdict...

And yeah, sure, anyone could have been in an accident... it falls under the category of "unforeseen circumstances" rather than intentional harm...

But that doesn't mean we're defending Čačić, nor does it mean the judge will view "accidents happen" as a valid legal defense when handing down a sentence...

Adam Collins4 said:Which, by the way, you actually did—you’ve got that footage right there showing that Cervar isn't even standing on the podium when the medals are handed out, let alone wearing one around her neck...☕

And honestly, all this stuff about Gobac Červar putting the roster together or deciding who makes the cut—like what Metličić does—is just creating alibis for their placement. It has absolutely nothing to do with Čačić...

Adam Collins4 said:Look, if you're so obsessed with Cervar, go ahead and start a whole new thread about him—I won't stop you—or maybe just wander over to the Sports subforum instead...

I have zero intention of trolling here...

The topic of this discussion is Čačić. If you can't manage to read a simple thread title, maybe find someone else to do it for you...

Adam Collins4 said:Look, unlike Linek—who basically just goes along for the ride—Čaččić actually stepped up, took ownership of his actions, and acted like he was actually the one steering the ship...

Which is a far cry from Cervar, where it feels like someone else is always at the wheel...

To put it bluntly...

Harold Wright6 said:Honestly, it might be better if he just stays within the Democratic Party for now, rather than letting everyone see what kind of organization they actually run. ☕ At least that way, we don't find out the full extent of things until there's a trial, assuming he’s actually guilty. Their tiny voter base doesn't really care anyway, as long as they keep banging on about the war and the diaspora, Ferenčar. Čačić and his crew can basically do whatever they want...

Harold Wright6 said:Since when is probation the standard punishment for causing the deaths of two people? And civil damages have nothing to do with criminal prosecution.

granitemarlin77 said:I'm guessing he meant both—since the guy drives a car everywhere just to get to his private political gig.☕

casualangler9 said:Why is this thread on the edge? Is R. Čačić actually the owner of this forum 😕 😳

granitemarlin77 said:In the first half of the show, where they grilled him about his arrogance, responsibility, and just being a classless jerk... the guy downed a five-gallon jug of water and answered every single question with stuff like "wellllll you know, yeah, but, how can I put this, I mean, listen, it's just......" Basically, he sounded like he was starving for bullshit.

Then in the second half, they talked about his vision for America with him in power, and that’s when Stanković was fighting just to get a word in edgewise, while Čačić was busy doing his usual routine—rambling on about nothing but filth and "integrity." ☕

shadowpanther3 said:Just your typical Hercegovac laugh—the kind that honestly drags the whole country down with its mobster antics.

Austin Gonzalez13 said:Look, there’s a massive distinction here that people seem to be missing—it's everything. When someone hits a woman, they are doing it with intent; it’s a conscious, deliberate choice. Car accidents? They aren't. They aren't "on purpose." That is the fundamental difference between a crime and an accident. If Radimir Čačić had steered his car into another vehicle on purpose, then we’d be talking about a completely different story altogether.

Austin Gonzalez13 said:Technically, it doesn't matter if it's a total loss or not... a mistake is still a mistake. For instance, someone rear-ended me at 60 mph once, and the damage was minimal because it hit me from behind... if they had hit my door, people could have died. But at the end of the day, the driver's error remains the same.

And honestly, being a careless driver isn't enough to disqualify him from being a public figure.

I’m really curious how many other politicians have cut someone off, sped, or crossed a double yellow line... I bet our entire Congress is filled with reckless drivers... NEW TALK!!! 😉

Austin Gonzalez13 said:To be perfectly honest, I can count on one hand the number of friends or even casual acquaintances I have who haven't dealt with some kind of legal trouble involving a car—anything from a minor scrape to a heavy collision. Personally, I’ve been in two. Nothing catastrophic, just some property damage... twice someone hit me, and once I hit someone. Every single time, it was just pure distraction.

And it’s pretty much impossible to accidentally swing your arm and hit someone, especially if it happens multiple times over several years.😉

shadowpanther3 said:Radimir Čačić is an honest politician—anyone standing against him is essentially standing against America.