176 posts shown.
steeleagle70 said:Look, the mod finally weighed in. My point was just that this PDF policy is a total goldmine—you could spawn five different threads with a hundred posts each in an hour. With the current crew, mods really need a shift schedule if they want to keep up with moderation in real time. 🙂
Charles Fox10 said:We’ve got two separate threads here. One deals with whether the registry should be public or not, and the other popped up yesterday because someone found the "registry" online.
You can't lump those together. And that third thread Vito saw? It already sank back into the archives because some guy dug up a two-year-old topic just to ask a stupid question.
Anyway, where are we supposed to put topics like "Should we publish the FBI, CIA, or social security registries?" or asking what a PDF would look like if it were based on a standard template?
steeleagle70 said:There aren't enough mods on politics (by count)
Charles Fox10 said:Look, if you get banned for no reason, you get a grace period, and if a mod bans someone unfairly, they take the hit.
hollowtrucker77 said:Roger Reed49, I'm just telling you how it is
It's on you whether you accept it or not, but don't cry about the consequences later.
granitemarlin77 said:Since it's legal jargon, you'd say "induce under..."
Participant (participant), lethally (lethally).
Mr. President😁, maybe watch the spelling and grammar a bit.
Either way, I’m basically signing off on your post.☕
Nicole Murphy said:Look, I'm not saying it's a direct court matter—that’s out of their jurisdiction—but an irrevocable resignation would be the inevitable fallout here.
It wasn't Vito, it was someone else. 😁
granitemarlin77 said:Short and sweet.👍
aside from the typos.☕
Scott Cox28 said:By now, we should have established that the car from Canada didn't hit a guardrail first and swerve into Čačić, nor was it reversing into Čačić's vehicle. Essentially, Čačić caused the accident that claimed two lives. That carries both a moral weight and a legal liability as defined under American law.
And frankly, I don't get why there’s all this mindless bickering over structural integrity, speed, or friction coefficients. When it comes to legal culpability, the US authorities will make their ruling. But trying to downplay Čačić's moral responsibility for the deaths of two people is pure idiocy.
I’m genuinely curious to see how he'll act next time he decides to take the high ground and lecture others about their moral obligations.
The resignation is a complete joke. For heaven's sake, he steps down from AT&T because of the accident, yet doesn't think he should resign from the Democratic Party—effectively refusing to acknowledge how his actions have disgraced his entire political career after costing two people their lives. Now I see why he only quit at AT&T. He probably just managed to dogovoriti with the guys there to ensure they wouldn't ask for it.
What a piece of work.
bluerider63 said:Then you go ahead and explain to me how someone can be held "morally responsible" if there wasn't even an intention to do it in the first place?
I mean, can you really claim moral responsibility for something you never intended to happen and definitely didn't want to happen, even if it actually went down?
Adam Collins4 said:I am not "proving" anything; we are discussing a hypothetical scenario regarding whether that Ford hit the guardrail before or after the collision...
Stop lying and cherry-picking posts like a fraud—show the whole conversation.
I am well and truly done with you, your lies, and your constant manipulation...
Once again, you're displaying a total lack of understanding regarding the relationship between velocity and friction—just like the first time, when I suggested you hit the car in front because you were speeding, and you insisted it wasn't speed, but rather sudden braking...
Son, that is a fundamental failure to grasp the connection between speed and frictional force... and frankly, I don't feel like teaching you physics.
Between your nonsense about hardness versus strength and your confusion over bluntness versus softness, you've made it clear you don't grasp the basics—even though two different people have tried to explain them to you.
And for the record, where did I ever say he wasn't at fault? Where did I write that Čačić isn't to blame?
I'll be waiting for you to produce proof for those lies...
Adam Collins4 said:I wasn't denying that you have to adjust your speed based on road conditions... I was just pointing out that it's not the only factor involved—there are other variables at play too...
Look, if you get hit by a car while you're on a motorcycle, things don't end well... especially if you're sitting around waiting for the police to show up. In most cases, an ambulance is the absolute bare minimum you're going to need...
And yeah, I went down to the elementary school level, because honestly, some of you people on this forum clearly haven't even mastered the basics...
Once again, you're showing a total lack of understanding regarding the correlation between speed and friction... just like that other guy above who can't distinguish types of collisions and doesn't understand the most fundamental laws of energy transfer...
How am I supposed to explain this stuff to you people?
And by the way, where exactly did I say "if he's at fault"?
Adam Collins4 said:If I say he's guilty, how exactly am I defending him?
Since when does telling people to wait for actual, relevant data count as "defending" someone?
The days of the mob mentality and the mindless pile-ons ended a long time ago...
Adam Collins4 said:I’m just noticing how a guy with practically zero posts suddenly pops up on a thread about Čačić, acting like he has some deep, personal history with him... which is interesting, to say the very least...
Adam Collins4 said:And why exactly would that be the truth?
Because some guy on a forum said so? A guy with, what, 36 posts total? And he just "happens" to pop up right when we're talking about Čačić... hmmm.