dustycanyon6 said:I honestly don't get some people... What kind of twisted logic is that? Your username is pretty ironic, isn't it? 😁 Look, if anyone is actually "doing" anything to someone else, it's the smokers. Smoking is an action; not smoking isn't an action. A non-smoker is just an "observer"—they aren't doing anything to anyone. So, if we want a world where nobody does anything to anybody, let's go back to zero. Zero is just air without smoke. If you move from that status quo into an active state—meaning you light up a cigarette—you're the one taking action, and you're doing it at the expense of yourself and everyone else. How can we even talk about banning something that shouldn't have been allowed in the first place? I’ve already proposed a solution: let's grab coffee a few times a week. You can poison me with your smoke, and I'll drop an Ariella spoon into your coffee. Sound fair? That way, we're both being "active," instead of you being the actor while I just sit here as an observer.
You shouldn't have taken that part of my post literally—read it again. If that sounded serious to you, then you really 🙂 😉
steelstag4 said:(I had a different vision for the ending—can't quite remember which one—but it felt like things were just going to drift off into some random nonsense) and then 🤣
For me, it happened during that scene where Coogan hears Molina talking to Spike—I really got the impression he was going to break down, admit he was totally corrupt, say he was sorry, and then Spike would just forgive him and all that 😱 I actually thought to myself, "Man, there's no way it ends that cheap." Thank God it wasn't 😁
The episode with the retirees is one of my three least favorites—alongside the one with those two Frenchmen and the lady reading about lung health. Those three were just meh, while the rest are absolute masterpieces. Honestly, I was just holding on for that specific scene where Coogan offers Molina a cigarette, starts to light it, and he just sets it on the table and says, 'I'll save it for later.' 🤣🤣 🤣🤣 That part was legendary to me 🙏
The twins episode is definitely the strongest, as is the one featuring RZA, GZA, and Murray. 🙏 The first one is alright, but I just can't stand seeing Benigni 🙂 so that gets a minus from me. Jack and Meg are incredibly cute—they turned out great, almost like little kids. 😍 Iggy is a genius, whereas Waits isn't even worth mentioning. 😕
So there you have it—half past midnight, sipping some coffee and having a cigarette while listening to GZA. 🙂
Jessica Davis12 said:Honestly, this whole anti-smoking campaign is starting to get under my skin. Honestly, that’s about the worst thing that can happen to a person. On the other hand, alcohol advertising is still everywhere—especially beer—and they’re constantly pushing it, too, with those "one glass before, after, or even while you sleep" kind of slogans. 🤮
It gets even more bizarre—you’ve got prostitution, crime, and just about everything else going down in bars, but heaven forbid someone actually lights up a cigarette. 🙄 🙄 🙄
Whatever. This is about bars—who exactly has the right to tell us we can't smoke in a bar?
IS ANYONE EVEN FORCING YOU TO GO TO A BAR? 😠😠
God forbid they try to slap a ban on us 😠 You non-smokers are honestly unbelievable. Do I complain to anyone just because they don't smoke when we're grabbing coffee? No! Sure, it’s a bit awkward when I see a friend is the only one out of five of us who doesn't smoke, but I’m not going to judge them for it 😢 They're still a good person even if they don't smoke! Why won't you just let us live? Give us our freedom 🙂
p.s. — forget Scandinavia, a law like that isn't going to pass easily here because there'll be hell to pay🙂 🙄
Oh, sure—let's just ban smoking everywhere so we can all stroll around looking fancy. Too bad everyone else will be somewhere else by then.🙄 Look, non-smokers, you get your smoke-free offices and workspaces—fine. But if you want to ban smoking in bars? You get a massive :2up: from me. That’s just a ridiculous demand. I mean, WHO IS FORCING YOU INTO BARS??? If you don't like it, just go somewhere else. It's pretty simple—if I don't like the music or the crowd at an asylum, I wouldn't set foot in there even if my life depended on it. So why shouldn't you do the same? If you can't stand the smoke in a bar, why bother going? 👋
Boring? I actually just caught his 'Night of the Living Dead' a couple of days ago and thought it was phenomenal—assuming you can overlook the demon effects, which were about as good as they could have been for that era. Honestly, the film feels incredibly ahead of its time; it almost felt like I was watching something made just a year or two ago. It completely avoids that oversimplified, dated look you often get with old horror flicks, especially those from the 50s.🙏
The Wicker Man is incredible! I watched it about a month ago and it’s genuinely great—not just in a "wow, cool horror flick" kind of way, but as a truly top-tier piece of cinema🙏🙏🙏
Though, I was mostly thinking about movies with a voodoo theme, and The Wicker Man definitely fits that vibe.
Amanda Lopez50 said:...it depends... mostly it's just an effect—for some reason people (including the industry and the actors themselves) still seem "appalled" by actual sex in movies... but if you want something real, genuine & non-fake, check out "9 Songs" by Michael Winterbott—I'm pretty sure that one is 100% genuine 👍 😉
I have to admit, I'm a bit of a conservative when it comes to these things 😬
And what about 😬 Brown Bunny? That isn't an effect either
I feel like the biggest question just presents itself—how do they actually film sex scenes? You've got a guy and a woman naked and grinding away—is that actually happening or is it all just some kind of effect?