I just can't let this pass without giving a shout-out to Desiree; she really is the gold standard for what a woman should be. She’s always there when you need her and is more than happy to lend a hand, which is something I personally value immensely. Desiree👍
Ashley Rogers4 said:Well, it really depends on how you define democracy. At its core, democracy can just be rule by the mob—and honestly, we've seen that play out far too many times already.
A constitutional democracy is all about the rule of law, where the rules apply equally to everyone. That is exactly what the USA is. It's just that the radicals and the local traitors are working overtime to spin it as some kind of sacrilege.
I totally get why they do it, though. It’s their way of trying to strip away the power of the system (even if it also strips away the strength of their own arguments).
You’re missing the point. If you look at where true democracy is actually lacking, you’ll find the USA—at least, not the version of it they try to sell to the rest of the world... and I say that from firsthand experience.
In America, if you don't have the money, you don't have rights!
Right now, there’s nothing revolutionary about us. Let’s be honest: we’re a lazy nation. We won't truly start waking up until the pressure becomes absolutely unbearable—until small protests are popping up every single week. That’s when the masses will finally stir. As long as we stay unified and maintain a clear goal and vision, we are practically unstoppable. Eventually, a leader will emerge—someone to step up and guide the movement.
RESULT=The corrupt administration will be toppled, and while I have no idea what comes next, you know what they say: "there's light at the end of the tunnel."
P.S. This whole referendum regarding NATO has started to unravel the knot, and people are slowly beginning to wake up... long live the revolution, provided it's actually for the good of the people!
So, we have this thread asking "Which moderator would you replace?", but I’m opening up a different one: who are actually your favorite moderators?
Basically, which moderator—or supermod, or admin—feels the most natural to you, your absolute favorite... and please, let's not have any brown-nosing going on here😳, I just want to see which mods are actually the most popular among us regular folks😁 And don't turn this into an off-topic vent session where you just complain about the mods you can't stand...
...so, let's get this started...
In my book, the best moderators are Lisa Rodriguez84 and Nancy Adams79....why? Because they actually care about helping us out when we need it, and honestly, I think everyone loves them just as much as they love everyone else😁 Even though they hold mod status, they're always down to joke around, and they've even helped us push back against MK😁, plus they hang out with us regular mortals all the time, not just when they're handing out gift cards😬....they're absolute legends....Lisa Rodriguez84 and Nancy Adams79 🙏🙏🙏👍 ............God bless you both, just keep doing what you're doing!
Honestly, this whole thread is just an eyesore to me... it’s completely locked up, and seeing that question "Where did the Democratic Party and Zoran Milanovic hide?" staring back at me is driving me crazy, especially since the last reply was posted by some random troll way back in February.
Just get rid of him, mods—we'll be eternally grateful.🙏🙏🙏
hiddensurfer17 said:Personally, I feel that if someone is going to start a discussion, they should at least have a basic grasp of the fundamental facts first.
He turned into a dictator, and a huge chunk of the German population simply wasn't having it—at that point, Professor, democracy was already out the window.
rowdytinker said:Of course there isn't, not given where you are in your education. Once you hit fifth grade, you'll learn about racial supremacy, the concept of "living space," plans for the total extermination of specific ethnicities and social groups, concentration camps, and all that. I'll catch you then. Take care.👍
Look, man, this PDF is literally titled "Madhouse," so just give me a straight yes or no answer instead of trying to send me back to elementary school. Just because you disagree with someone doesn't mean you get to imply they're ignorant; honestly, your own signature tells me everything I need to know about you anyway.☕
Alright, let's look at this... if you ask me, there isn't any meaningful difference between these two figures, because...
Did Hitler kill civilians? YES Did Bush kill civilians? YES
Was Hitler an imperialist? YES Was Bush an imperialist? YES
Did Hitler torture civilians and suspected dissidents? YES Does Bush torture civilians and suspected dissidents? YES
The guilt of the people...
Did Hitler come to power through democratic means? NO Did Bush come to power democratically and then get re-elected? YES
Go ahead, give me your thoughts... but I truly believe there’s no distinction here, other than the fact that Bush rose to the presidency by the will of the people and was subsequently voted back into office.😛
electricmoose29 said:Just leave the 'reason for editing' blank (you don't actually have to type anything in there just to save your changes).
Look, I left it blank just like you told me to, but it’s still not working—it simply won't go through. Can any of the admins who actually deal with this technical stuff please jump in and explain what's going on? Thanks in advance. 🙏🙏🙏
Why on earth is it that whenever I finish a post and realize I need to add a quick detail or fix a typo—so I go to edit it—and then the system asks for a "Reason," I get hit with this ridiculous error saying I don't have the authority to do it? It’s incredibly frustrating; I'm just trying to correct my own words, yet somehow I'm being told I lack the permission to make a simple adjustment to my own content. 😕
What am I even supposed to write as a reason for EDITING my post when the system rejects me every single time? Seriously, does anyone have any advice on this? Thanks in advance. 🙏