ambermoose4 said:ABC News (if you can even call it a news network) is basically just a loop of old movies at this point. You could watch them for an entire month and see everything they plan to broadcast for the next year—maybe even eighteen months.☕
including everything they’ve already cycled through over the last year and a half.😁
I can almost wrap my head around FOX and ABC constantly nagging us with endless reruns of old movies—films everyone has already seen about ten billion times.
But PBS? It’s just pure filler—hardly ever any actual new cinema. To be honest, things were actually decent a few years back; they used to air new releases. Now? Instead of grabbing the broadcast rights for recent hits as soon as they drop, they just sit there.
Then again, who cares? We all have torrents.😁
How is it even possible that FOX won't be airing Godzilla or Independence Day for New Year's Eve this year?😂 😂 😂 😂 It's really just a matter of time before they announce one of those two—complete with some over-the-top promo for what they'll claim is the greatest thing since the invention of electricity.
I can already see the teaser and hear that vapid voiceover... "....We thought we were alone.......We were wrong..." 🤣
You aren't going to find much practical advice here regarding such specific issues—you might have better luck finding some actual insight over at http://www.imamnovac.com/forum/
I haven't seen action this tight in ages. Honestly, this was the perfect palate cleanser after being completely let down by Die Hard 4.
Everyone’s complaining about the camera work—probably just because it was hard to track on a massive theater screen—but on Blu-ray? It’s a whole different story. The cinematography is top-tier.
Overall, the film is dark, gritty, and shrouded in mystery—exactly what a "new Bond" should be. Instead, we ended up with Craig playing dress-up in a swimsuit.
I actually appreciated that several plot points were left unresolved. I just hope they don't ruin the momentum by forcing some unnecessary sequels or, God forbid, a prequel.
For those of you who have read the books—are they actually any good?
hollowwalker142 said:I'm not, but I'm guessing you have some secret intel that makes them look any less incompetent than the usual mess we see from the Democrats-Republicans.
Is it really that hard for people in the Republican Party to grasp that there are actually dissatisfied citizens out there—people who know how to use a computer and own a $1.75 microphone to record a song?
Or is it always just the Democratic Party's fault...
I know there was already a thread titled "Cloverfield," but apparently everyone is calling it "11-8-08" now—referencing its US release date.
Americans have been tearing through the internet looking for any crumbs left behind by J. J. Abrams and the crew over at Paramount Pictures—sites supposedly packed with cryptic hints about the actual plot. As far as I recall, they pulled a similar stunt during the run of Lost. So far, the only one we've found is this: http://www.1-18-08.com/
Patrick Scott5 said:this one hits even harder 🙏 🙏 🙏
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kl6EqfUEhE&NR=1
Yeah, I caught that. 🤣
It’s interesting—not sure if anyone else picked up on this yet—but when you watch certain Republican Party clips, the sidebar usually suggests videos related to the topic at hand. But while you're watching these Republican Party videos, YouTube keeps suggesting stuff about "illusions," "magic tricks," and "David Copperfield." 🙏 🤣
I loved that mini-series back when it first aired on PBS—it was great. Re-watching it about a year ago? A bit silly, honestly. Still, Randall Flagg (played by Jamey Sheridan) remains the most powerful villain ever put on screen. In my book, "The Stand" and "Storm of the Century" are the best SK adaptations out there.
Since I know there are some SK fans lurking here, I wonder if you caught the news: King is reportedly in talks with J. J. Abrams (the mind behind Lost, Alias, Mission: Impossible III, and the new Star Trek film) to bring Dark Tower to the big screen. We’re talking full-scale cinema, not some low-budget mini-series...
To me, The Thin Red Line is a phenomenal piece of cinema, though it definitely isn't for everyone. Visually, the film is just too powerful—and Zimmer's score? Well... it's pure genius. 🙏
