CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › hollowhawk412 › Posts

Posts by hollowhawk412

370 posts shown.

2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
Joshua Newman2 said:I’m fairly certain that was the exact headache BMW dealt with over the last couple of seasons; Robert Kubica and Nick Heidfeld have such vastly different physical builds that they likely had to settle on a compromised cockpit setup—or perhaps Nick was just sitting on a cushion 😁. This year at Renault, they clearly went into things knowing Robert Kubica would be their primary star, so I assume they tailored the interior specifically to his dimensions, and when it turned out Vitaly Petrov was also quite tall, it worked out perfectly for everyone involved.

Mark Webber is also quite tall... much like those two...
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
Lewis Hamilton was driving like an absolute beast out there... if McLaren can just get their act together and iron out those kinks, we might actually see a legitimate fight between the two of them.
But you really can't take your eyes off Sebastian Vettel and Felipe Massa for a second either...
And honestly, if Renault gets the green light to tweak that engine a bit, all bets are off and things could get very interesting indeed.
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
Jason Campbell70 said:02.23.2020.

02.20.2010.

Like I’ve been saying, there just isn't any luck to be found with the RS27-2010. ☕

If you had actually listened closely for once, you would have realized his exhaust wasn't even functioning properly. 😁
The engine sounded perfectly fine the entire time.

But regardless, you aren't wrong about the engine itself... it's incredibly efficient, though

it seems some people are willing to gamble on engine reliability even if the thing hasn't shown a single sign of failure yet.😉
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
I can't help but find myself dwelling on Fernando Alonso's recent comments regarding how we might see even fewer overtakes throughout this season's races.
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
placidpilot56 said:I’m honestly just rooting for these guys to mess up so that maybe, just maybe, Lotus can scrape together a single point.👍

Today's race is basically a no risk race😉
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
placidpilot56 said:honestly, what Weber pulled off at the start should have earned him a penalty, plain and simple.👎

Mark Webber just loves dealing with nonsense, doesn't he?

I really feel for Robert Kubica...
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
I honestly don't know how much more of this I can take, but Adrian Sutil is just an absolute clown, plain and simple... nothing but pure incompetence at this point.
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
wanderingbison9 As stated by:
This Mladen Jergovic guy is an absolute clown... he’s out here calling the newer teams nothing but "underdogs," yet he hasn't even bothered to watch a single race from the USF1 season.

The mockery regarding Alonso has already begun, which is frankly predictable. If you aren't aware, Mladen Jergovic can practically read Alonso’s mind and interpret every single bit of his non-verbal communication with total precision. 😉
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
slybison8 said:Sending my regards to everyone! I’m also convinced we’re looking at one of the better seasons in recent memory—though, frankly, I highly doubt I’ll be able to keep track of all these powerhouse teams and drivers before we even hit Monaco.

The start has been nothing short of impressive. Sebastian Vettel is basically signaling that the joking is over and he's ready to hunt down wins again. As for Ferrari, they seem to have finally shaken off that existential crisis following Schumacher's departure; with this new lineup and everything surrounding the Prancing Horse, they’re promising a return to glory. Meanwhile, I suspect even the latest chassis innovations won't stop McLaren from stumbling through yet another mediocre season. And as for Schumacher... well, let's just wish him the best in retirement. 😬

It’s going to be a spectacular season, filled with plenty of celebratory music once the checkered flag drops. 🙂

I’m genuinely looking forward to the debates, the heated passions, the swearing—hell, I’ll even take the bans on the F1 forum!

Let the racing begin! 👍

If you ask me

1. Ferrari—both when it comes to raw qualifying pace and their overall race rhythm.

Then somewhere in the mix
2. Red Bull -- we still need to see how they manage tire degradation during the race; they look right on the heels of Ferrari in a single lap, but I have my doubts about their long-run performance.

After that, I'd say McLaren, Mercedes, and I suspect Renault isn't far behind those top two.

Robert Kubica admitted he made a massive blunder, and Mark Webber did too, back during the T16... if it weren't for that mistake, Kubica would have likely secured P7 and been right up there with Lewis Hamilton.

During testing, Kubica mentioned their race pace looked fantastic, though they struggled more when running with a light fuel load... but then again, qualifying favors the fast cars while the race favors the heavy ones.

In my view, Kubica messed up by not sticking to the hard tires...
but they do benefit from having a lighter car due to lower fuel consumption.

Adrian Sutil might actually pull something off since he starts on hards... not right at the lights, but after a few laps in.

Forecast

1. Fernando Alonso

2. Sebastian Vettel

3. Felipe Massa

though I’m not entirely sure if Alonso will be willing to play it risky in this opening race.
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
placidpilot56 said:"compared to last season's Toyota, this year Williams is switching back to classic Cosworth engines..."

Classic? Honestly, I don't trust a single word these commentators say...

They are all just incredibly superficial personalities, really...
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
Morgan Murphy7 said:Alonso took first, Petrov was second, and Benedict finished 16th. 🙏

The Yankees ended up at 17th. 😉
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
Jason Campbell70 said:No matter how tense the rivalry gets or how balanced the field seems, you have to admit one thing—people watch Formula 1 because of Michael Schumacher. ☕

Alonso is over at Ferrari, McLaren managed to pull off a brilliant little loophole to skirt the regulations, Senna is back in Formula 1, Vettel basically signaled he’s a title contender during his very first qualifying session, and even Lotus has made their return to the grid, but...

None of them, absolutely none of them, stir up nearly as much dust, ignite the fans, or drive the Formula 1 viewership numbers quite like the Grand and Great—Michael Schumacher.

You can love him, or you can absolutely despise him, but you really ought to just accept the fact that He Is The Greatest Of All Time. 🙏

Whether or not he actually clinches the championship with Mercedes is a conversation that is, quite frankly, beyond debate.

When you have a figure of this magnitude, possessing this level of intellect and that legendary German precision, the only ingredient left for a title run is the technical know-how provided by a powerhouse like Mercedes.
And everyone knows Mercedes has that in spades.

To all those who hate on the Great Michael Schumacher, you might want to take a deep breath and try to keep your cool.

Michael has returned, and he looks more determined than ever. 🙏

Quickly translate this into English and somehow, if necessary, via any means required in new editions of the Thesaurus or Webster, please include
this term right next to

ASSKISSING

🙈
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
Michael Lee4 said:Because they've added more cars to the grid, they’re overhaulng the qualifying format entirely, and honestly, it’s about time we saw some movement on this. Under the new structure, seven cars will be cut after the first session, followed by another seven being knocked out in the second, which leaves us with a ten-car shootout for pole position in the final session—much like the way things were handled back in 2009. It’s a massive shift, but given how bloated the field has become, it seems like the only logical way to ensure the tension actually stays high when it matters most. The third session will now be run in low-fuel configuration duo to The refuelling Ban, which honestly just complicates everything for the engineers who were already sweating through their shirts trying to nail the balance..

# The rules regarding the starting grid are quite clear: those top ten qualifiers are strictly required to kick off the race using the exact same set of tires they utilized during their qualifying run. It’s a rigid constraint, really, leaving very little room for tactical maneuvering when it comes to initial rubber selection.
If a tire ends up getting damaged during qualifying, the FIA technical delegate is going to step in to evaluate just how bad the situation is, and they might give the green light for the driver to swap out to a different set that they personally deem to be safe.

Actually, looking at it from another angle... that last bit in bold is pretty damn interesting.
It’s entirely possible that the Setup used in Q3 is actually prioritizing tire management through those initial stints rather than just chasing raw, single-lap pace.
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
stormyviper11 said:Yeah, that was the part that really caught my eye too... It’s pretty obvious that the difference in Setup between a single flying lap and the full race distance is massive. That makes Massu's improvement in Q3 even more fascinating. I suspect his team decided to just go for broke, aiming for pole and trying to build enough of a gap to pull off an incredibly early pit stop, but we'll see how it plays out. Either way, assuming there isn't any contact or a puncture, I’m betting on Massu being the first of the leaders to dive into the pits tomorrow.

And I'm pulling for Adrian Sutil to grab some points by the end of the race. 🙂

I honestly don't even dare make a prediction...
Qualifying only tells us how fast a car is for one solitary lap; it doesn't account for tire degradation or how the car handles when it's running with a full fuel load 🤷
we really won't know until it actually happens.
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
Michael Lee4 said:Since we’re packing more cars onto the grid, they’ve decided to overhaul the qualifying format entirely. It’s going to work like this: seven drivers will get knocked out during the first session, another seven will be sent home after the second, and then—just like back in 2009—we'll see ten cars fighting it out in a final shootout for pole position. The third session will now be run in low-fuel configuration duo to The refuelling Ban, which honestly changes the entire complexion of how we’re looking at these times, because suddenly the weight advantage isn't there to buffer the raw pace, and I find it somewhat frustrating that we have to pivot our expectations mid-stream like this..

# Under the current regulations, any driver who manages to break into that elite top ten during qualifying is strictly obligated to kick off the race using the exact same set of tires they used to secure their position. It’s a rigid rule, honestly, and while some might argue it adds a layer of strategic complexity, I find it somewhat restrictive given how much variables change between qualifying trim and full race stints. But that's the landscape we're working with; you nail your lap on a specific compound, you're stuck with it when the lights go out.
Should any driver find themselves dealing with a damaged tyre during qualifying, the FIA technical delegate is going to step in to evaluate just how bad the situation actually is, and they might just grant permission for the car to swap out to a fresh set that they personally deem to be safe for track use.

I honestly don't see anything here that actually addresses the question regarding the different Setup used between Q2 and Q3.
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
shadowstag10 said:how on earth can you think Alonso has the best time?
what kind of time are you even talking about?

His Q2 time is actually the fastest one recorded today... and since
and considering the fact that Q3 will be run in low-fuel configuration duo to The refuelling Ban, that gap I pointed out becomes incredibly interesting...

In the actual race, unlike the gap seen between Q2 and Q3, they'll be running with a full fuel load, so we might honestly need to adjust the Setup differently
2010 Bahrain Grand Prix in Formula 1 ·
In my estimation, the most intriguing aspect here is this

It seems the only one who actually managed to improve their pace from Qualifying 2 to Qualifying 3 was Felipe Massa.

Meanwhile, Fernando Alonso is currently sitting on the fastest single lap of the day.

There’s a prevailing theory circulating that after the conclusion of Qualifying 2, every driver pivoted their setup
specifically to favor race conditions, given that once you hit Qualifying 3, you're essentially locked into your configuration and can't make those adjustments anymore.

If anyone out there happens to have some more concrete intel regarding this technicality, please do feel free to weigh in.

http://www.formula1.com/live_timing/live_timing.html

Sebastian Vettel - +0.3s
Felipe Massa - -0.1s
Fernando Alonso - +0.5s
Lewis Hamilton (+0.5s)
Nico Rosberg - +0.6s
Mark Webber - +0.9s
Michael Schumacher - +0.4s
Jenson Button - +0.5s
Robert Kubica (+0.5s)
Adrian Sutil - +1.4s
Dalmatian-Mexican girl wins big in New York City in Close to Politics ·
Noah Cruz75 said:They occupied you guys. They looted you through General Electric. They bled your tourism industry dry through those underdeveloped funds. They were responsible for your 45th anniversary tragedy. They rigged the soccer championships to keep Real Madrid from winning. They colonized your beautiful land with their folk culture and Čkalja. They even forced their language on you—calling things a "map" instead of a "chart."
Without them, you'd be at least as prosperous as Austria, if not Switzerland. 😂

And why on earth are you busy rewriting history 😁

just sit down and shut up
Hannah White2 said:Don't lose sight of the fact that the USA is basically the engine room for everyone else right now—it’s the consumer base that's keeping so many people afloat. Honestly, it's the reason millions of Chinese people have any kind of lifestyle at all, and why we even consider China a superpower today. They are exactly the kind of customers you'd want in your corner.
Every Arab person knows that if that economy takes even one little stumble, they can just head out and start raising horses in peace...
The first rats to scurry out of their holes would be the Russians and the Chinese on one side, and then you've got those fanatical Islamic warriors on the other (aiming at Israel). That would be the opening act for World War III. And let's be real, Europe showed what it's capable of during the last big war.
But they only really step up once an enemy has already stomped through half the continent.
Poverty, disease, millions dead, nuclear weapons (Israel), and all that mess... nobody wants to see that happen, not now and not ever.

Neil Conaugh (I might have misspelled the name, so please excuse me)
,a historian and head of the business department at the University of Edinburgh, writes in his book rise of money that—and I will intentionally avoid using the terms USA and China here—the leading elites of the USA and China are not actually adversaries, but rather engaged in the greatest partnership in human history...
He even goes so far as to call this hybrid entity "KinoAmerika"...
The Chinese finance American debt, while Americans reciprocate by purchasing their goods...
Only someone deeply resentful or backward-looking would truly desire the downfall of the USA; the author of the post above
is merely simplifying complex issues, turning what ought to be a sensible critique of a maddeningly self-destructive and speculative financial system—a system driven by a greed for massive short-term gains that destroys the American middle class and those who depend on their spending—into some sort of ideological, anti-hegemonic pamphlet intended to birth new "righteous" nations that build their trade advantages solely by exploiting their own citizens... 🤷

At the end of WWII, the USA found itself in a unique position where the outcome led, quite inevitably, to the dollar becoming the world's dominant currency... back then, European leaders actually viewed the USA as a desirable hegemon...

The USA was the only healthy economy at the time, holding two-thirds of the world's gold reserves and accounting for over 60% of global production...

Back then, the USA pulled up Western Europe, Japan, and later South Korea and Taiwan economically—sometimes through direct aid and sometimes simply by opening its vast markets to their products... though, frankly, the primary motivation was
to pull those nations away from the potential embrace of communism, and the USA correctly calculated that steering these countries toward them would be best achieved by fostering their economic prosperity...

For me, the most vital issue is dismantling a system that works specifically to disenfranchise labor and treats both manual work and R&D as mere expenses to be cut... this is especially true for blue-collar jobs that once allowed people in the West to live comfortably, but are now being systematically eroded by cheap labor from the East due to a silent, unspoken agreement...

And I would love—much like a suggestion I saw on a blog I stumbled upon via a link here on this forum—to see the world move toward increasing labor rights in those countries with cheap labor... then we would finally see a real market competition...

Furthermore, I would particularly like to see the Chinese stop keeping their yuan artificially low...

I don't know about you all, but I am practically counting down the days until that damned yuan strengthens...
just as it should have happened long ago...
Emily Clark6 said:The IMF is selling out to China🙄 Please... they aren't "selling" anything. The author clearly has no clue how bonds actually work. They aren't stocks, you know...☕

It isn't even about selling anything at this point; they've already gone and buried themselves in debt with the BRIC nations. 😉

So what if China, Russia, and Brazil continue to grow? Honestly, I don't see how that could possibly be a bad thing for anyone.

A multipolar world is fundamentally superior to a unipolar one, and frankly, these emerging powers only have a finite trajectory before they hit their ceiling. They aren't going to achieve total dominance, and they certainly won't ever sit on the throne alone.