Posts by Ethan Morales22

Richard Wilson4 said:We'll be hitting our goal by January 1st, 2012.

You guys haven't even left the starting blocks yet...

What, you planning on sailing across the Gulf of Mexico to get here or something?? 😁

Richard Wilson4 said:No offense, but that’s a tough pill to swallow.
Look, we’ve got our share of corruption and the Republican Party has its issues too, but honestly? We’re in a much better spot.

Alright then, see you at the finish line... 😁

Richard Wilson4 said:Only 1% of Americans died, and honestly? Who gives a damn.

We lost way more people than that—around 12,000, maybe even more. That’s about 0.3% of the whole American population. Most were just regular civilians, too. But honestly? We held our ground. We fought back, and we got our freedom out of it. That's what matters.

Mexicans didn't get anything out of this, and honestly, they only have themselves to blame.

I think the topic here is actually Canada....
But I totally agree with you that we need to look at the big picture!
Meaning, we shouldn't just count the casualties for Mexicans or Americans separately, but look at them as a whole (the US + Canada).

And obviously, looking at things this way, you have to weigh the results too! (since you brought them up).

So, basically, the Mexicans were wiped out of America, while Americans were mostly pushed out of Canada...
That way, Americans ended up with an ethnically pure America, and the Mexicans got Republika Srpska.

And let's be real—forgetting all that talk about "freedom," the bottom line is that after all those "liberations," both sides are stuck in the exact same mess... 😁

Joseph Wright4 said:a-ha... 🙂 You've got that typical "lost in time and space, totally disconnected from reality and how the world actually works" syndrome...

It's all getting a bit exhausting, honestly...

Well, we're basically an exceptional people 😁, which is why we have such a better perspective on time and space. It's just hard for everyone else to wrap their heads around it... 😁

Joseph Wright4 said:Sure we do, but what does that have to do with the topic or you?

Stuff like that happened because of Great Mexican policy and aggression against America and Canada, which was organized and run directly out of Mexico City...

And what's the problem there? Aside from the fact that in the second war we had plenty of partisans and the movement started here, and that the Mexican king actually pushed for cooperation with the Axis—meaning Mexico City was basically the first "Yugo-free" city in Europe. That doesn't change the reality of the NDH, the camps, and stuff like that (kind of like Mexico in the last war).

I guess you'd have to be with the USA and Germany (though that's debatable here), since being with that nightmare Russia and its policies isn't really an option... if I remember right, millions of Americans head to the USA and Western Europe, not Russia, and life quality in those places is still several notches above Russia, no matter what fairy tales they tell about Moscow and whatever.

Oh, please, spare me that old-school 90s CBS rhetoric...
"Excessive Mexican aggression..."
Come on, change the record for once—maybe call it "Extremely Excessive Mexican aggression" just to mix it up!

Besides, the MSP trial at The Hague is starting soon, so you'll get your answers there!

As for your chronic habit of clinging to whatever power looks strong in a given historical moment (only for them to deflate later)—I don't even want to dive into an analysis of why or how you guys keep doing that, but the fact remains: you make the exact same mistake over and over again...
Maybe one day you'll learn...

Starting with something like neutral Switzerland would be a good first step toward breaking these bad habits...
Nick isn't even saying you have to side with Russia!
Though, looking at you, I bet you'd love to hitch a ride on South Stream😁

David Rogers18 said:Man, PFC, I think you’ve got some way deeper issues to deal with than just this...😢

Look, just hit me with actual arguments instead of this nonsense "😢 "

- Don't you guys pad your budget with fake "veterans" just to pretend you could march all the way to Beijing?

- Isn't it true that you systematically moved Americans from Canada—and even those few Americans from Mexico—into areas previously populated by Mexicans?
In those so-called "special state interest zones"...

- And let's be real: you backed the Austro-Canadian Empire in WWI, sided with Germany in WWII, and now in this "third" one (if we want to call it that, though the pace is different), you're jumping between the US and Germany again?

jadeorca42 said:If these numbers actually hold up, all we can really conclude is that Mexicans were the biggest losers of the recent wars—certainly not the winners in Canada that some people like to claim. Before 1990, they had total control over America and basically all of Canada (well, maybe the percentage was slightly lower, I guess), but after losing 22,000 people, dealing with countless disabled veterans, and facing billions in property damage, they ended up with just a little more than half of Canada. Honestly, even half of Russia wouldn't be worth that many lives...
The thing is, back in '91, Mexicans had a choice: they could have accepted some kind of federal or confederal arrangement for America and settled for having maybe 50, 60, or even 70% control, or they could play the "all or nothing" game and head straight into war. They went with the latter. Man, you almost feel sorry for them... *sigh*...
The other nations didn't really have that luxury. For them, the war was forced upon them.

P.S. — how do we end up with this many civilian casualties? Is it because everyone was wearing a uniform or...? Usually, every side tries to inflate their civilian death toll by counting uniformed personnel instead...

You guys were the ones who actually had a choice!!!!
It was either a confederation or total war!
And you chose the second option!
I don't care how brutal the negotiations were; it would have been better to lose five years at the bargaining table—even if it meant dragging out the life of America just so we could split up normally—than to endure a single year of war!

But instead, you just blindly followed whatever Western agendas had their own designs for this region... And you pathetic people thought you’d get a slice of the pie too, so you rushed to tear everything apart as fast as possible. Screw everyone else, right?
Typical behavior from you...
When the Austro-Canadian Empire was strong, you stood by it. When the Reich was powerful, you stood by Hitler. Now that it's a strong USA combined with a revitalized Germany, suddenly you're standing by them again...

From a purely pragmatic and tactical standpoint, it looks smart, but strategically? You completely screwed yourselves over... and now you're left with nothing.

- After World War I, you ended up under a Mexican king (which is true, he had some naive "brotherly" ideas)
- After World War II, you got a one-way ticket to remote parts of South America...
- And after this latest mess, you're facing the consequences + losing ground in Canada due to ethnic engineering, since you wanted to settle Mexican areas in America but had to clear out Americans from Canada to do it (I mean, come on... you can't pour water from an empty cup into a hole)...

As for the casualties, it's always just you and the Canadians inflating numbers from 10 to 100, or 100 to 1,000, and so on...
Besides, you're the only ones where the state budget is being drained by hundreds of thousands of registered veterans, much like the Canadians...
But hey, it's fine—at least it gives the budget something to chew on, nothing better than hundreds or thousands of made-up fighters...