Karen Sanchez19 said:What kind of "self" are we even talking about here?..
If you’re referring to the true Self—the ATMAN (the Absolute, God)—then there isn't much to lose. What exactly do you have in mind??
The issue is that the spiritual community is plagued by total terminological confusion.
And honestly, hardly anyone—whether they are seasoned DUHOVNJAKs, newcomers, or even established masters—bothers to study Kabbalah. It is essentially the mathematics of spirituality, providing a precise place for everything under the heavens within a perfect hieroglyph known as the Tree of Life.
It’s a clever idea, but frankly, half of it is wrong and a bit crude, if I may say so.
The Tree of Life, through its ten emanations, serves as a blueprint of the universe as designed by the Architect—showing how it is, how it is perceived, and how things ought to be viewed correctly.
Think of the Tree of Life as a "cabinet" with ten shelves; you can place every single thing, concept, or idea onto a specific shelf, ensuring you don't confuse anyone else.
It’s quite beautiful and useful, but it has one tiny catch.
Mathematics is the final veil standing before the image of Truth.🙂
Accordingly, Kabbalah and its glyph, the Tree of Life, represent the ultimate veil preceding the image of spiritual truth (because, just as math governs the physical world, Kabbalah governs the spiritual realm).
The problem is that Kabbalah is just as rigorous as mathematics; it requires a lifetime of dedicated study.
But why spend years studying Kabbalah when you can become a Reiki master in two or three years, perform a few tricks, and charge people hundreds or even thousands of dollars for various "initiations"? ***
Still, it’s a good question to ask: what actually constitutes the "self"?
Our friend Bernadette Roberts worked hard to answer this in her third book, *What Is Self*, spanning 216 pages of serious inquiry without any chat rooms or emojis.🙂
Everyone seems to think they know exactly what is meant when they say "I," "Self," "Ego," "Consciousness," "Enlightenment," or "God"—and then they claim victory and move on to prosperity...
When in reality, they don't know at all!!
So, Bernadette diligently demonstrates
what the "self" truly is
by examining various spiritual traditions, such as
Hinduism,
Jungian psychology,
Buddhism,
her own experiences,
and more.
For instance, she begins her discussion with a vital premise:
"Because the terms 'self' and 'consciousness' express
THE SAME EXPERIENCES (as noted by hiddenpuma75),
and since nothing can be said of one that cannot be said of the other, we use these terms interchangeably and affirm that the true nature of self IS consciousness."
(This reminds me that I was actually the one who started this thread
asking how you all would translate the distinction between CONSCIOUSNESS and AWARENESS into American English,
since they aren't quite the same thing in the teachings of Nisargadatta, yet we seem stuck with just one word to cover it all.)