graniteharbor502 said:I can agree with you—Räikkönen is one of the best drivers out there today, and he drove a flawless race. But let’s be real—first, Rosberg just cleared out of his way (something Hamilton would never have done for Rosberg, remember Canada 2014?), then Red Bull completely botched Ricciardo's pit stop. To top it off, Hamilton cut the chicane during a battle on track just to maintain the lead. We saw something similar back in 2013 with Alonso and Perez, where Alonso was penalized and forced to yield his position to Perez.
Look, if Ham hadn't run into car issues again during Q3, he probably would have taken pole—and the race might have been decided from lap one. As for him letting Ros through? It was obvious how slow he was; two more corners and Ham would have lapped him anyway.
Regarding the cutting of the corner—before that chicane, Ricciardo was right behind Ham, Ham clipped the curb and cut the line, and even though Ricciardo stayed behind, he caught up. Ham didn't gain any advantage at all—if anything, he lost momentum coming out of the turn because of his own mistake. Then Ricciardo makes his move and Ham shuts the door. That's just standard racing, folks—it's a battle for the win in freaking Monaco! Don't be such pushovers. You claim cutting the corner was the only way Ham could hold the lead? Ricciardo had 40 laps!!??? And he didn't make a single other attempt?!!! For first place at the Monaco Grand Prix!! He doesn't deserve the win. Ham earned it today.
Honestly, I don't get some of these people. When drivers aren't overtaking, you call them cowards and say the races are just processions, begging for overtakes because they're "exciting." Then, when an overtake actually happens, you start pulling out trigonometry and calculus to prove who was "too aggressive" in the duel and who deserves a penalty. Then, once someone actually gets penalized, you complain that there's too much officiating and we should just "let them race."Who's the crazy one here? 🤔
wiredscout14 said:#3 dominated the weekend, and his team basically stole a deserved victory from him. If roles were reversed, he probably would have been slapped with a penalty for defending like that, but instead, nothing happens. Classic Lewis.
If Ham's car hadn't died on him in Q3, he likely would have been on pole.
neonfox65 said:Because if he hadn't yielded, there would have been contact. Ham defended aggressively; it was nothing more than that.
In any racing duel, if someone refuses to give an inch, contact is almost inevitable. This
bold approach is just part of the game—it's not some petty playground scuffle, but rather elite drivers pushing world-class machinery to the limit at the Monaco Grand Prix, and Ham absolutely showed up!!