283 posts shown.
Brian Young76 said:I probably expressed myself poorly there.
It isn't the idea that I won't or don't want to wake up until everyone else does; rather, it's the thought that suffering on a cosmic level won't cease until the cosmic Mind awakens. If we are all one, then that seems like the only logical conclusion to me.
Of course, personal (though, of course, illusionary!) awakening is a massive deal and the greatest good you can do for the world (which is really doing it for yourself!), but if you have truly awakened, it means you've realized that we are all one. So, how could you possibly NOT want to awaken the rest of yourself???
I also wrote incorrectly regarding it being impossible to experience Love within oneself, my apologies. A Course in Miracles says that it is possible, though it takes much longer. Right at the beginning, it mentions that performing miracles (which are expressions of Love) can shorten that timeframe.
You haven't answered my question about how one actually practices Advaita, and I would really love to read your thoughts on that. 🙂
What kind of exercises are involved? Roughly what does the practice look like and how is it done? As I mentioned in my introduction, I've been playing music for 40 years, so the importance of consistent practice for making progress in anything (including the spiritual path) is practically hardwired into my subconscious. I am genuinely curious about how one practices Advaita in a practical sense. 🙂
And how important is a teacher? I think hiddenpuma75 mentioned somewhere that he has a teacher (if I remember correctly, his teacher is 78 years old). I don't have a teacher (at least not a living human being; A Course in Miracles says the true teacher is the Holy Spirit...), and I've spent a lot of time wondering whether I should be out looking for someone... for now, I still don't have an answer to that question.
From a non-dual perspective, that just doesn't hold water.
Advaita starts from the premise that we are already awake—that we already are what we are. There is no "force" to wake up from and no "attachments" to break free from; we simply don't realize it. We're stuck in a state of
ignorance (avidya). We can't see because our true self is obscured by emotions, concepts, and the various ideas we cling to. To recognize your true nature (which is already exactly as it is), you have to strip away the false ideas and concepts we try to live through "in the mirror." Once those are gone, what remains is what we’ve been searching for. Someone who has woken up from the illusion of existence (maya) sees that everyone is already awake—they just don't know it yet. For them, everything is exactly where it should be. They don't see "imperfection" anywhere, because imperfection is just our own mental projection that things *should* be different than they are. In short, for the awakened, there is nothing besides pure awareness—not even this so-called "cosmic mind" mentioned in ACIM; for them, that's just another word for awareness itself.
ACIM shouldn't be viewed as a system or some kind of spiritual self-help method; it’s the essence it nurtures that matters. Advaita isn't a system, a concept, or an idea, and it doesn't really offer a "practice"—because from a non-dual standpoint, all those things are just obstacles preventing us from seeing the reality of things.
Here are a few thoughts regarding gurus;
Imagine you're sitting down and someone walks up and tells you to sit down.
Your first reaction is "WTF?"—a momentary flash of confusion—before you realize you were already sitting. You recognize, you become aware of your actual position.
That’s the role of a teacher: to point out the most obvious thing in the world—something so glaringly apparent that we somehow miss it. That fact is
there are no attachments and there is no liberation. What happens next is just like my mundane example: a ready student recognizes the obvious truth—that there are no attachments and no awakening required. Nothing changed in the interim; the only difference is that now, this person
knows. They are now in a state of avidya. Wait, no—they've moved past it.
The one who doesn't see is immediately told to meditate on it, to surrender to a guru to handle it, to chant a divine name, or to work for the greater good without expecting results.
Brian Young76 said:I probably expressed myself poorly there.
It isn't the idea that I won't or don't want to wake up until everyone else does; rather, it's the thought that suffering on a cosmic level won't cease until the cosmic Mind awakens. If we are all one, then that seems like the only logical conclusion to me.
Of course, personal (though, of course, illusionary!) awakening is a massive deal and the greatest good you can do for the world (which is really doing it for yourself!), but if you have truly awakened, it means you've realized that we are all one. So, how could you possibly NOT want to awaken the rest of yourself???
I also wrote incorrectly regarding it being impossible to experience Love within oneself, my apologies. A Course in Miracles says that it is possible, though it takes much longer. Right at the beginning, it mentions that performing miracles (which are expressions of Love) can shorten that timeframe.
You haven't answered my question about how one actually practices Advaita, and I would really love to read your thoughts on that. 🙂
What kind of exercises are involved? Roughly what does the practice look like and how is it done? As I mentioned in my introduction, I've been playing music for 40 years, so the importance of consistent practice for making progress in anything (including the spiritual path) is practically hardwired into my subconscious. I am genuinely curious about how one practices Advaita in a practical sense. 🙂
And how important is a teacher? I think hiddenpuma75 mentioned somewhere that he has a teacher (if I remember correctly, his teacher is 78 years old). I don't have a teacher (at least not a living human being; A Course in Miracles says the true teacher is the Holy Spirit...), and I've spent a lot of time wondering whether I should be out looking for someone... for now, I still don't have an answer to that question.
WE ARE NOT ALL ONE (
because there is no "you" and there are no "others")
EVERYTHING IS ONE
There is no PERSON who supposedly awakens. Nor is there anyone to know that everything is ONE.
Because if everything is ONE, then there is no OTHER to know it—otherwise, it wouldn't be ONE.
A person cannot be awakened.
AWAKENING is nothing other than knowing that you ARE NOT a person.
An "awakened person" is an oxymoron—YOU (the person) cannot wake up; only when you transcend the idea of being a person are you awake. And if you have truly awakened, you realize there is no YOU, nor any "rest of you" (the others).
AWAKENING is awakening FROM the person.
That's why Advaita isn't for everyone.
The best practice for beginners is
Mooji's guided silent sitting meditations.COMPLETE ADVAITA PRACTICE FOR NOVICES IN THREE SIMPLE STEPS
1For me, the beginning of any practice is calling upon and paying respect to everyone who has had a serious impact on my spiritual journey, which looks something like this:
Om Namah Brahmajnananadd; Om Namah Narayananand; Om Namah Bhagawan Raman Maharshi; Om Namah Nisargadatta Maharaj; Om Namah PapajaIf they were able to assist in the awakening of others, why wouldn't they assist in mine? It's essentially like having a satsang (communion in pure consciousness) with the greatest saints, which makes your mind humble enough and open enough to receive the grace of realization (the realization that there is nothing to realize and no one to do the realizing)—I often let them meditate instead of me, which is the same as letting God meditate "as you."
Pay your respects to those who have significantly influenced your spiritual development; this could include Christ, Buddha, Ahura Mazda, Zoroaster...
2Next, and not less important, is to wish peace and happiness upon all beings in the universe—very simply and from the heart, something like this:
May all beings in the universe be forever peaceful and happy
Om Shanti Shanti Shanti3then you simply 'stay away from thoughts' and dwell in 'contentless presence'—or more accurately, exist 'as presence,' as Bhagawan Raman Maharshi puts it
be as you are, which is just the "I AM" presence—call it consciousness, the present moment, holy silence, or whatever you like; it doesn't matter. You don't interfere, you don't wait for something to happen, you don't judge... because this isn't an achievement. It already *is*... there's really no need for any other practice, nor are there any other practices to be had
as Om Namah Nisargadatta Maharaj says: Consciousness (the witness, the I AM) is the final remnant of illusion and the first touch of reality
The witness is both unreal and real. The last remnant of the illusion, the first touch of the real. To say: I am only the witness is both false and true, false because of the ‘I am’, true because of the witness. It is better to say: ‘there is witnessing’. The moment you say ‘I am’, the entire universe comes into being along with its creator.this kind of practice, at any given moment or stage, can result in
direct insight, regardless of whether you're ready or not, whether you deserve it or not, whether you're experienced or a novice, or even if you're a fool or a genius
Brian Young76 said:Thanks 😉
On my first pass through this, it all seems remarkably similar to me.
But... I can't help but feel there's a fundamental distinction here, specifically regarding how ACIM places such heavy emphasis on the idea that experiencing Love in isolation isn't really possible; rather, it has to be realized through our connection with others—that whole concept of us all being the Son of God. There’s also this profound insistence that suffering won't truly dissipate until everyone, and I mean absolutely everyone, reaches enlightenment. It’s not enough to just wake up for yourself, I suppose.
I wonder, what would the perspective from Advaita be on a point like that?
Furthermore, I'm curious about how one actually goes about practicing Advaita. With ACIM, you're provided with these incredibly specific exercises and very detailed instructions, which makes it feel like you don't necessarily need a teacher or a guru to guide you. In the context of Advaita, how much weight does the presence of a guru actually carry?
Saying
suffering only ends once everyone awakens is just some silly Bodhisattva nonsense—it reeks of those exotic Theosophical ideas from Madam Blavatsky. In Advaita, that's total gibberish. It’s like saying, "I won't wake up from this dream until everyone else does"—as if you don't have to wake up yourself first before you could ever hope to help anyone else. Being awakened is the greatest gift to the world, even if you have zero intention of helping anyone else wake up, or even if you couldn't care less about the rest of humanity. Not every awakened person becomes an instant guru, nor does every awakened person possess the capacity (siddhi) to awaken others.
And this whole idea that it's impossible to experience Love by yourself is based on a fundamentally flawed interpretation of ecumenism, because it’s clearly referring to impersonal, unconditional, absolute Love...
Everything starts and ends with the grace of the guru.
The guru has no intention of making you realize anything.
He doesn't actually care whether someone wakes up or not.
He’s like the sun, shining equally on everyone, maintaining
life on Earth without having any specific intention to do so.
What touches him is your true longing.
His spontaneous response is Love.
That Love is precisely what wakes you from the dream of conditioning.
Without that initial spark of Love, there is nothing.
Technically, he doesn't "wake" you, because you are already wakefulness itself...
but he helps you clear away the obstacles preventing you from seeing it.
Brian Young76 said:Thanks 😉
On my first pass through this, it all seems remarkably similar to me.
But... I can't help but feel there's a fundamental distinction here, specifically regarding how ACIM places such heavy emphasis on the idea that experiencing Love in isolation isn't really possible; rather, it has to be realized through our connection with others—that whole concept of us all being the Son of God. There’s also this profound insistence that suffering won't truly dissipate until everyone, and I mean absolutely everyone, reaches enlightenment. It’s not enough to just wake up for yourself, I suppose.
I wonder, what would the perspective from Advaita be on a point like that?
Furthermore, I'm curious about how one actually goes about practicing Advaita. With ACIM, you're provided with these incredibly specific exercises and very detailed instructions, which makes it feel like you don't necessarily need a teacher or a guru to guide you. In the context of Advaita, how much weight does the presence of a guru actually carry?
There is no "me" and no "others"... when you identify with a persona (the ego, the self-myth), you perceive everyone else as separate individuals. But once you recognize your True impersonal nature—the Truth of your own Being—everything is ONE. This doesn't mean everyone is physically "one," it means there is no "me" vs. "them"—there is no duality at all. Duality is just a mental construct; ONENESS is what is experienced through the lens of the mind,,,
By the way, I ran into A Course in Miracles years ago—much like hiddenpuma75 did—and I noticed immediately that, fundamentally, it’s indistinguishable from Advaita. It’s just different terminology... basically Advaita for the dummies... even Christ's teachings are non-dual at their core.
Advaita is the only true teaching, regardless of the form it takes. All other teachings aren't necessarily wrong, they're just tailored to various temperaments and states of being. Truly, Advaita isn't for everyone—but if the teachings are correct, they must inevitably lead to Jnana (realization or direct insight).
THE CORE OF ADVAITA FOR THE UNINITIATED
1 There is no such thing as bondage, and therefore, there is no such thing as liberation.
2 If you don't get that after being told, then meditate on it.
3 If it still hasn't clicked, spend time with saints and listen to what they say.
4 If it still hasn't clicked, read the sacred texts.
5 If it still hasn't clicked, chant the name of God (mantra).
6 If it still hasn't clicked, pray for true insight.
7 If it still hasn't clicked, don't worry—it will click eventually.
Here’s what Advaita says...;
The Ribhu Gita... Chapter 23...
The nectar of knowledge—it’s all well and good to talk about it, but let’s be honest: most people are just thirsty for the idea of it. Real wisdom isn't some light refreshment; it’s a total saturation. It’s that state where the mind isn't just "aware" of truth, but is absolutely drenched in it... completely soaked through until there's no room left for anything else. No more searching, no more grasping—just a mind overflowing with the essence of what is.
I’m going to talk about Existence-Consciousness-Supreme Bliss—which, naturally, is always overflowing with joy. It is, quite simply, the essence of the essence found within all the Vedas and Puranas...
There are no distinctions here—no duality, no opposing forces. Nothing exists that is separate or lacking in unity. This entire reality is, quite simply, the supreme Brahma, untouched by desire or rage. One reaches That through Jnana...
There is never any such thing as an "I." There isn't anything else. There is nothing indestructible, and there is no "higher than the highest." This is all—truly—the untouched, supreme Brahma. One reaches That through Jnana...
There is no external reality, no internal reality—no patterns, no forms. It is all just this: the untouched, supreme Brahma. And one reaches That through Jnana.
There is no existence, no renunciation, no words—no such thing as "wrong" meanings either. This is all just the untouched, supreme Brahma. One reaches That through Jnana...
There’s no quality—no indirect statements, no certainty regarding mental modalities, no ego, no boundaries... nothing pervasive and certainly no unreal results.
There is no guru, no student, no fixed anything—no good, no bad, no variety of forms... there is no separate shape, no liberation, and certainly no slavery.
There is no such thing as "I"—no word for "it," either. No senses, no objects, no doubt... nothing trivial remains. There’s no security left, and certainly no "action" that needs getting done...
There is no nature to peace—no duality, no highs, no lows. No characteristics, no segments defined by sadness or joy... no indecision.
No body, no phallus, no cause or lack thereof—no sadness, no finality, no "I," no secrets, and certainly no "highest state"...
There is no karma—neither the kind from the Agamas nor any other sort. There is no truth, no "you," and no "me." No ignorance, no empirical data... no fools, and certainly no one left who claims to know.
There is no heaven, no hell, no liberation, no holiness—no desire, no teaching, no you, and no me... No philosophy, and no God.
There are no indicators of good or bad—no death, no life, no satisfaction, no nothing worth enjoying... there isn't even a single undivided essence, let alone duality.
There are no sankalpas, no manifested world, no ruler over the waking state—no such thing as "equality" either... and certainly no misunderstanding of what we count as the fourth.
There is no such thing as "everything"—no impurity, no desire, no laws, no worship... no manifest world, no pluralism, and certainly no chatter from others.
There is no such thing as a satsang—or the lack thereof. There is no Brahma, no seeker, no endeavor, no speaker... no ritual washing, no holy waters...
There is no virtue, no sin, and no such thing as an action that causes error—nothing stemming from our inner nature, our outer reality, or even the divine...
There is no birth or death here—no waking, no sleeping, no deep slumber... there is no earth, no afterlife, no victories, and certainly no defeats.
There is no weakness—no fear, no craving, no desperate longing for death. There is nothing unthinkable... no sinner, and no misunderstanding of the Vedas or religious wisdom.
There is no sattvic state, no rajasic state, no tamasic state—none of those qualities exist. There is no Shaivism, no Vedanta, no studying their doctrines, and certainly no wasting time thinking about them...
21. There is no slavery, there is no liberation—no clever little aphorisms about the identity of the individual versus the supreme self... there is no masculine form, no feminine form, no state of being that is either male or female, and certainly no permanent state...
22. No praise, no criticism, no eulogies, no hymns—no worldly chatter, no religious dogma, no sacred scriptures, and no commandments...
23. No fasting, no drinking—none of that stuff... there’s no luck, no entertainers, no stances or lack thereof, no family lineages, no names, no form...
24. There is nothing excellent, nothing corrupt—no blessings or curses, no purity or cleansing, no individual soul, no such thing as mind control...
There is no such thing as "invoking peace"—there is no peace to invoke. There is no mind control, no sensory deprivation, no "play," no states of being, no modifications, and certainly no defects...
There isn't really anything left—nothing of who "I" am, nothing of this whole Maya illusion, and certainly none of the consequences that come with it. There isn't even the slightest trace of dharma remaining... nor any need to cling to it.
There is no youth, no childhood, no senility—no death or anything like it. No relatives, no strangers, no friends, no brothers...
There is no "everything," there is no "nothing"—no Brahma, Vishnu, or Shiva... no guardians of the eight directions, and certainly no cosmic observer drifting through waking or dreaming states...
There is no cosmic observer lurking in deep sleep—no fourth state, no Brahmin, no warrior, no scholar... none of that. It’s all just supreme Brahma: the nectar of Jnana, completely untouched by suffering.
There is nothing like that which reappears or that which follows; there are no events destined to repeat themselves, no markers of time, no "I," and no cause for conversation...
There is nothing above—no inner faculties (intellect, ego, thought), no grand narratives about Consciousness, no duality suggesting I am Brahman, and no duality claiming I am merely Consciousness...
There is no food wrapper (physical body), no pranic or mental sheath, no shroud of intellectual knowledge, and no covering of Bliss...
There is no such thing as innate knowledge—nothing to be perceived, nothing to be learned. And "learning" is just a fancy term for getting it wrong in the first place. There’s nobody here to worry, no one to be worried about, no illusion... there isn't even a definition for this supposed triad of knowledge.
There is no observer, no observation, no objects being observed—not even the appearance of results. It is all just supreme Brahma, the nectar of Jnana, completely free from any kind of suffering.
There is no realm of inner capabilities—no mind, no misunderstanding of reality, no world of thought, nor any manifested landscape of intellect...
There is no world of the individual—no separate "jiva" existence. There are no memories that are inherently repulsive, no world built upon distinguishing characteristics, and no memories rooted in ignorance...
There is no world of Vedic nature—no clinging to Shastras or Agamas... there is no world that could possibly demonstrate the existence of something separate. There is simply no division between things...
There is no perception of differences or non-differences—no imagining whether defects exist or don't... there is no world characterized by peace or a lack thereof—no dwelling on qualities or the absence of them...
40. There is no male gender, no female gender, nothing neutral, nothing static, nothing in motion—no sadness and no joy, ever...
There is nothing that is inherently virtuous or unvirtuous—no certainty regarding what is mature or immature—no activities possessing a dual nature, and no modalities belonging to the witness...
There is no duality here—no dual nature at all. There’s nothing of that joy found in a single, undivided essence... no concept of being trapped in this body, and certainly no revelations claiming I am Brahma.
There is no security in the indivisible—no grand, undivided essence, no emergence of any modality, and certainly no destruction of them all...
There is no questioning of all modalities—no liberation from them, no ultimate destruction of them, and certainly no voiding of them...
There is nothing left of those thousand modalities—all of which are being obliterated moment by moment. There is no witness to these modalities, and there is certainly no requirement for the individual to be Brahma...
There is no universe, no mind, no finite existence, no action—ever. No criticism, no praise, no escaping from chains...
There’s no label for a person full of virtue—no mark of someone possessing true goodness, no sign of being lost in deep meditation, and certainly no tally of accumulated sins...
There are no thoughts of Brahma or the Self—no traces of the Almighty's presence, nothing desirable to grasp at, nothing to reject... there is no "best," no "supreme," and the very phrase "the Almighty" loses all its meaning.
49. Anyone living without Knowledge of the Self is truly a lost soul—deeply misguided, at best. To be stripped of such Knowledge is to live in a state of profound spiritual sickness.
50. I am Brahman. There is absolutely no question about it. By my very nature, I am an indivisible essence. I possess the unshakable certainty of direct experience: Brahman is everything.
51. Such a person is liberated right now—no doubt whatsoever. In this very moment, they become the embodiment of the highest Knowledge. They are, quite simply, the world's sage. They are Parameshwara.
52. This entire truth is the supreme Brahman—a nectar of wisdom that saturates the mind. Whoever hears and understands this explanation is, in truth, Brahman.
53. Neither the state of oneness nor the state of many; neither the atom nor the infinite; neither cause nor effect; neither the universe nor its mastery; eternally without taste, without scent, without form, neither bound nor free—let us become that radiant Light. Let us be untouched by birth, aging, or illness... existing eternally in the joy of ultimate Bliss, that glorious Sadashiva.
translated by Anant