Gary Palmer8 said:so are you one of those people screaming from the stands and throwing bananas?
Since you asked, I'll give you an answer.
No. I’m not one of those people yelling from the bleachers and tossing bananas.
I don't even watch football. I haven't been to a single game in my entire life—honestly, I don't even know if a football team has 10 or 11 players.
Football just isn't my thing. It’s a sport for commoners. For the masses. For both the spiritually and materially bankrupt—people I affectionately call "peasants."
To me, football is like burnt soup or living on credit. I’m an aristocrat; I have no need for burnt soup, credit... or football.
But I see where you're going with this. No, I'm not a racist. I firmly believe all people are equally valuable, and I never judge anyone by their skin color. To me, skin color is a totally irrelevant detail. We’re all equals here.
However, I *do* see differences between people, but they have nothing to do with skin color. I see the difference in poverty—specifically spiritual poverty. You see it in a lack of education, in narrow, one-dimensional worldviews, in following dogmas, or believing in luck and fortune tellers.
I’m a firm believer in science and anything that can be proven. Luck isn't a scientific category. Saying Rosberg has a massive points lead because he's "lucky" is nonsense. Rosberg has a huge lead because he's the better driver—a more complete driver. That’s what his points show. Lewis, on the other hand, is the faster driver—which is obvious from his pole positions and wins. But at the end of the day, it's the points that count. So, Rosberg is the better driver, while Lewis is simply faster.
Alain Prost was the better driver; Ayrton Senna was the faster one. When they were teammates, Prost always walked away with more points than Senna. If the 2014 rules were the same as back in 1988—where not every point counted toward the championship—Lewis would have had a much better shot. But under today's rules, where every single point matters, every zero Lewis gets goes straight to Rosberg.
And Rosberg knows that, which is why he plays it that way. He’s smart. He knows he’s slower, so he knows if he tries to outrun Lewis, he loses. Instead, he plays the reliability card.
Unlike Lewis, Rosberg is more calculated, more thorough, and more intellectually grounded. Rosberg's father is a legend in global motorsports and a world champion. Lewis's father is a legendary third-shift worker. It's pretty obvious that Rosberg's father could provide a higher quality of upbringing and psychological development.
And none of this has anything to do with skin color; it's about approach to life. Some people live beyond their means and neglect proper education and a child's development just to chase elite athletic results. Others balance sports with a solid upbringing. Rosberg balanced it well. Lewis's father didn't balance it as well. And now we're left with an unbalanced, poorly educated Lewis who's prone to incidents—both on the track and off.