It’s painfully obvious she has no idea what she's doing. Everything about her feels forced and incredibly unnatural—just a fake persona recycling the same old lies. Even with another smear campaign, I doubt it'll sway the voters who have already made up their minds on who they're backing. Maybe those who actually want to stay home should just sit this one out so we can avoid another international embarrassment.
It’s honestly ridiculous how people criticize Zoran Milanović for being blunt or losing his cool when he's standing right next to some bottom-feeding, lying troll. Sometimes you just have to hit back harder to deal with people like that. It’s a damn shame the public is so easily fooled; they'll probably end up treating a guy like that as a victim, all because he can flash a fake smile.
Kolinda basically just plays the victim and acts like she’s mentally lagging behind during these debates.
Paul Sanders5 said:Man, I could really go for some cold medicine right now.
Zoki’s out here talking about making his own way, and honestly, it makes me sick. This guy was a straight-A grad, and now he's just stuck being shoved into some government ministry position. For real, it sucks—I seriously regret not getting the hell out of here when I was younger. I mean, who even benefits from my hard work at this point?
I honestly don't understand how you aren't more disgusted by Kolinda than you are by Zoran Milanović.
Look, there’s really no debate about who gets my vote. I can't stand watching this fake idiot anymore. Sure, Joe Biden has his flaws, but at least he'll actually act like a President.
Paul Martinez73 said:It's because that's how I choose to write.🤷 I capitalize Dad, Mom, Son, and the Church out of pure respect for the individuals and the institutions.
What "perspective" are you talking about? Go ahead, tell me, since I haven't actually written anything expressing an opinion on it. I might actually be closer to your way of thinking on this topic than the other side, except I look at things objectively. I don't like what happens, but I'm not shocked by it either. Honestly, I find it hilarious when people move away from their tiny hometowns and suddenly feel the need to criticize everything, acting like they're experts on life just because they finally made it somewhere. I certainly wouldn't go to someone living in New York City or Chicago for three generations just to lecture them on how they're doing everything wrong.
All I said was that it's totally normal, especially within the American community living in Germany, to show up to a mass in New York City and find it ridiculous that someone mentioned they should have voted for Miroslav Škoro. And I also pointed out that these topics aren't avoided in any other countries in Europe, given how many services I've attended around the world. They only get mocked because they've never traveled further than their own backyard.
The Church as an institution? Give me a break. What's your reasoning there?
Let Zoran Milanović take charge; he’ll act more presidential than that idiot anyway. Besides, he seems calmer than usual, almost like he's finally matured.
Walter Grant5 said:Is it messed up if someone wants to see a future where national identities are wiped out, leaving only race, language, and culture behind? Not through force, obviously.
Absolutely not.
Nationalism is nothing more than a last refuge for scoundrels. ☕
brightpilot6 said:The first point is accurate, though it tends to get glossed over because it contradicts the official narrative that Americans have always been overwhelmingly in favor of secession. If you look closely at how the ballot questions were phrased during those periods, you'll see they were specifically designed to avoid that exact realization. The later escalations simply pushed the situation further in the direction everyone eventually wanted.
As for the others, perhaps they have the courage, but do they also have the sense? Most of the wealthiest counties in those separatist regions actually seem perfectly content staying part of the United States. I suppose they're just doing the math, aren't they?
From what I can gather, most of California isn't actually looking for total independence; they just want financial autonomy. That’s where all the friction comes from.
It’s a complete mess. Honestly, how are you even supposed to trust anyone anymore? At this point, if everyone just went around hooking up with everyone else, it would actually be more honest. ☕
Top-tier concert. Plenty of room to move, and man, those visuals were absolutely insane. Between those robots popping out of nowhere and the security guys popping those balloons later on—plus the confetti—it was just extra. 🙏
They played for nearly two hours, which is actually longer than most festivals I've been to. The last three tracks were at the very end, and honestly, they hit me hard—especially the final one. Out of the rest, Saturate was killer, and Temptation / star guitar was incredible.
I finally pulled the trigger and grabbed a ticket—floor seats, too. Their new album really hit the mark, and honestly, I just have to experience this live. It’s going to be an absolute audiovisual masterpiece. My only hope is that they actually do an encore; since this isn't a massive festival circuit show, I'm praying they pull off those three tracks like they did during the shows in Russia and Ukraine:
Glint? catch me I'm Falling The Private psychedelic Reel
Ethan Martin said:If we’re really going to debate the horror genre, I’d argue that Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978) is actually a BETTER horror film than Psycho.
Honestly, that specific version was one of the most tedious movies I've ever sat through; after that, I had zero interest in touching the rest of the franchise. And look, the baby isn't overrated—it's a top-tier film, even if I'll admit it isn't pure horror. Personally, I find The Shining to be a better horror flick, though it's hard to judge purely on genre. Back in its day, The Exorcist probably hit people harder, whereas today, Psycho might actually be more shocking.
Anthony Jackson2 says: Yeah, because Trump is such a saint. He earned everything through sheer grit, never used illegal labor in his buildings, doesn't cater to lobbyists, and certainly won't profit personally from that wall he wants to build...
A saint, right? ☕
Quote:
Look, I’d take anyone more sane on either side over him, but honestly, I don't see anything better out there, and I think people are hysterically overreacting to Trump. The great Democrat Obama wasn't any better as president—he was stuck in wars constantly, even more so than Trump, despite all that talk about leaving Afghanistan and Iran. We're talking about ridiculous imperialist invasions and the total wreck of Libya and Syria (at least Trump established a normal relationship with Kim). Obama attacked press freedom more than any other president and went even harder after whistleblowers. His whole campaign was basically built on securing borders, and he sent more families back to Mexico than Trump ever did. As for the economy or employment? It definitely wasn't stronger under him than it was under Trump.
And after all that, Trump is somehow the worst president ever while Obama is treated like a saint. Practically nothing has improved. It's just nonsense. Regardless, Trump is going to steamroll whoever the Democrats decide to throw at him in this election.