CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › restlesssurfer97 › Posts

Posts by restlesssurfer97

1247 posts shown.

Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:See, there you go twisting things again. I guess I'm not really hiding behind anything, and I definitely don't think anyone is less valuable just because of what they believe.

I don't have a problem with religious people at all, and honestly, I couldn't care less who believes in what. It's just that I think religion itself is a pretty silly concept. Like, the religion part, not the people who find it meaningful.

Oh, for sure. 👍
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:Yeah. But, I don't know, screw the scientists. restlesssurfer9 is right here at his keyboard to break things down for us.

Look, my bad, I really don't want to step on your toes or ruin the joy you get from believing you just popped out of thin air, so feel free to keep going with that, I won't bother you anymore.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:I don't know, I guess the only sad part here is how you're subtly discriminating against those nerds. For them, at least, we don't have any doubts about the accuracy of the "price."🤷

I’ll take my subtle biases over your blatant discrimination against believers any day, especially when you hide behind that fake "I don't have a problem with them, everyone should just believe whatever they want" act.

The hypocrisy here is honestly enough to make your eyes bleed, man. It’s just blindingly obvious at this point. And don't even get me started on how many of you are sitting there with hearts absolutely aching to jump on the bandwagon, just waiting for the chance to pretend you actually believe what you're saying.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
Peter Thompson4 said:And what about being made from clay? Or the whole deal where He pulls out a rib just to manufacture a partner for us? Like, everything was supposedly perfect in paradise, yet He leaves one glaring flaw in the works? And then instead of just fixing it, He forbids us from touching it, acting all offended by the concept of "babies in adult bodies"—as if we weren't already played by the second most powerful entity in the entire universe! It gets even more ridiculous when you look at the ban on eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Why on earth would anyone be terrified of people actually knowing the difference between right and wrong?

It feels just as bizarre when you think about it, doesn't it?
The only real difference is that one is just a fairy tale kept alive by religious fanatics, while the other is an actual scientific theory built on solid foundations.

🤣😂
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:I guess it just feels a little more heavyhearted to think about how those literal stone tablets—you know, the actual foundation of the faith—were handed down by an old man who was talking to a burning bush.

Or maybe it’s just the fact that two total nerds, sitting in some stinky garage with nothing but a single dim lightbulb, somehow managed to build the whole world where you and I can sit here and chat on a forum today?
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:Which part specifically? I mean, why would the Christian theory of God be any more valid than my own theory of God? I guess being stuck thinking "inside the box" is just such a common issue in these kinds of debates.

Missing obvious logical points seems to be becoming a bit of a habit for you! ☕

Btw, I'm a huge believer that Anderlon is going to pay for a better server soon, so maybe this forum won't be so slow anymore.

Keep up the good work. 👍:shuker:
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
Black holes and stardust. It’s honestly kind of wild to think about the possibility that we all just emerged from cosmic debris. 😢
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:Okay, so what if I said I was leaving the door open for science to eventually prove that a giant floppy-eared rabbit wearing a Real Madrid jersey is actually God?

The odds of any of our theories actually coming true are basically the same, if you ask me, because we're talking about the same thing—something that just doesn't have anything to do with actual science.

KBKK?

The odds of any of our theories actually playing out are, if you notice, pretty much identical because we're talking about the same fundamental thing here, something that just doesn't have anything to do with scientific data.

Sadly, I’m just not seeing it.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:And what about the other half of this post?

Oh, and you totally mentioned having broad views, whereas I guess mine are pretty narrow since I'm certain science just can't prove the existence of God.

I’m leaving the door open for the possibility that science might eventually advance enough to actually prove whether God exists or not.

I'm not making any hard claims here. Unlike you. And honestly, that's the whole difference.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:I mean, I’ve never really ruled it out! For everything where I don't have hard proof, I just leave the possibility on the table, I guess. It’s up to me to weigh things out for myself, right?

I'm definitely ruling out the idea that God's existence could be proven through science. That’s just impossible—and I think I've already explained why three different times now (even if you argued the opposite a few posts back!). But, honestly, if such a proof were possible, it would be kind of ironic... it might actually kill off the concept of God for believers. I mean, faith wouldn't really be "faith" anymore, would it? It would either be a fact or it wouldn't, and then the whole point of believing would just vanish.

Nope.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
brightpilot6 said:Maybe there’s an honest headline about Barcelona buried somewhere in LP, but I certainly can't prove it.

There really isn't.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
Fresh sausages just landed over at Primer, if anyone's looking to grab some.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:Whose conclusion is that, anyway? Yours?

I guess it doesn't exist. I'm not claiming anything, though—I don't have any proof.

Man, I really hope you're just trolling.

So, you're basically telling me you're leaving the door cracked open just a little bit, like maybe God actually does exist after all?
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
brightpilot6 said:I don't personally believe that Islam is inherently militant; after all, it holds many virtues, much like Christianity does. Ultimately, aren't they all drawn from the same well? However, the issue isn't found in hope or faith itself, but rather when certain organizations twist that very hope or belief into fear, weaponizing it to serve their own agendas. In that regard, I make a clear distinction between a genuine belief in God or Goodness and organized religion.

And, as I’ve pointed out before, I don't limit my definition of "religion" strictly to theistic faiths; I include any ideology designed to mold the human mindset for the sake of control—most notably extreme nationalist movements or toxic tribalism.

So yeah, that's pretty much where I stand.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:How can we even talk about evidence when you clearly don't even know what that means? I guess I forget from time to time that some debates are just straight-up tilting at windmills. You can try to explain things as much as you want, but if it just won't sink in for someone else, there's really nothing you can do...

The fanatics and the people who just refuse to accept anything different, obviously.

I mean, who are you actually trying to convince here? Sorry, but you’d need to be way, way more persuasive if you actually wanted to pull that off.

Anyway, the bottom line is this: we don't know what it is, we can't prove it, so therefore it doesn't exist.

It's giving major religious fanatic vibes from the 15th century. 😂
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
brightpilot6 said:When I speak of religion, I’m not just referring to the sanitized, official versions we see today; I mean every iteration we’ve encountered or might encounter in the real world. I’m talking about everything from militant Christianity to militant Islam to various nationalist religions. Many of these versions do indeed peddle the idea of a blissful afterlife as a prize for taking out one's enemies.

As for Christianity, if you simply look at the Old Testament, Yahweh behaves somewhat like Sauron toward his enemies—and honestly, even toward his own people if they fail to follow his commands.

Religions—specifically those darker iterations we are discussing—tend to strike low. They prey on people who are susceptible to them (and there are plenty) by instilling a deep-seated fear of divine retribution if one fails to live up to certain standards. At the same time, the moral guidelines provided by these faiths are often nearly impossible to maintain in daily life, which creates a feedback loop where fear and internal guilt constantly amplify one another. That is the foundational step: fostering self-dissatisfaction and terror. Sometimes, that alone is enough to trigger negative social phenomena, where people try to compensate for their inner turmoil through outward aggression—some feel the need to be more "holier than thou" by persecuting anyone deemed unconventional, whether it's the LGBTQ+ community, people living outside traditional norms, or political dissidents back home. But let's go further. Occasionally, when it suits religious leaders, divine punishment is seen to fall upon others for failing to conform, even if you’re just standing by watching. This breeds a fear of "the other," which is then compounded by the fear of God. When you add a bad economy or the anxieties of globalization as catalysts, you get the kind of escalation we see today. Neither a belief in science nor being a die-hard Atletico fan tends to trigger these kinds of irrational terrors, or a fear of one's neighbor based on something as monumental as eternal life.

Nah, I can't go along with you there, ZZ. I really don't agree, because by that logic, even the hooligans who gather under the Atletico Madrid flag would count as some kind of "version" of religion. They just interpret football and their love for the club a bit differently, adding their own weird spin to it.

But let's not get carried away here, because I honestly can't keep up a debate about Atletico Madrid forever.

By the way, that speech from the fallen officer's brother? That's the answer for everyone pointing the finger at religion as the sole reason for what happened in Paris. What a moment 🙏🙏🙏

And just one more thing, ZZ, you seem to react most strongly to comments like 'they got what they deserved,' and that was pretty much the first thing you noticed.
For me, though, the things that really jumped out were the entries like 'all religious fanatics should be wiped out, skin them alive.'
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:I just can't get behind that. We're talking about things that, by their very damn definition, are impossible to prove or disprove. And guess what? They’re never going to be proven or disproven. I'm not even talking about who created the world here—I'm just talking about whether God exists.

There are plenty of well-accepted theories about how the world began that actually have solid foundations. Honestly, they're all way more grounded and sensible than that total nonsense about the seven-day thing. I guess most people agree on that, maybe?

You might think you've got the whole world figured out, but if you honestly believe you can prove God exists, you're probably off base. I mean, you can look at the big picture as much as you want, but I guess it just doesn't work that way. Maybe.

And which one of those am I absolutely never claiming to be—since, you know, that's just impossible—but how many times do I have to bring that up? I guess it's becoming a bit of a broken record, maybe.

You went and threw science into some crazy context that neither ZZ nor I were even talking about. I guess maybe you just felt like it? Just seems a bit out of left field to me!

Alright.

There are plenty of widely accepted theories about how the world started that actually have solid foundations, and honestly, all of them are way more grounded and backed by actual evidence than that total nonsense about the seven-day thing.

Great.

You might think you're being super open-minded, but if you actually believe the existence of God can be proven, you're just plain wrong. So go ahead and look at the big picture as much as you want.

Fine.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
brightpilot6 said:That isn't quite right. You won't find anything in an official document or a statement from the leadership at Atletico Madrid suggesting that murdering a rival supporter guarantees a blessed afterlife, nor would they claim that the mere existence of opposing fans is so offensive to the Atletico doctrine that they must be eliminated.

Alright, let me take a step back here because maybe I’m just uneducated when it comes to religious stuff, but are you seriously suggesting that the Muslim faith or the Quran actually promotes killing people as a way to earn a happy afterlife?
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
brightpilot6 said:Now, I really have no idea what you're getting at anymore. If we are discussing those who consider themselves "believers" in science, they typically don't follow a specific scientific doctrine blindly; rather, they put their faith in science as a continuous process of refining our understanding of the world. They allow it to evolve—which is usually the case, as those Copernican shifts you seem to be referencing are actually quite rare. Who exactly is clinging to the Big Bang theory like a drunkard? There are countless different iterations of it, each one rooted in some specific measurement or calculation. But at the end of the day, they are just theories, which is precisely why they carry that name; I haven't actually heard any proponent of these theories call someone an idiot or cast anathemas upon them just because they don't subscribe to their particular view.

Look, I’ve been sticking to my guns since LeGriffi’s very first Enrollment when he started trying to lean on scientific evidence to prove that God exists.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
steelharbor9 said:Are you just missing some basic facts here, or are you just trolling again? Like, as usual.

Science is never going to be able to prove or disprove the existence of God, because by definition, it's just not something that can be proven or disproven. It’s just how it works, I suppose.

As for all those philosophical ramblings about the origin of everything—well, let's just leave that to the people who love talking in circles without saying anything at all. I mean, is our little back-and-forth on a message board really what counts as "science" or the "meaning of life"? Maybe not.

Scientific achievements are absolutely massive, and the potential is basically limitless. Trying to say otherwise feels almost silly, if you ask me.

Look, I’m not even trolling, it’s just that you’re acting like some kind of religious fanatic who can’t actually wrap their head around my Enrollment posts because you aren't reading them with any actual comprehension.
The way you're talking, you basically sound like a potential terrorist, and honestly, you're lucky life didn't take you down a path where you end up radicalizing young Americans. 😂

Science is never going to be able to prove or disprove the existence of God because, by its very definition, it’s unprovable and impossible to debunk.

Are you actually going to let that word "NEVER" stay there, or can we swap it out for "TODAY" or maybe "FOR NOW," or are you just going to cling to your incredibly narrow worldview forever?
That’s really the heart of the whole thing.