Overclocking (Main Thread)
in Desktops ·
Mr.Ex.President said:>$33🙂
Wait, more than a hundred bucks? 🤣
491 posts shown.
Mr.Ex.President said:>$33🙂
rustydriver22 said:Speaking of power supplies, I'm running some random 450W unit in my rig. I've heard those things are total junk—is there any truth to that?
I've got an Athlon 3000+ @ 244x9.0
Now you've got me worried something's gonna blow up on me...
William Moore61 said:What’s your take on this?😕
It works fine for me.
William Moore61 said:Can anyone tell me how to overclock an Intel processor from 2.8GHz to over 3.0GHz?
Kimberly Moore90 said:What are you even talking about? If you actually bothered to read what I wrote, you'd see that’s not what I said at all. I'm talking about how dealers prey on kids who don't have a clue what's good or bad for them yet—they haven't even developed a sense of what they want or don't want. Dealers target teenagers because they're easy targets; they're in that rebellious phase and think doing something illegal makes them look cool. That's why I’d punish dealers just as harshly as pedophiles. Both groups steal the most precious thing from a child: their childhood, their innocence, and their entire future.
Getting someone hooked on hard drugs is basically like committing a slow-motion murder. You’re just delaying the inevitable. Honestly, isn't the punishment for that pretty much the same as premeditated murder anyway? Done.
In my neighborhood, there's an unwritten rule: ever since I moved here, there hasn't been a single dealer on even the next street over. 👍
William White2 said:Here we go again. Another one who thinks their kid is incapable of ever doing anything wrong—it’s always everyone else's fault, isn't it? 👎
brisknomad6 said:* so what, we just don't open "safe sex" rooms versus "get wasted then sober up" rooms? Is that the plan?
* I honestly don't get why none of you people pushing for these facilities haven't realized that the smarter move would be dumping that cash into education, prevention, early detection, and better oversight of high-risk areas. If we did that, we wouldn't need half these rehab centers and recovery rooms in the first place...
Why am I the bad guy for thinking prevention beats encouragement, while everyone advocating for supervised injection sites gets a free pass as "compassionate"?
Kimberly Moore90 said:Has anyone ever actually broken into your house or swiped your car stereo just to fund a pack of smokes or a bottle of whiskey?
Look, I get it—alcoholism is a massive social issue. But cigarettes? Who on earth beats their wife, kids, and even the family cat just because they ran out of Marlboros?😕
Besides, nobody is out here selling booze or nicotine right outside American schools just to pad their own pockets!!!!
If my kid ever started using drugs, the dealers who handed them over would be the first ones on my list. I'd feed those lowlifes to stray dogs.😈
Brandon Castillo4 said:So, I only made it through the first few pages. Honestly? I just didn't have the energy to slog through the whole thing. 😁Honestly, there’s just too much of it. First off, I haven't had any direct run-ins with addicts, and thank God for that. It’s not because I think they’re bad people—it’s just because having someone close to you end up in that kind of hell is a nightmare. I know a few people who struggled with those kinds of issues, but I wasn't exactly in the trenches helping them through the recovery process.
So, I might as well start by quoting Willard: Just beating it against the table with zero effort. Easy.
Look, this is a sensitive topic, and honestly, the biggest mistake people make is jumping straight to instant judgment and moralizing nonsense. We all love to act like we're above it until it hits close to home. Then, suddenly, everyone’s criteria for what's acceptable changes overnight, right?
Look, I get the whole harm reduction angle. It makes sense on paper. But is it a long-term fix? Not really. In my book, there needs to be a real path out—a way to actually pull someone away from that cycle and help them realize they’ve got no choice but to quit. That only happens if we get serious about prevention, real education, and actual, effective treatment.
I'm not buying what some people are selling when they try to draw comparisons to alcohol. Look, I get it—an alcoholic is just as much of a threat to society as any drug addict. But alcohol itself? It’s different. You can have two beers and be fine, but once you start chasing those heavy shots, that's when the real damage starts. And don't even get me started on cigarettes. They aren't psychoactive; they don't push someone toward a life of crime or drag them to the edge of existence. There's a massive difference.
I’m not really on board with legalizing soft drugs. And let's be honest, there’s no such thing as a "soft" drug besides marijuana. As far as I can tell, they all just end up doing permanent damage.
Honestly, I think those kinds of rooms could totally exist. People love to play dumb with arguments like "who would even pay for that?" as if we aren't already footing the bill for all the other nonsense this country insists on funding. It’s ridiculous. If we can't even get basic primary healthcare sorted out properly here in the States, how are we supposed to tackle something like this? We're miles away from actually fixing the essentials.
Look, let's say the funding is actually there. It would be a great move, but ONLY if we had a real roadmap—I mean a legitimate strategy that skips all the fake moralizing and threats. We need to win people over through cooperation, not intimidation. At the end of the day, this is for their own good. The ultimate goal should be getting them off the stuff entirely. The first step? Just controlled dosing—clean needles, strictly regulated. From there, you actually start helping them get better.
I’m worried that if we set up rooms exclusively for sanitizing gear, we might be sending the wrong message. Sure, it lowers the risk of spreading things like HIV or hepatitis, but doesn't it also send this weird subliminal signal to society? It almost makes it seem like these issues—as bad as they are—are just something manageable and "understandable." Look, I get it, banning something doesn't mean people will magically stop doing it; if anything, it might do the opposite. But I can't say I agree that the public message should be that liberal.
When it comes to drug policy, there’s no room for compromise. Period. If we’re talking about people struggling with addiction, they need support and resources. But that only works if they actually want it. That should be the ultimate goal.
So, we're talking about dedicated injection rooms? Yeah.,
But when you pair it with:
Hit dealers with everything they've got. Seriously.
With the right kind of training, you know?
Prevention, right?
Mental health support? Psychological help? You know, that whole scene.
With a highly developed system of communes...
So, we're just going to go ahead and ban drugs from society entirely? Just like that? Total blanket ban. Is that really how we're playing this?
Just from me, for now.
Synod said:When was the last time we saw some story on TV about someone using drugs who actually seemed totally fine—like, a normal, functional, social person just fitting right into society?
Never.
William White2 said:alcohol wipes out all the bacteria and viruses in your bloodstream, which is why you usually get sick right when you stop hitting it hard😬
Scarlet Rose said:So, addicts apparently have supercharged immune systems, right? 😁
Megan Reed said:Fine, maybe I knew someone who dealt with drug issues, only to watch them clearly spiral straight into another mess, like booze. And there’s nothing I can do. Just one disaster after another. So what then? How long am I supposed to keep grinding away for someone who doesn't even want to help themselves? 😕
Anthony Miller13 said:just one question: if such a room existed, how would that actually help you?
Wouldn't it be better to open more halfway houses, rehab centers, or workshops—basically creating actual jobs for people in recovery—instead of just a room where they can get high? Because from what I can see, the only perks of a supervised room are:
a) fewer needles lying around in public parks
b) everything is sterile, so there's less disease spread
But even that's debatable, since once you walk into a room like that, you aren't coming back a second time...
Anthony Miller13 said:care to explain? 🙂
Funny how I'm suddenly shallow just because I said it once. Oh, really? ☕
Megan Reed said:not really. 😉 I know people who messed around with drugs, but that was long before we met. If they decide to go down that road now... 👎 I’d try to help, sure, but I doubt they’d actually listen to me... the hardest part is trying to help someone who doesn't want it. 😉 So no, I wouldn't spend years watching them spiral while things just get worse and worse. No thanks.
Megan Reed said:if I watched someone close to me start falling apart right in front of my eyes, I don't think they'd even recognize me anymore. ☕