Your quote is wrong, the post is a mess, and it clearly violates the subforum rules—which you should probably go read. Your appeal isn't going anywhere.
stormyraven14 said:To put it in plain English: quoting a post that only contains a smiley face counts as spam, which earns you a strike under the site rules. You can find the general guidelines in the first subforum on the homepage, and most specific sections have their own set of rules pinned right at the top.
Fair enough regarding the points, but why go as far as deleting it? 🙄
"Violating the laws of the United States of America (specifically, we want to point out any incitement to hatred or discrimination, or the justification or glorification of criminal acts..."
Recently, some guy on MK got banned because he kept insisting that driving drunk isn't actually a big deal. According to the moderator, he was essentially justifying a violation of U.S. law.
But what about this? Isn't this also justifying or glorifying criminal activity, or inciting hatred?
But following that logic, someone could have "hanging Mexicans from willow trees" in their signature. And the excuse for why it’s allowed would be, "Well, they aren't saying it's a good thing. The author might just feel that hanging Mexicans from willow trees is a terrible idea." 😂
Alright, let’s just drop that whole "America" thing
If you're cool with a title like "NIGHT OF LONG KNIVES," then there's nothing I can do, but I'm pretty sure glorifying Nazism is illegal in this country.
Maybe they should learn what being an American actually means. If they won't figure it out on their own, someone else will have to step in. I guess I'm volunteering.
Jason Clark7 said:We see this happening quite often in the Religion section; some users have complained about it before, and I’ve felt the same way. Here’s a glaring example from the thread regarding the unrest in Egypt. People there are being described in purely racist terms—as savages who don't understand freedom and deserve nothing better than a dictatorship. I actually reported one of those posts once, but nothing happened. If it’s possible, I’d love to see a rule added stating that Muslims on this forum are essentially a second-class tier where hate speech can be vented without consequence. That way, Muslims and the reasonable non-Muslims here won't waste their energy reacting to such dehumanizing treatment.
Thanks.
It's just because some people are uneducated idiots. Just ignore them. 👍pusa
Robert Collins2 said:I went ahead and reported everything to the admin because someone seriously needs to clean up this mess and see what kind of chaos has been brewing here over the last few days. Honestly, it's pathetic how you guys try to lead vulnerable people down such dangerous paths just by pretending you actually have some kind of expertise—it’s shameful, really. This used to be a place where people could just vent their own personal frustrations, but now? You’re all just acting like absolute amateurs who don't know the first thing about what they're talking about. ☕
It’s actually the psychiatrists who mislead people by pretending they have all the answers. ☕ They're the ones acting like uneducated amateurs, venting their own frustrations. To you, whoever you are, I wish you nothing but the best.
Look, this is a public forum. Anyone can weigh in on whatever they want, and I’ve already said my piece regarding psychotropic meds. If "girl" wants to stay worked up about it, there's nothing I can do to change her mind 🤷 Maybe she can figure it out herself. 🤷
David Jackson22 said:Every drug lists its side effects clearly enough. Of course, that assumes you actually know how to read and properly interpret what's in front of you.
Then how do you explain psychiatrists basically admitting they're flying blind? No standardized tests, no hard evidence, and zero track record of actually curing anyone. Isn't that just a massive breach of trust? People put their faith in these doctors and swallow all kinds of junk, believing they're dealing with someone competent and well-meaning, when in reality—it’s a scam. 🤷
David Jackson22 said:So what? Even if there aren't lab tests, does that mean anything that isn't physically tangible or visible to the naked eye just doesn't exist? The brain is the engine behind everything; without it, nothing else functions, so can you prove that with a lab test too? And just because you read something online or in a magazine, that makes it gospel? That honestly just says a lot about your level of education. Besides, why would any psychiatrist bother coming here? To argue with people who don't know what they're talking about and try to prove points? They've got much better things to do, like actually treating patients, unlike people who just spend their time beating around the bush and selling snake oil!
What do you mean?!
If that's the case, then I guess they're out there selling snake oil all over the world.
Sure, you can definitely prove through testing that life doesn't exist without a brain. 😂 Watch what you say. 😂
If you refuse to see it, then they’re the ones who are crazy. 😂 They hand out dangerous drugs under the guise of a "chemical imbalance"—something that has never been proven because it simply doesn't exist. 😂 And they'll admit it, dead serious, when you get close with a microphone and a camera.
Of course suffering is real, but they don't actually know how to help, nor is that their intention.
Harsh, but true.
And why should they show up? Because people come here looking for help. 😕
As for the internet, you're literally using it right now to post this. 😂 😂 😂
Robert Collins2 said:Look, you never even bothered to take them in the first place, so obviously they aren't doing anything for you. It’s not exactly rocket science, right? ☕
Look, I didn't even ask you that. If you're going to sit there and act like you know what you're talking about, then go ahead—lay it all out for me. Show me the actual evidence. Bring out the clinical studies that SCIENTIFICALLY back up those lies and those totally biased conclusions you're throwing around.
😂 Asking me for clinical studies? You want me to find studies proving that something DOESN'T exist?!
Anyway, the proof is right there in the psychiatrists themselves—in the video, they openly admit they've never actually cured anyone, they never know how a specific "medication" will work, and there isn't some definitive test to prove a "chemical imbalance." My goal isn't even to argue with you; you aren't the only one on this thread. I only chimed in because reading about people who were suffering from those pills actually brought tears to my eyes.
And why aren't there any psychiatrists posting here? Because they DON'T CARE!
Watch from 3:36 onwards; she literally says, "we don't have any laboratory tests that we can use..." http://www.cchr.org/videos/psychiatr...l-illness.html
