My wife is still acting completely irrational; she’s been running late for work lately and has started coming up with these bizarre excuses, like how she had to stop on the side of the road to rescue earthworms so they wouldn't get crushed by traffic. Honestly, I don't really know what to say to her, especially since I don't work at that firm anymore, so I've decided to just let her deal with it on her own. 😁
Are we talking about the same thing when people mention a thickened uterus, a thickened endometrial lining, or a thickened uterine wall? I've been trying to wrap my head around whether these terms are just different ways of describing the exact same clinical finding or if there’s a subtle distinction between them.
I’ve included a link where you can reach out to the woman who actually treated his leukemia; I would suggest calling the Doctor directly to ask about his methods and whether he might be willing to share some contact numbers. He isn't someone who has anything to hide. I don't have any specific medical records to provide since I haven't had to visit him myself—thank God for that—but I truly wanted to offer some help to those who need it. This is an interview conducted by his brother
I believe anyone who is genuinely interested will take the initiative to call and look into this, so I am simply providing the information
It might be best if anyone truly interested does their own research online, given how much information is out there, or perhaps just gives their Doctor a call. This particular approach to medicine is built on the idea that the root cause of any illness stems from within, and they focus on addressing those internal imbalances to resolve health issues. I actually met this woman briefly—maybe for five minutes—while my mother spent quite a bit more time talking her through things, though unfortunately, we didn't manage to get her phone number. She had initially started some radiation treatments before deciding to see this specialist; now she’s just finishing up a course of tablets through the end of the year, and that should be the end of it. I don't know the full details of her specific diagnosis or the exact nature of the tumor, but I do know they had estimated she only had about a year left at the Salisbury clinic. I really don't want to spread any misinformation, so please, look into it yourselves via this website http://www.magicus.info/hr/magicus/tekst.php?id=228. If you scroll down to the bottom, you'll find comments from people, including women who claim they successfully overcame leukemia through his methods. There is also contact information listed there if you'd like to reach out and ask questions directly.
I realize this might come across as if I am trying to push my own agenda, though I don't actually have her direct number to provide here. My suggestion would be to reach out to the Doctor directly and ask how they manage their consultations; I know for a fact that when dealing with parents of children, they often share contact information for other families so they can discuss the therapy and treatment protocols firsthand. It is quite possible they follow a similar practice for adults as well. Please understand, I didn't join this discussion to mislead anyone or engage in any sort of deception; I simply wanted to offer a perspective on an alternative path that some might not be aware of, specifically for those who feel like they are losing hope and need to know there is still a chance. I am not here to peddle falsehoods. I just find the current situation difficult to wrap my head around.
Text sourced from http://www.grombol.com/pregled1.asp?...edicina&id=649
Of course, you don't have to agree with everything I'm saying here; if this information ends up being helpful to someone, then that's wonderful, and if it provides clarity to those who were previously unaware, then I suppose my purpose is served. I truly wish everyone the best of luck.
I would be truly grateful if you could put me in touch with that young woman. My own mother passed away from a brain tumor, and through the long, difficult journey we navigated together, I found myself connecting with so many others who are still fighting that very same diagnosis.
Unfortunately, I don't have their direct phone number on hand, but I do have the contact information for the Doctor at 098-210-845 or 2915-775. Regarding the discussion on metastases, here is exactly what the report states:
There is simply no such thing as "advancing" microbes, nor are there advancing metastases or wandering metastatic cells that supposedly circulate through the bloodstream at large; despite the claims, no one has ever actually detected them.
The whole concept regarding metastasis remains an unverified, unsubstantiated, and ultimately unprovable hypothesis. In my observations of cancer patients, I have yet to see a single scientist actually witness a tumor cell traveling through arterial blood. If cancer cells were truly capable of migrating to distant organs, they would inevitably have to travel via the arterial system, given that venous blood and lymphatic channels only flow inward toward the heart.
When we discuss "metastases"—which, in reality, aren't actually present—within the framework of German New Medicine, I believe what is truly occurring is that the individual experiences an iatrogenic sense of panic. For instance, simply receiving a diagnosis can trigger this reaction, causing the person to acquire a new DHS through a fresh biological conflict.
Take, for instance, the case of a patient suffering from breast cancer whose child was tragically injured in a car accident. Let's say that after spending three months in the hospital, the child finally recovered, only for the mother to discover a lump in her left breast during a checkup. The medical team informed her that a full mastectomy was mandatory to prevent the risk of malignant cells spreading or traveling through the bloodstream to cause distant metastases; they insisted she begin chemotherapy immediately to ensure any remaining cancerous cells were completely eradicated.
Following such a devastating diagnosis, especially when you consider the specific medical procedures she’s undergone and the grim prognosis that followed, this young mother is now facing a whole new wave of conflicting emotional shocks.
The conflict of disfigurement. The scarring left behind from my previous surgery on my left breast has actually become a site for melanoma development. The struggle with losing one's self-confidence is often more than just a temporary dip in mood; it can feel like a deep-seated internal conflict that pulls at the very fabric of your identity. I remember a period back when I was working in a high-pressure firm in Chicago, where every minor setback felt like a definitive judgment on my worth as a person. It isn't always about a single catastrophic failure, either. Often, it is a slow, quiet erosion—a series of small doubts that eventually accumulate until you no longer recognize the person staring back at you in the mirror. When that sense of certainty vanishes, it leaves a void that is incredibly difficult to navigate, making even the simplest daily decisions feel heavy and overwhelming. Dealing with this requires a certain level of patience and a willingness to sit with that discomfort rather than trying to outrun it. It leads to osteolysis of the ribs in the area where my left breast used to be—and honestly, looking at myself this way, I feel like I’ve lost all my worth, just a shell of who I once was. There is a persistent sense of conflict regarding the pain on the left side of my chest—specifically within the breast that is currently slated for surgery. It is a heavy thing to carry, both physically and emotionally, as I navigate this upcoming procedure. It can lead to mesothelioma in the left pleura. The conflict born from a mortal fear is a heavy burden to carry. It is a known risk factor that can lead to lung adenocarcinoma.
Certain types of conflicts that manifest through organ changes and are often detected quite early include lung adenocarcinoma and melanoma. In my experience, once a child enters the healing phase, you might observe what is known as a Hamer field in the right lateral part of the cerebellum, along with what some call a "distant metastasis" within the organ itself. It is quite common to notice things like rib osteolysis or pleural effusion only during this recovery period, specifically when the underlying conflict finally begins to resolve.
It seems to me that the whole narrative surrounding metastasis is little more than a fairy tale—an unverified, unproven, and ultimately unprovable hypothesis. This is just as speculative as the idea that tumor cells undergo mutations while traveling through the bloodstream. For instance, take the notion of a colon cancer cell originating in the gut—where it develops endodermally as a compact mass—suddenly migrating to the bones and triggering osteolysis by destroying bone tissue. To me, these stories feel like pure madness, reminiscent of nothing more than medieval dogmatism. There is absolutely no doubt that multiple carcinomas can coexist within a single patient at once, yet I believe we really need to take a step back and fundamentally re-examine how we approach assessing that reality.
Adenoid breast cancer is quite a rare diagnosis, and facing it often feels like navigating an incredibly complex maze without a map. I remember when my aunt was first told she had a malignancy, and the sheer weight of those medical terms can feel overwhelming for any family trying to process the news. It’s a specific type of cancer that requires a very nuanced approach to treatment, much like how you have to carefully calibrate a high-end instrument to get the right results. When dealing with such a specialized condition, having a dedicated team of specialists who understand the intricacies of this particular pathology is absolutely vital for finding the best path forward. During this conflict-active phase, breast gland cells begin to proliferate. There is a clear biological logic at play here: nature essentially attempts to support a child experiencing developmental setbacks by increasing milk production, as the mother's body tries to compensate for the perceived imbalance. As long as this conflict remains active, the tumor continues to grow in tandem with the increased milk secretion. All of this biological purpose is concentrated within that specific conflict-active stage.
In our modern, civilized society, this kind of psychological pattern in women tends to manifest mostly outside of the actual breastfeeding period. When a woman who isn't nursing encounters that deep-seated conflict regarding mother-infant care, a breast gland tumor can develop, essentially mimicking the biological urge to "provide more milk" to an infant. In these instances, the mother begins to perceive her child through the lens of a helpless infant, regardless of how much the child has actually grown or matured.
When you consider the biological conflict involving fluids or water—specifically looking at the relationship between the brain and the mesoderm—the dynamics shift entirely. We are looking at an active phase of necrosis within the renal connective tissue. At the same time, there is elevated blood pressure, which essentially serves as a mechanism to force fluid through the gaps created by that necrosis, attempting to functionally compensate for the damage and facilitate sufficient urine excretion.
During the recovery phase, specifically at the site where the kidney necrosis originally occurred, a protrusion filled with fluid begins to develop—what we commonly refer to as a renal cyst. Within the interior of this cyst, there is an accelerated proliferation of cells; then, after about nine months, that fluid is replaced by dense connective tissue that develops its own independent vascular system. At that stage, it has essentially become "integrated" into the surrounding tissue, and once it undergoes independent induration, it eventually sloughs off to participate in both the production and excretion of urine.
The true biological essence of this process is found within the healing phase itself, which manifests as a sustained, simultaneous improvement in both tissue structure and overall physiological function once that stage concludes. There is an inherent purpose to this specific biological programming; it exists to fulfill a vital biological necessity, ensuring that the body reaches its intended state of recovery. As we have observed, biological meaning manifests itself in two distinct ways: either through a phase of active conflict or through a stage where that conflict has finally been resolved. Nature seems to have been given free rein here to manifest both outcomes, though it has done so through very distinct, clearly defined layers.
When examining glioblastoma, there is a distinct biological tension at play; the tumor exists in a state of conflictive activity that stands in direct opposition to how cells spread when controlled by the forebrain. We are essentially looking at a fundamental contradiction—a process of degradation, where the squamous epithelial cells of the mucosa undergo cell death, only to be reconstructed during the subsequent healing phase.
It strikes me as quite profound how we have historically misidentified certain biological processes. For the longest time, what was actually a process of restitution—essentially the body attempting to restore itself or filling in necrotic tissue and ulcers during a healing phase—was mistakenly labeled as cancer or sarcoma. This confusion stemmed from the observation of rapid cell multiplication, specifically mitosis involving large nuclei, which looked like malignancy on the surface. In reality, however, this cellular activity was simply the body’s way of repairing itself.
It is finally becoming clear why we have struggled so much to grasp the true origins of cancer; we simply haven't been able to perceive or comprehend the deep-seated connections within the historical evolution of our own biological programming—specifically, the inherent tendency toward conflict.
Sacred medicine has completely upended everything we thought we knew; at this point, nothing remains certain except for the raw facts.
It isn't just that every individual biological program possesses its own inherent biological logic; rather, even the overlapping combinations of these programs—which might appear to us as a schizophrenic constellation of symptoms—actually hold their own profound biological purpose, a sort of "super-logic." When I speak of this, I am not referring to some abstract ideology, nor am I drifting into transcendental or spiritual territory. Instead, I am pointing to the observable reality that Mother Nature clearly possesses the capacity, and has perhaps even mastered the ability, to intervene during seemingly impossible or hopeless circumstances, such as a psychotic break, by opening a new dimension through which the individual can once again find the strength to navigate a profound crisis. In this light, German New Medicine offers entirely new dimensions for meaningful therapeutic care.
From the perspective of German New Medicine, radiation therapy is completely nonsensical. Up until this point, our entire approach has been centered on the idea that we must prevent the spread of metastases and focus on eliminating symptoms at all costs.
The commercialization of chemotherapy and various cytostatic drugs might just stand as the single greatest deception ever perpetrated by modern institutional medicine. To whoever actually devised this concept of chemo-torture as a standard course of treatment, they deserve nothing less than a monument built for them in hell.
Chemotherapy essentially boils down to administering poisons designed to target cells in an attempt to halt the spread of malignancy. In many ways, I find the process reminiscent of an old-fashioned exorcism or a religious inquisition—an aggressive, scorched-earth approach to cleansing the body. It is widely understood that these cytotoxic drugs primarily strike at the bone marrow, often resulting in temporary or even permanent damage to the reproductive organs, which leads to lasting sterility.
When you consider how certain pseudo-chemotherapy treatments for tumors controlled by the cerebellum function, it becomes clear they offer absolutely no positive benefits, which honestly borders on criminal negligence. In my experience observing these medical protocols, the use of cytostatics actually serves to heighten sympathetic tone, effectively acting as a catalyst that intensifies and accelerates the progression of the cancer itself.
When dealing with tumors controlled by the brain, employing chemotherapy is nothing short of idiotic. We have to remember that chemotherapy works solely through a process of destruction, specifically targeting the bone marrow, which effectively halts any genuine progress toward healing. It truly doesn't matter which specific brain relay is driving the disease's development; the outcome remains the same. What mainstream doctors call a "success" is really just their way of suppressing the body's natural recovery process—a process they have misinterpreted as being malignant.
How do chemotherapy and radiation actually impact the brain?
The unique capacity to resolve biological conflicts resides in the ability to allow Hamer's fields to heal once more. As we understand it, the brain facilitates this through edema during the healing phase. Through this edema, brain cells spread apart, which effectively means that Hamer's fields swell.
Chemotherapy and radiation essentially mimic a relapse of the conflict by halting the healing process, causing the entire swollen relay to constrict again. While the edema recedes, unfortunately, the Hamer field isn't truly healed; after every cycle of radiation or chemo, the body attempts to return to the healing phase, meaning the Hamer fields begin to edematize all over again. With each subsequent round of treatment, the neural synapses stretch out during radiation and contract during chemo. This triggers a catastrophic "accordion effect."
In German New Medicine, surgeries don't necessarily have to be rejected. Rather, they should be handled on an individual basis, guided by sound human reasoning.
Morphine is disastrous for any patient. Such interventions are unknown in nature. Ever since we gained access to morphine and its derivatives, our mindset has shifted toward the idea that "we can just switch off the pain with morphine and still recover." However, the logic is flawed because morphine fundamentally alters brain function, causing the patient to lose both willpower and reason, ultimately allowing them to be put to sleep without any fight left in them.
I would personally begin with this first option, because people tend to scramble toward alternatives only when it's already too late; usually, by then, doctors are merely discussing surgery, but the body has become far too weak to endure the procedure. I have seen individuals on other forums who truly found relief through this. I know a young woman whom this helped recover from a brain tumor after they had given her only a year to live at Salisbury. Even my friend met his current wife because he managed to save her life during a severe case of sepsis when she was practically fading away. It isn't as if God just reaches down and performs miracles out of thin air; you still have to listen, follow the protocols, and have faith, because without that, nothing happens.
I’ve heard that Dr. Sasha Tešić specializes in treating cancer patients. He follows the principles of New Medicine—you can find more details by searching Google for Dr. Hamer or New Medicine—where the primary focus is addressing the cancer itself before moving on to anything else. He completed his studies in Japan and I believe he did some work in China as well. Many people I know have consulted him, and he seems like a decent man who won't overcharge you if he isn't able to provide the help you need. He primarily works from CT scan results, which need to be provided on a CD or film, as he can interpret everything from those scans with incredible precision. He practices in a suburban neighborhood outside of the city. It is absolutely vital that conventional medicine hasn't interfered with the patient yet, because sometimes they tend to cause more harm than good; furthermore, a patient truly needs to believe that their treatment will work, because without that faith, nothing happens. You can read more about this approach here: http://www.grombol.com/pregled1.asp?...edicina&id=648 It covers topics like metastasis and chemotherapy as well. For anyone currently battling this or for their loved ones, I would highly recommend reading the book "You Can Heal Your Life" by Louise Hay. She dealt with cancer herself and recovered, and she explains exactly how that process works in her writing. Both Dr. Hamer’s methods and hers are rooted in the connection between the psyche and the brain, which then manifests in the organs. This is precisely why mainstream medicine often struggles to cure cancer; they are merely treating the symptoms rather than the underlying causes, which ultimately lie within oneself. I hope this information proves helpful to someone out there.
I would honestly prefer to just look the other way if it weren't for the fact that her constant health issues are putting me in such an awkward position regarding our shift schedule. It feels like there is always something wrong—one day she can't work because of her period, the next she's struggling to breathe, or she's dealing with a runny nose or just feeling generally unwell. I always try to maintain that I don't care about the office drama, but I have to admit, it’s becoming incredibly frustrating. It seems like every single damn day there is some new issue
My supervisor is a woman, and I’ve noticed she carries herself quite differently when we are face-to-face compared to our usual interactions. Because of the nature of my role, she isn't physically present with us in the office; most of our communication happens over the phone. While I am personally convinced that the rumors circulating aren't true and that there is an entirely different issue at play here, I have never experienced anything firsthand to validate those claims, so it feels somewhat silly of me to even bring it up. Regardless, I have decided that I am no longer going to let myself be swayed by such nonsense.
I used to consistently score around a 4 or a 5 on those assessments. I tend to write quite quickly when I'm sitting down to compose something, so I don't always pay much attention to the finer points of grammar.
She’s essentially on her own, having lost everyone else except for an aunt who won't even speak to her because she spent her whole life struggling to make ends meet. I genuinely feel for her, I really do, but I refuse to let the entire weight of her situation fall squarely on my shoulders; we shouldn't all have to sacrifice our own lives just to carry her through. There's simply no way I'm going to do that—I'd rather just hand in my resignation. She’s only 36, so menopause shouldn't be an issue yet, though I suppose when you're down to a single ovary, you can never truly predict when your cycle will hit. She actually took five days off in advance once just because she expected her period to start, acting as if the rest of us don't deal with those same biological realities. She isn't taking any hormones or medication because she says her chemotherapy treatments prevent her from doing so, which explains why it takes her forever to recover from something as simple as a common cold. If she could just perform her job duties professionally without constantly making life difficult for the rest of the team, I wouldn't say a word, but this has reached a breaking point for me. I find myself venting about it to everyone, including management, but nothing ever changes. I fear the day I finally snap and have to present them with an ultimatum: it’s either her or me. On top of all this, she claims to have these prophetic dreams about what’s going to happen next.
Look, we’re just a small non-profit office, mostly staffed by college students and people who put in enough hours to make ends meet while doing some good in the world. I only decided to post this here because I am genuinely struggling to wrap my head around certain things. I wanted to ask if anyone knows if it’s actually possible for things to have deteriorated this much after all these years, or how it could be that she still has half an ovary left if she was dealing with such an aggressive form of cancer. And honestly, how can she possibly know when her period is coming if she only has half an ovary remaining?
It feels like nobody here wants to deal with this, which honestly frustrates me because there is such intense tension between her and me right now. We haven't spoken since my last shift because she decided she wasn't going to work, and then she started taking it out on me, claiming it was my fault because I didn't log when she was going to be out—as if I’m supposed to just magically know that. When I told her straight up that it was her responsibility to report that, not mine, she claimed she felt hurt by my bluntness. She got offended, acting as if I could never say something like that to someone. Look, I certainly don't wish anyone ill, and God forbid I ever feel that way toward someone, but even if there were an issue, she shouldn't use that as an excuse to dodge her responsibilities; if you aren't fit to work, you should just stay home. Everything is moving at a snail's pace because of her; tasks that should take one click are taking forever. I genuinely feel bad that I might end up losing the trust of people who are actually decent just because I can't rely on her.
Everyone seems to share the same suspicion, yet nobody dares to speak up because they’re terrified of being wrong—fearful that if she truly is acting this way and we deny it, I’ll just end up back in the position of insisting she wouldn't behave like that. I actually tried to be honest with her about it once, and she had the audacity to question my character as a mother. She also constantly insists that serving as the HOA president is some sort of taxing second job. It reminds me of when I was starting my degree at State University; I spent weeks researching how to attend lectures on weekends just so I could maintain a full-time work schedule during the week. Even if my college offered weekend classes, the last thing I would ever consider is spending my Saturdays stuck there just to deal with her.
I was wondering, is it possible for the side effects of chemotherapy to resurface after all these years?
Honestly, this whole operation feels completely off the books, which is probably why they're getting away with it. After everything I’ve heard from her lately, I’m starting to seriously question if she ever even had cancer in the first place. It’s just bizarre; she listens to someone like Sarah talking about how much her stomach hurts during her period, and then she just swoops in and declares, "Oh, I know exactly how you feel, I have cancer!" Like, hello? Sometimes I genuinely wonder if she’s dealing with some kind of delusional disorder. And then there's that look she gives people—that "poor me, I'm so unwell" expression—even though she still shows up to work and heads off to her classes at NYU without missing a beat.