Posts by Melissa Watson4

electricangler22 said:So, I’m jumping in here because I feel like I’ve become invisible to the Alternative too. Honestly, I have to ask—what’s the deal, dustyharbor18? I don't really see myself in those groups you listed. Unless, of course, you know me better than I know myself and you're stripping away my access just to save me from myself? Maybe I offended you with some of my posts, though I truly never meant to be disrespectful.

There was no offense intended, no trolling, no spamming, nothing of the sort....

It’s actually quite simple.... dustyharbor18 decided to purge everyone who doesn't think exactly like her... so now, besides the chaos already here, we'll just have this echo chamber where everyone just nods along in unison...

Chris Lopez59 said:I suppose their views were just too "alternative" for the Alternative. Or maybe they only want views on the Alternative that show a healthy dose of skepticism toward the Alternative itself.

This is nothing more than a speech ban wrapped up in a pile of seemingly benign words, and as for who actually pulled the trigger on this group ban and at what level of authority, we can only speculate.

Personally, I know how I argued, and honestly, I don't even fit into the description provided, but then again, I don't consider myself central to the topic since I wasn't one of those "true analysts"—I was just participating incidentally. So, it's crystal clear to me that I've been banned simply because of the side I took and the support I offered. It’s transparently obvious that one school of thought is being silenced, while the group that was creating unarguable confusion remains untouched.

They can write whatever they want here as an explanation, but the truth is as plain as day.

I'll sign off on that... nothing left to say... everything is crystal clear.☕

dustyharbor18 said:A) @
Melissa Watson4, Chris Lopez59, Paul Chavez, Joseph White5
The ban on accessing Alternative regarding you four applies specifically to analyses of current military and political events that rely on alleged connections to the Book of Revelation. I guess the core thesis of the main ideological defender behind these military analyses is that World War III and the subsequent apocalypse are somehow desirable for humanity, serving as a firm and eagerly awaited guarantee of the return of Jesus.
It goes without saying that this kind of tone regarding military-political conspiracies has attracted a certain number of Christians whose views seem pretty bizarre and extreme—if not outright extremist—to most people.
Of course, such controversial stances have also drawn opposition, along with a fair amount of rude, uneducated, and naive forum users.

Since the participants described here show an increasingly low level of tolerance for differing views, the Alternative moderators are using this action to sharply distance themselves from such positions, which they consider utterly unacceptable from a civilized and humanistic perspective.

B)@
George Turner2, driftinggull13
As for you and others who take a stand based on skepticism, rationality, and logic against irrational, inaccurate, and uninformed views—the answer is completely different. Alternative has never distanced itself from you. In fact, any constructive opposition is always welcome.
Just to be clear, driftinggull13, since you’re the one with the most toxic, cynical language on this forum—something you actually pride yourself on while enjoying your own toxic posts—you should probably take responsibility for your sweet insults toward chlorine and silver solutions or bowel cleansers, especially given how much you enjoy pushing your opinions on them.
So, just to avoid confusion—it’s the manner in which you do it that is being criticized. I don't see any reason why your views couldn't be presented in a benevolent and educational way.

So that's it then??? There's no more Alternative for me (us)??? 🤔

Then you might as well just close my thread, since there's nobody left to lead it...

Melissa Watson4, Chris Lopez59, Paul Chavez, Joseph White5 [/B]
The ban on accessing Alternative regarding you four and three other forum members concerns analyses of current military and political events based on their alleged connection to the Book of Revelation. The core thesis of the main ideological defender of these military analyses is that World War III and the subsequent apocalypse is a desirable event for humanity, because it represents a solid and eagerly awaited guarantee of the return of Jesus.

Regarding that part... is it forbidden to hold such an opinion??? I mean, having it connected to the Book of Revelation???

And the idea that WW3 is desirable is nonsense... but WW3 will happen, and that is a fact regardless of prophecies... maybe not tomorrow, maybe not in 20 or 50 years, but it will happen, and I don't know why it bothers you to talk about it???

dustyharbor18 has completely lost it... she's banning everyone who actually kept the Alternative active... even though our thread is the most read one on the Alternative board. Since they lack the competence to start a better thread, it’ll just be left to trolls, who will likely ruin not just this thread, but the entire broken subforum as it is...😂🤣

Why am I being blocked from the Alternative?

@dustyharbor18 You're mistaken if you think they got rid of me that easily...☕

NATO - A miracle the US government joined

So, that's NATO for you... just what I've been saying all along... killers, rapists, occupiers, absolute scum... the bottom of the barrel...👎

It's embarrassing that America is part of an alliance like this... honestly... both they and our politicians make me sick...👎

silentsailor5 said:it'll be 🤷

Maybe use this for your signature...🙂

😁

Jose White18 said:Morning. 😈

Morning, I guess. 🙂🙂

😬

The mods are out for blood...😢 🙂

feraltrucker5 said:After checking in with administration, I guess we've concluded that your policy violates the rules.

Yeah, the link was on the blog, but I guess you can't host everything there. Maybe.

I suppose I'll find some way to set up a signature eventually... maybe.☕

Maybe I could at least get those 10 points back. I wasn't aware I was breaking any rules, since I thought I had the green light from the moderator... I guess. 😳

Come on, mods, show some life. Where did everyone go? It’s not even that late...😠 😬

I eventually listened and added my blog link to my signature. The moderator @fonemf told me it was fine... then out of nowhere, @silentsailor5/">@@silentsailor5 drops a 10-point penalty on me for breaking rules. I guess I didn't actually break anything, since it’s just a blog link and I had permission from @fonemf. 😠

blog:

www.stopthenewworldorder.blogspot.com

I suppose we've finally settled this whole "rule-breaking" nonsense regarding my signatures.... the link leads to my blog...☕ 😛

feraltrucker5 said:Look, we’ve got another massive headache brewing with this FTP server link situation, because honestly, none of us have the slightest clue if what you're dumping in there for download is even legal. It's one thing to host files, but it's another thing entirely to be flying blind on whether we're walking straight into a copyright lawsuit or some federal investigation by uploading stuff that might not actually belong to us. 🤷 Honestly, I just can't face staring down that mountain of files again; the thought of grinding through that endless pile of paperwork day after day is enough to make me want to pull my hair out. 🙂

everything I’m keeping there is just stuff about the Illuminati and the New World Order...☕

Anyway, what if I just link to a blog, and then put the FTP link on the blog? ☕

feralgardener362 said:You aren't allowed to post links to anything other than Reddit, Politico, or our own blog.
The stuff Laura Evans3 was quoting? I already quoted that back to you.

No, you can't use that link.

Look, I checked out what you sent, and honestly, I’m still not touching it. There's no way I'm typing in my passwords just because you asked. It's pretty simple: if the link isn't one of those three approved sites, it's a no-go. Plus, we don't even allow YouTube or anything else like it here.

As for people using other people's signatures, just report them to any moderator. If they're breaking the rules, they'll get taken down.

We'll see about that... there are still plenty of ways to go about this...☕

feralgardener362 said:You aren't allowed to post links to anything other than Reddit, Politico, or our own blog.
The stuff Laura Evans3 was quoting? I already quoted that back to you.

No, you can't use that link.

Look, I checked out what you sent, and honestly, I’m still not touching it. There's no way I'm typing in my passwords just because you asked. It's pretty simple: if the link isn't one of those three approved sites, it's a no-go. Plus, we don't even allow YouTube or anything else like it here.

As for people using other people's signatures, just report them to any moderator. If they're breaking the rules, they'll get taken down.

Everything can be found on YouTube, I suppose...☕

feralgardener362 said:You aren't allowed to post links to anything other than Reddit, Politico, or our own blog.
The stuff Laura Evans3 was quoting? I already quoted that back to you.

No, you can't use that link.

Look, I checked out what you sent, and honestly, I’m still not touching it. There's no way I'm typing in my passwords just because you asked. It's pretty simple: if the link isn't one of those three approved sites, it's a no-go. Plus, we don't even allow YouTube or anything else like it here.

As for people using other people's signatures, just report them to any moderator. If they're breaking the rules, they'll get taken down.

Fine, we'll see...☕

Laura Evans3 said:😕

pise:
Three lines of small font (size=1).

You had three lines written in a standard font...

There isn't a list here of which links are allowed or prohibited.As a general rule, we allow links to personal blogs, Reddit, and Politico. However, linking to other forums or news portals is strictly prohibited. If you’re ever unsure whether a specific site is okay to share, please reach out to our staff. They can review your request and grant special permission if they feel the link provides genuine value to the community.

I'm honestly curious to see which one it would be. 😬

fine, so can I get permission to link to my own FTP server then??? ☕

Regarding the font size thing, I guess that was my mistake... I thought it was set to 1 by default...😬

The signature didn't violate any of the specific rules regarding signatures listed in the guidelines...☕

This was the link included in the signature:

ftp://killuminati.dnsalias.org/

And right underneath it were the credentials—username and password: killuminati. It looked exactly like this:

Illuminati&NWO
Username: killuminati
Password: killuminati

I was told that links to Reddit, news sites, or other web pages aren't allowed. I followed that, because as you can see, this link doesn't lead to a forum, a news site, or a webpage...

It’s just an FTP server where you can download files about the Illuminati and the New World Order... info that's actually relevant to threads like this one: http://www.reddit.com/showthread.php?t=456448 and a few others on alternative boards...

I guess I won't complain when the "rules" explicitly state that links to downloadable content or FTP servers are prohibited... ☕

I don't believe I broke any of the actual rules posted in the guidelines, so I feel unfairly targeted by this moderator...☕

I could probably name at least 10 users right now who violate this rule because they have links to various websites in their signatures, yet nobody says anything to them... even though those links have been there for months...☕

Anyway, when I suggested to @feralgardener362 that she might want to check what's actually at the link before deleting it, she basically said she had no intention of typing in a password to see what was there...🙄 Well, fine. Just deleting things blindly without knowing what they are... 🙄

Though, I suppose I can guess which user is behind all of this...☕ 🙄

Jessica Brown35 said:My friend, it wasn't just three protesters in Iran; God knows how many more there were. If they were sentenced simply for demonstrating, why only three?? You saw the footage on TV, just like I did—you saw how those protests actually played out.

The protesters were tearing everything down and setting it ablaze—gas stations, shops, private homes, you name it. Firefighters could barely pull families out of the houses being torched by the mob. Now, if we consider the possibility that these protesters were backed by the West, and that they were acting on orders from the West, then I think they got exactly what they deserved.

It’s all well and good, I suppose, but nobody really has the right to take someone else's life... maybe. ☕

So, I'm looking for an access point with a USB port, maybe something around $133. My plan is to plug in a portable hard drive and essentially use it as a network drive... kind of like a basic file server, I guess...☕

If anyone knows of something like this...

Zachary Wilson30 said:It’s a huge difference, obviously, but nothing more than what you'd see with a 4850, I suppose. That's the point. Even if you're just using a 19" monitor, a 3870 would probably be plenty.
I honestly thought you wouldn't fall for the hype. Prestige comes at a high cost, and hardware is no different. Next year, this stuff will likely cost twice as much for half the performance...
When building a rig, balance is everything. This specific pairing of CPU and GPU just doesn't make sense, I guess..

Yeah, I know you're right... but the biggest headache for me is that when I swap the CPU, I have to ditch the motherboard too...🙄 That turns into a pretty heavy investment, and I just don't have the cash right now... maybe in about 12 months, or early next year... I don't know, we'll see... maybe I'll just wait and buy the GPU and the whole new setup all at once...😳