CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Opening the WhatsApp chat?

Opening the WhatsApp chat?

Started by Thomas Hernandez4 · · 👁 10 views · 101 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Thomas Hernandez4Sophia Thomas7Susan Davis7Matthew Castillo5mistyhound94nimbleowl6Jacob Sullivan91Eric Gray2cosmicgull52Daniel Kelly57rustydrifter10Larry Wilson25Jerry Parker72Hannah Allen5Lisa Barrett5Morgan Newman7Keith Cox6boldwalker12slynomad14quietnomad13restlesstiger49
Thomas Hernandez4 Thomas Hernandez4 MemberOP
31 messages
joined Sep 2014
#21 ·
Jacob Sullivan91 said:Mickey, the WhatsApp groups on the ŽuD were such a mess that they eventually had to shut them down because things got way too personal and spilled over into real life.

Look, I was actually the one pushing to open the chat back in the day, promising I’d moderate it, and I spent years hanging out there and keeping up with everything.

But once it turned into this unreadable disaster—honestly, just total chaos—it only made sense to pull the plug.

The same goes for the US WhatsApp group. I decided to stick around and follow it, but if you guys keep treating it like some low-effort tabloid feed, no moderator is going to touch it... and we absolutely cannot have an unmoderated thread where people are just hurling insults at everyone left and right.

At the end of the day, a chat isn't some essential part of any PDF, and the forum can totally survive without one.

The subforum can technically function without the chat, but that's what gives it its soul. Posting in threads is one thing, but the chat is a completely different beast.

If the issue is that there isn't enough time to monitor and moderate the WhatsApp group, I’m willing to step up and handle it. Just something to think about. 🙂
cosmicgull52 cosmicgull52 Active Member
125 messages
joined Nov 2023
#22 ·
To summarize, you had one WhatsApp group that was essentially pure chaos and anarchy—if I understood correctly, though I haven't actually joined it because just looking at it gives me a headache—and a second WhatsApp group where there's some occasional friction, but people generally stay polite and reasonable.

And someone decided the only logical move is to merge them, which in reality just means killing off the second group? I am trying to wrap my head around this, but it simply doesn't make sense.
Susan Davis7 Susan Davis7 Member
37 messages
joined Sep 2020
#23 ·
cosmicgull52 said:To summarize, you had one WhatsApp group that was essentially pure chaos and anarchy—if I understood correctly, though I haven't actually joined it because just looking at it gives me a headache—and a second WhatsApp group where there's some occasional friction, but people generally stay polite and reasonable.

And someone decided the only logical move is to merge them, which in reality just means killing off the second group? I am trying to wrap my head around this, but it simply doesn't make sense.

So, what exactly was giving you that headache?
cosmicgull52 cosmicgull52 Active Member
125 messages
joined Nov 2023
#24 ·
Susan Davis7 said:So, what exactly was giving you that headache?

The quantity and quality of the discourse.
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#25 ·
Jacob Sullivan91 said:Mickey, the WhatsApp groups on the ŽuD were such a mess that they eventually had to shut them down because things got way too personal and spilled over into real life.

Look, I was actually the one pushing to open the chat back in the day, promising I’d moderate it, and I spent years hanging out there and keeping up with everything.

But once it turned into this unreadable disaster—honestly, just total chaos—it only made sense to pull the plug.

The same goes for the US WhatsApp group. I decided to stick around and follow it, but if you guys keep treating it like some low-effort tabloid feed, no moderator is going to touch it... and we absolutely cannot have an unmoderated thread where people are just hurling insults at everyone left and right.

At the end of the day, a chat isn't some essential part of any PDF, and the forum can totally survive without one.

Yeah, I get what you're saying, all that holds water, but like Thomas Hernandez4 said, it gave the whole PDF some soul, and since I'm repeating myself like a parrot here 🤣, plenty of people actually met through it. That's usually where hangouts started, which would later turn into separate meetups. A forum is for discussion, sure, but chats are just an extra layer so people hanging out in certain subforums can bond in a space where they can talk about a million other things not necessarily tied to the specific subforum. Still, the chat itself should exist to maintain some sense of community and give people a place to be off-topic. 🙂

I can survive without a chat, and without the forum too, obviously, but it’ll be really lousy on the US side if people don't have a place to socialize, even if it's just virtually. New people won't find anyone to hang out with easily unless there's an occasional meetup at a pub, maybe something at Mount Rainier, or even a mushroom hunting trip at Central Park or Santa Monica Pier. I mean, those meetups aren't frequent, and they'll happen even less if there isn't a spot where people can get to know each other a bit better (besides private messages).
Thomas Hernandez4 said:The subforum can technically function without the chat, but that's what gives it its soul. Posting in threads is one thing, but the chat is a completely different beast.

If the issue is that there isn't enough time to monitor and moderate the WhatsApp group, I’m willing to step up and handle it. Just something to think about. 🙂

Oh, so you want to be a moderator? Trying to join the dark side? 😬
Just kidding, I'd definitely give you my vote for moderation. 😁
Susan Davis7 Susan Davis7 Member
37 messages
joined Sep 2020
#26 ·
cosmicgull52 said:The quantity and quality of the discourse.

I don't get why the volume of the chat is an issue... maybe we should just cap everyone's posts—but quality? Hmm, what even counts as "quality" conversation to you?

Shouldn't the chat be more for blowing off steam, especially since we've got plenty of other threads here for those deep, serious discussions...

I honestly don't follow your logic at all!
nimbleowl6 nimbleowl6 Member
34 messages
joined Mar 2012
#27 ·
mistyhound94 said:I'm a Virgo, so I guess nitpicking is practically part of my job description. 😬
But hey, at the end of the day, we're just sharing opinions, so it's fine. 🙂

I also hope everyone calms down so we can stop the bickering and instigating, though I always say the US is a powder keg; I just hope nobody decides to light the fuse right now.
People should hang out with those they actually like, not those they don't. People should be laughing, grabbing drinks, and just enjoying life—the world isn't meant for constant conflict, it's meant for enjoying time with others. If more people were relaxed and less negative, the US would actually be a nice place to hang out.

What you’re saying sounds like a total dream. Honestly, the only time I ever felt that kind of vibe was back in the old Zud WhatsApp.

The real issue with any chat is that you always get those bottom-feeders—those guys who think they’ve reached the peak of their existence not by having a funny debate, but by being absolute jerks, insulting people, and trolling anyone who happens to get under their skin for whatever reason. I don't hang out in the US chat systematically enough to tell you what it was like before, though.
cosmicgull52 cosmicgull52 Active Member
125 messages
joined Nov 2023
#28 ·
Susan Davis7 said:I don't get why the volume of the chat is an issue... maybe we should just cap everyone's posts—but quality? Hmm, what even counts as "quality" conversation to you?

Shouldn't the chat be more for blowing off steam, especially since we've got plenty of other threads here for those deep, serious discussions...

I honestly don't follow your logic at all!

Quality is everything. When you have quality, quantity isn't even an issue. If there is no quality and no quantity, you can at least tolerate that. But low-quality quantity? That is nothing but a headache.
Susan Davis7 Susan Davis7 Member
37 messages
joined Sep 2020
#29 ·
cosmicgull52 said:Quality is everything. When you have quality, quantity isn't even an issue. If there is no quality and no quantity, you can at least tolerate that. But low-quality quantity? That is nothing but a headache.

You totally dodged my question
cosmicgull52 cosmicgull52 Active Member
125 messages
joined Nov 2023
#30 ·
Susan Davis7 said:You totally dodged my question

Every single post you make in this thread answers him. 🙂
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#31 ·
nimbleowl6 said:What you’re saying sounds like a total dream. Honestly, the only time I ever felt that kind of vibe was back in the old Zud WhatsApp.

The real issue with any chat is that you always get those bottom-feeders—those guys who think they’ve reached the peak of their existence not by having a funny debate, but by being absolute jerks, insulting people, and trolling anyone who happens to get under their skin for whatever reason. I don't hang out in the US chat systematically enough to tell you what it was like before, though.

We were all rookies once; I definitely was. People didn't even really talk to me when I first started chatting because the group was already so tight-knit, but I didn't sit around whining about it. I eventually found my way in by being witty, and people seemed fine with that. It’s not like there weren't arguments in the chats—there were always those people who hung around just to be contrarians and ruin every single discussion, but people don't seem to realize that leads nowhere. Honestly, I’d feel terrible if I were in a position where I was constantly fighting and disliked; the frustration would just build up. I’d rather just step back and walk away than force something that isn't happening. People really need to stop doing that and start actually using the ignore options that, thank God, we have here on the forum. It made things much easier for me. 🙂
Susan Davis7 Susan Davis7 Member
37 messages
joined Sep 2020
#32 ·
cosmicgull52 said:Every single post you make in this thread answers him. 🙂

Look, if we can't have a decent conversation... then let's just not. I'm really not gonna sink to those kinds of cheap shots.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#33 ·
mistyhound94 said:I'm not trying to play cop or anything, I guess. But if I see someone getting insulted, I’m definitely not going to escalate things in the WhatsApp chat or anywhere else. There’s a report button for a reason. I'll just hit that and let the mods handle it. There are four of them volunteering their time, so they should be able to do their jobs once they see the reports. I have no intention of jumping into an argument or playing hall monitor to warn people. Honestly, I don't have the time or the energy for that anymore—work keeps me too busy to spend all day typing like I used to.

Look, the fact remains that if the WhatsApp group is meant for the older crowd, then it’s just a chat, and people moving over there isn't exactly a shocker. It’s pretty standard behavior. At the end of the day, it's still just a chat where the more mature users tended to hang out, and there aren't any clear-cut rules saying forum members can't participate in specific threads. Most of us aren't kids here; we're mostly adults in our 20s and 30s. So, I guess I'd ask that others don't try to belittle us with those kinds of comments. It doesn't achieve anything, other than proving that age doesn't necessarily equate to maturity—which, frankly, should be much higher by the time someone hits their 20s.

Thirdly, there is the issue of legitimate rights versus personal whims. Just because someone holds a moderator position doesn't mean their personal preference should be the final word on what happens to a specific chat. I guess, in my view, whatever benefits the forum and the majority of its users ought to take precedence over any individual's interests. This moderator from ŽuD decided she didn't want to handle certain things anymore, yet she kept her mod status regardless. That just isn't how it should work; she isn't the owner of this site, so her personal opinion shouldn't be treated like the law of the land here. If someone lacks the drive to actually moderate, maybe they should just hand the reins to someone else—someone who will actually manage the threads and subforums, ensure discussions stay on track, and have the patience to discipline those causing trouble. I'm not trying to attack the mods, per se; I just don't see the point in staying silent when I feel something is wrong. Honestly, if it weren't for the chat on the USA forum, the USA forum would be a toxic wasteland, and I doubt half these people would ever even interact if that chat didn't exist.

Regarding those USovac types causing trouble in other chats—you see them everywhere, really. It’s not like they only stick to their own subforum. At the end of the day, they're just regular users who post all over the place, I guess.

I guess I’m not really aiming this at anyone specific since I don't even know why the WhatsApp group was shut down. In my opinion, you shouldn't close the whole chat just because of one or two people. But then again, if those same individuals keep causing issues over and over, they should probably just get banned. This isn't exactly the place for constant bickering and stuff like that.
Look, if I provoke someone on this forum, I know I might get banned for it. Honestly, I’ve already racked up quite a few strikes, but I don't really do that as much anymore. I just don't feel the need to go toe-to-toe with random strangers online. I see those aggressive types out on the streets in cities like Chicago, and I see them all over the internet too; I just stay far away from people like that.

An ex—and I really want to emphasize that. Ex-girlfriend. The moderator back then was just a hot-headed person who let the WhatsApp bother her, so she shut the whole thing down on her own whim. None of the mods from that era are even around anymore; some haven't been on the forum for quite a while. I haven't insulted anyone with my current posts, so I guess I'd ask that people stop putting words in my mouth. Thanks.

We've heard these exact same arguments before:
- back when we decided to shut down the suggestions and feedback section
- when the classifieds were closed, then reopened with that "minimum 100" rule
- when we locked the WhatsApp group at least three different times for the exact same issues, only to reopen it again

Mods aren't obligated to host a feedback section on every single PDF, nor are they required to run the US classifieds, just like not every PDF needs a WhatsApp group. If the mod team decides a chat isn't necessary, we can lock it—unless the site owner or the admin decides otherwise.

Trying to spin it as "the mods just don't want to moderate something that occasionally spits out 50 posts in a heartbeat" or "they don't want to deal with the bickering and people nitpicking the staff"—which is exactly what a chat is—is just plain silly. No matter how you slice it.

And honestly, look at Forum.hr; they have a dedicated section just for chatting. This idea that the WhatsApp group *must* exist on the US, or that the US would be a "wasteland" without it—implying the PDF is worthless because a tiny subset of users wouldn't find each other—is just ridiculous.

No, the chat wasn't ruined by one single person, but it's glaringly obvious that the chat crowd tends to stick together and cover for each other. In fact, more than half of the reports on the US come from that very same group of people who report one another—the same people you claim make the forum "not a wasteland."

On the flip side, look at the long-standing chat on LJES plus the new one in LJES18—reports? Zero.

Next time this starts up again, the chat is getting locked for good.
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#34 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:We've heard these exact same arguments before:
- back when we decided to shut down the suggestions and feedback section
- when the classifieds were closed, then reopened with that "minimum 100" rule
- when we locked the WhatsApp group at least three different times for the exact same issues, only to reopen it again

Mods aren't obligated to host a feedback section on every single PDF, nor are they required to run the US classifieds, just like not every PDF needs a WhatsApp group. If the mod team decides a chat isn't necessary, we can lock it—unless the site owner or the admin decides otherwise.

Trying to spin it as "the mods just don't want to moderate something that occasionally spits out 50 posts in a heartbeat" or "they don't want to deal with the bickering and people nitpicking the staff"—which is exactly what a chat is—is just plain silly. No matter how you slice it.

And honestly, look at Forum.hr; they have a dedicated section just for chatting. This idea that the WhatsApp group *must* exist on the US, or that the US would be a "wasteland" without it—implying the PDF is worthless because a tiny subset of users wouldn't find each other—is just ridiculous.

No, the chat wasn't ruined by one single person, but it's glaringly obvious that the chat crowd tends to stick together and cover for each other. In fact, more than half of the reports on the US come from that very same group of people who report one another—the same people you claim make the forum "not a wasteland."

On the flip side, look at the long-standing chat on LJES plus the new one in LJES18—reports? Zero.

Next time this starts up again, the chat is getting locked for good.

I get what everyone is saying, but honestly, just restricting things and deleting stuff isn't going to achieve anything. I guess my opinion is that all parties involved should try to make this forum a real place for discussion, but also just for joking around and hanging out. It’s easy enough to say, "we aren't responsible for this or that," but if you want to make this place actually livable, both sides need to step up. You guys are here to moderate and set boundaries—acting like judges, which I suppose isn't easy—but it’s still way too simple to just shrug and say, "it's not our job." Ultimately, decisions like this should fall to the admin or supermod, but if you have different agreements in place, fine, just coordinate among yourselves. Just explain the reasoning behind why something is being done instead of everything just getting locked down and having people told, "we aren't obligated to do that."

And honestly, the US would be a pretty rotten place without the chat. It gives the regulars a spot to hang out that isn't just about whatever current events are blowing up in America; there's so much more to talk about. I guess I can't even list all the people who met through that chat in different ways, and I doubt they could have connected anywhere else on this forum unless they were already talking in other chats. Most of the folks in the LJES-ov chat are the same ones posting everywhere else, though every chat has its share of random drop-ins. But you have to realize that LJES isn't quite like the US section. In the US area, it's mostly people who feel like they belong there, even if they're lonely. The vibe is just different, and the chat was at least some kind of oasis for the US section.

At the end of the day, you guys call all the shots anyway. Most of us "regular" forum users aren't really consulted on anything, but I still don't see how shutting things down actually achieves anything positive. Maybe it would be better to just clearly define the boundaries and rules, then punish the people who actually deserve it without making a scene. I guess we should at least be allowed to have our own opinions on these matters, instead of everything being handled with that "we're the mods, we have the final say" attitude. It shouldn't be about anyone having the last word. Sometimes, finding a real solution might require taking a harder, different path rather than just closing everything down and claiming the "problem is solved."

If you want another suggestion to actually consider, maybe take Air Canada off the list of mods for the USA, since that guy isn't even really active in the States. I guess you could give the role to ja-cu-poluditi instead—she’s much further out there and way more active in the USA anyway. At least I trust her to stay impartial, and she might actually have the nerves to handle the crowd running wild in the USA.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#35 ·
mistyhound94 said:I get what everyone is saying, but honestly, just restricting things and deleting stuff isn't going to achieve anything. I guess my opinion is that all parties involved should try to make this forum a real place for discussion, but also just for joking around and hanging out. It’s easy enough to say, "we aren't responsible for this or that," but if you want to make this place actually livable, both sides need to step up. You guys are here to moderate and set boundaries—acting like judges, which I suppose isn't easy—but it’s still way too simple to just shrug and say, "it's not our job." Ultimately, decisions like this should fall to the admin or supermod, but if you have different agreements in place, fine, just coordinate among yourselves. Just explain the reasoning behind why something is being done instead of everything just getting locked down and having people told, "we aren't obligated to do that."

And honestly, the US would be a pretty rotten place without the chat. It gives the regulars a spot to hang out that isn't just about whatever current events are blowing up in America; there's so much more to talk about. I guess I can't even list all the people who met through that chat in different ways, and I doubt they could have connected anywhere else on this forum unless they were already talking in other chats. Most of the folks in the LJES-ov chat are the same ones posting everywhere else, though every chat has its share of random drop-ins. But you have to realize that LJES isn't quite like the US section. In the US area, it's mostly people who feel like they belong there, even if they're lonely. The vibe is just different, and the chat was at least some kind of oasis for the US section.

At the end of the day, you guys call all the shots anyway. Most of us "regular" forum users aren't really consulted on anything, but I still don't see how shutting things down actually achieves anything positive. Maybe it would be better to just clearly define the boundaries and rules, then punish the people who actually deserve it without making a scene. I guess we should at least be allowed to have our own opinions on these matters, instead of everything being handled with that "we're the mods, we have the final say" attitude. It shouldn't be about anyone having the last word. Sometimes, finding a real solution might require taking a harder, different path rather than just closing everything down and claiming the "problem is solved."

If you want another suggestion to actually consider, maybe take Air Canada off the list of mods for the USA, since that guy isn't even really active in the States. I guess you could give the role to ja-cu-poluditi instead—she’s much further out there and way more active in the USA anyway. At least I trust her to stay impartial, and she might actually have the nerves to handle the crowd running wild in the USA.

Misty, how long have we been trying to fix the WhatsApp group? Three years plus? Let's not kid ourselves here. We deal with constant arguments, people acting like they're all that, and then the complaints from WhatsApp start flying.

Next time this happens, I'm out.

mistyhound94 said:I get what everyone is saying, but honestly, just restricting things and deleting stuff isn't going to achieve anything. I guess my opinion is that all parties involved should try to make this forum a real place for discussion, but also just for joking around and hanging out. It’s easy enough to say, "we aren't responsible for this or that," but if you want to make this place actually livable, both sides need to step up. You guys are here to moderate and set boundaries—acting like judges, which I suppose isn't easy—but it’s still way too simple to just shrug and say, "it's not our job." Ultimately, decisions like this should fall to the admin or supermod, but if you have different agreements in place, fine, just coordinate among yourselves. Just explain the reasoning behind why something is being done instead of everything just getting locked down and having people told, "we aren't obligated to do that."

And honestly, the US would be a pretty rotten place without the chat. It gives the regulars a spot to hang out that isn't just about whatever current events are blowing up in America; there's so much more to talk about. I guess I can't even list all the people who met through that chat in different ways, and I doubt they could have connected anywhere else on this forum unless they were already talking in other chats. Most of the folks in the LJES-ov chat are the same ones posting everywhere else, though every chat has its share of random drop-ins. But you have to realize that LJES isn't quite like the US section. In the US area, it's mostly people who feel like they belong there, even if they're lonely. The vibe is just different, and the chat was at least some kind of oasis for the US section.

At the end of the day, you guys call all the shots anyway. Most of us "regular" forum users aren't really consulted on anything, but I still don't see how shutting things down actually achieves anything positive. Maybe it would be better to just clearly define the boundaries and rules, then punish the people who actually deserve it without making a scene. I guess we should at least be allowed to have our own opinions on these matters, instead of everything being handled with that "we're the mods, we have the final say" attitude. It shouldn't be about anyone having the last word. Sometimes, finding a real solution might require taking a harder, different path rather than just closing everything down and claiming the "problem is solved."

If you want another suggestion to actually consider, maybe take Air Canada off the list of mods for the USA, since that guy isn't even really active in the States. I guess you could give the role to ja-cu-poluditi instead—she’s much further out there and way more active in the USA anyway. At least I trust her to stay impartial, and she might actually have the nerves to handle the crowd running wild in the USA.

I don't make these calls, but if my memory serves me right, when this was brought up before, they said they weren't going to appoint someone just to manage a chat.
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#36 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:Misty, how long have we been trying to fix the WhatsApp group? Three years plus? Let's not kid ourselves here. We deal with constant arguments, people acting like they're all that, and then the complaints from WhatsApp start flying.

Next time this happens, I'm out.

I don't make these calls, but if my memory serves me right, when this was brought up before, they said they weren't going to appoint someone just to manage a chat.

Look, I get it. You're all fed up, and honestly, it’s understandable. Maybe we should try something else, but... even though I might feel differently about locking things down, I’d probably be the first to say you had a good reason to use the lock and I wouldn't complain. I guess this forum and that chat are part of who I am; they helped me grow and meet people I otherwise never would have known. I suppose I look at things a bit more broadly, which is why you think I'm being naive. 🙂
But yeah, if it ends up getting locked, well, we're the ones to blame. We shouldn't expect you guys to play cop and judge, wasting your energy on people who can't wrap their heads around others, even virtually.

As for the other thing, I didn't mean it would be *just* for the chat, let's be clear. I'm just saying she's a bit more active on WhatsApp than the current mod, and I believe she'd put more effort into giving the chat a new direction. Since I've known her for a long time—and you have too—I know she's unbiased and fair without going to extremes. That's why I suggested her. 😁
Daniel Kelly57 Daniel Kelly57 Active Member
228 messages
joined Sep 2016
#37 ·
This is a total joke. Honestly, I can’t remember seeing anything stupider than this. Don't you guys get that the forum was basically dead, and those two WhatsApp groups were the only places where people were actually talking? By merging them into one, what did you actually achieve? What was even the issue? Where was the actual harassment? I don't get why moderating a WhatsApp group is such a massive struggle. Like, wtf? A chat is supposed to be a chill spot. We don't all have to love each other or agree on everything. Everyone knows which cliques are which and who hangs out with whom. If anything, it would be better to just let each clique start their own separate chat at the bottom of the forum so they can do their thing there. If I remember right, that’s how you handled things after the chat on ŽUD got shut down. And look at what ŽUD looks like now. Nobody even posts there anymore. Plus, that refugee chat of yours crashed too. So now you've killed off the fun chat just to merge it with a bunch of grumpy old men? 🤔
Eric Gray2 Eric Gray2 Regular
254 messages
joined Jul 2014
#38 ·
mistyhound94 said:Look, I get it. You're all fed up, and honestly, it’s understandable. Maybe we should try something else, but... even though I might feel differently about locking things down, I’d probably be the first to say you had a good reason to use the lock and I wouldn't complain. I guess this forum and that chat are part of who I am; they helped me grow and meet people I otherwise never would have known. I suppose I look at things a bit more broadly, which is why you think I'm being naive. 🙂
But yeah, if it ends up getting locked, well, we're the ones to blame. We shouldn't expect you guys to play cop and judge, wasting your energy on people who can't wrap their heads around others, even virtually.

As for the other thing, I didn't mean it would be *just* for the chat, let's be clear. I'm just saying she's a bit more active on WhatsApp than the current mod, and I believe she'd put more effort into giving the chat a new direction. Since I've known her for a long time—and you have too—I know she's unbiased and fair without going to extremes. That's why I suggested her. 😁

But who's actually at fault here, mistyhound94? And who exactly is this "we" you're talking about—who are we that we're supposedly to blame?
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#39 ·
Daniel Kelly57 said:This is a total joke. Honestly, I can’t remember seeing anything stupider than this. Don't you guys get that the forum was basically dead, and those two WhatsApp groups were the only places where people were actually talking? By merging them into one, what did you actually achieve? What was even the issue? Where was the actual harassment? I don't get why moderating a WhatsApp group is such a massive struggle. Like, wtf? A chat is supposed to be a chill spot. We don't all have to love each other or agree on everything. Everyone knows which cliques are which and who hangs out with whom. If anything, it would be better to just let each clique start their own separate chat at the bottom of the forum so they can do their thing there. If I remember right, that’s how you handled things after the chat on ŽUD got shut down. And look at what ŽUD looks like now. Nobody even posts there anymore. Plus, that refugee chat of yours crashed too. So now you've killed off the fun chat just to merge it with a bunch of grumpy old men? 🤔

So you're admitting it's a dive bar, that everyone clashes, and that the cliques are real. You're a real sweetheart, aren't you? 👍 Look, listen: there *have* to be TWO separate chats because trying to cram them into one is impossible. And that other chat? That's just the cranky old guys.

Bless your heart. 🙂
Daniel Kelly57 Daniel Kelly57 Active Member
228 messages
joined Sep 2016
#40 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:So you're admitting it's a dive bar, that everyone clashes, and that the cliques are real. You're a real sweetheart, aren't you? 👍 Look, listen: there *have* to be TWO separate chats because trying to cram them into one is impossible. And that other chat? That's just the cranky old guys.

Bless your heart. 🙂

Of course I admit it! Was that even up for debate? Anyone who’s been around here long enough knows the top chat was always the younger, more chill crowd, while the 40+ crowd hung out in the other one—it's logical that the older group would be more uptight. All the drama has always been between the Addams Family and everyone else. It’s the same story every time. It's obvious I can't stand Naus, lord, or Rosie. And yeah, I'm an uptight old guy just like them. What's the problem with that? But I don't see why we need to ruin the top chat where there's never actually been an issue. If people fight there, it's always harmless. I don't get what the goal is here. I'm worried this is going to totally wreck that main chat. Personally, I won't post there just to make sure they don't shut it down by accident. If that happens, where is everyone supposed to hang out? Most of the threads here have been covered a million times already; honestly, it feels like the forum only stays alive because of those chats. But if you guys think this is better, fine. I don't get it, but I respect it. 🍿

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads