hollowskipper11 said:So, if those dates are actually:
October 1st, 2012 and
September 25th, 2012,
meaning they're set in month/day/year format, then this is the formula you need.
Hey man,
I don't think the dates are even in that format based on what > wrote above. Like, the dates themselves are fine, but in the text he's pulling from the web, the month is just one or two digits.
So basically, he's got (if I'm reading this right)
M/D/YYYY + rest of the timestamp
M/DD/YYYY + rest of the timestamp
MM/D/YYYY + rest of the timestamp
MM/DD/YYYY + rest of the timestamp
We can definitely convert that to DD/MM/YYYY format
But personally, this formula isn't quite hitting the mark for me (haven't had much time to dig into it though)
I'd just handle it with 3 helper columns and a date display formula (dates have always been a pain for me 🙂
Attached a screenshot here
EDIT:
Just noticed the time part after looking closer at the formula—you were basing it on a clean date without the extra text. Didn't realize immediately that > stripped out the timestamp, so now it's just looking at a plain date 🙂
my bad for not catching that sooner