goldencyclist60 said:Protein powders are actually the most cost-effective protein source, provided you know where to shop. Otherwise, regular milk or chocolate milk are solid choices. And there's no need to buy specialized glucose supplements; standard sucrose (table sugar) is just as good, if not better, since it breaks down into a 1:1 ratio of glucose and fructose. Unlike glucose, which exclusively replenishes muscle glycogen, fructose helps fill up liver glycogen reserves.
In short, 🙂
I personally prefer chocolate milk after a long run. There are plenty of studies showing it's effective for post-workout recovery... honestly, I have no desire to chug stuff loaded with extra glucose when there's already too much of it everywhere else... and powders aren't exactly cheap. I mean, sure, those pure protein ones are one thing... but when I look at things like mass gainers where you pay $200 for a 2kg tub$100 and then realize you only get about 8 servings because you have to mix 3 scoops with milk just to hit 300-500 calories, it's madness... it doesn't even last a week... I'm not exactly a high-profit athlete.
Regarding this fructose and liver glycogen point, I'll have to look into that further... is it somehow detrimental or what? Because I usually carb-load before something like a half marathon specifically to top off my glycogen stores... so that's exactly my goal. Unless this liver aspect negatively impacts performance. As for proteins and other supplements, I take them strictly for functional capacity and muscle recovery for future training... bodybuilding isn't my interest.