#501 ·
darkmarlin16 said:Did David lose his grip after that collision with Mass?
Just as originally stated.☕
Started by darkmarlin16 · · 👁 21 views · 590 replies
darkmarlin16 said:Did David lose his grip after that collision with Mass?
darkmarlin16 said:http://
Patrick White63 said:🧐Just a quick reminder: Belgium, Spa, 1998, lap 24... things would have ended very differently if MSC had grabbed those 10 points there. The championship battle between Lux and Jpn would've looked totally different.😢🙂🙂
Goddam you David Coulthard🙂 🙂🙂
Karma always finds its way back.
By the way, this is my first post on the Formula 1 subforum, even though I've been reading you guys for years and following Formula 1 for decades myself.🤔
darkmarlin16 said:An exclusive shot of Hamilton driving a beat-up old Chevy starting in 2009.
David Smith4 said:And a question for all you experts out there... I can't quite recall, but I think... Did Sato pick up the Safety car during some race?
Bradley Nelson2 said:I distinctly recall Heidfeld practically ripping the door off the Safety car🤣
darkmarlin16 said:why Raikkonen totally sucked in Australia
darkmarlin16 said:
the reason behind Raikkonen's rough performance in Australia
Mark Ruiz8 said:Man, you're totally overreacting here. Where did you even get this idea about Villeneuve? 🤣
cosmicmoose said:@ ovac: true, the numbers don't lie, but HOLD UP—back in those 2 or 3 years during the early 2000s when Ferrari was basically in a league of their own, Schumacher just absolutely crushed it. He stacked up those three titles and about 40 wins without even breaking a sweat because there was zero competition... I mean, the next fastest guys were trailing by a full second per lap. Nobody's seeing results like that anymore.
If you take those few dominant years out of the equation, his stats would look pretty mediocre, honestly.
silentorca492 said:It’s always such an easy excuse to just blame the car. People used to dog on Hill for having the best ride while being a "weak" driver. If we followed that logic, any random amateur could be a world champion if they just sat in a fast car. But let’s be real—Ferrari was a total mess before Schumacher showed up. He basically rebuilt Ferrari into the powerhouse it is today. The absolute legends are the ones who actually shape the cars into winners. Is there a single champion out there who didn't have the top car? Nope. Even Barrichello and Irvin had the exact same machinery and they were just fighting for scraps because, honestly, they weren't elite tier.
Edward Howard2 said:If a driver spent his entire career in a competitive car—even if it wasn't always the best on the grid—he would have yielded better results than Schumacher. He really held his own against him back in '97. Honestly, he should have been the champion in '96 if Williams Renault hadn't handed Hill the lead driver seat during his rookie F1 season. Even in those years at Benetton and BAR Honda where things were actually doable, he squeezed every bit of potential out of the cars, consistently grabbing 3rd or 4th place despite having subpar machinery. I don't understand why so few people recognized what an incredible talent he was; his driving in '96 and '97 was nothing short of impressive. If he had moved to a top-tier team instead of BAR, people would still be singing his praises today.
Jason Campbell70 said:Look, if you’re currently wasted or high on anything—doesn't matter if it's just a few beers or something way heavier—I guess I'll find it in my heart to tolerate this absolute train wreck of a shopping spree.☕
Edward Howard2 said:I can't exactly be blamed for your lack of perspective. You were still in diapers back in '96 and '97, weren't you? How could you have possibly witnessed those legendary displays of driving talent? 🤷