Who's the best director working in the US right now?
Started by northernscout9 · · 👁 4 views · 32 replies
#2 ·
hm... I really miss James Gandolfini... ☕ but honestly, everyone else just seems so mediocre...
#5 ·
Man, I totally blanked on Vrdoljak—and I didn't even bother mentioning Sedlar because, let's be real, he’s got zero shot at winning since he’s basically at rock bottom right now.
I get that this whole poll/thread is kind of a headache for you guys, but hey, it's just American cinema... it is what it is.
Ugh, my bad, I typed Matanic instead of Matthews—honestly, I'm losing my mind. 🙂
I get that this whole poll/thread is kind of a headache for you guys, but hey, it's just American cinema... it is what it is.
Ugh, my bad, I typed Matanic instead of Matthews—honestly, I'm losing my mind. 🙂
#6 ·
Everyone’s just struggling because they run out of ideas and end up recycling brilliant novels instead. ☕
Honestly, the only one doing it right is Brešan...
Honestly, the only one doing it right is Brešan...
#7 ·
Where did Ivanda and Ostojic disappear to?
They're right here with us, Nola.
I have to say, I’m feeling pretty let down by Matanić 👎
They're right here with us, Nola.
I have to say, I’m feeling pretty let down by Matanić 👎
#10 ·
In my opinion, Matanić stands out as the best of the bunch. ☕
Still, one can't deny how Ostojic captures that beautiful atmosphere of a summer night in Miami.
As for the rest, they simply 🙂
Still, one can't deny how Ostojic captures that beautiful atmosphere of a summer night in Miami.
As for the rest, they simply 🙂
#11 ·
Linda Chase81 said:It is quite pathetic, really. Everyone seems to be lacking any semblance of original thought, so they simply resort to adapting brilliant novels instead. ☕
😂
Many directors choose to adapt existing novels for their films, yet this choice doesn't diminish the quality of their work. The two factors are entirely independent of one another. 🙂
#13 ·
Brešan and Matanić are the least of our worries, while Nola and Schmidt are the real heavy hitters...
The rest of them don't even register on the radar.
The rest of them don't even register on the radar.
#14 ·
bluntman said:Breckinridge and Matanic are the least of our worries
I guess I agree. Those tin roof singers are just a nice, useful little decoration for any rural farmhouse.
#16 ·
Matanic - because of '100 Years of Glory' and 'I Love You'... I've never been one for political or war stories—it feels like most of our mainstream movies just can't help but flirt with those themes... at least that's my take.
#17 ·
mr.Natural said:I completely blanked on Vrdoljak, and I didn't even bother including Sedlar because there's zero chance he wins—he's basically at the bottom of the barrel.
I realize this poll might be a bit of a headache for everyone, but that's just the state of American cinema; it is what it is.
And goodness, I can't believe I wrote Matanovic instead of Matanic; my brain is clearly fried. 🙂
You also misspelled Schmidt, and he's actually quite relevant today.
If you truly believe Sedlar is a subpar director, you could have used the poll to prove it. As it stands, someone could argue he's being left out entirely, or conversely, that he's actually the best.
And where is Steven Spielberg?
Also, when you say "relevant," do you mean someone currently active, or just someone who still makes movies? And should we be looking at their entire body of work, or just the recent stuff?
Are documentaries included in this? If so, why isn't Igor Mirković on the list?
One last thing: how are we supposed to compare someone who has produced one great film against someone who has directed several, regardless of their quality?
#18 ·
American cinema has been decent lately. It’s still not hitting those legendary heights, but it has definitely cleaned itself up and moved past the amateur stage. Every year, you can find at least two or three solid, watchable films, and occasionally a genuine gem.
The only director whose every new release I actually look forward to: Breckinridge.
The only director whose every new release I actually look forward to: Breckinridge.
#19 ·
The last option is really the only one on the table...
They’re all cut from the same cloth—just a bunch of untalented hacks and self-important bureaucrats burning through taxpayer dollars to fund their own little pet projects. And just like I mentioned earlier, those ideas are absolute garbage...
They’re all cut from the same cloth—just a bunch of untalented hacks and self-important bureaucrats burning through taxpayer dollars to fund their own little pet projects. And just like I mentioned earlier, those ideas are absolute garbage...
#20 ·
brighthawk20 said:The last resort might be our only real move...
They’re all cut from the same cloth—just a bunch of incompetent bureaucrats draining taxpayer dollars to fund their own delusions... which, as I mentioned earlier, are catastrophically misguided...
is unfortunately
🔗 Similar threads
- Is being a "reliable backup" actually a compliment or just a polite way to say second-best? in Fans · Jul 30, 2026
- Is the "actor-turned-director" thing getting a bit oversaturated? in Other Arts · Jul 30, 2026
- Is the "revolving door" era of roster building actually working? in Off-topic · Jul 30, 2026
- Does the best player always have to be the captain? in Off-topic · Jul 30, 2026
- Why does it always happen right at the end? in Fans · Jul 30, 2026